Post on 07-Jul-2020
1
Cape Town, South AfricaApril 16, 2008
CSLF Annual MeetingReport by the CSLF Secretariat
John PanekDeputy Director
CSLF Secretariat
2
CSLF Members
CSLF Member Countries represent58% of world population70% of world energy production75% of world energy consumption76% of world CO2 emissions76% of world GDP
Sources: IMF (GDP 2005 data) and EIA (2004 data)
2
3
Overview of Secretariat Activities
CSLF Structure
Website Updates
Meetings and Workshops
Stakeholder Registry
Workshop Surveys
CSLF Projects
3
4
CSLF StructurePOLICY GROUPChair: United States
Vice Chair: United Kingdom
Vice Chair: South Africa TECHNICAL GROUPChair: Norway
Vice Chair: Canada
Vice Chair: India
CSLFSecretariat Task ForcesTask Forces
5
CSLF StructurePOLICY GROUPChair: United States
Vice Chair: United Kingdom
Vice Chair: South Africa TECHNICAL GROUPChair: Norway
Vice Chair: Canada
Vice Chair: India
CSLFSecretariat Task ForcesTask Forces
Legal Issues Task Force (Australia chair)Financial Issues Task Force (India chair)Capacity Building Task Force (United States chair)
6
Policy Group Task Forces
Financial Issues Task ForceMembers: India (chair), Australia, European Commission, France, Korea, Netherlands, South Africa, United Kingdom, and United States
Capacity Building Task ForceMembers: United States (chair), Australia, Canada, Colombia, European Commission, France, India, Italy, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and United Kingdom
7
CSLF StructurePOLICY GROUPChair: United States
Vice Chair: United Kingdom
Vice Chair: South Africa TECHNICAL GROUPChair: Norway
Vice Chair: Canada
Vice Chair: India
CSLFSecretariat Task ForcesTask Forces
Projects Interaction and Review Team (Australia, U.K., E.C. co-chairs)Storage Capacity Standards Task Force (Canada chair)Risk Assessment Task Force (United States chair)
8
Technical Group Task ForcesProjects Interaction and Review Team (PIRT)
Members: United Kingdom (chair), Australia, Canada, Denmark, European Commission, Germany, India, Netherlands, Norway, Saudi Arabia, and United States
Storage Capacity Estimation Task ForceMembers: Canada (chair), Australia, Brazil, European Commission, France, Norway, United Kingdom, United States
Risk Assessment Task ForceMembers: United States (chair), Australia, Canada, France, India, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, and IEA GHG
9
CSLF Web SiteContinued to upgrade the site.Created a new search tool for the entire site. Posted press releases on CCS projects, programs, and events to promote CCS awareness.Posted presentations and materials from these meetings and workshops:– Capacity Building in Emerging Economies Workshop (Pittsburgh, USA,
May 7-11, 2007)– 2nd Capacity Building in Emerging Economies Workshop (Porto Alegre,
Brazil, October 18-19, 2007) – 2nd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near Term Opportunities for Carbon
Capture and Storage (Oslo, Norway, June 21-22, 2007) – Review and Identification of Standards for CO2 Storage Capacity
Estimation Task Force Meeting (Paris, France, 25 March 2007). – CSLF Financial Issues Task Force Meeting (New Delhi, India, 11-12
October 2007). – Capacity Building Task Force Meeting (Oslo, Norway, June 20, 2007).– Capacity Building Task Force Meeting (Calgary, Canada, November 27-
28, 2007).
