Consumers willingness to pay for innovative technology: Hybrid Vehicles

Post on 22-Mar-2016

42 views 1 download

Tags:

description

Consumers willingness to pay for innovative technology: Hybrid Vehicles. Evolution of the Vehicle. Late 19 th and early 20 th century Steam, electricity, and gasoline Problems? Vibration and Friction Weight Power/Fuel/Distance Internal Combustion Engine emerged dominate (early 1900s) . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Consumers willingness to pay for innovative technology: Hybrid Vehicles

Consumers willingness to pay for innovative technology: Hybrid Vehicles

Evolution of the Vehicle

• Late 19th and early 20th century – Steam, electricity, and gasoline

• Problems?– Vibration and Friction– Weight – Power/Fuel/Distance

• Internal Combustion Engine emerged dominate (early 1900s)

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Evolution of the Vehicle

• Late 20th and early 21st century – Traditional gasoline engine receives criticism • Global warming• Fear of limited oil supply • Rising gasoline prices • Inefficient

• Introduction of the hybrid – Combination of gas/electric engine – Late 2000 First mover Toyota releases the Prius

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Evolution of the Vehicle

• Expansion of product assortment and growth

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Objectives of Analysis

• Consumers willingness to pay for:– New technologies – Vehicles -> Demographics

• Exploration through scenario analysis

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

?

Innovation Adaption and the Hybrid

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Relative Advantage• Degree of superiority to existing products

Compatibility • Fit of values and experiences

Complexity • Difficulty of use

Divisibility • Limited basis of trial

Communicability • Ability to be observed or described to others

Kotler (2008)

Innovation Adaption Diffusion Model

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

(Rogers, 1962)

Conclusions from Kotler and Rogers

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Consumers willingness

Environment

Fuel PricesGovernment Incentives

Demographic Correlation Studies

• Economic Logit models– Whether or not to upgrade • Multinomial Logit (Train, 1980) and Nested Logit

(Hocherman et. al. 1983)• Mixed Logits integrating combined and stated

preferences

• Demographic Correlation – “What kind of Person chooses a vehicle type”– Choo and Mohktarian (2004) and Sangkapichai and

Saphors (2009)

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Putting the Theories together

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Different Demographics

Environmental concern

Fuel Prices

Government incentives

Three Factors that Affect Consumers

• Government incentives– Government Tax Credit up to $3500– Access to High-occupancy Vehicle Lane– Discount on Insurance premiums

• Environmental Issues– More environmentally friendly then conventional counterpart– Emit less green house gases and consume less gases

• Cost-savings– High fuel efficiency cuts fuel costs– However, due to the high premium takes years to recover the

premium in fuel cost savings

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Consumer Segments

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Early Bloomers• 18-24, single with high school education• Household income of less than $20,000

Wealthy Elite• 35 to 44, married with graduate degree • Household income of greater than $150,000

American Dream• 35 to 44, married with kids and University

degree• Household income between $75,000 to $90,000

Early Bloomer• Government incentives are important– Purchase price is a significant factor in a lower income

bracket• Although they are environmentally conscious, they are

not willing to pay a high premium to drive a hybrid• Fuel Efficiency and Cost-Savings are important– Research finding showed that income has non-linear effect – High interest in hybrids to save fuel costs– However, due to a high premium the cost-saving is not

significant

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

Wealthy Elite• Government incentives are not as vital

– Purchasing price becomes less important– High disposable income

• Non-financial incentives may be more important– Access to HOV lanes can be a strong factor

• Environmentally conscious– More educated consumers are more environmentally conscious– Ownership of a hybrid goes beyond means of transportation, it’s

making a social statement• Long-term cost savings will less likely matter

– Only saves cost if driven for a long period of time

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

American Dream

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

• Government Incentives – Lower disposable income– High-occupancy Vehicle Lane

• Environmental concern– Future for children

• Fuel cost – May be seen as an short term incentive for

saving

Conclusion

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?

?

Thank You for your attention.We will now open the floor to questions

Introduction Theory Case Analysis Conclusion Questions?