Post on 27-Jun-2020
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING
STANDING COMMITTEE
FINAL MINUTES
10 August 2016
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38980
Table of Contents
Folio Date Particulars
38981 10.08.2016 Economic Development and Planning Standing Committee
Minutes
39007 31.07.2016 Development Services Monthly Review - July 2016
39024 10.08.2016 Development Services 2015/2016 Yearly Review
Declaration of Potential Conflict of Interest
Nil.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38981
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING
STANDING COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES
1. COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE:
Crs K L May (Chairperson), J F Englert, R C Gee, F A Mann (nee Fordham) and Mayor G R
Williamson were in attendance at the commencement of the meeting.
2. NON-COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE:
Also present was Cr A R Paton, Mr C Doyle (Chief Executive Officer), Mr G Carlyon
(Director Development Services) and Mrs M Iliffe (Minute Secretary).
The meeting commenced at 1.00 pm.
3. ABSENT ON COUNCIL BUSINESS:
Nil
4. APOLOGIES:
4.1 LEAVE OF ABSENCE - CR CAMM
THAT Cr Camm be granted leave of absence for today's meeting.
Moved Cr Mann (nee Fordham) Seconded Cr Gee
CARRIED
5. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Nil
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38982
6. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES:
6.1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING
COMMITTEE MEETING - 13 JULY 2016
THAT the Economic Development and Planning Standing Committee Meeting
Minutes held on 13 July 2016 be adopted.
Moved Cr Mann (nee Fordham) Seconded Cr Englert
CARRIED
7. BUSINESS ARISING OUT OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING:
Nil
8. CORRESPONDENCE AND OFFICERS’ REPORTS:
8.1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - MONTHLY REVIEW REPORT FOR JULY
2016
Author Director Development Services
Purpose
To review the attached Development Services Monthly Review Report for the month of July
2016.
Officer's Recommendation
THAT the attached report be received.
Cr May asked the Director of Development Services (DDS) for some background information
in relation to the Northern Queensland Capitals Alliance Program (NQCAP).
DDS advised the NQCAP originally was around North Queensland Councils working together
on economic developments. Unfortunately the NQCAP has not achieved what it was originally
set up to do and Mackay Regional Council may need to revisit their involvement in the
program.
Cr May queried who were the drivers of this program.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38983
DDS advised currently it was the Economic Development Managers of each Council but
originally it was driven by the Mayors.
Cr May queried if it would be worthwhile providing a report to the Economic Development and
Planning Committee on NQCAP.
DDS advised he would prepare a report to the committee on the NQCAP for consideration.
Cr May queried if the partly completed path leading from Jubilee Park to the Library will be
completed as presently it is still only gravel.
DDS advised there are various stages to the redevelopment of Jubilee Park and he was unsure
which stage the completion of the path was part of and would have to confirm this and advise.
Cr Englert queried who provides the locations for the signs provided by Caravanning
Queensland to Council.
DDS advised Caravanning Queensland have provided two (2) signs and these will be placed at
the entrance and exit of the Mackay region. The exact placement of the signs will be discussed
with Transport and Main Roads and internally through the Technical Services program. If
more signs are required Caravanning Queensland will provide these to Council.
Committee Resolution
THAT the Officer's Recommendation be adopted.
Moved Cr Mann (nee Fordham) Seconded Cr Gee
CARRIED
8.2 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - 2015-2016 YEARLY REVIEW REPORT
Author Director Development Services
Purpose
To review the attached Development Services yearly review report for 2015-2016 financial
year.
Officer's Recommendation
THAT the attached reported be received.
Cr Mann (nee Fordham) congratulated the Director and his staff on the quality of the report.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38984
The Mayor acknowledged it was an excellent report of very high standard and thanked the
Director and his staff for preparing the first annual report for Development Services.
Cr Gee queried if there will be barge access to Brampton Island going forward.
The Director of Development Services advised no discussions have been held in relation to
barge access but this can be discussed in the future.
Committee Resolution
THAT the Officer's Recommendation be adopted.
Moved Cr Englert Seconded Cr Mann (nee Fordham)
CARRIED
8.3 UPDATE ON RECENT TOURIST DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS AND
PROPOSALS - BRAMPTON ISLAND, LINDEMAN ISLAND AND EAST
POINT
File No DA-2013-173. DA-1991/7/A and DA-2015-8
Author Manager Development Assessment
Purpose
To update the Economic Development & Planning Standing Committee on the status of three
major tourist developments within the Local Government area, being Brampton Island,
Lindeman Island and East Point.
Background/Discussion
This report is to provide an update on the current status of the development proposals for
Brampton Island, Lindeman Island and East Point.
Brampton Island (DA-2013-173)
Site Details
The subject properties are located on Brampton Island, which is located approximately 39km
north northeast (NNE) of Mackay CBD.
The large majority of the island is National Park and is part of the Brampton Islands National
Park, which also protects Carlisle Island.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38985
There is an existing resort complex located on the north eastern portion of the island, which is
subject to a variety of lease arrangements over three parcels that cover the main resort,
foreshore and the northern part of the existing airstrip. There is also some infrastructure
associated with the resort located in the adjoining national park (water tanks, sewerage
treatment plant and southern part of the airstrip.
The existing resort is currently not operating, having closed in January 2011. There has been a
resort operating on the island since the 1930’s, with a wide variety of upgrades and operators
over the years.
The existing resort was a 3 – 3.5 star resort, targeting mainly domestic tourists. It has a guest
capacity of approximately 210.
Access to the resort and island generally is via boat to an existing public jetty or via air to the
existing sealed airstrip. The jetty and resort are connected by a rail line, which was used to
ferry goods and guests from the jetty to the resort.
Proposal
The application proposes a significant redevelopment of the existing resort, with the aim of
creating a world class 7-star resort. The guest numbers will be reduced from 210 to 35.