CSLF Web Site Search Function
Search Function
Presentations
13
SPIR –Table of Contents
Task Force Reports
Policy Group
Capacity Building Task Force
Financial Issues Task Force
Technical Group
Projects Interaction and Review Team (PIRT)
Storage Capacity Estimation Task Force
Risk Assessment Task Force
Other Reports
Report from CSLF Secretariat
Report from Stakeholders
14
Strategic Plan Implementation Report (SPIR)
Status Reports from CSLF Recognized ProjectsAlberta Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery Project
CASTOR
CO2 Capture Project, Phase 2 (CCP2)
CO2 GeoNet Project
CO2CRC Otway Project
CO2SINK
ENCAP
Frio Brine Pilot Project
Geologic CO2 Storage Assurance at In Salah, Algeria
IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project
International Test Center (ITC) CO2 Capture with Chemical Solvents
Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships
Regional Opportunities for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in China
Zama Acid Gas EOR, CO2 Sequestration, and Monitoring Project
15
SPIR –Table of Contents
CSLF Activities and WorkshopsMarch 2007 – April 2008
3rd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near Term Opportunities for Carbon Capture and Storage, Calgary, Alberta: November 27–28, 2007
1st Capacity Building Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA: May 7–11, 2007
2nd Capacity Building Workshop, Porto Alegre, Brazil: October 18–19, 2007 CSLF Annual Meeting,
Cape Town, South Africa: April 13–17, 2008
Financial Issues Task Force, Delhi, India: October 11–12, 2007
3rd Capacity Building Workshop, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia: January 29, 2008
CSLF Annual Meeting, Paris, France: March 25–28, 2007
2nd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near Term Opportunities for Carbon Capture and Storage, Oslo, Norway: June 21–22, 2007
17
Paris
CSLF Events Timeline
March2007
April2008
Pittsburgh
OsloDelhi
PortoAlegre
Calgary
Al Khobar
CapeTown
18
Stakeholder Growth
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Dec. '05 April '06 Oct. '06 Mar '07 Jan. '08 Mar. '08 Apr '08
Registrycomesonline
Delhi
London
Paris
Al Khobar
Cape Town
19
Stakeholder Registry34 stakeholders have registered since the Paris CSLF meeting.120 registered stakeholders, as of April 7, 2008 Stakeholders by Industry:
– Technology suppliers – 26%– Government – 15%– Association – 15%– Energy resource company – 13%– Environmental – 9%– Consulting/law – 10%– Other – 12%
Type of organization:– Governmental – 16%– Non-governmental – 78%– Multilateral – 7%
Areas of Interest:– CO2 capture – 81%
– CO2 transport – 60%
– CO2 storage – 88%
– Environmental policy – 83%
– Energy policy – 86%
– Economics – 72%
– Legal/regulatory issues – 82%
– Capacity building – 63%
– Financing – 51%
20
Stakeholders by Industry
Government, 15%
Association, 15%
Energy Resource Company, 13%
Environmental, 9%
Consulting/Law, 10%
Other, 12%
Technology Suppliers, 26%
21
Type of Organization
Non-governmental,
78%
Multilateral, 7%Governmental,
16%
22
Areas of Interest
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
CO2 Storag
eEne
rgy P
olicy
CO2 Cap
ture
Enviro
nmental
Policy
Legal/
Regula
tory I
ssue
sEco
nomics
CO2 Tran
spor
t
Capac
ity B
uilding
Financin
g
23
Overcoming Barriers to CCS Deployment Workshop Survey
Date of Workshop: March 27, 2007Location: IFP Offices, Paris, FranceNumber of Attendees: Approx. 120
24
CCS Deployment WorkshopSurvey – Overall Ratings
6g
6f
6e
6d
6c
6b
6a
5
4
3
2
1
12345Ratings: 5 = best, 1 = worst
QuestionNumber
= Weighted Average
25
CSLF Project Recognition Survey
Questions to Stakeholders:1. Has your organization ever considered
submitting a project to the CSLF for recognition?
2. What can the CSLF do to encourage project sponsors to apply for CSLF recognition?
3. What are the reasons for not seeking CSLF recognition?
4. Is your organization presently a sponsor of any of the 19 CSLF-recognized projects?
26
CSLF Project Recognition Survey
Questions to Project Sponsors:1. What do you see as the value of CSLF
recognition to a project sponsor?
2. What can be done to make CSLF recognition more attractive for project sponsors?
27
CSLF Projects Overview
28
Project Technologies
19 CSLF Recognized Projects (16 Active Projects; 3 Completed Projects)
Project Technologies:– CO2 Capture – 10 projects – CO2 Transport – 3 projects – CO2 Storage with Enhanced Oil Recovery – 4 projects– CO2 Storage with Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Recovery – 4 projects– CO2 Storage with Enhanced Natural Gas Recovery – 4 projects– CO2 Storage with No Secondary Recovery – 8 projects– CO2 Measurement, Monitoring, and Verification (MMV) of Storage – 13
projects– Identification of potential CO2 storage sites – 4 projects– Identification of target CO2 sources – 4 projects– Economic and/or Environmental Evaluation and/or Risk Assessment –
13 projects28
29
Project Technologies68% 68%
53%
42%
21% 21% 21% 21% 21%16%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
EER E
val
MMV
Captu
reNo 2
nd R
ecov
ery
ECMBR
ENGR
EOR
ID S
inks
ID S
ourc
esTr
ansp
ort
Percentage of CSLF-Recognized projects showcasing a given technology 29
30
Completed CSLF Projects
Report: “Best Practice Manual” summing up results from the previous SACS project and CO2STORE (http://www.co2store.org, look in “Archive”)
Denmark, Germany, Norway, and United Kingdom
CO2STORE
Project duration: February 2004 – February 2008
CASTOR 2 solvent under test (Sept. – Dec. 2007)
Four site studies in progress (modeling, monitoring design, …)
Final CASTOR workshop 22-24 January 2008 with ENCAP, CACHET and DYNAMIS EU projects.
