Post on 22-Feb-2016
description
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
1
Coastal Engineering – Theory and Practice
J. W. KamphuisQueen’s University
Kingston, ON, CanadaK7L 3N6
This paper and presentation are posted on: www.civil.queensu.ca
May 2011
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
2
Abstract:This paper attempts to identify the
development of coastal engineering, paying particular attention to how its theory and practice have grown and are becoming alienated so that they no longer complement each other.
It presents some possible routes to preclude further separation and bring about possible symbiosis.
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
3
1. History
May 2011
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
4
The history of Coastal Science and Engineering is related to the history of civilization and societal development .
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
5
(Western) Thinking
There was the Age of Providence – Please the god(s) and all is well
Then came the Age of Enlightenment – Replace inscrutable laws of fickle god(s) with constant laws of nature, which can be studied and understood and in time we should be able to chart our own course (Also called the Modern Era).
1. History
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
6
But… :Philosophers such as Nietzsche and
Heidegger began to question the “Yes we Can!” euphoria.
Much of the original questioning took place in the late 19th Century.
Thus began the Postmodern Era.(Still not begun in many areas of science
and technology, business and others).
1. History
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
7
Coastal Engineering grew up in the “Late Modern” ageWave forecasting for allied troop
landings in 1944Large expansion of facilities neededInitial study of shores and shore
protection.ICCE began 1950.
1. History
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
8
Modern Aspects of Coastal Science and Engineering
Given time and funding we thought we could (think we can?) improve solutions indefinitely and give ever more accurate answers.
In the beginning the funding was there.In the beginning a pressing need for
improvements to shores and facilities was there.
1. History
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
9
But then…..We lost confidence in the basic tool of coastal
engineering and research, our trial and error tool, the physical model (around 1970). Models had reached practical limits; they could only provide answers up to a certain level of accuracy, larger models could not produce better results and became too costly.
(The computer arrived, but it just extended the euphoria by 40 years.
1. History
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
10
And we found…Numerical modeling cannot reveal “the truth”
even when calibrated with the best field data.“Good” coastal engineering is not necessarily
considered good by all.There are no single, unique approaches to
problems and no single answers.This was essentially the end of modernity for
Coastal Engineering and Science.
1. History
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
11
2. Learning
May 2011
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
12
Learning (or Development) Curve
Time
Dev
elop
men
t(K
now
ledg
e, R
elig
ion,
Bus
ines
s)
Rap
id
Prog
ress
Oops !
May 2011
2. Learning
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
13
Ages of the Learning Curve
Time
Infa
ncy
Old age
Maturit
y
Dev
elop
men
t(K
now
ledg
e, R
elig
ion,
Bus
ines
s)
May 2011
2. Learning
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
14
The Learning Curve of Knowledge
Time
Kno
wle
dge
Yes.
we
can
!
Modern Era Postmodern
? ?
20001900180017001600
Enl
ight
enm
ent
May 2011
2. Learning
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
15
Learning Curve + Kuhn (1977)
Time
Kno
wle
dge
Solution of pressing practical problems Much empiricism
Pressing problems are solvedDevelopment of sophisticated theoriesParadigm is articulated
Science becomes subculture (talks to itself)Work is addressed to peers and adjudicated by peersChallenges are internally imposed(Improvement of theories, validating paradigm)
Infa
ncy
Old ageM
atur
ity
May 2011
2. Learning
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
16
Kuhn also defines Paradigm Shift
Time
Paradigm Shift (Sharp Break with the Old)
Dev
elop
men
t(K
now
ledg
e, R
elig
ion,
Bus
ines
s)
May 2011
2. Learning
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
17
Learning Curve - Photography
Time
Phot
ogra
phy
Plates
Dig
ital
Colo
ur
Film
Paradigm Shift
May 2011
2. Learning
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
18
Possible Decline
Time
Paradigm Shift
Knowledge and development can decline after paradigm shift due to lack of interest, people moving
on to greener fields.
Dev
elop
men
t(K
now
ledg
e, R
elig
ion,
Bus
ines
s)
May 2011
2. Learning
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
19
3. Application of the Learning Curve + Kuhn to Coastal Engineering
and Science
May 2011
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
20
Some of the following may be offensive some of you.
It will contain coarse language.It will contain scenes of nudity (the emperor
has no clothes).
Warning
May 2011
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
21
I use Kuhn’s work here.It is perceptive.But, as with all theoretical concepts, it is based
on simplifications (as is this presentation).Nevertheless, it is useful to gain insight into the
development of coastal engineering and the theory/practice subject of this conference
Disclaimer
May 2011
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
22
In spite of any pessimism I present,… there are many signs of hope, indications of improvement and course corrections.
There are many possibilities for further course corrections and improvements, etc.
I overstate the problem for clarity
May 2011
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
23Time
Kno
wle
dge
Solution of pressing practical problems Much empiricism
Pressing problems are solvedDevelopment of sophisticated theoriesParadigm is articulated
Coastal Engineering becomes a subculture. Work is addressed to peers and adjudicated by peers. Challenges are internally imposed (Improvement of theories, validating paradigm).
