Post on 30-Jan-2018
EDEXCEL IGCSE History Revision Checklist: Paper 2, Section A: First World War 1905-1918
Use this revision checklist to help you keep track of all the topics you need to revise for your exam. You need to have a confident grasp of the subject knowledge
about each event. Try revising facts and key features about each event and recalling the key points and details on paper. When you feel confident enough,
progress onto the next event. For exam practice, Questions A + B of the paper do not require prior knowledge but Question C does. Although I have not
included any sources, for the exam questions below, make a small table/list outlining the evidence for and against each statement with supporting facts.
Key Question 1
Topics You should be able to: Checklist Exam Questions Checklist
How did International
Rivalry contribute to the outbreak
of war?
Triple Alliance
Describe how, when and why the Dual Alliance formed.
Describe how, when and why the Triple Alliance formed.
‘The formation of the Alliance System was the primary cause of the First World War’. Do you
agree?
Triple Entente Describe how, when and why the Franco-Russian
Alliance, Entente Cordiale, Anglo-Russian Entente and Triple Entente formed.
Economic Causes of
International Rivalry
Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the British, French, Russian, German, Italian and Austro-Hungarian economies.
Describe why economic competition could lead to conflict.
‘Economic competition was the main cause of
the First World War’. Do you agree?
Imperial Causes of
International Rivalry
Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the British, French, Russian, German, Italian and Austro-Hungarian empires.
Describe why the race for empires could lead to conflict.
‘The race for empires amongst European nations was the main cause of the First World
War.’ Do you agree?
Military Causes of
International Rivalry
Describe what militarism is.
Describe why Germany could be considered a militaristic state.
Describe why there was a rise in military spending.
‘The militaristic nature of European governments was the primary reason for the outbreak of the
First World War.’ Do you agree?
Key Question 2
Topics You should be able to: Checklist Exam Questions Checklist
How did conflict in the
Balkans contribute to the outbreak
of war?
Balkan Rivalries
Describe the aims and objectives of the Ottoman Empire, Austria-Hungary, Serbia and Russia in the Balkans.
‘The main cause of the First World War was the tensions and conflicts in the
Balkans.’ Do you agree?
The Bosnian Crisis 1908
Describe the causes, events and effects of the Bosnian Crisis.
Describe how the Bosnian Crisis contributed to increasing tensions in the Balkans.
The Balkan Wars
1912-1913
Describe the causes, events and effects of the Balkan Wars.
Describe how the Balkan Wars contributed to increasing tensions in the Balkans.
The Assassination
of Franz Ferdinand
1914
Describe how, why and by whom Franz Ferdinand was assassinated.
Describe the series of events that led from the assassination to the outbreak of the First World War.
‘The main cause of the First World War
was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand.’ Do you agree?
Key Question 3
Topics You should be able to: Checklist Exam Questions Checklist
How did the growth of tension in
Europe increase the likelihood of
war?
Anglo-German
Naval Race
Describe the causes, events and results of the Anglo-German Naval Race.
‘The main cause of the First World War was the Anglo-German Naval Race.’ Do you agree?
The First Moroccan
Crisis 1905-1906
Describe the causes, events and results of the Tangier Crisis.
Describe what happened at the Algeciras Conference. ‘The main cause of the First World War was the crises over Morocco.’
Do you agree?
The Second Moroccan
Crisis 1911
Describe the causes, events and results of the Agadir Crisis.
Key Question 4
Topics You should be able to: Checklist Exam Questions Checklist
What was the fighting like on the Western Front?
The Failure of the
Schlieffen Pan
Aug-Dec 1914
Describe how the Schlieffen Plan was intended to work.
Describe how and why the Schlieffen Plan failed.
Describe why the failure of the Schlieffen Plan led to trench warfare.
‘The main reason for the failure of the Schlieffen Plan was the action of the
French army at the Battle of the Marne.’ Do you agree?
The Trench System
Describe the key features of the trench system.
Describe how trench warfare worked.
‘The main reason for the construction of the trench system was to gain
territory.’ Do you agree?
Life in the Trenches
Describe what conditions in the trenches were like for soldiers in reference to: daily life, food, hygiene, healthcare, comradeship, weather and dangers.
‘Life in the trenches was unpleasant
rather than dangerous.’ Do you agree?
New Weapons
and Technology
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of chlorine, phosgene and mustard gas.
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tanks.
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of aircraft.
‘Technological developments did little to break the stalemate on the Western
Front.’ Do you agree?
Reasons for Stalemate
Describe how the trench system, machine gun, failure of new weapons and the failure of commanders all contributed to the stalemate on the Western Front.
‘The main reason for deadlock on the Western Front was due to the poor
tactics of the Generals.’ Do you agree?
The Battle of the Somme
1916
Describe the causes, events and results of the Battle of the Somme.
Describe the main reasons why the battle was a disaster.
‘The main reason for the disaster on the first day of the Somme was due to German preparations.’ Do you agree?
The Third Battle of
Ypres 1917
Describe the cause, events and results of the Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele).
Describe the main reasons why the battle was a failure.
‘The main reason for the failure of the Third Battle of Ypres was due to poor weather conditions.’ Do you agree?
The Role of Douglas
Haig
Describe the evidence against Haig’s leadership.
Describe the evidence in defence of Haig’s leadership.
‘The main reason for the British disasters on the Somme and Passchendaele was the poor
leadership of Douglas Haig.’ Do you agree?
Key Question 5
Topics You should be able to: Checklist Exam Questions Checklist
What was the fighting like in other theatres of
war?
The Gallipoli
Campaign 1916
Describe causes, events and results of the Gallipoli campaign.
Describe the main reasons why the campaign was a failure.
Describe how the successful evacuation was carried out.
‘The main reason for the failure of the Gallipoli Campaign was poor planning.’ Do you agree?
‘The main reason for the failure of the Gallipoli
Campaign was due to the poor living conditions in the trenches.’ Do you agree?
Key Events of the War
at Sea 1914-1915
Describe the key features of the British Naval Blockade.
Describe the causes, events and results of the Battle of Heligoland Bight.
Describe why the German Navy raided towns along the east coast of Britain.
Describe the causes, events and results of the Battle of Dogger Banks.
‘The main reason for the defeat of Germany in 1918
was the British Naval Blockade.’ Do you agree?
The Battle of Jutland 1916
Describe the cause, events and effects of the Battle of Jutland.
Describe the two interpretations on who won the battle.
‘The Battle of Jutland was a complete victory for the
British Navy.’ Do you agree?
The German U-boat
Campaign
Describe the causes, events and effects of the German U-boat campaign.
Describe how Britain managed to defeat the U-boat threat.
‘The failure of the German U-boat campaign is the
main reason why Germany eventually lost the war in 1918.’ Do you agree?
Key Question 6
Topics You should be able to: Checklist Exam Questions Checklist
How was Germany
finally defeated?
US Entry into the War
1917
Describe the reasons why the USA entered the war.
Describe the causes and effects of the Sinking of the Lusitania.
Describe the American contribution to the Allied war effort.
‘The sinking of the Lusitania was the main reason why the USA joined the
War on the Allied side.’ Do you agree?
‘The main reason for the defeat of Germany in 1918 was the entry of the
USA into the war.’ Do you agree?
The German Spring
Offensives 1918
Describe the causes, events and effects of the Spring Offensives.
Why did the Spring Offensives fail?
Describe how the Allies counter-attacked after the offensives.
‘The main reason for the defeat of Germany in 1918 was the failure of the
Spring Offensives.’ Do you agree?
The Defeat of German
1918
Describe how: the British Naval Blockade; entry of the USA; Russian Revolution, Tanks, Revolution in Germany and the defeat of Germany’s Allies all contributed to Germany’s final defeat.
‘The main reason for the defeat of
Germany in 1918 was the use of tanks.’ Do you agree?
1. How did the creation of Germany in 1871 upset the balance of power
in Europe?
2. How and why did the Triple Alliance form?
5. How did military rivalry increase
international tensions in Europe?
3. How and why did the Triple Entente form?
4. How did economic and imperial rivalry contribute to international tension?
What were the long-term
causes of international
rivalry?
1. Why was the Ottoman Empire so weak by 1900? 2. What were the aims of Russia and Austria-Hungary in the Balkans?
5. What were the Balkan Wars (1912-13) and
how did they increase tensions in Europe?
3. How did rising Balkan nationalism increase the
risk of war?
4. What was the Bosnian Crisis (1908) and how did it increase tensions in Europe?
How did the struggle over
the Balkans worsen
tensions in Europe?
1. How and why did Germany challenge Britain’s naval supremacy? 2. How did the launch of HMS DREADNOUGHT lead to a naval arms race?
3. How and why did the First Moroccan Crisis
(1905-6) increase tensions?
4. How and why did the Second Moroccan Crisis
(1911) increase tensions?
5. How and why was Franz Ferdinand assassinated?
6. How did events spiral out of control after the assassination?
How else did tension
grow in Europe
before 1914?
1. What was the Schlieffen Plan? 2. What fatal assumptions did the plan make?
7. How and where did the French army finally
stop the German advance?
4. How did Belgian resistance slow the plan
down?
6. How did the BEF contribute to the defeat of the plan?
3. Was the plan undermined by changes?
5. How did German exhaustion contribute to the
failure?
Why did the
Schlieffen Plan fail?
1. Why had the war descended into trench
warfare by Christmas 1914?
2. What were the key features of the trench
system?
8. What were the reasons for deadlock on the
Western Front?
3. What was life like for soldiers in the trenches?
5. How were tanks used on the Western Front?
4. How was gas used on the Western Front?
6. How were aircraft used on the Western Front?
7. What other new weapons and tactics were used
on the Western Front?
What was the
fighting like in the
trenches?
1. When and why was the Somme offensive
launched?
2. What happened during the battle and what did it achieve?
6. Was Douglas Haig to blame for the failure
to achieve a breakthrough?
3. How did bad planning and leadership contribute to
the disaster?
4. What role did failing technology play in the defeat?
5. Were there factors outside of British control that
contributed to the failure of the offensive?
Why was there no
breakthrough at
the Somme?
1. When and why was the Third Battle of Ypres
(Passchendaele) launched?
2. What happened during the battle and what did it achieve?
6. Was Douglas Haig to blame for the failure
to achieve a breakthrough?
3. How did bad planning and leadership contribute to
the disaster?
4. What role did failing technology play in the defeat?
5. Were there factors outside of British control that
contributed to the failure of the offensive?
Why was there no
breakthrough at
Passchendaele?
1. When and why did the Allies launch the Gallipoli
campaign?
2. What happened during the campaign and what were conditions like for soldiers?
7. What were the results of the campaign?
3. How did bad planning and leadership contribute to
the disaster?
4. What role did failing technology play in the defeat?
5. Were there factors outside of British control that
contributed to the failure of the campaign?
6. Were the evacuations a success?
Why did the
Gallipoli campaign
fail?
1. How did the German navy threaten Britain? 2. What happened at the Battle of Heligoland
Bight?
7. What were the effects of the British
blockade on Germany?
3. What happened during the German raids on
the British east coast?
5. What was the Battle of Jutland and who won?
Who won the war
at sea?
4. What happened at the Battle of Dogger Bank?
6. How did U-boats threaten Britain and how were they defeated?
1. Why did the USA decide to remain neutral at the start of WW1? 2. How did the sinking of RMS Lusitania effect relations between the USA and
Germany?
5. How significant was the US contribution to
the Allies during the war?
3. What was the Zimmerman Telegram and how
did it effect relations between the USA and
Germany?
4. How did the collapse of Tsar Nicholas II’s Russia influence the US decision to enter the war?
Why and with what effect
did the USA enter the war
in 1917?
1. Why did Ludendorff decide to launch an offensive on the Western Front in
Spring 1918?
2. What successes did the offensive have at first?
5. When and why did Germany’s allies
(Austria-Hungary, Turkey, Bulgaria)
surrender?
3. Why did the Spring Offensive fail by July 1918?
4. How did the Allies respond to the Spring Offensive in August 1918?
What was the German
Spring Offensive and why
did it fail?
fdfd
1. Failure of the German U-boat campaign? 2. Impact of the British blockade?
8. Impact of Bolshevik Revolution and Kiel
Mutiny?
3. Contribution of the USA?
5. Role of Tanks?
4. Failure of the Spring Offensive?
6. Role of Foch?
7. Defeat of Germany’s Allies?
How and why did
Germany finally
collapse in 1918?
A2: The Origins & Course of the First World War: Key
Events
1.) The Major World Powers in 1914
Country Britain Germany Russia Austria-Hungary France
Ruler King George V
1910-1936
Kaiser Wilhelm
II 1888-1918
Tsar Nicholas
II
1894-1917
Emperor Franz
Joseph II
1848-1916
President
Raymond
Poincarè
1913-1920
Population 40.8 million 65 million 159 million 50 million 39.6 million
Numb of
colonies 56 10 n/a n/a 29
Size of
colonies 27 million sq. km
2.5 million sq.
km n/a n/a
11 million sq.
km
Population of
colonies 390 million 15 million n/a n/a 58 million
Size of army 700,000 soldiers 4,200,000
soldiers
1,200,000
soldiers 800,000 soldiers
3,700,000
soldiers
Size of navy 388 ships 281 ships 166 ships 67 ships 207 ships
Coal output
each year
292 million
tonnes
277 million
tonnes
36.2 million
tonnes 47 million tonnes
40 million
tonnes
Steel output
each year 11 million tonnes
14 million
tonnes
3.6 million
tonnes 5 million tonnes
4.6 million
tonnes
Knowing and understanding the key events and facts from each topic is obviously essential. For
Paper 2, Section A topics like WW1 1905-1918, you need to be able to expand on the sources with
your own factual knowledge. Make sure you study the following list of key events and changes as
part of your revision:
2.) Formation of the Triple Alliance - 1882
What? When? Who? Why?
Dual Alliance –
defensive alliance which
pledged the signatories
to aid one another in
case of an attack by
Russia. Each state also
promised benevolent
neutrality to the other
if attacked by another
European power.
7th
October
1879
Germany
and
Austria-
Hungary
A defensive alliance was sought between these two powers
due to their common dislike and fear of Russia. In 1878
Russia had defeated the Ottoman Empire in the Russo-
Turkish War, gaining considerable influence over the
Balkans. This angered Austria-Hungary who was Russia’s
chief competitor in the region. Germany Chancellor Bismark
called an international conference (Congress of Berlin) to
solve the tensions. The Treaty of Berlin that year
provided Austria with Bosnia as compensation but relations
between Germany and Russia had also soured, with Russia
resenting German and Austrian meddling in the Balkans.
Triple Alliance –
defensive alliance in
which members
promised to support
each other in the event
of an attack by any
other great power or
for Germany and Italy,
an attack by France
alone.
1882
Germany,
Austria-
Hungary
and Italy
The Dual Alliance was extended in 1882 when Italy joined.
Italy had been angered by the French seizure of Tunisia in
1881 as many Italians considered Tunisia as a potential
colony. Italy felt compelled to join the Alliance despite the
fact that Austria-Hungary had been Italy’s traditional
enemy and had fought 3 wars in the past 34 years!
3.) Formation of the Triple Entente
What? When? Who? Why?
Franco-Russian Alliance
– a military alliance that
stipulated that if one of
the countries of the
Triple Alliance attacked
France or Russia, its ally
would attack the
aggressor in question.
Drafted on
17th August
1892, final
in 1894.
France
and
Russia
France had been left diplomatically isolated since its defeat in the
1871 Franco-Prussian War and due to the policies of Otto von
Bismarck. It needed allies. France and Russia both feared the
combined power of the Triple Alliance and despite political
differences, they agreed to help each other if either of them was
attacked.
Entente Cordiale (cordial
agreement) – a series of
agreements between
Britain and France ending
almost a thousand years
of conflict between the
two nations.
8th April
1904
France
and
Britain
The agreements settled many colonial issues. France recognised
British control over Egypt while Britain reciprocated regarding
French control over Morocco. Britain ended its policy of ‘splendid
isolation’ mainly due to a growing fear of isolation in the face of a
newly aggressive Germany. However the Entente Cordiale was NOT
a formal military alliance like the Franco-Russian Alliance.
Anglo-Russian Entente –
an agreement ending
colonial rivalries in
Central Asia.
