District Performance Report2009

Post on 19-May-2015

508 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of District Performance Report2009

District Performance Report

April 20, 2009

Dr. Patrick HarriganAssistant Superintendent for Research,

Assessment and Special Services

Administrative Interns:

Kathy LevyValerie Geiler

District Profile 2007-2008

Enrollment K-12: 10,142 Free-Reduced Lunch: 8% Limited English Proficient: 2% Special Education: 13.5% Racial/Ethnic Origin

American Indian/Alaskan Native: <1% Black or African American: 13% Hispanic or Latino: 5% Asian/Pacific Islander: 11% White: 71% Multiracial: <1%

Annual Attendance Rate: 95%

District Accountability

English-Language Arts: Good StandingMathematics: Good StandingScience: Good StandingGraduation Rate: Good StandingAll Half Hollow Hills Schools achieved a

rating of Good Standing for accountability purposes on Federal and State Measures.

Highest Status

Granted

State Assessments English Language Arts Grades 3-8 (4,841 Students Tested) Mathematics Grades 3-8 (4,853 Students Tested) Science grades 4 & 8 (1,247 Students Tested) English HS 2004 Cohort (836 Students Tested) Mathematics HS 2004 Cohort (836 Students Tested)

12,61312,613State Assessments were prepared for

administered, taken, graded, and reported to the Regional Information Center for Accountability purposes.

Sunil John, Lori

VanStry, MIS

Total State Assessments…

English / Language-ArtsAccountability

ELA Grades 3-8 Performance Index

188

146

177 173192 190

158 165

131 128 129 125 128 131123 128

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Per

form

ance

Inde

x

Group Size

AMO

181194 190 196 197 195

182

127 127 127 127 127 127 127

50

100

150

200

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

ELA Grades 3-5 Performance Levels

NYS Effective AMO (Effective Annual Measurable Objective).

Historical Comparison Grade-3

District Summary ELA Grade 3

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Levels

Per

cen

t of T

ota

l Po

pu

latio

n

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Increased Level-

4

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-3

93%

55%

86% 95% 94%

53%

84%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Small GroupAsian/PacificIslander

White Lim English EcoDisadvantagedStudent Groups

Perc

enta

ge L

evel

3 and

Ab

ove

Grade 3

Historical Comparison Grade-4

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Levels

Per

cen

t o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-4

90%

55%

79% 81%88% 93%

60%69%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Small GroupAsian/PacificIslander

White Lim English EcoDisadvantaged

Student Groups

Perc

enta

ge L

evel

3 and

Ab

ove

Grade 4

Historical Comparison Grade-5

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Levels

Per

cen

t o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-5

92%

55%

86%74%

96% 93%

50%

75%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Small GroupAsian/PacificIslander

White Lim English EcoDisadvantagedStudent Groups

Perc

enta

ge L

evel

3 and

Ab

ove

Grade 5

ELA Grades 6-8 Performance Levels

186 186

130 130

50

100

150

200

Candlewood West Hollow

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

NYS Effective AMO (Effective Annual Measurable Objective).

Historical Comparison Grade-6

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f To

tal P

op

ula

tion

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-6

86%

41%

78%

56%

91% 88%

17%

52%

0%

10%20%

30%

40%50%

60%

70%

80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif icIslander

White Limited English Econ.Disadvantaged

Subgroups

Perc

enta

ge of

Leve

l 3 an

d Abo

ve

Grade 6

Historical Comparison Grade-7

District Summary ELA 7

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Levels

Per

cent

age

of T

otal

Pop

ulat

ion

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Increased Proficienc

y

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-7

91%

62%

79%85%

92% 93%

43%

82%

0%10%

20%30%

40%50%60%

70%80%

90%100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif icIslander

White Limited English Econ.Disadvantaged

Subgroups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vel 3

and

Abov

e

Grade 7

Historical Comparison Grade-8

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Levels

Perc

ent

of

Tota

l Popula

tion

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-8

81%

23%

57%

69%

91%84%

54%

0%10%

20%30%

40%50%60%

70%80%

90%100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif icIslander

White Limited English Econ.Disadvantaged

Subgroups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vel 3

and

Abov

e

Grade 8

ELA by Gender / Grade Level

95%92% 92%

88%93% 91% 89%

83%

94%88%

84%78%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cen

tag

e L

evel

3 a

nd

Ab

ove

Female

Male

Secondary English Performance Index

Secondary English Performance Index

191183

175

195 194

178

150 152160

154150156155161

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

All Students AmericanIndian

Hispanic White EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Pe

rfo

rma

nc

e I

nd

ex

Good News from SED

97 96 95

5967

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing

Distinction

NY STATE REGENTS ENGLISH

85% or Better

MathematicsAccountability

Math 3-8 Performance Index

Math Performance Index - 2008

194

164

185 183198 196

187177

100 97 98 94 97 10092 97

0

50

100

150

200

All Students Disabled American Indian Black Hispanic Asian or Pacif icIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Perf

orm

ance

Inde

x

Math Performance Grades 3-5

189199 197 200 199 199 192

96 96 96 96 96 96 96

50

100

150

200

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

Historical Comparison Grade-3

G rade 3 Math

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

L E VE L 1 L E VE L 2 L E VE L 3 L E VE L 4

L eve l

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l P

op

ula

tio

n

D IS TR IC T 05-06 D IS TR IC T 06-07 D IS TR IC T 07-08

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-3

99%

87%96%

100% 100% 99%94%

98%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited English EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Student Groups