Infa
ncy
Old ageM
atur
ity
May 2011
3a. Learning Curve + Kuhn (1977)This fits coastal theoretical work, but not coastal practice
3. Application
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
24
Stages of Knowledge Re-Interpreted
Time
Kno
wle
dge
“Practice” develops to solve (simpler) practical problems using much empiricism.
“Practice” and “Theory” work together to develop, more sophisticated methods – Theory supports practical solutions.
Theory and practice become separate cultures. Research goes much beyond solution of practical engineering problems.
Infa
ncy
Old ageM
atur
ity
Theory: Challenges internally posed, peer adjudication Practice: External adjudication by clients and public
May 2011
3. Application
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
25
3b. Amplification of “Old Age”
Theory
Practice
Remember - Overstatement for focus !
Theory: Challenges internally posed, peer adjudication
Practice: External adjudication by clients and public
The difference is the Adjudication !
3. Application
Theory and practice become separate cultures. Research goes much beyond solution of practical engineering problems.
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
26
• Traditionally, decision making and design was simple. A project owner hired an engineer, a practical individual, who simplified concepts, designed by trial and error (models) – Infancy.
• Then we improved our solutions with formal university courses, given by (practicing) engineers and who conducted research in support of better engineering - Maturity.
3b. How did we get there ?3. Application
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
27
• Universities want to be “universities” and not “professional schools”.
• This means Research as well as teaching of Practice.
The Universities, however, need to emphasize research To generate additional incomeTo develop reputation
This normally comes at the expense of teaching.
3. Application How did we get there?
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
28
Valuable research results are understood by the universities to be (Peer Reviewed) Publications and Citations, which are purported to be:Hard evidence of scientific achievementImprovement of scientific theoriesValidation of the existing paradigm, etc
3. Application How did we get there?
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
29
This “Research” has become a self-contained game (as in Old Age as defined by Kuhn - “a subculture that talks to itself”)
This Research/(Publish or Perish) culture defines researchers/theoreticians, but also practicing engineers.
3. Application How did we get there?
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
30
Researchers/Theoreticians.The Research/Publish or Perish culture
defines research funding, hiring, salaries, promotion and tenure.
This forces Engineering Profs, Ph.D’s, Postdocs and Graduate Students (our brightest minds) into the research game and away from practice (and from teaching engineering).
Discussion with Sam
3. Application How did we get there?
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
31
Since the Engineering Profs must focus mainly on research, students are less exposed to actual, practical engineering concepts, supported by their prof’s practical experience.
The busy profs also relegate teaching to PhDs, postdocs and teaching assistants, who have little or no practical experience.
3. Application How did we get there?
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
32
Engineers in PracticeAt the same time the Research/(Publish or
Perish) culture also defines engineers in practice:They are essentially outside the systemThere is no incentive for them to join
hands with their researcher/theoretician colleagues.
They walk away from the very force that defines them as well as their colleagues
3. Application How did we get there?
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
33
• This rant about the disconnect between practice and theory (engineering and research) is not unique for coastal engineering. It is voiced regularly in civil engineering and in other applied science disciplines. But it is also voiced in other professional disciplines, such as medicine, law, etc.
3. Application How did we get there?
May 2011 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
34
The peer review system that drives the publish/perish and reward systems is seriously flawed.Because of specialization, adjudicating
peers are close colleagues, often friends.This is not objective adjudicationIt tends to preserve the status quoThe system is of little interest to engineers
in practice and v.v. , thus missing a vital input into the system.
Finally
The empero
r is c
learly
withou
t clot
hes!
3. Application How did we get there?
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
35
In light of: Climate change - sea level rise, increased
storm activity Man-induced land subsidence. Continued population encroachment upon
the world’s shorelines. etc.
We can no longer afford to:
May 2011
3. Application
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
36
We can no longer afford to: Institutionally reduce “good” Coastal Engineering to
peer- adjudicated Coastal Research Downgrade the teaching of practical engineering. Support a rewards system that is primarily based on
the number of citations and published papers Support peer review systems, university education
and technical conferences that draw young people away from practical engineering and into more theoretical science. (Easier, safer, sexier?).
There are many hopeful signs ! (e.g. 1st yr design courses)
May 2011
3. Application
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
37
We need engineers who can synthesize technical information and integrate it with Socio-Economic constraints to formulate problems accurately and to provide solutions to very complex problems.
This is not Science – it is Engineering; the application of science to real life problems for practical answers.
And future problems will not become any easier or less urgent.
May 2011
3. Application
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
38
3d. Coastal Learning Curves ??
Time
Numerical Modeling
ProcessKnowledge
DataCollection
Today
Physical Modelling
1970
0
75
50
25
100
1950 1970 1990 20101910 1930
Dev
elop
men
t%
of P
oten
tial ?
May 2011
3. Application
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
39
1970: The steepness of the numerical modeling,
process knowledge and field measurement curves resulted from the introduction of computers.
We took full advantage of the opportunities provided by the computer.