31st August
1907
Russia
and
Britain
The Anglo-Russia entente ended colonial rivalries, particular over
Iran, India, Afghanistan and Tibet. Both nations were rivals for
power and resources in the region and this rivalry was known as ‘the
Great Game’. By the early 20th century Britain was concerned by the
cost of defending against a possible Russian invasion of India and
sought to ease tensions. Following defeat in the Russo-Japanese
War of 1904-05 and attempted revolution at home, Russia also
sought to ease tensions. The result was the Anglo-Russian
Convention of 1907.
Triple Entente – the end-
product of the three
previous agreements.
31st August
1907
Britain,
France
and
Russia
The Triple Alliance was not a formal agreement or military alliance.
Rather, the entente was the combined result of the previous three
agreements between Russia, France and Britain. The spirit of the
three agreements stated that they had a ‘moral obligation’ to
support each other. After WW1 broke out, the Entente powers
signed a formal military alliance.
4.) Economic Causes of International Rivalry
Country Strengths of Economy Economic Threats and Weaknesses
Britain
Britain had been the first country in the world to go through an industrial
revolution. In the 1800s Britain had become rich through the manufacture and
sale of home-produced goods, exporting huge quantities of manufactured items
to its colonies. In 1914 it still led the world in trade, finance, shipping, and had
strong manufacturing bases and mining. The City of London was also the
financial centre of the world. Britain had vast investments and reserves
overseas which it could use to pay for supplies during World War One.
Britain was increasingly concerned about Germany whose
growth rate, manufacturing output and GDP were beating
Britain. British industry was slow to adapt to global changes
and Britain relied on the Empire to support its economy.
Britain feared a growing German navy which could endanger
its control over its colonies and trade routes.
Germany
By 1914 Germany was producing more iron, more steel, more coal and even more
cars than Britain. Germany was also showing a keen interest in gaining colonies,
which would give it access to cheap raw materials and markets into which to
sell its goods. By 1914 it controlled a staggering 90% of the world’s chemical
industry and also dominated in electrical equipment, dyes and pharmaceuticals.
As a major industrial nation, German made money by
importing raw materials and exporting finished products
abroad. The lack of overseas colonies and a small navy
meant that Germany was vulnerable to blockade in a time of
war. This would lead Germany to seek an overseas empire
and larger navy, a move seen as threatening by the British.
Russia
From the 1890s onwards, the Russian economy was one of the fastest growing
in Europe helped by French and British capital investment. Railroads and
agriculture received investment along with a focus on the armaments industry.
Growth averaged 9% in the 1890s and 5% in 1900-14 but this was from a very
low base.
The Russian economy was the poorest of the major powers.
85% of the population were still peasants in 1914 who
survived on subsistence farming. Russia had vast resources
but these undeveloped due to the climate and transport.
France
Despite the fact that the French economy had been declining throughout the
19th century, France could still rely on its large empire to provide resources
and manpower. France was also mostly self-sufficient in food and energy
resources. From the 1890s, France experienced an economic and industrial
boom due to its growing colonial empire and increased its investments abroad,
especially in Russia.
The French economy was still largely agricultural based and
run by small family businesses. They struggled to out-match
German industrial might or have the ability to leverage
large investment loans like the British. Its growing colonial
ambitions was bringing it into conflict with both Germany
and Britain.
Austria-
Hungary
Having industrialised relatively later than other countries, Austria-Hungary
enjoyed high growth rates preceding 1914. It was the 4th biggest machine
manufacturer in the world and was a huge food exporter to Britain and
Germany.
Although A-H experienced high growth, it was largely
centred in Hungary and wealth was mostly concentrated
amongst the landowning aristocracy. Austria also lacked an
overseas empire to supply resources or an export market in
times of war.
Italy
Italy, along with Russia, was unfortunately the poor man of Europe. The Italian
economy did experience growth in the years before 1914 but mainly in the
industrialised cities of the north. Southern Italy was intensely poor,
agricultural and backward.
Italy was still a largely agricultural country and
industrialisation had only affected the north of the
country. Nearly 25 million people had emigrated between
1880-1914 leaving Italy with a shortage of manpower.
159
6550
40.8 39.6 35
0
50
100
150
200
Population: home (millions)
Russia
Germany
Austria Hungary
Britain
France
Italy 0 1550
390
584
0
100
200
300
400
500
Population: overseas (millions)
Russia
Germany
Austria Hungary
Britain
France
Italy
0.18
1
0.2
1.2
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Value of annual trade (£ millions)
Russia
Germany
Austria Hungary
Britain
France
Italy
3.6
14
5
11
4.63.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Steel production (million tons)
Russia
Germany
Austria Hungary
Britain
France
Italy
5.) Imperial Causes of International Rivalry
Country Major Colonies Owned Problems and Threats
One of the issues that led to tension between the Great Powers in the early twentieth century concerned the ownership of land overseas – colonies.
Colonies provided cheap raw materials for industry and were also a place where European countries could export their home-produced goods. It was thought
that the more colonies a nation had, the more powerful it became. This is why under Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany sought its own ‘place in the sun’.
Britain
Britain had the largest empire in the world covering more
than 11,400,000 sq miles and reigned over 400 million
people. Colonies included: India, Ireland, Canada, Australia,
New Zealand, South Africa, Egypt, Sudan, Rhodesia,
Singapore, Malacca, Java, Burma, Hong Kong, Gibraltar,
West Indies.
Despite its size, the profits made from empire were declining by 1914 and
the costs of defence were rising. The Irish in particular were demanding
home rule. The Boer War in South Africa (1899-1902) had exposed British
military weaknesses. Russia was threatening British interests in Central Asia
(ended in 1907) and German expansion in Africa was beginning to worry the
British. Britain’s main concern was therefore in maintaining its supremacy in
the world and preventing any one power from dominating Europe.
Germany
Germany had also been a continental land-based power and
had grown rapidly in the 19th century. The focus of
Germany’s expansion changed when Wilhelm II became
Kaiser. He encourage a ‘new imperialism’ overseas. By 1914,
Germany’s main colonies were: Namibia, Cameroon,
Togoland, German East Africa, Shandong (China), German
Samoa.
Germany only had a small and poor empire but its desire for more colonies in
Africa brought it into conflict with Britain and France. The building of a
navy to rival Britain and the Kaiser’s open support for the Boers in the
South African War only served to push Britain towards France with the
signing of the Entente Cordiale in 1903. This push for an overseas empire
ultimately upset the balance of power internationally.
France
The French empire was the second biggest in the world and
was able to provide France with manpower and resources
throughout WW1. Its main colonies were: Algeria, Morocco,
Tunisia, Chad, Senegal, Vietnam, Laos and most of West
Africa.
Like Britain, the French empire was huge but by 1914 was draining French
finances. Groups in Indo-China (Vietnam) were constantly rebelling and the
cost of fighting was huge. The French also faced competition in Africa,
especially from Germany. The Moroccan Crises (1905-6 + 1911) both nearly
led to war between France and Germany.
Austria-
Hungary
Austria-Hungary was the second biggest country in Europe
in 1914 and the third most populous yet it did not have any
overseas colonies. Instead, the empire was a multinational
realm which ruled over the parts of these modern day
countries: Austria, Hungary, Czech Republic, Montenegro,
Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Ukraine.
Austria-Hungary ruled over an empire of over eleven different nationalities
and many of these wanted their own independence. The rising tide of
nationalism in the Balkans were create a series of tensions and conflicts
that would eventually led to war in 1914.
Russia
Like Austria-Hungary, Russia had no overseas colonies – it
was a huge land-based empire. However Russia was seeking
to expand into Manchuria (China), The Balkans and Persia
(Iran). Russia also ruled over most of modern day Eastern
Europe and the Central Asia Republics.
Russia’s aim to expand into Central Asia brought it into conflict with Britain,
especially in Afghanistan, Persia, Tibet and India. Russia also came into
conflict with the Austrians in the Balkans, where Russia was encouraging
Slavic nationalism and the rise of Serbia. In the East, its push into
Manchuria brought Russia into conflict with Japan, leading to its defeat in
the Russo-Japanese War (1904-05). This defeat also led to Russia seeking
peace with Britain in 1907 (Anglo-Russian Agreement).
Italy
Modern Italy had only been created in 1861 and as such,
was one of the last powers to establish an empire. By 1914,
Italy ruled over: Eritrea, Somalia, Libya, Docecanese
Islands (Turkey) and Tietsin (China).
Italy’s new empire was tiny and didn’t really benefit them economically to
any great extent. The weakness of the Italian military was also illustrated
in its failed attempt to conquer Ethiopia in the First Italo-Ethiopian War of
1895-96. Italy’s desire to conquer more lands from the crumbling Austro-
Hungarian empire would lead it to join the Entente powers in 1915, rather
than honouring its agreement to the Triple Alliance.
6.) Military Causes of International Rivalry
What is
militarism?
The culture of militarism was persuasive in many European capitals prior to the First World War. Militarism generally
refers to the domination of government and decision makers by military elites. Governments often became dominated by
Generals and military planners who fuelled arms races by demanded increases in military spending. They also contributed
to the mood of war by drawing up war plans and promoting military solutions to political and diplomatic problems.
Why was
militarism
strong in
Germany?
Militarism was strong in Germany mainly due to the undemocratic nature of German government. The German army was
formed from the old Prussian army and was therefore dominated by the Junkers, a small but powerful group of Prussian
aristocrats. Prussia had been the most powerful of the Germanic states prior to unification, both in political and military
terms. The Prussian army had been reformed and modernised by Field Marshal von Moltke in the 1850s. Under von
Moltke’s command the Prussians developed a rigorous training regime for officers; they also incorporated new weaponry
and communication technologies into their military strategy. After 1871 the Prussian army formed the core of the new
German imperial army. The kaiser was the supreme commander of the army; he relied on a military council and chief of
general staff, made up of Junker aristocrats and career officers. The Reichstag, Germany’s elected civilian parliament,
exercised very little say in military matters. In many respects the Germany military existed as a part of the government,
rather than being a servant of the government. Therefore many events before 1914 were driven by the demands of
German military planners and Generals.
What was
the arms
race?
It is natural for military leaders to be obsessed with modernising their forces and equipping them with new technology,
and the decades prior to 1914 saw no shortage of this. One of the most significant developments were marked
improvements in the calibre, range, accuracy and portability of heavy artillery. This would allow artillery shelling and
bombardments to become standard practice, particularly after the emergence of trench warfare. Machine-guns, first
developed in 1881, became smaller, lighter, more accurate, more reliable and much faster (some were capable of firing up
to 600 rounds per minute). Millions of metres of barbed wire, an invention of the 1860s, would be mass produced and
installed around trenches to halt charging infantry. Various types of poison gas – chlorine, phosgene and mustard – were
developed. On the oceans, the development of the dreadnought – a large battleship, the first of which was launched in
1906 – prompted a flurry of ship-building and naval rearmament.
Rising
military
spending
European military expenditure skyrocketed between 1900 and 1914. In 1870 the combined military spending of the six
great powers (Britain, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia and Italy) totalled 94 million pounds. By 1914 this had
quadrupled to 398 million pounds. German defence spending during this period increased by a massive 73 per cent,
dwarfing the increases in France (10 per cent) and Britain (13 per cent). Russian defence spending also grew by more than
one-third. Its embarrassing defeat in the Russo-Japanese War (1904-5) prompted the tsar to order a massive
rearmament program. By the 1910s, 45 per cent of Russian government spending was allocated to the armed forces, while
just five per cent went on education. Every European power but Britain increased conscription levels to bolster the size
of their armies. Germany alone added 170,000 full-time soldiers to its army in 1913-14. Germany also dramatically
increased its navy: in 1898 the German government, largely at the Kaiser’s behest, ordered the construction of 17 new
vessels. The Germans also pioneered the construction of military submarines: by 1914 the Kaiser’s navy had 29
operational U-boats. These developments caused alarm in Britain, and London responded by commissioning 29 new ships
for the Royal Navy.
d
7.) Nationalism and Rivalry in the Balkans
Country Background Aims in the Balkans
The
Ottomans
Since the 1600s, most of the Balkans (a poor,
mountainous region of south-east Europe)
had been part of the Ottoman Empire. The
Ottomans were Muslim rulers of what is now
modern day Turkey. By the 19th century the
Ottomans were in decline: Greece (1832),
Serbia (1878), Montenegro (1878) and
Romania (1878) had all won their full
independence. Other states became semi-
independent like Bulgaria (1878) and the
Ottomans were forced to let Austria-
Hungary ‘administer’ Bosnia-Herzegovina in
1878.
The primary aim of Ottoman foreign policy was to prevent revolutions and
the collapse of its European Empire. Essentially, the Empire was too big
and too expensive for the army to keep control everywhere. It was facing
a growing tide of nationalism from the many ethnic groups within the
Empire like Bosnians, Serbs and Croats who all wanted their independence.
The Ottomans also faced competition in the Balkans from Russia and
Austria-Hungary who were both trying to extend their influence in the
area. Russia in particular was actively supporting and encouraging Slavic
independence.
Austria-
Hungary
Austria-Hungary had a large and scattered
Empire in central Europe with its capital in
Vienna. It was ruled by the Habsburg family
and is often referred to as the ‘Habsburg
Empire’. The Empire ruled over 11 different
nationalities like Slavs, Czechs, Serbs,
Bosnians and Croats.
Like the Ottomans, Austria-Hungary wanted to both extend and preserve
its power in the region and stop the growth of Balkan nationalism as it
threatened to break up the empire. Since its independence in 1878, Serbia
had been keen to extend its influence in the Balkans. Many Serbs lived in
the Austro-Hungarian Empire and wanted to unite with Serbia. If this
happened, other ethnic groups might also seek their independence from
the empire like Czechs and Croats. Austria-Hungary was therefore keen to
confront the growing power of Serbia and take advantage of the
weakening Ottoman Empire.
Russia
Russia was a huge country and empire that
shared a southern border with the Ottoman
Empire across the Black Sea and the Balkans.
Russia had been at war with the Ottomans
several times in the 19th century. In 1877-78,
Russia had supported the Bulgarians and
other Slavic nationalities in rising up against
the Ottomans by sending troops and supplies.
Russia saw it as an opportunity to gain
influence in the area.
Russia’s primary concern was to gain access to the Mediterranean Sea for
trade. To reach the Mediterranean, Russian ships had to sail through the
narrow Dardanelles straight, controlled and closed off to them by the
Ottomans. Russia was therefore determined to establish pro-Russian
governments in the Balkans, which would allow their ports to be used to
transport Russian goods in the Mediterranean.
The Russian were also Slavs and many Slavs in the Balkans were Christian
and belonged to the Russian Orthodox Church. Russia was keen to promote
Slavic nationalism and help Slavic people win their freedom from the
Ottomans. If this also threatened the break-up of Austria-Hungary then
more the better.
8.) The Bosnian Crisis: 1908
Causes What happened? Consequences
Young Turk Revolution, April
1908 – Group of army officers in
Turkey overthrow the rule of
Sultan Abdul Hamid and
introduce a series of reforms to
modernise the Ottoman Empire.
Austria-Hungary was alarmed at
the prospect of a stronger,
modernised Turkey and wanted
to prevent the Ottomans from
recovering the province of
Bosnia-Herzegovina which
Austria-Hungary had been
allowed to administer since 1878.
Serbian Nationalism – Serbia
was unhappy with the status quo
and wanted to take over Bosnia-
Herzegovina. Relations with
Austria-Hungary deteriorated
over the issue and by 1907,
Austria-Hungary was planning to
annex Bosnia-Herzegovina to
prevent Serbian influence from
spreading.
On 6th October 1908 Austria-Hungary announced the annexation of Bosnia
and Herzegovina and made it an official territory of the Habsburg
Empire. The Ottomans, Serbia and Russia all objected to the annexation.
Despite the fact that the 1878 Treaty of Berlin had given Austria-
Hungary special rights to ‘occupy and administer’ Bosnia-Herzegovina, the
Ottomans still technically owned and ruled the provinces and considered
that their territory had been seized. The Ottomans protested and
launched a boycott of Austro-Hungarian trade goods but was too
concerned with Bulgaria’s declaration of independence on 5th October to
do anything about the annexation of Bosnia Herzegovina.
Serbia strongly objected to the annexation as it had designs of its own on
the province. It hoped to bring Bosnian Serbs into Serbia. On 7th October
Serbia mobilised its army and demanded that the annexation be reversed.
It asked Russia for help to stop the annexation.