All existing accommodation buildings will be demolished and 6 new buildings will be
constructed for accommodation along the northern part of the resort. The middle four buildings
will be two storeys; the western signature villa will be single storey and the main building to
the east will be three stories. Refer to Attachment 1 for the approved plans of development.
A large proportion of the non-guest accommodation buildings will be re-purposed and
refurbished accordingly. All existing staff accommodation will be retained; however it will be
refurbished to make the staff accommodation more spacious, comfortable and inviting for
attracting long term quality staff to service the guests expected in a 7 star resort.
The redeveloped resort is intended to be an iconic destination and will be a significant upgrade
to the existing facilities.
Generally it is intended that guests would access the island via the existing airstrip via charter
or private plane. Goods, food and services would access the island via a barge service (include
waste removal) via a landing site located to the west of the existing rock pool.
The approval was issued by Council in July 2015.
Next Steps
To move the project forward from a Council perspective, the developer would need to obtain
further approvals from Council in relation to the proposed landscaping of the redeveloped
resort and for the Stormwater Drainage design for both stormwater quality and quantity
treatment. Building Works and Plumbing & Drainage Works Permits will also be required.
The most recent discussions between Council Officers and the owners Planning Consultant in
mid 2016 has outlined that the owner was in discussion with the State Government in relation
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38986
to the land tenure for a number of elements as some items of infrastructure (water tanks,
sewerage treatment plan and part of the airstrip) are located within the National Park area and
the owner is seeking to have these areas converted to either long term leases or excluded from
the National Park estate.
It is understood that the owner wants these issues sorted out before proceeding with major
investment in the project.
Lindeman Island (DA-1991-7/A)
Site Details
The subject property is located on Lindeman Island, which is located 77km north of the
Mackay CBD. The island is the northern most land parcel in the Mackay Local Government
Area, being directly east of Cape Conway and approximately 15km south of the Hamilton
Island marina.
The subject property is a 71.2ha perpetual lease from the crown for the purpose of the operation
of a tourist resort. The perpetual lease contains the resort buildings, airstrip and part of the golf
course.
There are also some areas of term leases adjacent this property that is under control of the
resort operators. The term lease areas contain part of the golf course, the dam used for water
supply and other ‘environmental’ areas. The remainder of the resort is National Park, being
part of the Lindeman Islands National Park.
The existing resort has 224 rooms for guests, a number of restaurants, bars and convention
rooms. There are also staff accommodation areas and associated infrastructure.
The resort is currently not operating after being closed by Club Med, the former
owners/operators, after the resort was damaged from weather events associated with Cyclone
Yasi in 2011.
History
Tourist facilities on the island were initially established in 1923 after being established as a
Sheep grazing lease in 1905. Lindeman is the oldest of all the resort islands in the
Whitsundays.
1986, 1987 and 1991 resort upgrade applications were approved under the former Pioneer Shire
Planning Scheme 1983. The most recent major upgrading of the resort buildings/facilities was
done in 1992 after the resort was purchased by Club Med.
Proposal
The application proposed the redevelopment of the existing tourist resort. The redevelopment
will see the number of units reduced from 224 to 112, and the overall GFA of the site reduced
by approximately 3% across accommodation areas, central facilities, restaurants, etc. Refer to
Attachment 2 for the approved plans of development for this application.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38987
Number of rooms is halved by the proposal to create larger rooms through the amalgamation of
a number of existing rooms. 40 rooms will stay largely the same, though longer, where the
rooms are redeveloped to a minimum 5 star standard (Standard Suite). 65 rooms are a
combination of two existing rooms (Hotel Suite). The other 7 rooms are a combination of two
or more rooms to create the ‘Luxury’, ‘VIP’ and ‘Presidential’ suites.
The central facilities area adjacent the beach, the resort shops, restaurants and bars will be
either redeveloped or refurbished to match the new standard of the redeveloped accommodation
buildings. It is also expected that staff accommodation will also be given a facelift to ensure
the upgraded resort can attract the staff required for the planned resort.
The requested amendment to the previous approval was issued in May 2014
Next Steps
Subsequent to this approval the owners reconsidered the options for the island and have come
up with a masterplan for the island that included an expansion of the resort accommodation and
facilities. This has included expansion of the accommodation provided on the island into the
current golf course area and the construction of an all-weather marina and upgraded airstrip.
Due to the proposed development impacting on areas of national park and the Great Barrier
Reef Marine Park, the proposed expansion is being assessed as a ‘co-ordinated project’ by the
Co-ordinator-General under the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act. The
proposed development also triggers assessment under the Commonwealths Environment
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
The proponent is preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement in relation to the impact of
the development. Officers were advised in March 2016 during discussions with the lead
consultant that they hoped to have responded to the Draft Terms of Reference and undertake
public consultation in 2016. .
At the completion of the EIS process the proponent will be required to lodge a Material Change
of Use with Council for approval of the land use. Council has been supportive of the project
since becoming aware of the redevelopment plans and continues to provide support to the
proponent as and when needed.
East Point (DA-2015-8)
Site Details
The subject site is located at the northern spit of land where the Pioneer River meets the Coral
Sea. The subject site is made up of two lots, both of which are zoned Special Activities
(Tourism) under the Mackay City Planning Scheme, and combine for an area of 57.2ha. In and
around the subject site are a number of smaller irregular shaped lots that were created as part of
previous approvals over the land for vegetation clearing, these lots are to be re-
vegetated/rehabilitated. Generally, the subject site is bordered to the west by an estuary of
Basset Creek, to the south by the mouth of the Pioneer River, and to the east by the Coral Sea.
The site has direct access to East Point Dr to the north.