Dev
elop
men
t(%
of
pote
ntia
l)
Time
Numerical Modeling
ProcessKnowledge(Theory) Field
DataCollectio
n
Today
Physical Modeling
1970
0
75
50
25
100
1950 1970 1990 20101910 1930
May 2011
3. Application
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
40
2011: All learning curves are quite flat.This is the “Old Age” of Coastal EngineeringTherefore, we can not - must not - continue
along the old paths followed since 1970 (as we continue to do at present).
Dev
elop
men
t(%
of
pote
ntia
l)
Time
Numerical Modeling
ProcessKnowledge(Theory) Field
DataCollectio
n
Today
Physical Modeling
1970
0
75
50
25
100
1950 1970 1990 20101910 1930
May 2011
3. Application
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
41
3e. Coastal Learning Curve ??
Time
Decline in knowledge and development of
Physical Modeling
Dev
elop
men
t(K
now
ledg
e, R
elig
ion,
Bus
ines
s)
Paradigm Shift ?? (Introduction of
computers)
May 2011
3. Application
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
42
4. How can we proceed?
May 2011
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
43
Rapid advancement can occur through a paradigm shift We should be so fortunate! We need to encourage it by funding
real innovative thinking with money that is not tied to peer review and publications only.
Set up a “Coastal Think Tank” ?
May 2011
Proceed?
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
44
In the meantime, to advance at all (to be able to meet the present and future design complexities, uncertainties and the approvals procedures) we need a concerted (and integrated) effort on all fronts – process knowledge (theory), physical modeling, numerical modeling, field measurement.
May 2011
Proceed?
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
45
We must take advantage of the particular strengths of each element.
We must integrate science and engineering, re-integrate theory and practice and integrate all our tools, people, facilities and cultures.
May 2011
Proceed?
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
46
Specialization has occurred within coastal engineering, e.g. numerical modeling, waves, sediment transport, breakwaters, environmental, construction, etc.
This is inevitable – it is the “continental drift” of progress of knowledge.
It is generated in a positive feedback loop with peer review.
But…
May 2011
Proceed?
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
47
To be able to solve practical problems, we must connect the various ‘expert silos’ better and concentrate on the more general concepts of coastal engineering, as well as on the specialties.
This will be very difficult, since career advancement is generally based on specialization, publication, etc (It is like stopping continental drift?).
Proceed?
May 2011
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
48
5. Integration
(of cultures, expertise, tools and people)
May 2011
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
49
Closer (physical) integration of cultures
1. Theory ↔ Practice2. University Education ↔ Engineering3. Physical ↔ Numerical Model (ing, ers)4. Physical Laboratory Space
Integration
May 2011
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
50
1. Theory ↔ Practice :
As a profession, we must define exactly what we mean by these terms.
We must together define a prioritized agenda of research needs and update it regularly (forming a target for research).
We must find means to fund these vital priority research topics (e.g. lobby !).
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
51
We must address the peer review of engineering research and create room for greater interest and involvement of practicing engineers.
We must address the university reward system for engineers (and other professions?)
We must address the system of research funding for engineering research.
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
1. Theory Practice
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
52
We must encourage (and find funding for) participation of practicing engineers in peer review, tenure and promotion committees, etc.
Inclusivity is part of the basic fabric of universities. We need to stress Equal Opportunity for practice and theory - e.g. count engineering reports, patents, practical experience, etc., as well as the usual scholarly achievements.
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
1. Theory Practice
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
53
2. University Education ↔ Engineering:
We must as a profession define engineering education, e.g. theory + application + problem solving + skills.
We must increase interaction on the shop floor – Students and Professors must spend time regularly in industry – “Scholarships and sabbaticals in practice, co-op programs, etc.” (and find funding)
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
54
We must get engineers into the universities “Engineers in Residence, Mentoring, Educational leaves, design courses, etc.” (and find funding).
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
2. University Education Engineering
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
55
We must encourage and develop “Industrial Academies”
The coastal courses run by the developers of software, are a great idea. But they must be technically broad and teach theory and application, as well as skills with software.
If the university does not teach practice, the profession must AND IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER.
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
2. University Education Engineering
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
56
3. Physical ↔ Numerical Model(ing,ers) This is happening. My first job My second job
4. Physical Modelers - Join forces, co-operate, share facilities and expertise. HYDRALAB is an excellent example.Always problematic because of intellectualproperty and perceived leading positions.
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
57
This integration will cost money.To generate funding, we must immediately
be able to show added value: Better, more relevant education = $$, More competent engineers = €, ¥, Shorter project approval periods mean
reduced costs, Academic rewards for engineering as well as
research will improve performance, etc, etc, etc.
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
Comment
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
58
This is a road map.It does not tell you about the vistas and
flowers along the road – stop to look around and smell the roses!
It does not tell you what has been done to the road in the past to straighten the curves, improve the sight lines, widen the shoulders etc.
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
Final Note
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
59
Many people have been and are working to improve the road.
What I present is not something new.The problem is not unique to coastal
engineeringWe are not starting, we are in a process.But there is much to be done to prevent
further crashes on the road.
Integration
May 2011
(physical) integration of cultures
Final Note
J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice
60
Thank You
The paper is posted on:www.civil.queensu.ca
(or google: j william kamphuis)May 2011