Russia responded by accusing Austria-Hungary of betraying its
confidence and considered war. On 22nd March 1909, Germany made it
clear to Russia that unless it agreed to the annexation, it would ‘let things
take their course’ and support Austria-Hungary if war occurred.
Russia backed down in the face of this threat, as did Serbia, and the
crisis ended when Austria-Hungary agreed to pay the Ottomans
compensation of £2.2 million for the annexation.
Serbia and Russia were
humiliated and were
determined to win the
next dispute. Russia
begins to invest heavily
in its armed forces.
Austria-Hungary begun
to see the Serbs as a
real threat and was
reassured by the fact
that Germany had
stood by it – this
encouraged Austria-
Hungary to become
even more assertive in
the region.
The ‘Black Hand’
terrorist organisation
was created in Serbia
which would later
assassinate Franz
Ferdinand.
9.) The Balkan Wars: 1912-13
Causes What happened? Consequences
The F
irst
Balkan
War
Fall of the Young Turks – After
defeat to Italy in the Italo-
Turkish War of 1911-12, the
Young Turk group fell from
power in Turkey. The Balkan
countries saw this as an
opportunity to attack the
Ottoman Empire.
Formation of the Balkan League –
With the encouragement of
Russia agents, a series of loose
agreements between Serbia,
Bulgaria, Greece and Montenegro
formed into an alliance. All four
powers wanted to take land away
from the Ottoman Empire.
The First Balkan War broke out on
8th October 1912 when the Balkan
League (Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia
and Montenegro) attacked the
Ottoman Empire.
The Ottomans were primarily
defeated by the actions of the
Greek navy, which prevented the
Ottomans from transferring
reinforcements from the Middle
East to Europe, across the
Dardanelles Straight.
The war ended seven months later
with the Treaty of London. The
Ottomans had lost virtually all of
its Balkan possessions.
Turkey lost nearly all its lands in Europe and over
2.5 million Muslim Ottoman Turks were forced to
flee to the Turkish heartland.
All four Balkan League powers extended their lands
in the Balkans, making Serbia especially more
powerful.
The province of Macedonia was divided amongst
Serbia and Greece, angering the Bulgarians which
would led to another war.
Albania used the confusion of war to declare
independence. This was backed up by Austria-
Hungary in the London Conference which ended the
war. This angered Serbia who was hoping to gain
access to the Sea by annexing Albania.
The S
eco
nd B
alkan
War
Bulgaria was unhappy with the
territory it gained in the First
Balkan War. It had been
promised part of the province of
Macedonia, which was eventually
taken by Serbia and Greece. This
angered Bulgaria into using force
to recover these provinces.
The Second Balkan War broke out
on 16th June 1913 when Bulgaria
attacked Serbia and Greece.
The Bulgarian offensive was
repulsed by the Serbian and Greek
armies and they counter-attacked
in to Bulgaria. Romania and the
Ottomans also attacked Bulgaria.
It ended in the Treaty of
Bucharest with Bulgaria loosing
most of the territories it had
gained from the First Balkan War.
Bulgaria’s aggression against Serbia (Russia’s main
ally in the region) had permanently damaged
relations between Russia and Bulgaria. Bulgaria
would go on to support the Triple Alliance in WW1.
Russia now only had one ally in the region – Serbia –
and felt obliged to support Serbia unconditionally.
This would led to Russia’s willingness to back Serbia
without question in 1914 – leading to WW1.
Serbia gained huge amounts of land in the wars and
became vastly more powerful. This worried Austria-
Hungary. Both sides now realised that only a war
could resolve tensions between each other.
10.) Anglo-German Naval Race: 1906-1912
Causes What happened? Results
Kaiser Wilhelm II was a keen
sailor and jealous of the
British fleet. He wanted to
build his own ocean-going fleet
to compete with the British.
There was also the belief that
a deep-sea fleet was needed in
order to secure colonies and
protect imperial trade.
Germany also feared a British
naval blockade of its coastline.
In 1897, the British foreign
office had threatened to
blockade the German coast if
Germany intervened on the
side of the Boers in the
African Boer War. A stronger
navy might prevent the British
from doing this.
British naval policy was the
‘two-power standard’. The
British navy would always try
to be as big as the next two
biggest navies combined. So as
Germany began to enlarge her
fleet, Britain was obliged to
follow its policy and build
more, resulting in a race.
German Grand Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz, Secretary of State of
the German Imperial Naval Office, championed and persuaded the
Parliament to pass four Fleet Acts between 1898 and 1912,
providing funding for the construction of a larger fleet. The aim
was to be at least 2/3 the size of the British fleet, big enough
to inflict serious damage, therefore the British wouldn’t ‘risk’ a
confrontation with the German fleet.
The British navy responded with a rearmament campaign, resulting
in the construction and launching of HMS Dreadnought in 1906 –
17,900 tons; 526 feet in length; ten 12 inch guns; eighteen 4 inch
guns; five torpedo tubes; 11 inch armour; top speed 21.6 knots.
HMS Dreadnought was revolutionary in its design and was so
powerful, it made all other naval ships redundant. This had the
effect of altering the balance of power, as now Germany could
match the power of the British navy if it could build more
Dreadnought class ships. An arms race then ensued.
The naval race between Britain and Germany generated huge
public support on each side. The British public coined the slogan,
‘We want eight and won’t wait!’, referring to the number of
dreadnoughts they wanted the government to build.
The arms race was ended in 1912 by the German chancellor
Bethmann Hollweg. Hollweg was concerned by the increasing size
of the Russian army and needed to switch funding from the navy
to the army. He also wanted to ease tensions with Britain, as
Germany was becoming increasingly isolated.
By 1914, Britain
had built 29
Dreadnoughts
whilst Germany
had built 17.
Germany had
successfully built
a fleet that
according to its
‘risk theory’ could
pose a significant
threat to the
British. As a
result, there was
only one major
naval battle during
WW1 – Jutland.
The competition
and fear
generated by the
naval arms race
led Britain to view
Germany as a
threat, which only
served to push
Britain into a
stronger military
partnership with
France and Russia.
11.) First Moroccan (Tangier) Crisis: 1905-6
Causes What happened? Consequences
Morocco was one of the
last independent countries
in North Africa. France
was trying to increase its
influence in Morocco and
sought to turn the country
into one of its colonies.
Germany was looking for an
opportunity to increase its
empire in Africa and also
sought to protect its
commercial interests in
Morocco.
Germany also sought to
increase tensions between
France and the UK, in an
attempt to test the
strength of the recently
signed ‘Entente Cordiale’
(1904). The issue of
Morocco seemed to be the
perfect opportunity to
challenge the French.
On 31st March 1905, Kaiser Wilhelm II landed at
Tangier, Morocco and conferred with representatives of
Sultan Abdelaziz. He declared support for the
independence of Morocco – challenging French influence
in Morocco.
The Sultan subsequently rejected French-proposed
government reforms and under the advice of the
Germans, issued invitations to a major world conference
to advise him on necessary reforms. The Germans sought
to isolate and embarrass the French.
The French foreign minister (Delcasse) responded by
saying there was no need for a conference. The German
Chancellor (Bulow) threatened war over the issue. By
mid-June, the French army began to mobilise however
the French Premier (Rouvier) refused to risk war with
Germany over the issue and agreed to attend the
conference. Delcasse resigned.
The Algeciras Conference (Spain) began on 16th January
and ended on 7th April 1906. The only country that
supported Germany was Austria-Hungary, and the
Entente Cordiale between France and Britain held firm.
Germany was forced to accept a face-saving compromise
agreement: Moroccan independence was agreed but
France gained control over Moroccan political and
financial affairs.
The Algeciras Conference
solved the crisis and both
France and Germany de-
mobilised their armies.
However relations between the
Triple Alliance and Triple
Entente countries was damaged
– Germany was now seen as a
serious threat.
It also strengthened the
Entente Cordiale as Britain had
defended France in the crisis
and Britain began detailed
military discussions with the
French. It also drew Britain
closer to the Russians,
resulting in the Anglo-Russian
Entente in 1907.
Kaiser Wilhelm II was angry at
being humiliated and was
determined not to back down
again, which led to the Second
Moroccan Crisis.
12.) Second Moroccan (Agadir) Crisis: 1911
Causes What happened? Consequences
France was still keen to
extend its empire and take
over Morocco. When a
rebellion broke out against
the Sultan in April 1911,
France had the perfect
pretext to launch a
takeover, using the excuse
of ‘protecting European
lives and property.’
Anglo-German tensions
were also high in 1911. The
naval arms race between
Britain and Germany was at
its height and Britain was
concerned that Germany
was seeking to use its navy
to extend its influence in
Africa.
Germany was keen to form
an alliance with Britain and
wanted an opportunity to
‘test’ the relationship
between Britain and
France, possibly
intimidating Britain into an
alliance.
Despite the Act of Algeciras (1906) and the Franco-
German Accord (1909), which both guaranteed Moroccan
independence, in April 1911 France sent troops to Morocco
to ‘put down’ the rebellion against Sultan Abdelhafid in Fez.
This was interpreted as a hostile act by Germany.
Germany responded by sending the gunboat Panther to the
Moroccan port of Agadir on 1st July 1911 under the pretext
of ‘protecting German trade interests’.
Britain tried to restrain France from sending troops to Fez
but Sir Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary, said ‘what the
French contemplate doing is not wise, but we cannot under
our agreement interfere’, so Britain backed-up the French.
Britain was also worried as they believed Germany might
try to turn Agadir into a naval base, threatening Britain’s
base, Gibraltar, in nearby Spain. On 21st July 1911, David
Lloyd George gave a speech warning Germany to back-off:
‘If Britain is treated badly where her interests are vitally
affected, as if she is no account in the cabinet of nations,
then I say emphatically that peace at that price would be a
humiliation intolerable for a great country like ours to
endure.’
Despite the stand-off, Germany was forced to back down
and accept the French takeover as a financial crisis was
effecting the German economy. In the ensuing negotiations,
Germany accepted a French Morocco but in exchange,
France gave Germany control of 275,000 km of territory in
the African Congo.
Negotiations concluded
between France and Germany
with the Treaty of Fez (4th
November 1911) and France
subsequently established a
full protectorate over
Morocco on 30th March 1912,
ending Morocco’s formal
independence.
The Kaiser’s attempt to drive
a wedge between Britain and
France failed. British fear
and hostility of Germany
increased, and the crisis only
served to draw Britain closer
to France.
The result was a secret naval
agreement where the British
Royal Navy promised to
protect the northern coast
of France from German
attack, while France
concentrated her fleet in the
western Mediterranean and
agreed to protect British
interests there. This allowed
Britain to concentrate on
opposing the German High
Seas Fleet in the North Sea.
13.) The Assassination of Franz Ferdinand and the
Countdown to War: June-Aug 1914
Causes What happened? Consequences
Serbia objected to the annexation of Bosnia by Austria-Hungary in 1908, in
which Serbia was powerless to stop Austria-Hungary. Many ethnic Slavs
lived in Austria-Hungary’s southern provinces (particularly Bosnia) and Serbia
hoped to bring these areas into its growing kingdom. This emboldened
nationalistic elements in Serbia to consider assassination as a means of
attacking Austro-Hungarian control in the region.
Serbian success in the Balkan Wars of 1912-13, in which Serbia conquered
Macedonia and Kosovo from the Ottoman Empire, enlarged the Serbian
state, further increasing Serbian power and confidence – further
emboldening nationalists to strike at Austria-Hungary.
On 28th June 1914 Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir
presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his
wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, were shot dead in
Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia, by Gavrilo Princip, one of
a group of six assassins.
The assassins were part of a group called the ‘Black
Hand’, supported by Nationalistic Serbian military
officers. The group was supplied by Serbian intelligence
with bombs and pistols and were also trained by them.
The
assassination
triggered a
series of
events known as
the ‘July Crisis’
which led
directly to war.
The Countdown to War
4TH July
Germany’s ‘blank
cheque’ to Austria-
Hungary
On 4th July, Kaiser Wilhelm II declared he was entirely for ‘setting accounts with Serbia’ and instructions the German
ambassador to Austria to stop advising restraint. On 5th July, the Kaiser met with the Austro-Hungarian ambassador
and informed him that his state could ‘count on Germany’s full support’ even if ‘grave European complications’ ensued.
This seemed to imply that Germany would back-up Austria-Hungary militarily if it decided to invade Serbia, regardless
of whether Russia tried to defend Serbia (which the Kaiser believed wouldn’t happen).
23rd July July Ultimatum
Austria blamed Serbia for the death of Franz Ferdinand and sent it an ultimatum. It was a list of ten firmly worded
demands, plus a requirement for the Serbs to respond within 48 hours, otherwise the Austrian ambassador would
leave Serbia. The demands were worded in a war that Serbia would find hard to agree with. Winston Churchill called
the ultimatum, ‘the most insolent document of its kind ever devised.’
28TH July Austria declares
war on Serbia
Serbia responded by agreeing to all the demands of the ultimatum except point six which demanded the Austro-
Hungarian law enforcement officers be allowed into Serbia to investigate the murder. Serbia viewed this as a breach
of its sovereignty and refused. At 11.00 AM on 28th July, despite British attempts to mediate a peace, Austria
declared war on Serbia and Austro-Hungarian ships on the River Danube begin to bombard the Serbian capital of
Belgrade. In Russia, partial mobilisation was ordered for the districts bordering Austria-Hungary.
30TH July Russia orders full
mobilisation of army
Nicholas II, under pressure from his army generals, orders the full mobilisation of the army. The German ambassador
in St. Petersburg informs Nicholas that Germany would mobilise if Russia did not demobilise at once.
1st August
Germany declares
war on Russia and
invades Luxemburg
Russia refuses to halt the mobilisation of its army and Germany uses this as a pretext to declare war. At 7.00 PM,
Germany troops begin the invasion of Luxemburg and Germany delivers an ultimatum to France, either renounce its
alliance with Russia or face a German attack. France authorises mobilisation of its army. Britain warns Germany that if
it invades Belgium, it would go to war.
2nd August German ultimatum
to Belgium.
Germany send an ultimatum to Belgium, requesting free passage for the German army on the way to France. King
Albert of Belgium refuses the German request. Italy declares neutrality!
3rd August
Germany declares
war on France and
invades Belgium.
Germany declares war on France for failing to remain neutral and begins its invasion of Belgium, as dictated by the
German Schlieffen Plan.
4th August Britain declares war
on Germany.
At 7 PM, Britain delivers an ultimatum to Germany to stop its invasion of Belgium by midnight. Britain had promised to
protect Belgium neutrality in the Treaty of London of 1839. Berlin failed to reply to the ultimatum so war was
declared.
6th August Austria declares
war on Russia. Austria-Hungary declares war on Russia and Serbia declares war on Germany.
14.) The failure of the Schlieffen Plan: Aug-Dec 1914
What was it? What did it need
to succeed? Why did it fail? Effects
Germany had long feared a war on two
fronts, with France to the west and Russia
to the east. In 1905 Count von Schlieffen,
the Chief of the German General Staff,
prepared a plan to avoid having to fight on
both fronts at the same time.
He believed that due to the terrible state
of the country’s road and its inefficient
railways, Russia would take about six weeks
to mobilise. In the meantime, the German
armies would quickly knock France out of
the war and then deal with Russia.
The border with France was well defended
by strong French fortresses however
French defences along the Belgian frontier
were weak – however Belgium was a neutral
country whose neutrality was guaranteed
by the Great Powers including Britain (1839
Treaty of London).
Von Schlieffen decided to attack through
Belgium as the Belgium army was small. The
main French armies attacked through
Alsace-Lorraine, the German armies would
sweep through Belgium and into northern
France.
The French would realise their mistake too
late by which time Paris would have been
taken and the French armies surrounded.
With the fall of the capital, all French
enthusiasm for the war would collapse and
their armies would surrender.
Schlieffen did realise that Britain might
join the war but he believed that France
would be defeated before the British army
could land in Europe and make any impact.
The plan made
several
assumptions:
The Belgian would
not resist, or if
they did, they
would be easily
defeated and the
German armies
would quickly
advance through
the country.
The French would
attack through
Alsace-Lorraine
and would be too
slow to realise
their mistake and
disrupt the
German Plan.
Russia would take
at least six weeks
to mobilise and
Germany would
only need to send,
at first, a small
force to the east.
The British
Expeditionary
Force would arrive
too late to stop
the German
advance.