The site has an undulating topography typical of sand dune environments, and slopes generally
from north to south from RL15.0m to RL4.5m. A retaining wall exists along the western
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38988
boundary of Lot 1 (constructed as part of civil works for stage 1 under previous approval)
which results in a generally flat topography for the northern section of the subject site. Some of
the other smaller lots within the area (not subject to the application as they were created
previously) accommodate vegetation/open space corridors and protect high value vegetation.
The site is not currently connected to reticulated water, sewer, or electricity services however
the services run nearby and can be extended to provide connection.
Background
On 5 December 2005, the Planning & Environment Court issued a preliminary approval
overriding the planning scheme for the following:
140 hotel suites
110 serviced apartments
330 multiple dwelling units
75 aged care units
2,000m2 of retail GFA
385 residential lots
1 community facility lot, and
1 cultural facility lot.
A subsequent development permit was approved by Council under DA-2006-112 for the
following (stage 1):
93 residential lots
2 multiple dwelling lots
5 parkland lots
1 environmental lot, and
1 balance lot.
An associated Operational Works approval was obtained (OW-2008-28) and civil works had
substantially commenced. There is some infrastructure ‘in the ground’ as part of works
authorized by this previous approval, some of which may be reused as part of this approval if
suitable.
Current Proposal
The current application was lodged in response to a Court Appeal against Councils refusal to
extend the currency period of the 2005 Preliminary Approval. The applicant had also sought to
change the ‘tourism’ component of that approval. Concerns were held that the proposed
change to the tourist element was not a ‘permissible change’ to the approval and therefore the
applicant was encouraged to lodge a new development application to seek approval for the
development that they actually wanted to construct.
The current proposal seeks approval for a slightly different proposal to that approved in 2005,
with a reduced development footprint and a change to the ‘tourism’ element from a 5 star hotel
development, to a more laid back tourist hub that contains a large ‘beachfront’ caravan park
and adjoining areas intended for unit development for holiday letting.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38989
The overall development of the site comprises the following uses to be staged in the order
below (refer to Attachment 3 for the approved proposal plans):
Stage 1A
54 residential lots
2 tourist accommodation lots
1 local community (environmental centre) lot
1 local community (Aboriginal cultural centre) lot
1 drainage lot
1 balance lot
Stage 1B
47 residential lots
1 open space lot
1 balance lot
Stage 1C
20 residential lots
1 tourist hub lot (caravan park)
1 balance lot
Stage 1D
33 residential lots
1 balance lot
Future stages (preliminary approval)
231 residential lots
2 tourist hub lots (motel and units)
2 open space lots
Deemed Approval Notice
Council had been working through a suite of draft conditions with the applicant in late 2015.
The proposal was identified as most likely needing a full report to Council to be decided in the
chambers however the impending caretaker mode (as a result of the local government
elections) meant that a full report could not be tabled until after the election had been
completed and the new Council sworn in. Officers informed the applicant of these timeframes
and the applicant issued Council with a deemed approval notice on 22 January 2016. The
applicant advised that the likely timeframes for a report and subsequent decision from Council
would take too long as the applicant wished to start work on the development as soon as
possible. Legislation dictated that Council must issue a Decision Notice giving approval for
the proposal within 10 business days from this date, which was 8 February 2016.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38990
Next Steps
Since the issue of the Decision Notice for the application, the applicant has requested that
Council issue a Negotiated Decision Notice, primarily to deal with vegetation clearing issues
from the conditions of approval.
Council is working with the State Government on the vegetation issues related to the site.
While awaiting resolution of this matter with the State Government, Council officers have
reviewed the applicants requested changes to the conditions and issued a ‘draft’ set of
negotiated conditions and are awaiting their feedback.
Consultation and Communication
Discussions have been held with the Planning Consultants for the island developments to
obtain up-to-date information as well as with the proponent and State Government regarding
the East Point Development.
Resource Implications
Nil
Risk Management Implications
Nil
Conclusion
The three development proposals are at different points in their approval processes and all of
them propose exciting tourist developments that will contribute to the economic growth of the
region via construction and tourism sector employment. Council officers have worked, and
continue to work closely, with the proponents of all three development proposals to ensure that
each of the proposals obtains the necessary approvals in a timely manner.
Officer's Recommendation
THAT the report be received.
The Mayor queried given the Brampton Island seven (7) star proposal DA was approved last
year and the resort has been closed since 2011 is there a sunset clause in the DA.
The Director of Development Services (DDS) advised the proposed DA was for a very high
end and high end resorts can work in the region however the DA may need to be managed to
assist with the outcome but feel the developers are genuine but did concede there was only
three (3) more years to activate the current DA.
The Mayor queried what Council could do to assist with the development of this proposed
seven (7) star resort.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38991
DDS advised Council could provide information on the new processes and concessions
available and assist with connections with local suppliers, contacts and builders, etc.
The Mayor advised he would be available to meet with the developers should they wish to
discuss what Council could do to assist with the Brampton Island DA.
Cr Englert queried what the vegetation issues were in relation to the East Point DA.
DDS advised that additional details would be available next week in relation to the vegetation
issues following a meeting between all parties.
Cr Englert queried if public access would be restricted to the site.
DDS advised it was private property and it was at the discretion of the owner if public access
would be changed from what it is currently. However, in the very least access to the public
would cease during the construction phase for safety reasons.
Committee Resolution
THAT the Officer's Recommendation be adopted.
Moved Cr Mann (nee Fordham) Seconded Cr Englert
CARRIED
8.4 FACILITATING DEVELOPMENT IN THE MACKAY REGION POLICY -
SOUTHLINK INDUSTRIAL HUB - 12-38 COOKS LANE, BAKERS CREEK
Author Principal Economic Development Officer
Purpose
To assess an application under the Facilitating Development in the Mackay Region Policy.
