Post on 21-May-2020
CITATION: Aralez Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Re), 2018 ONSC 6980 COURT FILE NO.: CV-18-603054-00CL
DATE: 20181121
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE – ONTARIO (COMMERCIAL LIST)
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.c-36, AS AMENDED
RE: IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE OR ARRANGEMENT OF ARALEZ PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND ARALEZ PHARMACEUTICALS CANADA INC., Applicants
BEFORE: S.F. Dunphy J.
COUNSEL: Maria Konyukhova and Kathryn Esaw for Applicants
Jeffrey Levine, for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
David Bish, for Richter Advisory Group, Monitor
Danish Afroz, for Deerfield Management Company, L.P.
HEARD at Toronto: November 16, 2018
REASONS FOR DECISION
[1] This case raises for determination the always-troubling question of Key Employee Retention Plans (or “KERPs”) and Key Employee Incentive Plans (or “KEIPs”). At the conclusion of the hearing. I indicated that I would be approving the proposed KERP involving three employees with reasons to follow and would take under reserve the matter of the proposed KEIP.
[2] For the reasons that follow, I have determined to approve the KEIP as well. My reasons that follow apply to both programs.
Background facts
[3] The applicants Aralez Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Aralez Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. brought this application under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1990, c. C.-36 and an initial order was granted by me on August 10, 2018 with Richter Advisory Group Inc. appointed as Monitor. A number of affiliated entities in the same corporate group sought relief pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States