Belgian Resistance – The Belgians, using their forts, resisted and
slowed down the German advance. On 3rd August an army of over one
million Germans marched into Belgium. Deep concrete forts protecting
Antwerp, Liege and Namur delayed the Germans. Heavy guns had to be
brought up to pound the defences to rubble. Antwerp did not
surrender until October. Belgian resistance gave the British
Expeditionary Force (BEF) time to arrive.
Changes to the Plan – Von Schlieffen died in 1913 and his dying words
were ‘keep the right wing strong’. He urged that the right wing of the
German army should be six times stronger than any other. The new
German commander, von Moltke, ignored this advice and the army was
not strong enough to carry out the plan. The German armies that
invaded Belgium were 100,000 soldiers short because von Moltke sent
additional forces to reinforce the Russian Front. Schlieffen also
wanted a wide sweep through the Netherlands, Luxembourg and
Belgium. This was changed to a narrower sweep attack through Belgium
and Luxembourg. In addition, German armies were supposed to encircle
Paris. This plan was abandoned in early September and they moved to
the east, leading to the Battle of the Marne.
The BEF – The Kaiser had dismissed the BEF as a ‘contemptible little
army’. However the BEF, under the command of Sir John French
arrived on 18th August, more quickly than the German expected. It was
small but excellently trained. Von Moltke had to transfer troops from
the Eastern Front to face the BEF. On 23rd August, the BEF met the
Germans near the Belgian town of Mons. The BEF were outnumbered
and had to retreat but they delayed the German advance. Three days
later there was a further battle at Le Cateu. Again the British
retreated but the German were slowed down.
German Exhaustion – The advance through Belgium and into northern
France took its toll on the German soldiers.
French Resistance – The French attacked Alsace-Lorraine and
suffered heavy casualties. The delays achieved by the Belgians and
British gave the French time to move their troops towards Paris and
make a stand at the Marne River on 5th-19th September 1914. Taxis and
buses transported every available soldier from Paris to the front line.
British reconnaissance balloons spotted a gap between two German
armies, and the BEF and French armies counter-attacked into this gap.
The battle lasted over a week and the German armies were forced to
fall back to a safe position 60km north of the River Aisne.
The Battle of
the Marne
signalled the
failure of the
Schlieffen
Plan. Von
Moltke was
replaced as
German
commander
by Erich von
Falkenhayn
on 25th
October
1914.
The
German’s
dug-in along
the River
Aisne,
building
machine gun
posts and
trenches.
This marked
the beginning
of trench
construction
along the
Western
Front.
The Germans
were forced
to revert to
Plan B, the
race to
capture the
Channel
ports.
15.) What was the Trench System?
Reason for the construction of the Trench System
After the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, the Germans were forced to retreat to the River Aisne. The German commander, General Erich von
Falkenhayn, decided to hold onto the occupied lands of Belgium and France at all costs – victory in the west still seemed possible or at the very least, the
more land they held the better chance for a negotiated peace. Falkenhayn ordered his men to dig trenches to provide them with cover against the
advancing British and French troops. The Allies soon realised that they could not break through this line and they also began to dig trenches, to prevent the
Germans from advancing further. By the end of 1914, the trenches stretched from the North Sea to the Swiss Alps. The Germans generally held the
highest ground as they were first to decide where to stand and fight. This gave them a tactical advantage. Trenches were usually about seven feet deep
and six feet wide.
Element Description
Barbed-Wire
Thick barbed wire entanglements were used to protect the front line trenches. Barbed-wire was usually placed far enough from the
trenches to prevent the enemy from the trenches to prevent the enemy from approaching close enough to lob grenades in. They were
also used to channel attacking infantry into machine-gun fire. Barbed-wire entanglements were virtually impassable.
Communications
Trench
Communications trenches connected the front-line trenches to the support and reserve trenches and provided the only protected way to
the front-lines. They were dug at an angle to those facing the enemy to ensure better protection for the men, equipment and food
supplies being transported.
Duck-boards
Duck-boards were wooden planks placed on the bottom of trenches and across other areas of muddy or waterlogged ground. Most of the
land on the Western Front was only a couple of feet above sea level and standing in water caused Trench Foot after a while. Duck-boards
were used to keep the base of trenches and other routes dry.
Dugouts
Dugouts were protective holes dug out of the sides of trenches. The size varied and some could house over ten men. They also served as
the daily living quarters for the troops and their refuge from attack. They could be as deep as ten meters below ground level. Some
dugouts were reinforced with concrete to provide deep bunker protection from artillery attacks although this was often on the German
side, who had the advantage of higher and dryer ground.
Fire-Bays
Front-line trenches were not dug in straight lines. This was to prevent the enemy from firing straight along the line into the trench. The
French tended to build zig-zag trenches however the British army preferred a system where each trench was dug with alternative fire-
bays and traverses. Fire-bays were sections of trench where the troops did their shooting. Each fire-bay was protected at the side by a
barrier of earth and sandbags.
Fire-Step The fire-step was a step 2 or 3 feet high which allowed a soldier to see and shoot through the parapet of a trench.
Front Line
Trench
The front-line trenches were the first line of defence in the trench system and the most dangerous areas for soldiers to defend.
Almost every day, enemy shells would fall on the trenches and snipers would often try to pick-off visible soldiers. It is estimated that
one-third of all casualties on the Western Front occurred in the trenches. The British army worked on a 16 day timetable. Eight days in
the front line, four days in the reserve trench and four days at a rest camp a few miles away from the trenches.
Listening Posts Listening posts were areas in no man’s land where soldiers were sent at night to spy on enemy defences. Craters were often used for this
purpose. They were connected to the front-line trench by a narrow passage called a sap.
Machine-Gun
Posts
These were defensive positions used to house machine guns. The German often built concrete ‘pillboxes’ or blockhouses to give their
machine-guns extra protection. With very thick walls, German machine-gun posts were very difficult to destroy by artillery barrages.
No Man’s Land This was the ground between two opposing trenches. On average the distances was 230m but could be shorter. Soldiers crossing no
man’s land faced difficult terrain, full of waterlogged shell-holes, dead bodies and barbed wire.
Parados The Parados was the rear-side of the trench and was often protected by two-three feet of sandbags. Soldiers were instructed to build
the parados higher than the parapet so that the defenders were not outlined against the sky and easy targets for German snipers.
Parapet The front of the trench, protected by sandbags with gaps for soldiers to fire their weapons through.
Reserve
Trench
Reserve or support trenches were dug parallel and behind the front-line trenches in case the front line should be captured. They were
also a resting place for the troops. In some places, there were even third of forth lines of trenches.
Sandbags Sandbags were filled with earth and were used to absorb any bullets or shell fragments. Soldiers in ‘filling parties’ were expected to fill
sixty bags an hour. A typical bullet would penetrate up to fifteen inches into a sandbag.
16.) Life in the Trenches
Element of Life Description
Daily Life
Soldiers would spend on average 10 days a month in the firing line. 60% of their time was spent behind the lines. Most
days were very monotonous and boring and seemed to pass very slowly. Men sat around reading or smoking or playing
chess. Some wrote letters home. When not in the front line, soldiers were sent back to billets a few miles away. Here
men could undergo training, eat fresh food, have baths and get new clothing. Football matches and concerts were also
organised. Letters could also be sent home for free. These were checked by a censor before being posted. Anything
that might help the enemy or reduce morale on the home front was crossed out with a blue pencil.
Food
Troops did not go hungry although there was little variety in their diet. They often ate ‘bully’ or corned beef with ten
men sharing a loaf of bread. In an emergency there were always hard biscuits, Cooking facilities were very basic.
Some troops had no hot meal for weeks on end. Food was generally prepared in pots, making it all taste the same.
Water was brought in petrol cans to the front, where chloride of lime was added to kill germs. In winter, men even
melted snow and ice to make tea. The British army tried to give its soldiers a daily intake of 4000 calories. Tobacco
was widely available. Many soldiers actually put on weight and had a far better diet then back at home.
Hygiene
Diseases were common as men crowded together in unhygienic conditions. Everyone had lice – in his hair, body and
clothing. Men were occasionally deloused but the lice would reappear within a few days. Rats were everywhere,
feeding on rotting bodies and horse carcasses. Occasionally there were epidemics. Germs in food and water led to
typhoid, cholera and dysentery. Trench foot was the biggest problem – caused by a lack of circulation in the feet and
legs. If untreated, it led to gangrene and amputation. Later in the war, soldiers were provided with thigh-high rubber
waders and whale oil, rubbed into the feet. By mid-1915 trench foot had been almost eliminated.
Healthcare
Each battalion (700-1000 men) had one Regimental Medical Officer with a team of medical orderlies and stretcher-
bearers. A Regimental Aid Post (RAP) was usually set up in the reserve trench for lightly wounded soldiers. More
serious cases were sent to the Advanced Dressing Station.
Comradeship
Firm friendships were built by men who fought alongside each other. There was a real sense of ‘being in it together’.
Soldiers shared the same experiences and helped each other ease the fear and insecurity of life. A shared sense of
humour made the suffering more bearable. In the early years of the war, ‘Pals Battalions’ were formed in which
friends from the same area joined together and served together. Men often served alongside friends, neighbours and
workmates. This increased their desire to ‘stick it out’ and not let their friends down.
Weather
Trenches were exposed and soldiers had to put up with extremes if weather – snow and frost in the winter and rain
at any time of year made conditions miserable. A metre of water in the bottom of trenches was not uncommon.
Soldiers who stood in water for a long time developed trench foot, and in some cases, the foot had to be amputated.
Dangers
It is estimated that about one-third of all deaths and casualties occurred in the trenches. Soldiers faced numerous
problems. Enemy marksmen known as snipers waited for an unwary soldiers to pop his head above the parapet. Enemy
artillery bombardment occurred most days and many died from flying splinters and debris. Poisonous gas which was
first used by the Germans in 1915 caused death and a range of injuries. Many soldiers suffered from shellshock as a
result of the constant strain of living under shellfire. Early in the war, the army did not understand that shell shock
was a form of mental illness, and many men, unable to fight, were shot as cowards.
17.) New Weapons and Technology
Weapon Description Advantages Disadvantages
Gas
Gas was first used in August 1914 when the French deployed tear gas to slow the Germans
in Belgium but failed to kill them.
Poisonous gas was first used in the Second Battle of Ypres in April 1915, where the
Germans deployed chlorine against the French. When the gas reached them, the French ran
away however the German failed to capitalise.
By 1918, more than 63 types of poisonous gas had been used. It is estimated that the
Germans used 68,000 tons of gas, the French and British 36,000 and 25,000 respectively.
After 1915 deaths from gas were rare although each side continued to use it because it
injured soldiers and created disruption and panic. Initially, soldiers were advised to hold a
urine-drenched cloth to their face but in 1915, British soldiers were given efficient gas
masks. By 1918, Filter Respirators were standard.
Chlorine – caused
tremendous panic and killed
the enemy by choking and
damaging the lungs, so
victims’ lungs filled and
they drowned.
Chlorine – visible and
soldiers were able to
prepare for it. Also did
not kill in huge numbers
and wind could blow it
back!
Phosgene – Killed the enemy
due to lung damage. It did
not have a strong smell like
Chlorine therefore soldiers
inhaled large amount before
realising.
Phosgene – Did not kill in
huge numbers and could
be dispersed or returned
by the wind.
Mustard Gas – Blistered the
skin, ate the flesh and
caused internal and
external bleeding/blindness.
It was almost odourless,
colourless and difficult to
protect against.
Mustard Gas – Remained
in the soil for weeks
after so made capture of
infected trenches a hard
task. It did not kill in
huge numbers and took
12 hours to take effect.
Tanks
Tanks were first used by British forces in September 1916 during the Battle of the Somme
but only had limited success. British commander-in-chief Douglas Haig decided to use them
against the wishes of the commander of the tank corps, who wanted to only use them when
the army had huge numbers of the new machines. Haig wanted to use 50 immediately to be
able to boast some success on the Somme.
On 15th September 1916, 49 tanks began the attack at Flers, on the Somme. 17 broke down
on the way to British lines; another 9 failed to work and 5 others became stuck in ditches.
18 tanks moved slowly into no man’s land and were able to capture their objectives. Many
Germans fled, terrified of the new weapon. Over the next 3 days, 4 miles were gained on a
narrow front. However bad weather and a shortage of tanks meant initial successes could
not be built on.
The first major success came at the Battle of Cambrai in November 1917. The entire
British tank corps of 474 tanks was involved in action against the Germans. They broke
through German lines, and the supporting infanty were able to capture 10,000 German
prisoners, 123 guns and 281 machine guns. However the success was not sustained because
there were insufficient infantry reserves to follow up the breakthrough.
In the August 1918 (Battle of Amiens) Offensive, 604 tanks assisted the Allied advance of
32 km on the Western Front however by the fifth day, less than 50 were still working.
Terrified and
caused panic
amongst enemy
defenders
Could drive over
barbed wire and
allow infantry to
follow
Could traverse
difficult terrain
Provided a morale
boost to infantry
soldiers
Slow
Extremely hot
inside
Difficult to
manoeuvre
Difficult for
commanders
outside to
communicate
with the tank
crews
Soon became
stuck in the
mud
Mechanically
unreliable
Machine Guns
could penetrate
the armour
Aircraft
First flight was in 1903 and by 1914, aircraft technology was still poor. Huge numbers of
aircraft were built during the war but they were not hugely effective. They could perform
a range of tasks however they were slow and could not carry large numbers of bombs. At
first, pilots even had to use pistols to defend themselves. Eventually, machine-guns were
fitted that could fire between the propeller blades.
Aircraft were used to: destroy enemy aircraft; observe enemy trenches; take aerial
photographs; direct artillery fire; machine-gun enemy soldiers; bomb enemy trenches;
destroy enemy bases; observe troop movements.
Aircraft were often unreliable and could be easily shot down. Britain lost 1270 between
March-May 1917. Nearly all pilots were under the age of 25 and most had only 30 hours of
training. Pilots lived short lives.
Aircraft were
very effective at
reconnaissance.
Spotting enemy
artillery positions
and guiding their
own artillery onto
target became
their main role.
Weak armour
and could be
shot down easily
Couldn’t carry
many bombs
Slow speeds
18.) Why was there a Stalemate for Three Years?
Reasons Explanation
The Trench
System
In the First World War infantrymen were supposed to attack quickly through gaps in the enemy trenches.
This proved impossible against trenches that were defended by barbed wire and sandbags.
Mud made cavalry charges ineffective.
The
Machine
Gun
Machine guns were ideal defensive weapons. They could fire up to 600 rounds a minute and were able to cut down
lines of attackers, causing huge casualties.
The German Maxim Gun accounted for 90% of Allied victims in the Battle of the Somme 1916.
The Failure
of New
Weapons
Several new weapons were developed but none was successful in helping to achieve a breakthrough.
The invention of the gas mask reduced the effectiveness of poisonous gas.
The early tanks were slow and cumbersome, and many broke down. They were not used effectively until 1918.
Heavy guns could cause considerable damage to enemy trenches but could not destroy the barbed wire or achieve a
breakthrough. If anything, they made the task of the attacking side even more difficult, since no man’s land became
badly churned up by the bombardment, thus slowing the advancing troops.
The flame-thrower was unreliable and quite likely to explode and kill the soldier using it.
The
Commanders
Trench warfare was a new kind of fighting. No one really knew how to win a war like this. So the generals fell back
on the ideas they had used successfully in past wars, such as mass cavalry or infantry attacks.
The French commander, Marshal Joffre, believed that the ‘spirit’ of the French soldiers would see them across no
man’s land.
The commanders on both sides persisted for three years with the belief that using large numbers of troops in an
attack would achieve a breakthrough against machine guns and barbed wire.
19.) The Battle of the Somme: July – Nov 1916
Causes What happened? Consequences
The Allied war strategy for 1916 was decided at the
Dec 1915 Chantilly Conference. An Anglo-French
offensive for summer 1916 was planned for the
Somme River valley, as it was the area of the front
where the French and British armies met, however
it was also the area in which the German defences
were strongest.
Haig believed in a policy of attrition or wearing
down the Germans by constantly attacking
The British secretary of State for War, Lord
Kitchener, had launched a major recruitment
campaign in 1915. As a result, the British army was
strengthened by about one million new recruits.
The German attacked the French fortress town of
Verdun in February, and the French were desperate
for help. The Somme was re-planned as a
diversionary campaign to relieve the pressure off
the French.