Background/Discussion
The approved development is for a Reconfiguration of a Lot – 1 Rural Lot into 9 Industrial
Lots at 12-38 Cooks Lane, Bakers Creek (Lot 2 on RP718473). The development was
approved by Council on the 20 April 2016 (Council Reference DA-2015-107).
The development involves the subdivision of one (1) rural allotment into nine (9) allotments.
The development will be constructed over two (2) stages with allotments one (1) to eight (8)
being included in stage one (1) and one (1) balance allotment, allotment nine (9) being included
in stage two (2).
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38992
The approved development involves the creation of new road reserve and will require
intersection upgrades at Southlink Drive and Main Street and Temples Lane and Main Street,
as conditioned by the Development Permit.
The applicant has requested the following Specific Incentives under the Facilitating
Development in the Mackay Region Policy Schedule 2:
50% concession on infrastructure charges:
- Infrastructure Charges = $3,096,221
- Requested concession = $1,548,100.50
Development application fee refund = $11,355
Delayed payment of infrastructure charges
Service connection fee refund
As per the policy infrastructure charges may be reduced up to 50% based on the net charge
amount identified on the Infrastructure Charges Notice. Council may consider reductions in
infrastructure charges beyond 50%, for applications that can demonstrate that they will
generate significant long-term economic benefits, job creations and have transformative
outcomes that will diversify the existing economic base of the region.
General Eligibility Criteria
The Facilitating Development in the Mackay Region Policy seeks to attract investment in
qualifying development to stimulate growth, diversify and add value to the economy of the
Mackay region. The policy is discretionary and seeks to support projects that will deliver the
greatest economic benefits to the region.
Based on information provided by the applicant in the Stage 1 Expression of Interest, the
proposal satisfies all requirements under the General Eligibility Criteria for consideration under
the policy.
Criteria Eligibility
Timing of development
Estimated Commencement of Use
within 2 years
Estimated construction in October 2016.
Estimated commencement of use March 2017.
Non-Government Development Yes
Infrastructure capacity Extension to infrastructure services will be
undertaken at no cost to Council.
Location Specific Eligibility Criteria – Schedule 2
Based on information provided by the applicant in the Stage 2 Application, the proposal
satisfies four (4) of the five (5) criteria under the Location Specific Eligibility Criteria. The
application is not located in the Applicable Area as it is located outside of the Priority
Infrastructure Area.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38993
Criteria Eligibility
Economic Investment The applicant must demonstrate that
the minimum capital investment in the
development is equal to or greater than
$3M in Paget and $1M in other
locations.
• Estimated total capital investment (e.g. plant
and equipment) and land/property cost =
$109.51 M.
• Estimated construction cost = $100.51M.
• Based on economic modelling, from a direct
injection of $100.51M (construction costs),
flow on economic output would be
$216.152M, totalling $316.662M economic
output.
• The applicant has committed to utilising local
contractors and suppliers.
Employment Generation • The development is projected to generate
approximately 250 jobs during the
construction phase.
• Economic modelling supports this by
estimating the project to generate a total of
554 direct and in-direct on-going jobs.
Applicable Area For eligible development located
inside the Priority Infrastructure Area
in the Paget, Marian, Mirani, Sarina,
Slade Point and Glenella urban areas,
the policy is applicable to land within
the bounds of the industrial zoned
areas.
• The development is located outside the
Priority Infrastructure Area (PIA)
While outside the PIA the site is zoned
Industry Investigation in accordance with the
Draft Mackay Region Planning Scheme
(Draft Planning Scheme). The Industry
Investigation zone identifies land suitable for
future industrial development subject to
detailed investigations and master planning.
Through the development application
assessment process it has been determined
that the development is considered an
appropriate use in its location and the use has
been approved accordingly.
Extension to infrastructure services will be
undertaken by the applicant at no cost to
Council.
Applicable Land Uses The policy applies to material change
of use (MCU) or reconfiguring a lot
(ROL) for uses that are consistent with
the “applicable land uses” listed in the
policy as defined by the relevant
planning schemes in effect at the time
of application.
• The development is defined as Reconfiguring
a Lot and is consistent with applicable land
uses nominated by the Policy.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38994
Compliance with Eligibility Criteria
The application complies with the General Eligibility and four (4) of the five (5) Location
Specific Eligibility criteria.
The Policy is discretionary in nature and Council may support an application despite areas of
non-compliance. It is considered that sufficient grounds exist to consider the application under
the Policy, despite non-compliance with the Applicable Area criteria.
A summary of these grounds include:
The development is located in the Industry Investigation zone in accordance with the
Draft Mackay Region Planning Scheme (Draft Planning Scheme).
The Industry Investigation zone identifies land suitable for future industrial development
subject to detailed investigations and master planning.
The development has been approved by council which indicates council’s support for
industrial development in the approved location
The approved development will not result in additional significant costs to Council.
Business and Regional Benefits
Based on information provided by the applicant in the Stage 2 Application, the development is
considered to be value-adding to the regional economy and will generate additional full time
employment and business activity.
The provision of the Specific Concessions is likely to further assist in attracting investment to
the region by facilitating the creation of nine (9) industrial allotments. The applicant has
indicated that there are currently two multi-national firms looking at the two (2) largest
industrial allotments that would equate for over 80% of the available land.
The on-going sale and development of these sites for industrial uses will provide a further
contribution to the regional economy.
Consultation and Communication
Development Assessment has considered the application through the statutory assessment
provisions provided by the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. As part of this assessment process,
Development Assessment has consulted with the other relevant sections of Council.
The application has also been assessed by the Department of Infrastructure Local Government
and Planning as a concurrence agency for the development application.
Resource Implications
Under the Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution, the approved Development Permit for a
Material Change of Use (MCU) has a net infrastructure charge of $3,096,221 (+ annual
adjustments).
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38995
The following fee reductions would be applied should the Specific Incentives be approved:
A 50% reduction of infrastructure charges would reduce the charges by $1,548,110.50.
