Does an Increase of Boats Cause Decreased Vocalization Rates in Killer Whales (Orcinus orca)?

Post on 30-Dec-2015

28 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Does an Increase of Boats Cause Decreased Vocalization Rates in Killer Whales (Orcinus orca)?. Matthew J. Williams Beam Reach Marine Science and Sustainability School June 4, 2009. Bioenergetics. Every action requires energy Energy is a limiting factor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Does an Increase of Boats Cause Decreased Vocalization Rates in Killer Whales (Orcinus orca)?

Does an Increase of Boats Cause Decreased Vocalization Rates in Killer

Whales (Orcinus orca)?

Matthew J. WilliamsBeam Reach Marine Science and Sustainability

SchoolJune 4, 2009

Bioenergetics

• Every action requires energy

• Energy is a limiting factor

• Do orcas limit vocalizations if they are unlikely to be heard?

Methods• Recorded:

– Vocalizations

– Behavioral state

– Number of boats within 1000 m

– Ambient noise levels

Key Questions

• Does an increase in boats correlate with an increase in ambient noise?

• Do call rates decline with an increase in ambient noise?

Does an increase in boats correlate with an increase in ambient noise?

Boat Noise in Relation to Ambient Noise Levels

y = 0.3201x + 124.7

R2 = 0.0447

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Number of Boats

Am

bie

nt

No

ise

(dB

re

1 m

icro

Pa)

Linear (Boat Numbers in Relation toAmbient Noise)

P < .001

Sample Size: 1016

Do call rates decline with an increase in ambient noise?

Ambient Noise in Relation to Call Rates

y = -0.1464x + 19.686

R2 = 0.051

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150

Ambient Noise (dB re 1 micro Pa)

Cal

l Rat

e (C

alls

per

Min

)

Linear (Series1)

P < .001Sample Size: 1016

Call Rates

• Min: 0

• Max: 26

• Mean: 1.22

• Mode: 0

• Sample Size: 1016

• Very large proportion of data is 0 calls/min!

Supplementary Question

• Does the behavioral state influence the call rates?

• Important to limit a source of variance

Call Rates

Behavioral State

Min Max Mean Sample Size

Foraging 0 9 .53 134

Milling 0 1 .02 58

Playing 0 26 11.47 15

Resting 0 0 0 78

Traveling 0 18 1.37 731

Changes in Call Rates: ForagingForaging: Ambient Noise in Relation with Call Rate

y = -0.101x + 13.359

R2 = 0.0853

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

115 120 125 130 135 140 145

Ambient Noise (dB re 1 micro Pa)

Cal

l Rat

e (C

alls

per

Min

)

Ambient Noise Level in Relation to Call Rate

Linear (Ambient Noise Level in Relation to CallRate)

P < .001Sample Size: 134

Changes in Call Rates: Traveling

Traveling: Ambient Noise Levels in Relation to Call Rates

y = -0.1148x + 15.78

R2 = 0.0349

-5

0

5

10

15

20

100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150

Ambient Noise (dB re 1 micro Pa)

Cal

l Rat

e (C

alls

per

Min

)

Series1

Linear (Series1)

P < .001Sample Size: 731

Questions?

• Acknowledgements:– Jason Wood– Scott Veirs– Val Veirs– Todd Shuster– Mike Kramer– Classmates