The offensive was preceded by a week long
bombardment, with 1500 guns shelling the German
lines continuously. The barrage did not destroy the
barbed wire and only informed the Germans of an
impending attack. They further strengthened their
defences.
When the shelling ended, the Germans, who had
been sheltering in deep dug-outs, quickly took up
their posts at the machine guns.
The first British soldiers went ‘over the top’ at 7.30
AM on 1st July 1916. They were there would be no
survivors and told to walk in line towards the enemy,
carrying heavy packs.
It went terribly wrong. The machine guns opened
fire, killing 20,000 and injuring 40,000 on the first
day alone. Despite heavy losses, Haig continued the
battle. In September tanks were used. Also, the
villages of Beaumont Hamel and Beaucourt were
captured using the new tactic, the creeping barrage.
Bad weather called it off in November 1916.
The British and Imperial
forces had over 400,000
casualties. Germany
suffered nearly 700,000
casualties.
The Germans had been
pushed back a little, 7
miles!
Haig was blamed and
called ‘the Butcher of the
Somme.’
Verdun had been relieved
and the French army
saved.
Why was the Battle of the Somme a disaster?
Failing Technology 1.75 million Shells were fired at German positions although 1/3 were duds and did not explode.
Haig did not have enough artillery cannons to destroy the trenches.
Poor Leadership
and Planning
Haig ignored reports that the barbed-wire had not been cut by the artillery bombardment.
Haig attacked the strongest part of the German lines.
Soldiers were told to walk across no man’s land in straight lines carrying heavy pack.
Haig failed to call of the attack despite the heavy casualties.
Factors outside
British Control
The Germans had built deep bunkers underground which protected German soldiers from the
artillery bombardment.
700,000 French soldiers had fallen defending Verdun and the French army could not spare
enough soldiers to contribute to the Battle of the Somme.
The Germans were skilled soldiers who were able to setup their machine guns in 5-minutes.
v
20.) Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele): Jul–Nov 1917
Causes What happened? Consequences
Haig needed to take the pressure off the French and
prevent their military collapse. Some of the French troops
has mutinied in April and May 1917 after the failed Nivelle
Offensive.
The Russians were suffering badly and were about to leave
the war, potentially leaving the Germans free to transfer
troops to the Western Front.
He still believed in attrition. He was convinced that the
Germans had been greatly weakened by the offensives of
1916 and were on the verge of collapse. He was also
personally committed to a ‘war-winning’ offensive in
Flanders.
He was convinced that he could achieve a quick
breakthrough at Ypres. The British could then advance
north and capture the Belgian ports of Zeebrugge and
Ostende, which were being used by the Germans as U-boat
bases.
The main attack was proceeded by an attack
on Messines Ridge, south of Ypres on 7th
June where 19 huge mines were detonated,
destroying the ridge but alerting the entire
German army.
An Initial bombardment of over 4.5 million
shells from 3000 guns was launched on 18th
July 1917. It lasted for ten days.
The first attack took place on 31st July 1917.
There was no breakthrough and, within a
week, the British had lost 30,000 men, By
October the fighting had reached the village
of Passchendaele, about 11km from the
starting point.
On 6th November Canadian troops finally
captured the village and then, because it was
so late in the year and the conditions on the
battlefield were getting worse, the
offensive was called off.
The British lost 250,000
men during the battle.
Haig reputation was
further discredited.
The British gained 11 km
of ground.
The Germans lost over
300,000 soldiers and had
been successfully
diverted from the French
further South, who were
still recovering from the
failed Nivelle Offensive.
Why was the Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele) a disaster?
Failing Technology Artillery bombardment failed to destroy the German defences.
Tanks and cavalry couldn’t move in the thick mud of the terrain.
Poor Leadership
and Planning
The German positions were on ridges above the town of Ypres that overlooked the British
positions. The Germans knew the British were planning a major attack.
Initially bombardment on the 18th July gave away the element of surprise.
Shelling churned the soil and destroyed the drainage system, flooding the terrain which made it
impossible to advance.
Main attack should have been at the Messines Ridge. Why did Haig wait a month?
Factors outside
British Control
Heaviest rain for 30 years turned the soil into a quagmire and prevented further advances.
Mud clogged the rifles and immobilised tanks. Men and horses drowned in their hundreds.
Shell holes just filled with rain water and provided no cover for advancing troops who couldn’t
keep up with the creeping barrage and were gunned down in their thousands.
Heavy rain meant planes could not spot artillery targets for the British.
The Germans used mustard gas for the first time which totally confused the British troops.
21.) What part did Haig play in the Stalemate?
Sir Douglas Haig was appointed commander of the British forces on the Western Front in December 1915. He has been
criticised by many people and was nicknamed the ‘Butcher of the Somme’ because of the heavy casualties during the
Somme offensive. He was blamed for his failure to break the stalemate.
Evidence for the ‘Butcher’ Evidence against the ‘Butcher’
Haig believed in a policy of attrition, which meant
wearing the enemy down with constant attacks even if it
meant heavy casualties
Haig faced a difficult task. Trench warfare was a new
kind of fighting.
Source A – Haig writing in 1919
In the course of the struggle, losses are bound to be heavy
on both sides, for in this the price of victory is paid. There
is no way avoiding this although our total losses in the war
may have been greater than were to be expected.
Source D – Haig writing in 1919
We attacked whenever possible, because a defensive policy
involves the loss of the initiative. The object of all war is
victory and a defensive attitude can never bring this about.
Source B – A letter written to the Daily Telegraph in
November 1916
We are slowly but surely killing off the best of the male
population of these islands. Can we afford to go on paying
the same sort of price for the same sort of gain?
Source E – A historian writing in 1991
If the criterion of a successful general is to win wars, Haig
must be judged a success. The cost of the victory was
appalling, but Haig’s military methods were in line with the
ideas of the time, when attrition was the method all sides
used to achieve victory.
Source C – From a school textbook about the First
World War, 1998
The High Command, and especially Haig, could not think of
any other form of warfare except to throw into battle
large numbers of men, month after month. Haig’s method
of winning the war was clumsy, expensive in loss of life and
based on a misreading of the facts.
Source F – From a modern world history textbook,
written in 2001
Haig believed that the key objective of his offensives were
achieved. The Battle of the Somme saved Verdun and the
French army. Passchendaele took the pressure off a
French army close to breaking point. Some of Germany’s
best troops were killed in both 1916 and 1917, preparing
the way for the Allied successes of 1918.
22.) The Gallipoli Campaign: 25th April – 9th Jan 1916
Causes What happened? Results
The attack on Turkey was the
idea of Winston Churchill, the
First Lord of the Admiralty,
who saw the attack at Gallipoli
as a way of breaking the
stalemate on the Western
Front. He believed that if the
Allies knocked the Turks out
of the war they could open up
an alternative front against
Austria & Germany.
The troops could not be
spared for the campaign so a
naval campaign was proposed,
with Allied ships sailing
through the Dardanelles to
the Turkish capital,
Constantinople.
The naval attack began on 18th
March 1915. The Turks had
put mines in the water, and 3
battleships were blown up,
forcing the Allies to call off
the campaign. It had failed
because the Allies had not
used proper minesweepers to
clear the Dardanelles.
The Allies now changed their plan to landings on the Gallipoli peninsula.
Troops would be used to capture the Turkish forts that guarded the
Dardanelles. They would attack the west coast of Gallipoli, cross
overland and capture the forts from behind. The attack was launched
on 25th April 1915, using a combination of British, ANZAC (Australian
and New Zealand Army Corps) and French troops led by Ian Hamilton.
The attack started with a British amphibious landing on five beaches at
Cape Helles, while the Anzacs landed further north at Anzac Cove. The
problem was that the Turks were already on all the beaches and mowed
down thousands of advancing troops. The soldiers did manage to secure
a foothold on the beach and dig in, resulting in a stalemate like the one
on the Western Front.
In August the British tried further landings at Suvla Bay, taking the
Turks unawares but the British commander delayed the advance and
the Turks managed to prevent any breakthrough inland.
The condition were terrible. Water was scarce & food was often
contaminated causing widespread dysentery. Of 7 ANZAC battalions
examined in September 1915, 78% of men had dysentery & 64% skin
sores. The dead were littered between trenches, rotting in the sun,
until both sides agreed a temporary ceasefire to bury the dead on 20th
May. In Winter temperatures drop and snow blizzards swept over men
without overcoats. On 28th November 15,000 died of exposure.
The Allies decided to call off the attack in December 1915. From 12th
onwards, groups of men were secretly lead away at night to waiting
boats and ferried away. More than 83,000 escaped without a single
death.
To most the campaign was a
disaster:
Turkey was not
knocked out of the war.
Bulgaria joined the war
on the side of the
Central Powers.
Churchill resigned due
to the campaign’s
failure.
There were 213,000
Allied deaths.
There were 300,000
Turkish deaths.
However the campaign did
have some minor
achievements:
The campaign diverted
the Turks from their
attack on Egypt and
attempts to seize the
Suez Canal.
No troops died during
the evacuation.
A few British
submarines sailed into
the Black Sea and
destroyed several
Turkish warships.
Why was the Gallipoli Campaign a Disaster?
Bad Planning
and
Leadership
The failed naval attack on the Dardanelles Straight was a disaster and alerted the Turks giving away the element of
surprise.
Detailed planning was not undertaken by senior commanders. No attempt was made to work out how many soldiers
and guns were needed.
Sir John French refused to allow any experienced commanders to leave the Western Front, starving the campaign
of experienced leadership. Hamilton’s only intelligence consisted of a 1912 manual on the Turkish army, old maps and
a tourist guidebook.
Failing
Technology
Warships used in the campaign were out of date and were of no help to the soldiers on land. Lack of minesweepers.
No airforce help or naval artillery support.
Other
Factors
Strong Turkish defence organised by German general Otto Liman von Sanders was unexpected and fierce.
Turkish soldiers occupied well dug in positions on hills and ridges above the beaches making it almost impossible for
the Allies to push in land.
23.) Key Events of the War at Sea: 1914-1915
British Navy German Navy
The British had the largest fleet, with 29 Dreadnoughts. These
were anchored at Scapa Flow, a protected and sheltered bay in the
Orkney islands, and at Cromarty. The battle cruisers were at
Rosyth.
The British also had a long naval tradition, having controlled the
seas throughout the 19th century.
Britain had one more advantage. Early in the war a German cruiser,
Magdeburg, was sunk by Russian ships in the Baltic Sea. The body
of a German officer was found clutching the German naval code
book. From then on Britain was able to decode German messages
and knew when enemy ships were leaving port.
The German fleet was smaller, with only 17 dreadnoughts in 1914. The
German High Seas fleet spent most of the time at its base in
Wilhelmshaven.
Germany had no naval tradition. The Kaiser had built up the navy in the
preceding 14 years.
Germany did have several advantages over Britain:
The German ships were of superior design, especially in the quality of
their steel armour protection.
The German gunners proved themselves to be superior marksmen.
Most German shells, unlike their British counterparts, exploded on hitting
enemy ships.
Event What happened? Results
British
Naval
Blockade:
August
1914 – July
1919
One of the first things Britain did on the outbreak of war was to order a naval blockade of Germany. This
meant stopping all ships heading for German ports and turning back or sinking any found to be carrying
food or supplies such as oil, steel or chemicals. During the war, about 12,000 ships were intercepted while
fewer than 80 slipped through. By 1916 there were serious food shortages, which led to riots in a number
of German towns. Some Germans called the winter of 1916 the ‘turnip winter’ because turnips seemed to
be the only food that people could get to eat.
British Victory
It is estimated that between
400,000-800,000 German
civilians died as a result of
starvation caused by the
blockade.
The Battle
of
Heligoland
Bight:
August
1914
This was the first naval battle of the First World War, and it took place in August 1914. Fast British
destroyers deliberately sailed close to the German coast. They were pursued by more powerful German
cruisers, which sailed into a trap – the British battle cruiser fleet under Admiral Beatty was waiting for
them further out at sea. Three German cruisers and a destroyer were sunk. This gave great
encouragement to the British public at this very early stage of the war, and Admiral Beatty became a
popular hero.
British Victory
Britain: 1 ship damaged, 35
killed, 55 wounded.
Germany: 6 ships sunk, 6
ships damaged, 712 killed, 149
wounded, 336 captured.
Result: German navy
instructed to remain in port.
German
Raids on
the East
Coast:
December
1914
In December 1914 the Germans decided to raid the east coast of Britain. This would (a) strike a blow at
the morale of the British people and the reputation of the British navy and (b) force the navy to spread
out its fleet along Britain’s North Sea coast. This, in turn, would allow the German fleet to target single
British ships without having to face the full ‘Grand Fleet’. The first raid was on Hartlepool at 8.10 AM on
16th December. Whitby and Scarborough were also shelled that day and about 500 civilians were killed or
wounded. The British public was outraged and, at first, criticised its own navy for failing to protect its
coastline. One British headline said, ‘Germans creep out to attack east coast’.
German Victory?
Britain: 137 killed, 592
injured, 3 ships damaged.
Germany: 3 damaged ships.
Result: Public outrage
towards the German navy,
recruitment boost in England.
The Battle
of Dogger
Bank:
25th
January
1915
On 24th January 1915 the British intercepted German radio signals suggesting the German battle cruiser
fleet was sailing to Dogger Bank to attack the British fishing fleet. Admiral Beatty’s battle cruisers lay in
wait and, in the ensuing battle, two German battle cruisers were sunk. The German fleet had been taken
by surprise and there were no further raids on the British coast. But the battle was not a total success
for the British. Beatty’s flagship, HMS Lion, was damaged and had to slow down, enabling remaining
German ships to escape.
British Victory
Britain: 2 ships damaged, 15
killed, 32 wounded.
Germany: 2 ships sunk, 954
killed, 80 wounded, 189
captured.
Result: Raids on England were
stopped but German ships
escaped.
24.) The Battle of Jutland: 31st May 1916
Causes What happened? Results
In an attempt to end
British control of
the sea and the
blockade of
Germany, Scheer
planned to lure the
British battle
cruisers into a trap
using his own cruiser
fleet.
British Admiral
Jellicoe, commander
of the British Grand
Fleet, had decoded
the German message
and come up with a
plan of his own.
On 31st May 1916, Beatty arrived first off the
coast of Jutland because his ships were faster
and he had less distance to travel. His cruisers
fought against the German cruisers led by Hipper.
It soon became clear that the Germans could fire
they guns more accurately and that there was
something seriously wrong with the British ships.
The armour plating on the gun turrets was too
thin, which meant that they were easily destroyed
by direct hits.
Two British cruisers blew up and at that moment
the great battleships of Scheer’s fleet arrived.
Beatty was in trouble and he steered north to lure
Scheer towards Jellicoe’s fleet. The Germans
followed the trap as Jellicoe’s fleet of
dreadnoughts opened fire.
Scheer and Hipper, realising they had sailed into a
trap, turned for home as night began to fall.
Jellicoe did not chase them until it was too late.
By morning, the Germans had escaped safely to
port.
British Victory?
The Germans had the best exchanges but
the British fleet was simply too large.
Britain = 14 ships sunk, 6094 killed, 674
wounded, 177 captured.
Germany = 11 ships sunk, 2551 killed, 507
wounded.
Britain Won = The Germans had fled the
battle and the German navy rarely went to
sea again, leaving the British blockade
untouched. A US newspaper said of the
battle, ‘The German fleet has assaulted its
jailor, but it is still in jail.’ The Germans was
forced to resort to unrestricted U-boat
warfare, which brought the USA into the
war.
Germany won = The German inflicted the
greater losses and the British suffered
heavier casualties. German gunnery and ship
design was also shown to be far better in
battle.
25.) German U-boat Campaign & Anti U-boat Measures
Date What happened? Results
1914:
Initial
Campaign
The initial aim of the U-boat campaign was to sink capital ships of the British Grand
Fleet, thereby reducing the Grand Fleet’s numerical superiority over the German High
Seas Fleet. In October 1914 the first attacks on merchant ships began
Allied Losses = 312,672 tonnes
German Losses = 5 U-Boats
1915: War
on
Commerce
In February 1915, the German government decided to broaden its attacks on
merchant ships supplying Britain. There were about 15,000 sailings each week to and
from British ports, and the Germans felt they had to try and cripple the British war
effort. They indicated that U-boats would attack any ship, regardless of country, in
British waters. This became known as unrestricted submarine warfare. The threat to
British food and other supplies from the USA was evident. On the 7th May 1915, the
passenger ship Lusitania was sunk with the loss of 1198 lives, some were US citizens.