A refund of the development application fees would reduce the charges by $11,355.
A service connection fee refund would reduce the charges by a maxim of $1,000.
Approval of these Specific Incentives would reduce the total charges received by Council by
$1,560,465.50.
Resource Implications
Nil
Risk Management Implications
If the development is not completed and operational within the recommended timeframe, the
concessions will no longer be applicable and 100% of the applicant Infrastructure Charges will
be applicable to the development.
There is a risk that granting significant concessions can leave Council exposed to similar claims
in the future and that a potential infrastructure funding gap could be created. These risks are
sufficiently mitigated by the strict timeframes applied to claiming concessions and the fact that
infrastructure is available to service the development and any extension to these infrastructure
services will be undertaken by the applicant at no cost to Council.
Conclusion
The Facilitating Development in the Mackay Region Policy provides incentives for
development that will deliver significant economic development and growth outcomes in
alignment with Council’s policy and planning objectives.
This project meets the policy objectives and will generate significant economic benefits and
increased development opportunity for the region and therefore should be positively considered
for support.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38996
Officer's Recommendation
THAT the following Specific Incentives are approved under the Facilitating
Development in the Mackay Region Policy for the Southlink Industrial Hub:
a) Concessions of 50% on the net charge amount ($1,548,100.50 + annual
adjustments) identified on the Infrastructure Charge Notice;
b) Delayed payment of infrastructure charges, payable at the sale of each lot or
within 12 months of sealing of Survey Plan by Council, whichever occurs first;
c) Development application fee refund ($11,355.00) calculated as a discount to the
outstanding net charge amount payable at the required time of payment; and
d) Reduction in water and sewer service connection fees (50% discount up to a
maximum of $500 for each service), applied at the time when the fees would be
payable for the activity.
Cr May queried if the employment generation of 250 jobs during the construction phase was
accurate.
The Director of Development Services (DDS) will take this on notice and come back to the
Committee.
Cr Gee acknowledged the great outcome for the region in the 554 direct and in-direct on going
jobs and believes the 250 jobs generated during the construction phase would be a combination
of all the different tradespeople required on site.
Committee Resolution
THAT the Officer's Recommendation be adopted.
Moved Cr Gee Seconded Cr Englert
CARRIED
8.5 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION OF QUEENSLAND QCOAST
2100 FUNDING PROGRAM - MACKAY REGIONAL COUNCIL'S
COASTAL AND INLAND FLOOD HAZARD ADAPTATION STRATEGY
File No SPSW-004
Author Principal Engineer (Waterways)
Purpose
To inform the Economic Development and Planning Standing Committee of the QCoast2100
funding program and the projects intended to be lodged for funding consideration.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38997
Background/Discussion
The Local Government Association of Queensland (LGAQ) are delivering a coastal hazard
adaptation funding program throughout 2015/2016 to 2017/2018, called QCoast2100. The
Program is funded by the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (EHP) for the
next three years and will be delivered by the LGAQ. The program allocates $12 million of
State Government funding over the three years of the life of the program to eligible Queensland
coastal councils to assist in the preparation of coastal hazard adaptation strategies (CHAS).
The intent of the program is to provide the funding, tools and technical support to enable all
Queensland coastal local governments to progress the preparation of plans and strategies to
address climate change related coastal hazard risks over the long-term. A fact sheet on the
QCoast2100 program is provided in Attachment 1.
The Mackay region is subject to flooding from a number of sources, including storm tide,
riverine flooding and local catchment events. Large portions of the urban areas are at risk of
both storm tide and riverine flooding, where coastal processes and inland flooding are directly
related. Because of the relationship between coastal and inland flooding, residents often
express confusion regarding their risk and the appropriate solution. This has resulted in
Council adopting an approach to including coastal and inland flooding in combination, rather
than only considering coastal hazards – the CIFHAS approach (Coastal and Inland Flood
Hazard Adaptation Strategy).
Developing an Adaptation Strategy should comply with the Disaster Management Act 2003,
forming the legislative basis for disaster management activities within all levels of Government
and the Queensland disaster management arrangements. Under this Act, there is a statutory
requirement for local governments to consider, plan and take action to reduce the future
impacts of climate change. While climate change is not explicitly mentioned in the Act, the
Strategy Policy Framework for Disaster Management is explicit about the requirements to
consider the future impacts of climate change and take preventative and adaptive measures to
mitigate these impacts. Developing a strategy also addresses the coastal component of the State
Planning Policy’s interest for natural hazards, risks and resilience, which is guided by the
following principle: The risks associated with natural hazards are avoided or mitigated to
protect people and property and enhance the community's resilience to natural hazards.
Mackay Regional Council have commenced with the first stages of developing a Coastal and
Inland Flood Hazard Adaptation Study (CIFHAS), which, once complete, will assist future
planning, emergency management, hazard funding prioritisation and community education
measures.
As one of 42 eligible local councils, Mackay Regional Council is intending to apply for funding
under the QCoast2100 programme to complete a number of projects related to coastal and inland
flood hazard adaptation.
It is proposed to submit three projects for QCoast2100 funding consideration:
1. CIFHAS Community Awareness/Engagement Campaign
2. Terrestrial LIDAR
3. CIFHAS Coastal Structures engineering assessment
Each project meets the eligibility criteria set out in the QCoast2100 framework, and either
directly feeds into a formal phase in the accepted CIFHAS process or produces otherwise
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38998
unavailable/inappropriate information. Further funding submissions will be considered as the
CIFHAS process develops.
Council is required to provide a 9% co-contribution to each project. All three projects have
been partially funded in the 2016/2017 budget in anticipation of the funding application with a
total of $495,000 from QCoast2100 being requested.