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lev

els

3 an

d Ab

ove

Grade 3

Historical Comparison Grade-4

Grade 4 Math

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Level

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-4

96%

73%

86%

97% 97%

87%81%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White LimitedEnglish

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Student Groups

Per

cent

age

of L

evel

s 3

and

Abo

ve

Grade 4

Historical Comparison Grade-5

Grade 5 Math

0%

20%

40%

60%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Level

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08Level-

4!

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-5

97%

77%

93%100% 98%

75%

86%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited English EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Student Groups

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lev

els

3 an

d Ab

ove

Grade 5

Math Performance Grades 6-8

193 192

99 99

50

100

150

200

Candlewood West Hollow

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

Historical Comparison Grade-6

6th G rade Math

0%

20%

40%

60%

L E VE L 1 L E VE L 2 L E VE L 3 L E VE L 4

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

D IS TR IC T 05-06 D IS TR IC T 06-07 D IS TR IC T 07-08

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-6

91%

53%

84%

68%

98% 93%

57%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

Student Groups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vels

3 an

d Abo

ve

Grade 6

Historical Comparison Grade-7

Grade 7 Math

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Levels

Per

cen

t o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Level-4!

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-7

95%

71%

89% 89% 100% 96%

75%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

Student Groups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vels 3

an

d Abo

ve

Grade 7

Historical Comparison Grade-8

Grade 8 Math

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f To

tal P

op

ula

tion

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-8

92%

60%

75%88% 97% 95%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

Student Groups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vels

3 and

Ab

ove

Grade 8

Math by Gender / Grade Level

99% 99%96% 95% 96% 97%

93%90%

97%94% 95%

90%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cen

tag

e L

evel

3 a

nd

Ab

ove

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Grade Level

Female

Male

Secondary Math Performance Index

Secondary Math Performance Index

192

155

183 180194 195

178

155 150144 148

154146149

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

All Students AmericanIndian

Hispanic White EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Per

form

ance

Ind

ex

NY STATE REGENTS MATHEMATICS A

94 95 94

78

5752

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

NY STATE REGENTS MATHEMATICS B

95 92 89

5246 47

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

NY STATE REGENTS Integrated Algebra

96

46

0102030405060708090

100

Passing Distinction

First Year

Science Accountability

Science Elementary and Intermediate Performance Index

178188 184

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

196 198 198192

0

50

100

150

200

All Students Disabled American Indian Black Hispanic Asian or Pacif icIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Perfo

rman

ce In

dex

Science Grade-4

190200 197 200 200 200 191

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

50

100

150

200

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

Science Grade-8

195 196

100 100

50

100

150

200

Candlewood West Hollow

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

NY STATE REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT

98 97 96

69

50 49

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

NY STATE REGENTS EARTH SCIENCE

93 90 92

5849

55

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

NY STATE REGENTSCHEMISTRY

91 87 91

3227

45

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

NY STATE REGENTSPHYSICS

97 98

83

56 59

45

010

2030

405060

7080

90100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Social Studies Results

NYS 5TH GRADE SOCIAL STUDIES

1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1%

32%

42%

32%

66%

55%

66%

0%

20%

40%

60%

PE

RC

EN

TAG

E

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

NY STATE REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY

9590 90

6254 58

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

NY STATE REGENTS U.S. HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT

98 97 95

8171

76

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Foreign Language Results

SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY

100 98 100

0102030405060708090

100

French Italian Spanish

Passing

NY STATE REGENTS FRENCH

100 100 100

88 9286

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

NY STATE REGENTS ITALIAN

100 100 100

8088 86

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

NY STATE REGENTS SPANISH

99 99 99

74 76 74

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Spanish RegentsStudents with Disabilities

10095 92

4454

33

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Graduation RateAccountability

Graduation Rate by Percentage

92

70

86 83 85

55 55 55 55 55 55 55

9496

0

20

40

60

80

100

All Stu

dents

Disab

led

Amer

ican

India

nBla

ck

Hispan

ic

Asian

or P

acific

Isla

nder

White

Limite

d Eng

lish P

rofic

ient

Econom

ical

ly D

isad

vanta

ged

Pe

rfo

rma

nc

e In

de

x

IEP Diplomas and 5-year graduates are not considered graduates

High School Completers

93 94 97

66 66 67

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Regents Diploma Regents with Advanced Designation

Change in formula

Post-Secondary Plans

4-year College 2-year College Other Post-secondary

Military Employment Adult Services

Other Known Plans

94%2 or 4 year

College

The End!