There was an outcry in the USA and the Germans were forced to scale back their
operations.
Allied Losses = 1,307,996 tonnes
German Losses = 19 U-Boats
1916: The
High Seas
Fleet
The Germany navy spent most of 1916 trying again to trap the British Grand
Fleet, without success. U-boats continued to harass Allied shipping in the
Mediterranean and American waters.
Allied Losses = 2,327,326 tonnes
German Losses = 22 U-Boats
1917:
Resumption
of
Unrestricted
U-boat
Warfare
In February 1917 Germany decided to begin unrestricted submarine warfare again in
the hope of bringing Britain to its knees. It was a gamble because there was always
the chance that the USA might enter the way if US vessels were attacked on a
regular basis. The Germans had great successes in 1917. By April Britain had only six
weeks’ food supply left. In response to the new submarine programme, the USA
declared war on Germany on 6th April.
Allied Losses = 6,235,878 tonnes
German Losses = 63 U-Boats
1918: End
of the War
By 1918, the establishment of the convoy system had ensured that Allied ships were
protected and U-boat losses increased dramatically. By the Autumn, it was clear that
Germany would not win and on 24th October, all German U-boats were ordered home.
Allied Losses = 2,666,942 tonnes
German Losses = 69 U-Boats
How did Britain manage to defeat the U-Boat threat?
Q Ships
This was first used in 1915. It looked like a harmless cargo vessel, but it carried powerful guns disguised as freight or
even as cabins on deck. When a U-boat surfaced to search the ship, the crew would wait until the enemy was on deck,
making it impossible for the submarine to dive quickly. Then the guns would be revealed and the U-boat sunk. This only
worked for a short period. U-boats soon stopped surfacing.
Horned
Mines
These were large round metal containers packed with explosives. Several spikes or ‘horns’ stuck out – if a ship touched a
horn, the mine would explode. By 1918 both the English Channel and the North Sea had been closed off by rows of deadly
mines under the surface, however U-boats would surface at nights and sail over these mines. Not until 1918 were
searchlight fitted across the Channel.
Depth
Charge
&
Hydrophone
A depth charge was a container about the size of a large oil drum, packed with explosives. It was dropped in the sea above
a suspected U-boat and could be set to explode at a certain depth. Some ships were fitted with hydrophones. Sounds
travel easily under water and an operator with headphones could hear a nearby submarine engine.
The Convoy
System
This proved the most successful idea and was introduced in June 1917. A convoy was a group of ships sailing together and
protected by fast warships such as armed trawlers or destroyers fitted with depth charges and hydrophones. From June
1917 to November 1918, 16,539 ships sailed in convoys and only 154 were torpedoed. In addition many more U-boats were
sunk whilst attacking the convoys.
Raids on U-
boat Bases
The British attempted to block off the U-boat bases at Ostend and Zeebrugge using block ships which were sunk at the
entrance to the harbours. These two attacks, in early 1918, had limited success and did not completely block off the
ports.
26.) Why did the USA enter the War in 1917?
Reason What happened? Results
The
Sinking of
the
Lusitania
At 3.10 PM on 8th May 1915, the British passenger liner Lusitania was sunk with the
loss of 1198 lives including 128 Americans.
Germany justified the attack by saying that the Lusitania was carrying munitions and
was therefore a legitimate target. This was later proved by historian to be correct.
However the British government was keen to portray this event as an atrocity in the
hope that the USA might join the war on the side of the Allies. The British Daily
Express claimed: ‘It is simply an act of piracy. Noting more.’
President Woodrow Wilson
demanded reparations from
Germany and an assurance that
such an attack would not recur.
As a result of the US reaction,
Germany cut back its attacks on
merchant shipping and ended
unrestricted submarine warfare,
which ensured the USA’s
continued neutrality.
The
Zimmerman
Telegram
Britain intercepted a coded message sent from the German Foreign Minister,
Zimmermann, to the German ambassador in Mexico. The message was to the effect
that if the USA entered the war, then Mexico should ally itself with Germany.
Germany was proposing financial aid to Mexico and, following a German victory, would
return to Mexico its former territories of Texas, Arizona and New Mexico, which
were by the part of the USA. Germany was also hoping to create some form of
agreement with Japan. If successful, these friendships would divert the USA’s
attention from the European war zone.
Britain gave the US government
a translation of the message and
it served to push the USA closer
towards the Allies.
Other
Reasons
Relations soured further between the USA and Germany in March 1917 when four US
ships were sunk with the loss of 36 lives.
The overthrow of Russia’s Tsar Nicholas II in the same month meant that Wilson and
others in the US government now felt more able to join Britain and France because
they would not be allying with the autocratic government of Russia. They could put
over the idea of a war being fought for democracy against the tyranny of Germany
and Austria-Hungary to the people of the USA.
On 6th April 1917, the USA
declared war on Germany.
What was the US contribution to the Allied war effort?
From the beginning of the USA’s involvement in the war, President Wilson stressed that it was seeking to remove the tyranny of
autocratic governments like that of Germany. Britain and France saw the total defeat of Germany as paramount, and France, in
particular, wanted to ensure that Germany would no longer be the most powerful country in Europe. The differing aims of the Allies were
to become problematic at the end of war as they attempted to agree a peace settlement with Germany.
By the end of 1917, there were over 200,000 US soldiers in Europe but they were not as well trained as the British or French. The
arrival of the US troops gave fresh impetus to the war-weary troops serving there. The USA troops in 1918 made important
contributions in defeating the German Spring Offensive, and in the final three months of the war at St Mihiel and Meuse-Argonne. In
total 4,355,000 US soldiers were mobilised for war, with 1,950,000 facing active service on the Western Front. Total casualties
amounted to 318,203 with 120,144 killed and 198,059 wounded.
27.) German Spring Offensive: March 1918
Causes What happened? Effects?
By the end of 1917, Germany’s new High
Command was aware that the longer the war
went on, the less likely Germany was to win.
They were also optimistic about the
potential for success in 1918:
Russia was forced to withdraw from the war
in 1917 and signed a peace treaty with
Germany March 1918. This enabled Germany
to transfer over 500,000 troops to the
Western Front.
American troops were being sent to France
and it wouldn’t be long before American
industry and manpower would begin to tell.
The British Naval Blockade was seriously
affecting German supplies. USA had stopped
trading with Germany as had Sweden and
Denmark – something had to be done.
Germany’s Allies Failing – Austria was in
stalemate in Italy and Turkey was being
pushed back in the Middle East. Germany
would soon be fighting alone and needed a
victory.
These causes persuaded General Ludendorff and Field
Marshal Hindenburg to launch a dramatic attempt to win the
war. Ludendorff’s aim was to cut through the Somme and then
wheel north-west to cut the British lines of communication.
He intended to avoid the British strong points and sweep the
British forces in order to cut them off from the French. The
offensive was codenamed Operation Michael.
The attack started on 21st March, using artillery and mustard
gas. The Germans used specially trained ‘stormtroopers’ –
small groups of soldiers that would surprise attack across no
man’s land, using cover to avoid mass casualties. They
advanced 8 km on the first day and the British retreated in
chaos. They eventually got to within 60 km of Paris.
The problem was they were too successful – the supporting
forces bringing supplies of munitions and food could not keep
up with the advance.
Many German soldiers actually wasted time looting French
shops in the areas they captured for food due to
malnutrition.
The offensive failed to push through Allied defences
completely, and the exhausted German soldiers could no
longer press the attack and it was called off in July.
By the end of the
offensive, 880,000
German casualties had
been suffered and
Ludendorff needed
200,000 fresh troops
each month to continue
the war. He was told
the reserves could only
supply about 300,000
for the whole of the
next twelve months.
The German High
Command had made its
gamble and now knew
that defeat was not far
away.
The Germans had left
the Hindenburg Line
and were dangerously
overstretched. This
gave the Allies the
perfect opportunity to
counter-attack.
28.) Why did Germany collapse in 1918?
Cause What happened?
British
naval
blockade
of
Germany
This had a serious effect on the German war effort. Industry ran short of fuel and chemicals for explosives and gas. By
the end of the second year of war, imports had fallen by almost half on 1913 levels. Agriculture was severely hit by the
inability to import fertilisers. German ships were trapped in port. By 1916, food riots broke out in many German cities as
people demanded more bread. In the ‘turnip winter’ of 1917, the supply of potatoes ran out. By 1918 starvation had hit
millions of Germans and rationing was introduced. The constant queuing for food was eroding enthusiasm for the war.
About 120,000 died of hunger in 1916 and this figure rose to 290,000 in 1918. By 1918 there were riots and strikes as the
civilian population demanded an end to the war.
Entry of
the USA
into the
War
The entry of the USA on the Allied side certainly hastened the end of the war. It forced Ludendorff to gamble. It
greatly increased the morale of the Allied troops and gave the Allies the benefits of American industry and manpower,
whilst denying these to Germany. In total, around 2 million American soldiers served on the Western front.
Impact of
the
Bolshevik
Revolution
The impact of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was also important because many socialists in Germany saw the chance to
copy Lenin and remove the Kaiser. They saw the idea of establishing a socialist country as a real possibility, and there was
an increasing number of strikes in October 1918. Workers’ Councils were set up across Germany. A general strike was
proclaimed for 9th November in Berlin. German politicians were becoming worried – if they failed to change the
government, there might be the danger of a communist revolution.
Role of
Tanks
These proved a war winning weapon in 1918. They were used correctly by Haig on 8th August 1918 to force a gap in the
German trenches which was then exploited by infantry assaults.
Failure of
Operation
Michael
The failure of Operation Michael was the sign to the German High Command that they could not win the war. The
Germans suffered over 800,000 casualties and no longer had the manpower to resist Allied counter-attacks, especially
with the recent entry of nearly 2 million US soldiers. The Allied counter-attack launched on 8th August 1918 pushed the
Germans back on a 320km front. It was clear that an armistice had to be agreed otherwise the Allies would push them
back into Germany.
Defeat of
Germany’s
Allies
Germany's allies collapsed in 1918. Driven back by Serbian and French troops during 1918, the Bulgarian army surrendered
on 29th September. A month later, on 30th October, the Turkish forces surrendered to combined British and Arab
troops. On 3rd November the forces of the Austro-Hungarian Empire surrendered as Czech, Polish and other troops
mutinied against the hated Austrians.
Revolution
in Germany
Discontent in Germany due to food shortages and a serious flu epidemic which killed thousands led to the abdication of
the Kaiser and a new German republic. In October 1918, German sailors at the Kiel naval base mutinied and refused to
follow orders. The army was not sent to crush the mutiny and rebellions soon spread to Wilhelmshaven and other German
cities. Chaos reigned and Kaiser Wilhelm II was forced to abdicate on 9th November 1918. The new government of the
Social Democratic Party led by Freidrich Ebert concluded an armistice with the Allies on 11th November 1918.
A2: Origins and Course of the First
World War, 1905-1918 – Exam Questions
Paper 2, Section A topics are split into three questions. The wording and pattern of the questions will
always be the same so remember the three types of questions you have to deal with: a) Making
inferences from a source b) Cross-referencing and comparing sources c) Evaluating a historical claim.
Possible topics include:
You only have about 45 minutes max to answer all three sub-questions. The amount of marks for each
questions should help you judge how much to write. For Question a) give 5 minutes, Question b) 10
minutes, Question c) 30 minutes. Grade boundaries are at the end of document.
The Alliance System and International Rivalry, 1905-1914
The Alliance System before 1914 including the Triple Alliance and the formation of the Triple Entente.
Economic, Imperial and Military Causes of international rivalry.
The Stuggle for Control of the Balkans, 1905-1914
The key issues in the Balkans including the weaknesses of the Ottoman Empire, Balkan nationalism, Austro-
Serbian rivalry, The Bosnian Crisis, The Balkan War.
The Growth of Tension in Europe, 1905-1914
Anglo-German rivalry, the Naval Arms Race, The First and Second Moroccan Crises 1905-6 and 1911. The
Assassination at Sarajevo and the events leading to the outbreak of war.
The Schlieffen Plan and Deadlock on the Western Front
The Schlieffen Plan and why it failed, the trench system, life in the trenches, new weapons and methods,
reasons for deadlock, key features of the Somme and Passchendaele, successes and failures, Responsibility
of Haig.
The War at Sea and Gallipoli
German threat to Britain in North Sea, German Raids, Heligoland Bight, Dogger Bank, Battle of Jutland, The
U-Boat threat, the Lusitania, Anti U-boat measures, reasons for and key features of the Gallipoli Campaign,
Evacuation and effects of campaign.
The Defeat of Germany
US entry into war, Key features of the Ludendorff Spring Offensives 1918, The Allied drive to victory
(July-November 1918), Revolution in Germany and Reasons for German Defeat.
Question 1 – The Schlieffen Plan 1
This question is about the German invasion of Belgium and France using the Schlieffen Plan in 1914.
Study Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - A British cartoon showing the German attack on Belgium, August 1914. The
title of the cartoon is ‘Bravo Belgium’.
Source B
From an account of the Battle of Mons, August 1914, written by Walter Bloem, a
German soldier.
We had no sooner left the edge of the wood than a volley of bullets whistled past our noses
and cracked into the trees behind. Five or six cries near me, five or six of my grey
uniformed lads collapsed on the grass. Damn it, this was serious! Forward again at the
double. More firing, closer now and tearing into our ranks, more lads falling. From now on
matters went from bad to worse. We had to go back. It was a bad defeat, in our first
battle we had been beaten by the English.
Source C
From an account of the Battle of Mons, August 1914, by Corporal Holbrook of the British
Army.
You couldn’t see the earth for them [Germans] there were that many. Time after time our officers
gave the order ‘Rapid Fire’. Well, you didn’t wait for the order, really! You’d see a lot of them coming
in a mass on the other side of the canal and you just let them have it. They kept retreating, and then
coming forward, and then retreating again. Of course we were losing men and a lot of officers
especially when the Germans started this shrapnel shelling and, of course, they had machine-guns –
masses of them. But we kept flinging them back. I don’t know how many times we saw them off.
Source D
From a modern history textbook.
Von Kluck, the German commander, decided he could not swing around to the west of Paris, according
to the original plan, so he advanced straight towards it. While the Germans marched on foot, the
French diverted troops to Paris by rail, and then on to the front. The German army was weary and
overstretched. The French were fighting to save their country. The German advance was eventually
halted at the River Marne.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the German
invasion of Belgium in 1914. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the Battle of Mons? Explain
your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main reason for the failure of the Schleiffen Plan was the action of the French
army at the Battle of the Marne.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 2 – The Schlieffen Plan 2
This question is about the Schlieffen Plan of 1914. Study Source A, B, C and D and then answer all
the questions that follow:
Source A - A painting by a British artist in August 1914 showing the Belgian defence of
Liege against the advancing German army.
Source B: From a diary of a German soldier who fought at the Battle of Mons, August 1914.
We had no sooner left the edge of the wood than a hail of bullets from the British whistled past
our noses. The 160 German troops that left the wood with me were now reduced to 100. From now
on matters went from bad to worse. Wherever I looked there were dead or wounded. We were
being driven back, badly beaten by the British – by the British we had laughed at a few hours
before.
Source C: From the diary of a British officer in the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) after
the Battle of Mons.
The battle showed that well-directed fire could mow the enemy down with very little risk to those
who were firing. The Germans must have suffered ten times as many casualties as us. The battle
also showed that the enemy had no plan of action and did not try to make use of cover. If they had
had a proper plan, they would have pushed us back in a quarter of the time they did.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the Belgian
defence of Liege. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the Battle of Mons? Explain
your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main reason for the failure of the Schleiffen Plan was the changes made by Von
Moltke.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Source D: From a history of the First World War, published in 2007.
Von Moltke, the German commander, made crucial changes to the original plan. The German armies
that invaded Belgium were 100,000 soldiers fewer than Schlieffen’s original estimates because von
Moltke sent additional men to reinforce the Russian front. In addition, German armies were
supposed to encircle Paris. This part of the plan was abandoned in early September, leading to the
Battle of the Marne.
Question 3 – The Schlieffen Plan 3
This question is about the First World War in 1914 after the failure of the Schlieffen Plan. This
period on the Western Front, between October-November 1914, is sometimes known as the ‘Race to
the Sea’. Study Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - A British drawing showing an attack by German troops on British trenches during
the First Battle of Ypres, October 1914.
