Designing for the Open Education Ecosystem

Post on 14-Jul-2015

2.948 views 2 download

Tags:

Transcript of Designing for the Open Education Ecosystem

Designing for the Open Education EcosystemAn update on my doctoral research Hans Põldoja

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

Context

Open education

Personal learning environments

Digital ecosystems

Article 1

Progressive Inquiry Learning Object

Templates (PILOT)

Progressive inquiry

(Hakkarainen et al, 1999)

Article 2

LeMill

http://lemill.net

http://lemill.net

http://lemill.net

http://lemill.net

http://lemill.net

Article 3

EduFeedr

Learning content

Student blogs

Course wiki and bloglink and tag

link and tag

link

link

RSS

link

link and tag

link

How to follow and support learning activities which cross the borders of different Web

2.0 applications?

http://www.edufeedr.net

Article 4

LeContract

Age: 26

Education: Master student

Occupation: librarian

MariaMaria has studied information science and now she is doing her Masterʼs studies in interactive media. At the same time she has a full time job as a school librarian. Therefore she is interested in combining school assignments with her work as much as possible. At the same time she is a self-directed learner who likes to go in depth in topics that are interesting for her.

Goals:

Personalization: “It is hard to have a full time job and be a master student at the same time. If possible, then I try to choose assignments that can be connected with my work.”

Scaffolding: “I feel that often it is difficult to specify all the resources and actions that I have to make in order to achieve my learning objectives. Good examples from other learners help me to refine my contract.”

Awareness: “It was good that we had to review our learning contracts. This way I was constantly aware of my objectives and thinking about the strategy to achieve my goals.”

Photo by Alessandro Valli,taken from http://www.flickr.com/photos/liquene/4435467897/

Age: 34

Education: PhD student

Occupation: university lecturer

DianaDiana is a PhD student and university lecturer in educational sciences. She completed her Masterʼs as a biology teacher and worked in a school for several years. She was eager to try various pedagogical methods and finally decided to start PhD studies in educational sciences.

Now she is teaching a few courses in the university. One of the methods that she is using in her courses is a personal learning contract. She can really see how the learning contracts help some students to improve the way they learn. On the other hand for some students it is difficult to come up with a meaningful learning contract.

Goals:

Thinking in details: “I can give feedback to studentsʼ goals and help them to refine their learning contracts already in the beginning of the course. This encourages them to think in details.”

Planning the learning environment: “It is good to know what kind of resources and tools students are planning to use. This way I can design the learning environment according to their needs.”

Staying on track: “We are reviewing the learning contracts in the middle of the course. I can see what kind of progress the students have made and make necessary changes to the course.”Photo by Russell James Smith,

taken from http://www.flickr.com/photos/russelljsmith/7006464/

Scenarios

• First experience with LeContract

• Writing a learning contract

• Reviewing the learning contracts

• Creating a new template

• Browsing the learning contracts

Scenario 3: Reviewing the learning contracts

Diana is teaching a course on learning theories. In the beginning of the course all her students wrote personal learning contracts. It was easy to find the contracts from LeContract, because all the students used the template that she created for this course.

Diana wrote short comments for all the learning contracts. With some contracts she agreed completely while with others she suggested several improvements.

Maria received an e-mail notification that the teacher has commented her learning contract. She went to LeContract and found out that her strategy to achieve the learning objectives was not detailed enough. She opened her learning contract for editing and rewrote her learning strategy section. When she was done with the changes she saved the contract again.

A few days later Diana was visiting the learning contracts again. She compared the recent versions of learning contracts with the initial versions. It was possible because all the versions are saved just like a wiki page.

The students were asked to review and edit their learning contracts in the middle of the course. They wrote a comment on the current status: which objectives have they received, have they used the strategy that they planned, etc. Then they edited the learning contract if there were some necessary changes.

A final review of the learning contracts was done at the end of the course.

http://blog.lecontract.org

Põldoja, H., Väljataga, T. (2010). Externalization of a PLE: Conceptual Design of LeContract. In The PLE 2010 Conference Proceedings.

Article 5

How teachers create open educational

resources?

Cases

• LeMill competitions in Estonia

• Long term LeMill trainings (2 groups of biology teachers)

• Open courses in Wikiversity

Which patterns occur in the creation of learning resource

collections created by the teachers?

Article 6

What is the role of design in TEL?

Pedagogy Technology

Pedagogy TechnologyDesign

Design

Technical Pedagogical

Social

“The Open Education Ecosystem”

Pedagogical “layer”

PILOT's

Knowledge building

Progressive inquiry Social constructivism

Learning contractsLeContract

Personal learning environments

Self-directed learningCommunities of practice

Technical “layer”

RSS

Hyperlinks

Embedding

Tags

Learning objects

Open standardsOAI-PMH

Metadata

Open API

Web services

Repositories

Templates

LeContract

PILOTʼsFle4

Plugins

Social “layer”

Open content

Open educational resources

MOOC

Licenses

Open accreditation User generated content

Quality

Social software

Research question

What are the pedagogical, technical and social considerations for designing educational tools for the open education ecosystem?

Hypothesis

Photos

• René Ehrhardt, http://www.flickr.com/photos/rene_ehrhardt/2390448921/

Thank You!

• hans.poldoja@aalto.fi

• www.hanspoldoja.net