A background document has been prepared to provide further information about the work
already undertaken by Council regarding CIFHAS and explain the linkages between the three
projects being submitted. Titled ‘Coastal and Inland Flood Hazard Adaptation Strategy:
Mackay Regional Council’s approach to utilising the QCoast2100 program’ (Attachment 2). It is
recommended that this document be endorsed to accompany the applications.
Consultation and Communication
The projects were identified as part of a package of works being delivered in 2016/2017 (and
beyond where applicable), as a result of the Mackay Region Flood and Stormwater
Management Strategy. Extensive communication between various Council programmes,
including Strategic Planning, Technical Services, Emergency Management, Community
Engagement and Civil Operations has been undertaken throughout the preparation of the
Strategy. A draft Stormwater Strategy is being prepared for Council’s consideration later in
2016. There have been on-going regular discussions between Technical Services and Strategic
Planning specifically regarding the QCoast2100 projects with the preparation of the background
document and the applications themselves being a joint effort. Advice from Council’s
Contracts team has also been sought regarding appropriate procurement methods.
A preliminary meeting with the QCoast2100 Project Advisor and follow up communication has
indicated in-principle support for the three projects being prepared.
Resource Implications
Officers within Strategic Planning and Technical Services have been working on the projects
and will continue to have the resources and skills to manage their delivery. To undertake each
of the projects, specialist consultants will be engaged for the majority of the components with
overall management and co-ordination being undertaken by existing Council officers. If the
funding is successful, the CIFHAS Community Awareness/Engagement Campaign in particular
is an opportunity to boost in-house community engagement knowledge and methodology by
working with the consultants to develop a plan appropriate for the Mackay region’s
community.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 38999
A summary of the budget implications is included below, based on the eligible component of
the project:
Project 2016/2017
budget
allocation
Overall
project
cost
Eligible
component
project
cost
QCoast2100
funding
request
Co-
contribution
Shortfall or
excess (2016/17
Budget
Allocation
minus Co-
contribution)
CIFHAS
Community
Engagement
/ Awareness
Campaign
$90,000
(with
potential
for more
funding in
future
years)
$400,000 $150,000
(excludes
position
funding to
implement
campaign)
$136,000 $14,000 $76,000
potentially
available in
2016/2017 for
the engagement
of a position to
implement the
campaign
Terrestrial
LiDAR
$250,000
(with
potential
for more
funding
future
years)
$700,000 $274,000
(only
proportion
of
properties
in the
region
mapped as
being in the
‘hazard’
zones for
coastal and
inland flood
hazard is
eligible)
$249,000 $25,000 $225,000
potentially
available in
2016/2017 for
scope including
areas not
specifically
mapped as ‘high
hazard’.
Shortfall of
around $200,000
to achieve
coverage in
whole of region
(although can be
captured in future
years)
CIFHAS
Coastal
Structure
engineering
assessment
$50,000
(with
potential
for more
funding in
future
years)
$120,000 $120,000 $110,000 $10,000 $40,000
potentially
available in
2016/2017 for
further
investigation of
identified ‘high
risk’ structures
during
preliminary
investigation
TOTAL $495,000
Some amendments to the above allocations towards projects may be made as a result of the
consideration of the funding applications by LGAQ, but will be managed within the 2016/2017
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39000
budget allocations. It is intended that further projects be identified for further funding
applications under the QCoast2100 project as the CIFHAS project progresses.
Risk Management Implications
The QCoast2100 program is an opportunity to increase the available budget for three critical
projects that otherwise may need to be completed over a longer period of time or with a
significantly reduced scope.
The risk in lodging the application is minimal, as LGAQ has confirmed that funding has been
earmarked for each Council subject to the projects having merit within the CIFHAS process. If
certain components of the application do not meet the criteria, Council officers have been
advised that more information will be requested and assistance provided to improve the
submission to enable funding to be granted rather than the application being rejected.
If the funding application is not successful, the scope of the projects in the 2016/2017 financial
year will need to be amended to fit within the available budget. This may lead to the project
being completed over a number of years in order to achieve the entire desired scope, with less
efficient delivery and a higher overall cost by completing the project in stages. Alternatively,
the overall scope may need to be reduced to meet the available budget.
Conclusion
Mackay Regional Council is progressively working towards completion of a Coastal and Inland
Flood Hazard Adaptation Strategy (CIFHAS). The QCoast2100 program, provides an
opportunity to progress the CIFHAS project by undertaking a number of projects in various
stages of the CIFHAS Guidelines. The following initial high priority projects that will directly
feed into the CIFHAS proposed for the funding application have been partially funded in the
2016/2017 budget in anticipation of the funding application co-contribution requirements.
CIFHAS Community Awareness/Engagement Campaign
Terrestrial LiDAR
CIFHAS Coastal Structures engineering assessment
A total of $495,000 is proposed to be applied for, with a $49,000 co-contribution from Council.
Officer's Recommendation
THAT the following projects be approved for submission for QCoast2100 funding:
CIFHAS Community Awareness/Engagement Campaign
Terrestrial LiDAR
CIFHAS Coastal Structures engineering assessment
FURTHER THAT the background document, "Coastal and Inland Flood Hazard
Adaptation Strategy: Mackay Regional Council's approach to utilising the QCoast2100
program" be endorsed to accompany the funding applications to the QCoast2100 program
for the three proposed projects.
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39001
Cr Mann (nee Fordham) queried if the submissions were successful how would the community
be engaged in the content of the strategy.
The Director of Development Services (DDS) advised if the submission was successful the
Community Engagement Officers would be given the task of preparing a plan for community
engagement and a report prepared for Council's approval.
Cr Mann (nee Fordham) queried if Council has the necessary expertise to undertake this work.
DDS advised Council does have the necessary expertise but will also source local firms who
have specialist expertise in this area as well to assist.
Committee Resolution
THAT the Officer's Recommendation be adopted.
