Post on 04-Jun-2018
8/13/2019 Critical Review mgmt2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-review-mgmt2001 1/5
Critical
Review
MGMT2001
Submitted by Jiayu LUOz3219847
8/13/2019 Critical Review mgmt2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-review-mgmt2001 2/5
MGMT2001 - Critical Review
Submitted by Jiayu LUO (3219847) 1
The article being reviewed is Sapprasert and Clausen’s (2012) article, which is an empirical
study on the effect of organisational innovation on the firm’s performance, as well as its effect on
future attempts at organisational innovation. This examination is an analysis of data obtained from
two CIS surveys integrating financial accounts (1994-2004), detailing the firm’s involvement in
organisational innovation, the definition of which includes not only changes in “knowledgemanagement systems” but also changes in interaction with external firms or public institutions, as
well as other types of internal organisational change.
Sapprasert and Clausen points out in their article that quantitative studies in this topic are is
quite lacking, and their approach allows for new understanding of the impact of organisational
innovation on the firm. The article begins with Section 1, an introduction to the broad definition of
organisational innovation taken. It then moves on to Section 2, which explore the definitions of
organisational innovation, and how it has been or could be applied in empirical studies. Section 3
and 4 concerns the actual empirical study, from the formation of hypotheses to the data and
method involved in this analysis. Section 5 discusses the actual findings from the analysis, andSection 6 concludes with a discussion of the results and the impact of the findings.
The article also outlines the prior research relevant to this area. In particular, the articles by
Wolfe (1994) and Damanpour et al. (2009) were used to highlight the importance of the need for
more empirical studies in the research area regarding organisational innovation. Specifically, Wolfe’s
1994 study found that the inconsistency of research results regarding organisational innovation is
the clearest finding in prior literature in this topic. Sapprasert and Clausen use Wolfe’s 1994 article
to emphasize the need for further empirical studies on the importance and effect of organisational
innovation. On the other hand, Damanpour et al. (2009) was a longitudinal study on the effect of
different types of innovation on the service industry. This article was used by Sapprasert andClausen not only to highlight the need for research in the technological side of innovation and its
effects on firm performance, but also to state that there is a need to study firms over the long term
to fully comprehend the effects of innovation on performance.
Sapprasert and Clausen take a longitudinal approach to their study, adding to the existing
research available on the topic of organisational innovation. Although their approach has its flaws,
they are making headway into the topic, and any addition to the research is welcome at this stage. In
this article, the authors attempt to limit the bias present in their data collection, and thereby achieve
more reliable results. They understand that their analysis is just a small step towards understanding
the effects of organisational innovation on performance.
Their analysis covers both technological and organisational innovation. The study found that
although innovation in manufacturing is far more prevalent, organisational innovation has gained
more popularity, particularly in the area of services. The impact of such innovation has historically
been known to be positive on firm performance (Chandler, 1962), however, research on the topic
has been lacking. Sapprasert and Clausen set out to test several hypotheses, endeavouring to
improve the information available on this topic, by analysing the effect of past innovation on both
the performance effects of current or future innovation, as well as overall influence on current
innovation, and the effect of combining both organisational and technological innovation.
8/13/2019 Critical Review mgmt2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-review-mgmt2001 3/5
MGMT2001 - Critical Review
Submitted by Jiayu LUO (3219847) 2
In formulating the first hypothesis, the authors realise that there is some prior empirical
studies conducted indicating the importance of organisational innovation, and the positive effects it
has on firm performance. It has been previously shown that prior innovation builds on current
innovation, and it is a cumulative effect (Schumpeter, 1942). As thus, Sapprasert and Clausen believe
that past attempts at organisational innovation increases the probability of new attempts atorganisational innovation.