Final technical reporting in progress
Conclusion: enhancement of coalbed methane recovery and storage of CO2 is feasible in the anthracitic coals of Shanxi ProvinceCurrent bi-lateral country funding phase (Canada and China) completedRecommendation 1: proceed to multi-well pilot at test siteRecommendation 2: evaluate deeper coal seams at alternative sitesProject paper in the International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Volume 1(2007) p. 215-222, available at http://www.sciencedirect.com
Denmark, Spain, Austria, The Netherlands, Norway
CASTOR
ChinaChina’s CBM Technology/CO2 Sequestration Project
Project Location
30
31
Cape Town Closing Dinner
31
32
CSLF Recognition Awards
Completed Projects to be Honored at the Closing Dinner on Wednesday April 16th. – China’s CBM Technology/CO2
Sequestration Project– CO2STORE– CASTOR
33
Backup Slides
34
CSLF Annual MeetingParis, France, March 25–28, 2007
Back to Timeline
35
Pittsburgh, PA May 7–11, 20071st Capacity Building Workshop
Back to Timeline
36
Back to Timeline
Oslo, Norway, June 21–22, 2007
2nd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near-Term Opportunities for CCS
37
Delhi, India, October 11–12, 2007Financial Issues Task Force
Back to Timeline
38
Porto Alegre, Brazil, October 18–19, 20072nd Capacity Building Workshop
Back to Timeline
39
Calgary, Alberta, November 27–28, 2007
3rd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near Term Opportunities for Carbon Capture and Storage
Back to Timeline
40
Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia, January 27–29, 2008
CSLF Technical Group Meeting
Back to Timeline
41
CSLF Annual MeetingCape Town, South AfricaApril 13–17, 2008
Back to Timeline
42
Overview
Purpose:Gather feedback on the workshop’s strengths and weaknesses. Learn what attendees would like to see in future workshops.
43
Overview
Attendees were asked about:Level of success in identifying opportunities and obstacles;Appropriateness of workshop content;Value of the poster session;Overall success of the workshop in meeting expectations;Interests of workshop attendees;Amount of presentations and panel discussions;Ideas for future workshops; andOverall impressions.
44
Key Findings
The workshop was worthwhile.85% thought topics were appropriate (neutral or higher).
Most were interested in technical as well as policy aspects.Unanimous support for more time for panel discussions. Majority would like to see fewer presentations.Overall Impressions: – More time for audience interaction and panel discussion.– Fewer presentations and posters. – Scheduling the workshop in the middle of a CSLF meeting
ensures best possible attendance.
45
CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Stakeholders
1. Has your organization ever considered submitting a project to the CSLF for recognition?
Yes (7)
Intend to, after funding decisions are made (2)
No (2)
46
CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Stakeholders
2. What can the CSLF do to encourage project sponsors to apply for CSLF recognition?More could be done to promote endorsed projects, to disseminate information on their progress and to facilitate collaboration between project participants Clarify and communicate the benefits of CSLF recognitionUse the CSLF R&D projects to coordinate the development of policy and regulatory frameworks Widen areas of interest, and not restrict to "conventional" CO2capture & storageSeek out projects and solicit applications
47
CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Stakeholders
3. What are the reasons for not seeking CSLF recognition?
Benefits of doing so are not made clearAdministrative burden outweighs apparent benefitsAwaiting funding decisions/financial supportFor R&D projects there is currently little apparent pay-off in terms of project promotion and collaborationLack of awareness of CSLF
48
CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Stakeholders
4. Is your organization presently a sponsor of any of the 19 CSLF-recognized projects?
Yes (7)
No (4)
49
CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Project Sponsors
1. What do you see as the value of CSLF recognition to a project sponsor?opportunity for to seek partnerships and collaborations
distinguishes projects from rest of the pack
“Prestige.”
Access to US DOE co-funding, or other potential funding
50
CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Project Sponsors2. What can be done to make CSLF recognition more
attractive for project sponsors?Pay for travel to present results at CSLF meetingsInvite the project sponsors to present the progress, opportunities and technology advancement of a project to the CSLF audience Show clearly that the outputs from the research projects are used for policy developmentIncrease the profile of projects and encourage CSLF members to work cooperatively rather than developing competing projects.Multi-lateral agreements among member countries that facilitate the project collaborations under those agreements. Seed funding for initiating collaborative projects through CSLF recognitionThere needs to be some way of CSLF demonstrating its value through national members or by providing better access to endorsed projects.