Moved Cr Mann (nee Fordham) Seconded Cr Englert
CARRIED
9. TENDERS:
Nil
10. CONSIDERATION OF NOTIFIED MOTIONS:
Nil
11. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Nil
12. LATE BUSINESS:
Nil
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39002
13. CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS:
13.1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MONTHLY LEGAL REPORT - JULY 2016
Confidential Legal Report - Subject to Legal Professional Privilege
Committee Resolution
THAT the report be received.
Moved Cr Mann (nee Fordham) Seconded Cr Gee
CARRIED
14. MEETING CLOSURE:
The meeting closed at 1.37 pm.
15. FOR INFORMATION ONLY:
15.1 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION INFORMATION - 01.07.16 TO 31.07.16
For Committee Information Only - No Decision Required.
Development Applications Received
App No.
Code / Impact
Address Applicant Description Officer
DA-2007-523/B
Code 1-23 Bondi Road, BLACKS BEACH
Blacks Beach Cove No 2 Pty Ltd
Request to Extend Relevant Period - Combined Application for a Material Change of Use for a Shopping Centre AND a Reconfiguration of 1 lot to create 2 Urban Expansion lots
Julie Brook
DA-2010-179/A
Code 40 Maggiolo Drive, PAGET
Southern Steel Properties Pty Ltd
Request to Consider Plans 'Generally in Accordance' - General Industry - Warehouse
Darryl Bibay
DA-2011-171/A
Code 8 Highway Plaza, MOUNT PLEASANT
Neil J Fitzgerald Extension of Relevant Period (4 Years) - Multiple Dwelling Units (35) and Caretaker's Residence
Kathryn Goodman
DA-2011-188/B
Code 24 Lester Hansen Street, SLADE POINT
Torres Hire Pty Ltd
Change to Development Approval - Plan of Development - General Industry
Darryl Bibay
DA-2011-218/A
Code L 12 Rosewood Drive, RURAL VIEW
Plantation Palms Properties Pty Ltd
Request for Pre-Request Response (s368)- Change to Development Approval - Change of Plan Development - 1 Urban Residential Lot into 371 Residential Lots and 1 Parkland Lot - Stage 4 of Plantation Palms Estate over 7 Stages.
Shane Kleve
DA-2014-139/A
Code 184-192 Malcomson Street, MOUNT PLEASANT
Cotherstone Pty Ltd
Change to Development Approval - Change of Condition - Shopping Centre
Josephine McCann
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39003
App No.
Code / Impact
Address Applicant Description Officer
DA-2015-134/A
Code 34 Hamilton Street, NORTH MACKAY
Kylie M Smith Change to Development Permit - Change of Condition - 1 Urban Expansion/Open Space Lot into 5 lots, 1 drainage lot and 1 balance lot
Josephine McCann
DA-2016-53
Code 21 Hacketts Road, MUNBURA
Malcolm H Allan Boundary Realignment - 2 Rural Lots into 2 Lots Helle Jorgensen Smith
DA-2016-54
Code 143 Sydney Street, MACKAY
Trendy Lane Mackay Pty Ltd
Commercial Premises/Shop Darryl Bibay
DA-2016-61
Code 51 Edmonds Road, HAMPDEN
Wayne M Sommerfeld
Boundary Realignment 3 Rural Lots into 2 Rural Lots Helle Jorgensen Smith
DA-2016-62
Code 481 Mirani-Eton Road, MIRANI
Ronald G Pullen Boundary Realignment - 2 Lots into 2 Lots Helle Jorgensen Smith
DA-2016-63
Code L 1 Walkerston-Homebush Road, PALMYRA
Peter A Petersen and Gary W Petersen
Boundary Realignment - 7 Rural Lots into 5 Lots Kathryn Goodman
DA-2016-64
Code 59 Logan Crescent, ERAKALA
Jeffrey L Grendon and Wendy M Grendon
Dwelling House (Steep Land Overlay) Helle Jorgensen Smith
DA-2016-65
Code L 900 Diesel Drive, PAGET
Bowen Basin Residences Pty Ltd
Service Station, Catering Shop and Tourist Facility Leah Harris
DA-2016-67
Code 1 Coakley Court, ERAKALA
Bradley J Strohfeldt
Residential Storage Shed (Steep Land Overlay) Helle Jorgensen Smith
DA-2016-68
Code 15 Sunset Drive, ERAKALA
George R Nikolsky and Robyn M Nikolsky
Combined Application - Boundary Realignment - 2 Rural Lots into 2 Lots and Material Change of Use - Dwelling House (Steep Land Overlay)
Josephine McCann
DA-2016-69
Code 8 Grendon Street, NORTH MACKAY
R & K May Super Pty Ltd
Warehouse Josephine McCann
DA-2016-70
Code 3 Range Road, SARINA
The Roman Catholic Trust Corporation
Community Facilities (Extension of Existing School) Josephine McCann
DA-2016-71
Code L 4 Running Creek Road, OAKENDEN
Desmond M McCallum
Caravan Park Darryl Bibay
DA-2016-72
Code 29 Nindavale Avenue, NINDAROO
Tempus Design Studio
Dwelling House Extension & Detached Carport (Steep Land Overlay)
Darryl Bibay
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39004
Development Applications Entering Decision making Period
App No. Code /
Impact Address Applicant Description Officer
CAC-2016-68
Code 15 Sunset Drive ERAKALA
George R Nikolsky and Robyn M Nikolsky
Combined Application - Boundary Realignment - 2 Rural Lots into 2 Lots and Material Change of Use - Dwelling House (Steep Land Overlay)
Josephine McCann
MCUC-2011-171A
Code 8 Highway Plaza MOUNT PLEASANT
Neil J Fitzgerald Extension of Relevant Period (4 Years) - Multiple Dwelling Units (35) and Caretaker's Residence
Kathryn Goodman
MCUC-2014-139A
Code 184 Malcomson Street MOUNT PLEASANT
Cotherstone Pty Ltd
Change to Development Approval - Change of Condition - Shopping Centre
Josephine McCann
MCUC-2015-159
Code 39 Paradise Street SOUTH MACKAY
Titan Investments (Aust) Pty Ltd
Multiple Dwelling Units (5) Kathryn Goodman
MCUC-2016-67
Code 1 Coakley Court ERAKALA
Bradley J Strohfeldt
Residential Storage Shed (Steep Land Overlay) Helle Jorgensen Smith
ROLC-2016-50
Code 24770 Peak Downs Highway VICTORIA PLAINS
Astute Financial Strategies Pty Ltd
Reconfiguration of a Lot - Boundary Realignment 1 Special Activities (Tourism) Zone and 1 Rural Zone into 1 Special Activities (Tourism) Zone and 1 Rural Zone
Darryl Bibay
ROLC-2016-53
Code 21 Hacketts Road MUNBURA