Source B
From a modern textbook about the First World War.
In late-October 1914 the Germans tried to break through the British lines at Ypres.
The Germans had a considerable numerical advantage over the BEF's seven infantry divisions and
three cavalry divisions. For replacements, General French could only count on a few divisions of
Indian troops already en route as reinforcements. The Indian units would soon prove to be
outstanding fighters in both offence and defence.
The attacks began along a narrow front on 31 October when German cavalry drove a smaller British
cavalry unit from its position near the village of Messines. Shortly after, German forces engaged the
British further to the north, but a ferocious British counterattack repelled the Germans. Thanks to
superior British rifle fire, they were able to hold this sector. The British rifles were so fast and
deadly that the Germans mistakenly believed they were facing British machine guns.
Source C
Extract from a book written by a British soldier in 1917, ‘From Mons to Ypres with General
French’. Here he describes an attack by troops of an Indian unit on German positions in the
village of Messines during the First Battle of Ypres, October-November 1914.
The Sikhs charged magnificently. They got into the village, and the houses were the scenes of many a
hand-to-hand fight. One big Sikh brought back three prisoners.
But close-quarter fighting and individual conflicts in the buildings of the town scattered the Sikhs.
Soon the Germans brought a couple of machine-guns into play at the end of a street, mowing down the
big fellows in squads as they came within range. Their officers were down, save one or two. No
cohesive body could be formed to take the machine-guns, so back the Sikhs came, straggling and
demoralised, the effect of their splendid charge made ineffective by their inexperience of this kind
of warfare.
Source D
From the despatch by British Commander Sir John French on 20th November 1914. In it he was writing
to his superiors in Britain about the battles between the Battle of the Marne (September 1914) and the
First Battle of Ypres (October-November 1914). This period is sometimes known as the ‘Race to the
Sea’.
General Rawlinson informed me that large hostile forces were advancing upon him from the east and north-east,
and that his left flank was severely threatened. I was aware of the threats from that direction, but hoped that
at this particular time that these could be held off by the combined efforts of the French and British Cavalry,
and the Territorial troops supporting them. It was probably wise of Rawlinson not to launch a full attack by
British troops in their somewhat weakened condition; but the result was that the enemy's continued possession
of Menin (near Ypres) and its railway junction certainly aided the rapid reinforcement of German troops and
this meant any further British advance was impossible.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about fighting on the Western
Front during 1914. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the difficulties soldiers faced in
achieving a breakthrough against enemy lines? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main reason neither side was able to break through on the Western Front in October-
November 1914 was the rapid movement of troops to defend against an enemy attack.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this view.
(15)
Question 4 – Life in the Trenches
This question is about conditions and life in the trenches on the Western Front. Study Source A, B, C
and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - Photograph of German soldiers in the trenches on the Western Front in 1916.
Source B
In May 1915 Winston Churchill resigned his post as First Lord of the Admiralty and in
November went as an army officer to France. On his second night in the trenches near Neuve
Chapelle he wrote to his wife.
Filth and rubbish everywhere; graves built into the defences with feet and clothing breaking through
the soil; water and muck on all sides. There is a non-stop sound of rifles and machine-guns, and
whining of bullets which pass overhead.
Source C
An extract from a diary kept by a civilian. The writer was helping in a hospital in Britain.
3rd August 1916. One patient was a Regular soldier before 1914. He served in Gallipoli as well as
France. He says that getting to the front-line trenches is a hundred times worse than being in them.
It means possibly an eight-mile walk through narrow trenches each man burdened with kit. In muddy
weather progress is difficult; he remembers mud waist deep. By the time the front-line trenches are
reached men are dead-tired.
Source D
From a modern British history book about the First World War.
A [British] soldier usually served in the trenches only for short periods. Of 20,000 men in a division,
only 2,000 were in the front line at any moment. A typical month would be: four days in the front
line, four in the support trenches, eight in reserve and the remainder in rest areas.
The section of the front where a soldier served was also important. Anywhere near Ypres was always
bad, but many other areas were very quiet.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about conditions for
soldiers in the trenches. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the experience for soldiers in
the trenches? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘Life in the trenches was unpleasant rather than dangerous.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 5 – Deadlock on the Western Front 1
This question is about the deadlock on the Western Front. Study Source A, B, C and D and then
answer all the questions that follow:
Source A – An illustration from The Illustrated London News, 29th July 1916, with the title
‘The Surreys Play the Game.’
SOURCE B: A German soldier describes ‘going over the top’ during a German offensive
of April 1915.
At noon we went over the top. After less than a hundred metres we ran up against an almost
concrete wall of whistling and whining machine-gun bullets. My company commander had his
face shot away. A young boy cried for his mother, blood spurting from a wound in his face.
Whole rows of men on either side of me, in front and behind, fell, one after another. We
suffered horrific casualties. We had no chance.
SOURCE C: A German soldier’s account of the first day of the Somme, 1 July 1916.
Our machine guns were hurriedly placed in position. A series of extended lines of infantry
were seen moving forward from the British trenches. The British came on at a steady pace as
if expecting to find nothing alive in our front trenches. A few moments later, when the
leading British line was within a hundred metres, the rattle of our machine-gun fire broke
out. All along the line, sections seemed to fall. All along the line men could be seen throwing
up their arms and collapsing, never to move again.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about fighting on the
Western Front during the First World War. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the attacks on the Western
Front? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main reason for the deadlock on the Western Front was the tactics of the
commanders on both sides.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
SOURCE D: From a textbook on the First World War, published in 2007.
Both sides made attempts to break through between 1915 and 1917, without success. The
trench system, supported by the machine gun, was too strong. New weapons such as gas and
tanks failed to break the stalemate. However, the main reason for the deadlock was the
tactics of the Allied and German commanders who persisted for three years with the belief
that using large numbers of troops in an attack would succeed against machine guns and
trenches.
Question 6 – Deadlock on the Western Front 2
This question is about the deadlock on the Western Front. Study Source A, B, C and D and then
answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - A British painting showing an attack by British troops on German trenches at Neuve
Chapelle, March 1915.
Source B: From an account by a British soldier who fought on the Western Front. He is
describing a British attack on the German trenches on 1st July 1916, the first day of
the Somme.
The 1st Rifle Brigade advanced in perfect order. Everything was working smoothly, not a shot
being fired. We had nearly reached the German front line, when all at once machine-guns
opened up all along our front with a murderous fire. We were caught in the open, with no
shelter. Men were falling all around us. I tripped over dead bodies and fell headlong into a shell
hole. Bodies were strung out on the barbed wire.
Source C: From an interview with a British soldier who served on the Western Front. He
is describing a British attack during the Somme offensive.
Hundreds of dead were strung out on the barbed wire. Quite as many died on the enemy wire
as on the ground. It was clear that there was no gap in the wire at the time of the attack. The
Germans must have been reinforcing the wire for months. How did the planners imagine that
the British soldiers would survive the machine gun fire and the barbed wire?
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about fighting on the
Western Front during the First World War. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the failure of the British
attacks at the Somme in July 1916? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main reason for the deadlock on the Western Front was the tactics of the
commanders on both sides.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Source D: From a modern history textbook, published in 2005.
The commanders on both sides had little or no idea about trench warfare and the tactics
necessary to break the deadlock. Many of the senior British generals had very out-of-date
ideas. They still believed that the cavalry would win wars. They persisted for over three years
with the belief that numbers of infantry soldiers would achieve a breakthrough against
machine-guns and barbed wire.
Question 7 – The Use of Tanks
This question is about the use of tanks and the defeat of Germany. Study Source A, B, C and D and
then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - A British painting showing tanks being used during an Allied Offensive, Aug 1918.
Source B: From A Company of Tanks written in 1920 by a British tank commander. He is
describing the use of tanks during August 1918.
We had repeated the success of Cambrai, breaking through the German trenches and taking a
great number of German prisoners. The thick mist at dawn had protected the tanks, but it had
not been dense enough to seriously handicap the drivers. The advance, spearheaded by the
tanks, had been rapid, and only in one or two villages had the enemy shown any strong defence.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the use of tanks
on the Western Front in 1918. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the use of tanks on the
Western Front in 1918? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main cause of the defeat of Germany in 1918 was the use of tanks.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Source C: From an account written by a British commander in 1947. He is describing the
Western Front in 1918.
Tanks only really affected the morale of the British soldiers. From what I saw, it was clear
that the troops were pleased to see them. Tanks were some use for crushing enemy machine
gun posts and artillery. They were less effective in moving across enemy territory where there
were huge craters and damaged trenches.
Source D: From a textbook about the First World War, published in 1993.
By mid-1913, the Germans had several weaknesses. Their soldiers were exhausted after
Ludendorff’s failed offensives of March-June. The German war effort had been seriously
disrupted by the British naval blockade. On the other hand, the Allies had several advantages.
Their armies were being constantly reinforced by the arrival of fresh American troops. The
unified command under General Foch enabled the Allies to coordinate their attacks.
Question 8 – Gallipoli 1
This question is about the Allied attack against the Turks at Gallipoli in 1915. Study Source A, B, C
and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - Painting, by Charles Dixon, of the landings by Australian troops at Anzac Cove on
the Gallipoli Peninsula, April 1915.
Source B
Extract from a letter home written by Captain Guy Dawnay, a British officer involved in the
Gallipoli campaign, April 1915.
The landing place was a difficult one. A narrow, sandy beach backed by a very high intricate mass of
hills, those behind the beach being exceedingly steep. The moment the boats landed the troops had
to rush forward for those hills, almost cliff-like, only 50 yards away. I went ashore there yesterday,
into their position, and it seemed almost incredible that any troops could have got up that hillside
fully armed and equipped.
Source C
Extract from the diary of Captain Aubery Herbert, a British officer attached to an Australian
unit in the landings of April 1915.
We landed on a narrow piece of land. There were lines of men clinging like cockroaches under the
cliffs. The only thing to do was to dig in, but a good many men were shot while trying to do this.
We slept on a ledge a few feet above the beach. Firing went on all night. In the morning it was very
cold, and we were all soaked. The Navy, it appeared, had landed us in the wrong place. This made the
Army very angry, though as things turned out it was the one bright spot. Had we landed anywhere
else, we would have been wiped out.
Source D
Extract from a modern book about the First World War, The Great War: Myth and Reality,
by D Marshall, written in 1988.
The [Gallipoli] expedition was plagued by inadequate resources. The question arose, if Britain lacked
the resources to conduct such a campaign, was it wise to attempt it in the first place?
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the landings on the
Gallipoli Peninsula. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the difficulties troops faced
when landing on the beaches of the Gallipoli Peninsula? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The Gallipoli Campaign failed because of chronically bad planning.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 9 – Gallipoli 2
This question is about the Allied attack against the Turks at Gallipoli in 1915. Study Source A, B, C
and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - Australian troops go ‘over-the-top’ in an attack on Turkish positions at Gallipoli.
Source B
From an account by a British officer who fought at Gallipoli.
The Turks had sited their trenches very cleverly on the higher ground and it was often useless to
attack one set before another had been taken. There were two difficulties: getting the attacks
underway at all, and then supporting them properly. The trenches became congested, the telephone
wires were cut by shrapnel and the whole show got out of control. The idea was always to go through
with a rush and to disregard losses. This tactic had no chance against determined defenders armed
with machine guns.
Source C
From a history textbook, published 2001.
British and ANZAC attacks failed to break through against strongly defended Turkish trenches and
machine guns which were sited on higher ground. For the Turks, this was a Holy War, a struggle to
drive out Christian invaders from Muslim Turkey. Time and again, the Turks charged downhill on the
Allies. Despite suffering very heavy casualties from machine-gun fire, the Turks continued their
charges.
Source D
From the memoirs of a British officer who fought at Gallipoli.
The major problem was that attacks were carried out by men who had been seriously weakened by
the conditions in the trenches. The dead bodies in no-man’s land attracted horrendous numbers of
flies which, in turn, contaminated our food. Typhoid and dysentery were rife. Those that didn’t get
either suffered other very unpleasant tummy troubles.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the nature of a
trench attack during the Gallipoli Campaign. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the attempts to break through
at Gallipoli? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘Living conditions in the trenches were the main reason why the Gallipoli Campaign
failed.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 10 – Gallipoli 3
This question is about the Allied attack against the Turks at Gallipoli in 1915. Study Source A, B, C
and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - Allied troops come ashore during landings at ‘V Beach’ at Cape Helles during the
Gallipoli Campaign, April 1915.
Source B - An eyewitness, John Masefield, describes the landings at Suvla Bay, August 1915.
From every Turkish rifle and machine-gun began a murderous fire upon the ships and boats. Almost
all the shots hit their target. Many were killed in the water and many who were wounded were swept
away and drowned. Others, trying to swim in the fierce current, were drowned by the weight of their
equipment. But some reached the shore. These instantly rushed to try and cut the wire
entanglements, and were killed. Only a handful reached cover.
Source C - An Australian folk song of the First World War.
We sailed off to Gallipoli.
How well I remember the day
When the blood stained the sand and the water
And how in that hell that they called Suvla Bay
We were butchered like lambs to the slaughter.
Jonny Turk was ready,
He primed himself well,
He showered us with bullets and he rained us with shells
And in five minutes flat he’d blown us to hell
Nearly blew us back to Australia.
Source D – From a modern history book about Gallipoli.
There was a lack of up-to-date knowledge about Turkish troop positions. The instructions for the
campaign were vague. Kitchener had only a hazy idea of what was needed. General Hamilton was the
Allied Commander of Gallipoli. His only intelligence consisted of a 1912 manual on the Turkish army,
some old inaccurate maps, a tourist guide book and what little could be found out from the Turkish
desk at the Foreign Office.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about landings at
Gallipoli. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the landings at Suvla Bay in
August 1915? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The Gallipoli Campaign failed because of poor planning.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 11 – Battle of the Somme
This question is about the first day of the Battle of the Somme, 1st July 1916. Study Source A, B, C
and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - British soldiers advance across No-Man’s Land in the Battle of the Somme on 1st
July 1916. The dark strip is the forward trench of the British lines.
Source B
Account of the first hours of the battle from Sidney Appleyard, who was held in reserve as
part of the attack by the London Division on 1st July 1916. Appleyard wrote this shortly after
the battle.
By 8 o’clock all the smoke had cleared and it was risky to look over the parapet, for the Germans had
machine-guns fixed on these trenches. The first news to reach us was from the London Rifle Brigade
who reported that they had successfully moved through the first three German lines and had taken a
large number of prisoners. This sounded good but no news was received from our boys until 9.30 a.m.
when B Company sent word back that they had reached the Hun second line, but that other companies
were held up, the Germans putting up a stubborn resistance.
Source C
The account of Corporal W. H. Shaw of the British Army. Here he describes the attacks on
German lines on the first day of the Battle of the Somme.
Our artillery had been bombing that line for six days and nights, trying to smash the German barbed-
wire entanglements, but they hadn’t made any impact in clearing them. The result was we never got
anywhere near the Germans. Our lads were just mown down; they were simply slaughtered. It was
just one continuous advance, retreat, advance, retreat, losing men all the time and there we were,
wondering when it was going to end. You couldn’t do anything. You were either tied down by the
shelling or the machine-guns, and yet we kept at it, kept on going along the line, making no impact on
the Germans at all.
Source D
From a history of the First World War, published in 1989.
British security surrounding the Somme offensive was by no means perfect. Indeed the Germans
knew well in advance about the attack and were well-prepared. German defenders had regularly
practised rushing their machine-guns up from the dug-outs. This had been perfected to a three-
minute-drill.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the British attack
in the Battle of the Somme on 1st July 1916. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the British attacks on the first
day of the Battle of the Somme? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘German preparations were the main reason for the British failure on the first day of
the Somme.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 12 – Technological Developments
This question is about the use of technological developments in warfare on the Western Front. Study
Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - ‘Gassed’, a painting, by J S Sargent, of British troops at a Field Hospital on the
Western Front.
Source B - From a modern history textbook about the First World War.
Over the four years of war, each side developed an airforce that included armed fighters and
bombers. The rate of technological development in the air was the same on both sides. By 1918, the
British, French and Germans had developed bomber aircraft that could damage enemy cities and kill
civilians. But, although technological progress was rapid, the general effectiveness of aircraft
remained limited. They were not powerful enough to bring about a breakthrough in the war.