Although there is evidence showing that persistent innovation may be disadvantageous and
decrease firm performance (Amburgey et al. 1993), further research found that firms’ persistent
ability to cultivate technological and organisational innovation are able to benefit by having higher
adaptability to change (Kelly and Amburgey, 1991; Amburgey and Miner, 1992). Using past research
which focuses on firms’ ability to focus on persistent change in terms of technological and
organisational innovation, the authors theorise that persistent organisational innovation increases
the effects of current organisational innovation on the firm.
From previous research, technological innovation has always had a positive effect on firm
performance (Chandler, 1962). However, quantitative research on the combined effects of
innovation on firm performance is lacking (Damanpour et al., 2009). Despite this, the authors believe
that by extending the prior research, they put forth that technological and organisational innovation
has a complementary effect on firm performance.
The measurement used here is a “unique firm-level data set” integrating the annual financial
accounts (1999-2004) and two Norwegian Community Innovation Surveys, CIS3 and CIS4. This data is
used to analyse organisational innovation at the firms which were willing to report an application of
technological or organisational innovation. CIS4 was preceded by CIS3 by three years, but both were
distributed to employees to relevant firms. These firms had a greater than 30% overlap in the
respective sectors (service, technology and other), which was considered to be reasonably
representative of the overall industry. The authors then developed a two-step model which analyses
the determinants and effects of organisational innovation based on this data set.
This article stresses the importance of undertaking organisational together with technological
innovation, and exploring the effects on the firm’s performance. It is encouraging to note that
although this article has weaknesses, considering the use of data from 1999-2004, it is still an
addition to the under-researched topic of the effects of organisational innovation. Sapprasert and
Clausen found that organisational and technological innovation should be undertaken together, as
combined, they have a significant and positive connection to firm performance.
Moreover, it was found that past organisational innovation was a good indicator of future
attempts at organisational innovation, and prior experience with organisational innovation is highly
beneficial on firms undertaking current organisational innovation. However, the authors realise that
this article is only a small step in the research on the effect of organisational innovation on firm
performance. Overall, Sapprasert and Clausen have made good headway in a research area which
has been lacking in empirical studies.
While the authors have made good headway into this research area, they are only making a
very small contribution. Moreover, the lack of research relating to long-term effects of
organisational innovation on performance is still evident.
8/13/2019 Critical Review mgmt2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-review-mgmt2001 4/5
MGMT2001 - Critical Review
Submitted by Jiayu LUO (3219847) 3
On the other hand, their research is fairly well conducted given the limitations they were
under in terms of data collection. They did, however, note down all the faults that were present in
their analysis. Overall, the article was well written and opens the doors for more research to be
undertaken in this area.
This article was chosen because it was interesting, and, for its time, a new empirical study on
the performance effect of innovation. This relates to the course as it specifically analyses the
importance of innovation and change in an organisation, and the effects on firm performance, as
well as the effects of innovation on future prospects of further change.
8/13/2019 Critical Review mgmt2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-review-mgmt2001 5/5
MGMT2001 - Critical Review
Submitted by Jiayu LUO (3219847) 4
Bibliography
Amburgey, T.L. and Miner, A.S. (1992), “Strategic momentum. The effects of repetitive, positional,
and contextual momentum on merger activity,” Strategic Management Journal , 13, 335-348.
Amburgey, T.L., Kelly, D., and Barnett, W.P. (1993), “Resetting the clock: The dynamics of
organisational change and failure,” Administrative Science Quarterly , 38(1), 51-73.
Chandler, A. (1962), Strategy and Structure. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Damanpour, F., Walker, R.M. and Avellaneda, C.N. (2009), “Combinative effects of innovation types
and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations,” Journal of
Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675.
Kelly, D. and Amburgey, T.L. (1991), “Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of
strategic change,” Academy of Management Journal , 34(3), 591-612.
Sapprasert,K. and Clausen, T.H. (2012), “Organisational innovation and its effects,” Industrial and
Corporate Change, 21(5), 1283-1305.
Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy . Routledge: London.
Wolfe, R.A. (1994), “Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions,”
Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405-431.