Post on 28-Dec-2015
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 2
Bradley D. Westbrook, UC San Diego
Katherine Stefko, Bates College
Lee Mandell, Archivists’ ToolkitTM
Presenters
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 3
• Project Update
– Accomplishments– Since SAA ‘06
• Functional testing of beta prototype
• Demonstration of beta prototype
• Questions
Overview
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 4
• Specification
• Build
• Documentation
• No cost extension
• Functional testing / performance metrics
• SPOT meeting
• Release of Version 1.0
Accomplishments
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 5
Product Description-Features
•Recording accessions and deaccessions•Tracking sources / donors•Basic authority control for names and topical subjects•Describing archival resources and digital objects•Permanent location management•Ingesting legacy data in standardized formats (EAD, MARC XML) and non-standard formats (accessions data in delimited form)•User and project management functions for configuring the application•Tracking of record creation and editing•Searching for use in reference settings•Context-sensitive help
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 6
Product Description-Features
EAD finding aid Accession, resource, name, resource, digital object, location records
METS digital object Acquisition report
MARC XML record (resource & digital object)
Restrictions list
MODS record IP status list
Dublin Core record Resource source list
Repository collection profile Collections subject guide
Repository production report
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 7
• AT2 Proposal
– Staff & Partners– Primary objectives– Timeline– Releases
• Functional testing of beta prototype
Since SAA ‘06
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 8
AT Beta Testers
• American Museum of Natural History*
• Arizona State University• Bates College* • Brooklyn Museum of Art*• Center for Jewish
History* • Das Bundesarchiv • Georgia Tech • Getty Research Institute • Harvard University• Mount Holyoke College*
• Nationaal Archief • New York University* • Northern Arizona
University• Princeton University• Scripps Institution of
Oceanography* • University of California
San Diego* • University of
Massachusetts Amherst* • University of Michigan• University of Texas
* = partnering repository
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 11
• Weekly/biweekly individual repository reports
• Compiled reports distributed by AT team
• Bug reports
• Online bug log
• Discussion List
• AT Team distributed email account
AT Info Exchange
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 12
Edmund S. Muskie Archives and Special Collections Library, Bates College
• Founded in the 1960s, existing as combined unit since 2000
• 14,000 volumes of rare books• 1,000 linear feet of College records• 4,000 linear feet of manuscripts, 3,000 of which is
Muskie-related• 3 FTE + 2 grant-funded FTE
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 13
• Contribute to a long-needed application built by and for archivists
• Become part of a community of users to share knowledge and experience
• Test drive the application, consider its implementation
• Voice institution’s needs and concerns
Why Test?
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 14
• Installation – Not configured to work behind a firewall or
with a proxy server– Identified as P2P file traffic on my network
Starting out
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 15
• Time commitment
• Unfiltered information in a variety of places
Life of a beta tester
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 18
• Time commitment• Unfiltered information in a variety of places—
where to look for what?• Need to reinstall application often• No onsite technical support• Typos, omissions and bugs are the norm• Neither the application nor the manual are
complete• The manual and application don’t always match• Not everything is predictable
Life of a beta tester
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 19
• Intuitive interface with hierarchical display and helpful pop-ups with field definitions
The good
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 21
• Intuitive interface with hierarchical display and helpful pop-ups with field definitions
• Filtering and searching
• Supports authority work
The good
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 23
• Intuitive interface with hierarchical display and helpful pop-ups with field definitions
• Filtering and searching
• Supports authority work
• Track description, accessions, deaccessions, donor info
• Very detailed and helpful user manual
The good
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 25
• Intuitive interface with hierarchical display and helpful pop-ups with field definitions
• Filtering and searching• Supports authority work• Track description, accessions, deaccessions,
donor info • Very detailed and helpful user manual• Encourages consistency within and between
repositories• Automation of encoding
The good
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 26
• Data entry is labor intensive, and some aspects are not intuitive
The bad
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 28
• Data entry is labor intensive, and some aspects are not intuitive
• Lose flexibility to gain functionality
• Raises the bar in terms of time, training and expertise by mandating data elements and standards
• Ingest of legacy data is limited
The bad
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 29
• Who will adopt the Toolkit?
• What will be needed for their success?
Conclusion
21 Oct. 2006 Archivists' Toolkit at NEA 32
www.archiviststoolkit.org