Source C - Maurice Baring worked at Flying Corps Headquarters during the First World War.
He later published his recollections in his book Flying Corps Headquarters: 1914-1918. Here is
an extract about the development in the use of aircraft during 1917.
The operations of this year [1917] confirmed the lessons of the past, but soon a new factor became
apparent. Fighting not only extended upwards, but downwards as well; low-flying machines with
wireless radio co-operated with ground troops, and attacked men, guns, trenches, transport, and
hostile aerodromes [airfields]. The Germans were a year behind in realising the value of wireless in
the air; but once they did realise they lost no time in adopting similar methods and applying them with
thoroughness and energy.
Source D
Extract from a book written by George Coppard, With a Machine Gun to Cambrai, a war memoir
written in 1969. Coppard served in the British Army in the Machine Gun Corps, having
volunteered in August 1914. Here he writes about the first day of the attack on the German
lines in the Battle of Cambrai in November 1917.
At 6.30 am on 20th November we heard the sound of tank engines warming up. The first glimpse of
dawn was beginning to show as we stood waiting for the big bang [artillery bombardment] that would
erupt behind us at the end of the count down. The tanks, looking like giant toads, became visible
against the skyline as they approached the top of the slope. Some of the leading tanks carried huge
bundles of tightly-bound brushwood, which they dropped when a wide trench was encountered, thus
providing a firm base to cross over. It was broad daylight as we crossed No Man's Land and the
German front line. I saw very few wounded coming back, and only a handful of prisoners. The tanks
appeared to have busted through any resistance. The enemy wire had been dragged about like old
curtains.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the impact of the
use of gas in the First World War. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the use of aircraft in the war?
Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘Technological developments did little to break the stalemate on the Western Front.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 13 – The Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele)
This question is about the Third Battle of Ypres (sometimes known as Passchendaele) in 1917. Study
Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - British troops manning a position on the battlefield in the Third Battle of Ypres,
October 1917.
Source B
General William Birdwood wrote this, about the Third Battle of Ypres, after the war. He was
a British Corps Commander on the Western Front and had many divisions of Australian troops
under his command.
My men were weak and tired and when I was asked [in a meeting of senior commanders in October
1917] I had to advise against any further attacks. However, since only one division of my Corps was
to be involved in the next stage of the attack, and since the other Corps Commanders were in favour
of pushing on, Haig decided to do so.
There is little doubt that if the weather had held, and if we had been able to prepare and rehearse
our advance as carefully as in the early stages of the attack, we should have been able to take
Passchendaele. But the weather defeated us. In that deep, clinging mud neither men nor animals
could progress.
Source C
From a letter, dated 19th October 1917, written by a soldier in the British Army, Private
Leonard Hart, a New Zealander fighting in the Third Battle of Ypres.
I have just decided to have this letter posted by someone going on leave to England, so I will tell you
a few more facts which it would not have been advisable to mention otherwise.
Some terrible blunder has been made. Someone is responsible for the barbed-wire not having been
broken up by our artillery. Someone is responsible for the opening of our own artillery barrage in the
middle of us troops instead of 150 yards ahead of us. Someone is responsible for those [German]
machine-gun emplacements being left practically intact, but the newspapers will all report another
glorious success, and no one except those who actually took part in it will know any different.
Source D
From a modern book, Battles of the First World War, by Martin Evans.
The likely total figures for casualties [in the Battle of Ypres] are 244,900 British (including soldiers
from the Empire), 8,500 French and approximately 230,000 German. The whole battle has been
condemned by some as futile. Perhaps a more accurate criticism might be that it was an error to
continue the attack after September 1917 when it became clearer that conditions were not favouring
the Allies. It appears, rightly or wrongly, that Haig was genuinely convinced that the Germans were
on the point of breaking by the end of September and therefore he should continue the assault. It is
also the case that the Germans themselves viewed their losses as a calamity. By now the Allies could
look to America to add to its manpower; by contrast the Germans had no further reserves to call
upon.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the conditions on
the battlefield during the Third Battle of Ypres. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the reasons for the problems
the British faced in the Passchendaele offensive? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele) was simply a failure for the British.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 14 – Douglas Haig
This question is about the leadership of Douglas Haig during the First World War. Study Source A, B,
C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - A 1918 cartoon from the British magazine, Punch entitled ‘The Conquering Hero’
showing Douglas Haig and British troops.
Source B
A comment about Douglas Haig by Fred Pearson, an ordinary soldier in the British army during
the First World War, reported in a newspaper in 1996.
The biggest murderer of the lot was Haig. I'm very bitter; always have been and always will be and
everybody else that knew him. He lived almost 50 kilometres behind the line and that's about as near
as he got. I don't think he knew what a trench was like. And they made him an Earl and gave him
£100,000. I know what I'd have given him.
Source C
David Lloyd George, British Prime Minister during the First World War, writing in his memoirs,
1935.
Haig was a second-rate Commander in unparalleled and unforeseen circumstances. He was not
endowed with any of the elements of imagination and vision ... And he certainly had none of that
personal magnetism which has enabled great leaders of men to inspire multitudes with courage, faith
and a spirit of sacrifice ... He was incapable of planning vast campaigns on the scale demanded on so
immense a battlefield.
Source D
From a modern book about the First World War by John Terraine.
The simple reason why the British Army had such heavy casualties between 1914-1918 was that it was
doing far more fighting, against a very powerful foe, than it has ever done before or since. It would,
in fact, have been a mistake if the British army had not had very heavy casualties in carrying out that
task.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about Douglas Haig.
(3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the Douglas Haig’s leadership
of the British Army? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main reason for the high casualties in the British Army during the war was due to
the nature of the fighting.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 15 – The War at Sea
This question is about the War at Sea during the First World War. Study Source A, B, C and D and
then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - Painting of a British ship being sunk by a German submarine in 1914. The crew of
the British ship are in the rowing boat.
Source B
A civilian in Britain recorded news of the Battle of Jutland in a diary entry dated 3rd June
1916.
We have had the greatest shock since the start of the war. On opening our newspapers we read that
some of our finest ships have been sunk and that thousands of our brave seamen have been lost. All
the facts are not known yet, but what we are told is bad enough.
Source C - From the Daily Mirror’s front page, 3rd June 1916, reporting on the Battle of Jutland:
Greatest naval battle in history in North Sea
British lose three battlecruisers, three cruisers and eight torpedo-boat destroyers.
Two German dreadnoughts sunk - Enemy battle cruiser blown up, another disabled and third seriously damaged.
Enemy cruiser and six destroyers sunk - Our losses include Queen Mary, Indefatigable, Invincible, Defence
and Black Prince, and Warrior abandoned.
Friday 7pm, The Secretary of the Admiralty makes the following announcement: On the afternoon of
Wednesday, May 31st, a naval engagement took place off the coast of Jutland. The British ships on which the
brunt of the fighting fell were the battlecruiser fleet and some cruisers and light cruisers, supported by four
fast battleships. Among these the losses were heavy.
The German battle fleet, aided by a low visibility, avoided prolonged action with our main forces, and soon after
these appeared on the scene the enemy returned to port, though not before receiving severe damage from our
battleships.
The enemy's losses were serious. At least one battle cruiser was destroyed and one severely damaged; one
battleship reported sunk by our destroyers during a night attack; two light cruisers were disabled and probably
sunk. The exact number of enemy destroyers disposed of during the action cannot be ascertained with any
certainty, but it must have been large.
Source D
From a modern book on the First World War.
By the end of 1914 the British navy had won control on the surface of the North Sea forcing the Germans to
adopt a strategy of submarine warfare. With the Germans increasingly forced to keep their surface fleet in
harbour the British tightened the blockade. The Battle of Jutland, while not a decisive clash, produced
decisive confirmation that the British controlled the surface once the Germans were forced back into their
ports. But the threat of the U-boats was always present and it took major work, particularly in 1917, to reduce
the threat. The arrival of the USA into the war and the introduction of the convoy system were two major
elements in this respect.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about how German submarines
operated in the early stages of the First World War.
(3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the outcome of the Battle of Jutland?
Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main reason the British were successfully able to defeat the threat posed by the German
navy throughout the First World War was the outcome of the Battle of Jutland.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this view.
(15)
Question 16 – The War at Sea 2
This question is about the War at Sea during the First World War. Study Source A, B, C and D and
then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - Poster showing the sinking of the passenger liner the Lusitania, May 1915.
Source B
From the Secretary to the Admiralty following the German raids on British east coast towns
such as Scarborough and Hartlepool in December 1914.
These coastal raids are militarily insignificant... They may cause some loss among the civil population,
and some damage to private property, which is to be regretted, but they must not in any
circumstances be allowed to modify the general Naval policy which is being pursued.
Source C
Article from the local newspaper, the ‘Scarborough Mercury’, following the German
bombardment of the town in December 1914.
The Germans must pay and every penny. We are assured by the Allies that the war will not terminate
until the Germans are on their knees and prepared to accept the terms decided upon by the Allies.
In undertaking this brutal act the Germans have disregarded the rules of war. The German ships
came out of port for the distinct purpose of firing upon the town, and those responsible were fully
aware that the carrying out of this act would result in the wanton destruction of property and
ruthless sacrifice of life. All children of those who have been killed must be provided for, and those
maimed must be cared for during the remainder of their days.
Source D
From a modern textbook on the First World War.
The Allies were able to win the all-important economic war by imposing the naval blockade on
Germany. The British and French had access to supplies in America (the USA only entered the war in
1917) and the neutral countries. The Germans did not. This had a major impact on the German
economy as raw material and food shortages grew as the war dragged on. British naval blockade as
early as 1915 had reduced German imports by 55 percent from pre-war levels. The result was critical
shortages throughout German industry. Germany began to run short of many important raw materials
needed to produce munitions and arms as well as the economy as a whole. Food for the population was
only part of the problem. There were shortages in coal (at the time a vital industrial fuel). There
were also shortages of various non-ferrous metals. The blockade also sharply reduced fertilizer
which was needed to maintain agriculture production. By 1917 there was wide-spread hunger in
Germany. Some sources suggest up to 500,000 German civilians may have died from malnutrition.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the sinking of the
Lusitania. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the effects of the German
bombardment of British coastal towns in 1914? Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The most significant aspect of the war at sea was the German U-boat campaign.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 17 – Allied Drive to Victory
This question is about the final stage of the war, in 1918, and the Allied victory against Germany.
Study Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - A photograph of British troops moving forward to the front line (near the St.
Quentin Canal) as part of the September 1918 offensive against the German defences of the
Hindenburg Line.
Source B
A British infantry soldier speaking in 1996, recalling his experiences of the Allied attack on the
Hindenburg Line.
[The Hindenburg Line] was very strongly fortified with barbed-wire, trenches, pill-boxes and
everything. I don’t think the Germans ever thought we’d break through. But by that time we had a
tremendous amount of artillery and gunfire.
We broke through quite easily, as far as I was concerned. We followed the barrage and were over –
we never got any fire in return. It was the big breakthrough. Morale was high and we could see we
were going to win.
Source C
Extract from a book written by German General Ludendorff, called My War Memories, written
in 1920.
8th August 1918 was the black day of the German Army in this war. Early on 8th August, the English
and the French attacked with strong squadrons of tanks. The [German] divisions in the line at that
point allowed themselves to be completely overwhelmed. The situation was very serious. The report
I received worried me deeply. I was told of valiant deeds, but also of behaviour which, I openly
confess, I would not have thought possible in the German Army; whole units of our men had
surrendered to small groups of enemy soldiers. The officers in many places had lost their influence.
Source D
Extract from a modern History textbook about the First World War.
In March 1918, Germany finally defeated Russia in the East. The Germans then took a final gamble to
break the deadlock on the Western Front and win the war. The great German Spring Offensive
began on 21 March and pushed the Allies back many miles, but after four months it had run out of
steam, and the Germans had suffered 1.5 million casualties in the process. By August 1918 the Allies
were able to launch their own offensive which was strikingly successful.
The Germans were now also suffering back home. In October, food shortages and low morale led to
strikes and protests in German cities. Communists stirred up ill-feeling in the hope of starting a
Russian-style revolution. On 29 October, German sailors mutinied at Kiel and refused to take their
ships out to fight the British.
Questions
a) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the British Army
in 1918. (3)
b) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the success of Allied tactics?
Explain your answer. (7)
c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main reason the Germans suffered defeat in 1918 was the collapse in morale of
their troops.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Question 18 – Allied Drive to Victory
This question is about the final stage of the war, in 1918, and the Allied victory against Germany.
Study Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:
Source A - A photograph of German prisoners escorted by Allied troops, 1918.
Source B
From an account, written shortly after the battle, of the recapture of the town of Albert by
the British army in August 1918.
The attack went forward with tanks, under cover of a creeping barrage which played havoc among the
German’s carefully sited machine guns, placed in pairs and in depth along the whole front. Eighty such
guns were captured by 54 Brigade, and many more destroyed by shell-fire. Although the advance was
achieved the Germans still put up some stiff resistance.
Source C
Extract from the memoirs of a British soldier, who served on the Western Front in 1918,
published in 1993
At first the German spring offensive of 1918 worked because it took us by surprise and pushed us
back, but they just couldn’t get through our lines. Our attacks in August were much more effective
and were able to achieve a breakthrough. When the Germans retreated, they didn’t have time to get
back into their trenches. We had them on the run, as it were. The German prisoners were exhausted
and had the look of defeat on their faces.
Source D
Extract from a history of the First World War, published in 1992
In 1918 Germany was weakened by the surrender of its allies – Austria, Turkey and Bulgaria – and the
failure of the Ludendorff spring offensives. Moreover, the Allied blockade brought serious food
shortages and suffering for the German civilians. However, the main reason for German defeat was
the arrival of US troops. There were 1.7 million in Europe by the end of the war and they played an
important part in the Allied Offensives of July-October 1918.
Questions
d) Study Source A.
Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the Germany Army
in 1918. (3)
e) Study Sources B and C.
Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the British attacks on the
German Army in 1918? Explain your answer. (7)
f) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.
‘The main reason for the defeat of Germany in 1918 was the arrival of US troops.’
Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this
view. (15)
Paper 2, Section A - Mark Scheme
(a) Target: Source comprehension, inference and inference support (AO2) - 3 marks
Descriptor Mark
No rewardable material 0
One unsupported inference 1 mark
Two unsupported inferences 2 marks
Three or more unsupported inferences OR One or more supported inferences 3 marks
(b) Target: Corroboration by cross-referencing of sources (AO2) – 7 marks
Level Descriptor Mark
Level 1 Simple statements which identify support/differences at face value
1 mark – summarises or paraphrases the sources 2 marks for generalised comparisons.
1-2
Level 2 Developed statements identifying support OR challenge based on source contents 3-5
Level 3 Developed statements identifying support AND challenge based on source contents
AND extent of support 6-7
(c) Target: Making a judgement about an interpretation, relating analysis of sources to own knowledge (A01, 2, 3) –
15 marks
Level Descriptor Mark
Level 1
Simple statements, based on sources and/or own knowledge – Answers will often make generalised comments with little or no focus on the question.
1-2 marks for answers which summarise or copy sources.
3-4 marks for answers which attempt to answer the question using sources or own knowledge.
1-4
Level 2
Developed statements offering evidence for and/or against the view and is supported with details from the sources
5-6 marks for using sources/own knowledge only
7-8 marks for using the sources and own knowledge
5-8
Level 3
Developed explanation offering support for and/or against the view and is supported by precisely selected details from the sources
9-10 marks for using sources/own knowledge only
11-12 marks for using the sources and own knowledge
9-12
Level 4
Sustained argument, explicitly focused on the question, which reviews alternative views before giving a balanced judgement. The answer is supported
by precisely selected details from sources and own knowledge.
13-14 marks for explicit judgement on one factor. 15 marks for explicit judgement comparing the relative importance of a number
of factors.
13-15
Grade Boundaries for June 2012
Please use these grade boundaries only as a rough estimate of working at grade.
Boundaries are subject to change by Edexcel. If you are working at Level 2
then that is equivalent to a C. If you are achieving high level 3 consistently, you
are working at A/A* level.
Grade Total Marks from Exam Average Marks
Needed per Topic
A* 78 19.5
A 68 17
B 58 14.5
C 48 12
D 38 9.5
E 29 7.25
F 20 5
G 11 2.75
U 0+ 0+