Malcolm H Allan Boundary Realignment - 2 Rural Lots into 2 Lots Helle Jorgensen Smith
ROLC-2016-61
Code 51 Edmonds Road HAMPDEN
Wayne M Sommerfeld
Boundary Realignment 3 Rural Lots into 2 Rural Lots
Helle Jorgensen Smith
ROLC-2016-62
Code 481 Mirani-Eton Road MIRANI
Ronald G Pullen Boundary Realignment - 2 Lots into 2 Lots Helle Jorgensen Smith
ROLC-2016-63
Code 0 Walkerston-Homebush Road PALMYRA
Peter A Petersen and Gary W Petersen
Boundary Realignment - 7 Rural Lots into 5 Lots Kathryn Goodman
Development Applications Finalised
App No. Code /
Impact Address Applicant Description Officer
Approved Subject to Conditions
CAI-ASPA-2011/21
Impact 557 Grasstree Road SARINA QLD 4737
Bepkel Pty Ltd Preliminary Approval under s242 affecting the Planning Scheme to regulate development as though it were code assessable for a Rural Tourist Facility and Reconfiguration of a Lot
Julie Brook
MCUC-ASPA-2016/46
Code 49 Olletts Road HABANA QLD 4740
Kevin P Bohne-Kobo
Residential Storage Shed (Steep Land Overlay) Helle Jorgensen Smith
MCUC-ASPA-2016/51
Code 31 Macalister Street MACKAY QLD 4740
Lyndon Walker Dental Pty Ltd
Material Change of Use - Health Care Centre Brogan Jones
MCUC-ASPA-2016/64
Code 59 Logan Crescent ERAKALA QLD 4740
Jeffrey L Grendon and Wendy M Grendon
Dwelling House (Steep Land Overlay) Helle Jorgensen Smith
MCUI-ASPA-2015/152
Impact Wongabeena4-10 Hoey Street SARINA QLD 4737
Wongabeena Aged Housing Sarina Inc
Multiple Dwelling Units (24) Josephine McCann
MCUI-ASPA-2015/66
Impact 7 Brooks Road West SARINA QLD 4737
Sentinel Sarina Development Pty Ltd
Material Change of Use Preliminary Approval to override the Planning Scheme under s242 for Residential Precinct, Medium Density Residential Precinct, Service Centre Precinct, Health & Medical Precinct, Emergency
Julie Brook
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39005
App No. Code / Impact
Address Applicant Description Officer
Approved Subject to Conditions
Services Precinct, The Village, Sarina
ROLC-ASPA-2015/134A
Code 34 Hamilton Street NORTH MACKAY QLD 4740
Kylie M Smith Change to Development Permit - Change of Condition - 1 Urban Expansion/Open Space Lot into 5 lots, 1 drainage lot and 1 balance lot
Josephine McCann
ROLC-ASPA-2016/60
Code 58 Maple Drive ANDERGROVE QLD 4740
Patrick J Gauci Reconfiguration of a Lot - 1 Lot into 3 Lots Brogan Jones
Relevant Period Extended
CA-IDAS-2007/523B
Code 1-23 Bondi Road BLACKS BEACH QLD 4740
Blacks Beach Cove No 2 Pty Ltd
Request to Extend Relevant Period - Combined Application for a Material Change of Use for a Shopping Centre AND a Reconfiguration of 1 lot to create 2 Urban Expansion lots
Julie Brook
MCUC-ASPA-2013/30B
Code 10 Industrial Street MACKAY QLD 4740
Telstra Corporation Ltd
Request to Extend Relevant Period - Telecommunications Facility
Helle Jorgensen Smith
MCUCD-IDAS-2008/785A
Code 10 Eimeo Road RURAL VIEW QLD 4740
WA Stockwell Pty Ltd
Extension of Relevant Period (6 Years) - Combined application comprising a Preliminary approval for Locality Concept Plan no 10 for the Major Neighbourhood Centre AND a Development permit for extension to Shopping Centre, Showroom-General, Hardware Store, Hotel, Child Care Centre, Educational Establishment, Special Purpose and Veterinary Hospital Land Uses - Northern Beaches Central (Stages 3 & 4)
Brogan Jones
Confirmed on Wednesday 14 September 2016
………………………………………
CHAIRPERSON
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39006
APPENDIX / ATTACHMENTS
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39007
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39008
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39009
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39010
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39011
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39012
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39013
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39014
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39015
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39016
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39017
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39018
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39019
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39020
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39021
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39022
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39023
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39024
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39025
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39026
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39027
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39028
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39029
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39030
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39031
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39032
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39033
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39034
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39035
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39036
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39037
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39038
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39039
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39040
FINAL MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STANDING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 10 AUGUST 2016
MIN/10.08.2016 FOLIO 39041