det coasp 2015 - OASPA | Open Access Scholarly Publishers...

Post on 11-Oct-2020

3 views 0 download

Transcript of det coasp 2015 - OASPA | Open Access Scholarly Publishers...

@gbilderhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-5960

DOI Event Tracking

Geoffrey BilderDirector of Strategic Initiatives

@gbilder

7th Conference on Open Access Scholarly PublishingAmsterdam, 2015

DET

DOIEventTracker

10.2302/kjm.59.84

10.5555/12345678

10.2307/4300485

• Supplemental and grey literature (e.g. data, software, working papers)

• Orthogonal professional literature (e.g. patents, legal documents, governmental/NGO/IGO reports, consultation reports, professional trade literature).

• Scholarly tools (e.g. citation management systems, text & data mining applications).

• Secondary outlets for scholarly literature (institutional & disciplinary repositories, A&I services).

• Mainstream media (e.g. BBC, New York Times).

• Social media (e.g. Wikipedia, Twitter, Facebook, Blogs, Yo).

The Scholarly RecordThe Academix

Stereo

1665

many metrics

such data

wow

We had our board meeting yesterday, and the topic of

ALM came up. How could OASPA support this more

practically? Could a group of publishers come together

to form some kind of collaborative project where we

agree to do things in similar ways, so that data is more

comparable etc? How could that interface with work at

CrossRef? Mark Patterson 3/25/14

• Altmetric

• American Psychological Association

• BMC

• COUNTER

• Co-action Publishing

• Cranfield University/ISUS

• de Gruyter

• Digital Science

• eLife

• Elsevier

• Mendeley

• Nature Publishing Group

• OUP

• PKP

• PLOS

• Springer

• TIB Hannover

• Taylor and Francis

• U Wolverhampton

• University of Birmingham

• Wellcome Trust

• Wiley

The concerns

• The N sources will change. New ones will emerge. Old ones will vanish.

• The N analytics platforms will change. News ones will emerge. Old ones will vanish

• The N audiences will change. New ones will emerge. Old ones will vanish.

• Each event subscriber will need to deal with N source’s different APIs, rate limits, T&Cs, data licenses, etc. This is a logistical headache for both the event subscribers and for the sources.

• If publishers use different systems which in turn look at different sources, it will be difficult to compare or audit results across publishers.

• If a journal moves from one publisher to another, it will be difficult to ensure that metrics for that journal’s articles follow the journal.

opencomparableaudit-ableportable

Data about the research process itself deserves exactly the same level of respect and care as data that is the product of research.

DET based on the premise that the infrastructure involved in tracking common information about "DOI events" can be usefully separated from the the value-added services of normalising, supplementing, analysing and presenting these events in the form of qualitative indicators.

Created by Luis Pradofrom the Noun Project

APPROVED

July 2015

Service available 2016

http://bit.do/DETinfo

gbilder@crossref.orgThank You

@gbilder

jlin@crossref.orgJennifer Lin

http://bit.do/CrossrefDET

register to keep updated

or talk to

DET

Rachael LammeyMark PattersonMartin Fenner

Victoria RaoJennifer Lin

Joe Wass

10.2302/kjm.59.84

10.1371/1000141

10.2307/4300485

Credits Included Icons are under Creative Commons Attribution License

Record by Katrine Kolström from The Noun Project

Created by Luis Pradofrom the Noun Project

Created by Karsten Barnettfrom the Noun Project

DOI.org

somebody used http://doi.org/10.555.12345678

report to: det.crossref.org

DET

public

public

One 2 Many

DOI.org

somebody used http://doi.org/10.555.12345678

report to: linkback.psychoceramics.org

DET

Private

One 2 One

DOI.org

somebody used http://doi.org/10.555.12345678

report to: linkback.psychoceramics.org

det.crossref.org

DET

Private

public

public

Both

DOI.org

somebody used http://doi.org/10.555.12345678

report to: linkback.psychoceramics.org

det.crossref.org

DET

Private

public

public

Both

DET pull

one 2 one

Source push

Source push

Subscriber pullDET push

DET push

Subscriber pull

DET

Event Sources Event Subscribers Audience

•arrows indicate flow of data •colored arrows indicates agency •dotted line indicates data that never gets stored in DET

PunkMetrics

OpenWhuffie

MegaPub

Thankkyou Foundation

Thankkyou Foundation

MegaPubMegaPub

Source push

Created by Luis Pradofrom the Noun Project