Post on 30-May-2018
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
1/34
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
Choo Kam Thong (aSir)Master of Design(in Communication Design)Swinburne UniversityMelbourne, Australia
016-685 7375019- 360 7633choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
aSir(ChooKa
mT
hong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
2/34
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
GRADING GUIDELINE
aSir(ChooKa
mT
hong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
3/34
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
GRADING GUIDELINE
GG 1.1:
This is a Standard Assessment Marking Schedule to be undertaken, by the
lecturer-in-charge, for the purpose of grading the students project on the set
guidelines to ascertain the competency of an individual students progress
during the course.
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
4/34
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
GRADING GUIDELINE
GG 1.2:
The criteria set is a measurement to gauge the capability and progression of
skills, technical competency and technology to form a general
appraisal ofdesign intent.
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
5/34
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
GRADING GUIDELINE
GG 1.3:
The marking of all students project work is to be carried out on the scheduled
Assessment Date.
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
6/34
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
GRADING GUIDELINE
GG 1.4:
The project requirements are as set out in the Project Brief and the Criteria.
Please be reminded that although there can be focus on certain outcomes, the
Assessment will be based on the Project Briefand the Marking
Criteria outlined.
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
7/34choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
1.1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ~ PROBLEM ANALYSIS
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
PA-E1 . . .
Has veryintelligentlyand clearly analysed the nature of the task, problem orissue.
PA-E2 . . .
Has questionedthe views of others andseenall sides of the argument.
PA-E3 . . .
Has shown outstandingopen-mindednessandobjectivity.
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
8/34choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
1.1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ~ PROBLEM ANALYSIS
. . .GOOD. . .
PA-G 1 . . .
Has satisfactorily analysed the nature of the task, problem or issue.
PA-G 2
Has shown awareness of the differential importance of the variouselements but may not be consistently open-minded orobjective.
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
9/34choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
1.1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ~ PROBLEM ANALYSIS
. . . FAIR . . .
PA-F1:
Has shown little orno analytical understanding.
PA-F2:
Is unable to establish hierarchies ofimportance.
PA-F3:
Follows slavishly the views of others. Is unable to perceive ownprejudices.
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
10/34choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
1.2 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ~ RESEARCH
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
R-E1 . . .
Has researched the issue thoroughly in breadth and depth.
R-E2 . . .
Has effectively selected and evaluated the materials and made verysuccessful use of it.
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
11/34choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
1.2 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ~ RESEARCH
. . . GOOD . . .
R-G1 . . .
Has researched the issue satisfactorily.
R-G2 . . .
Has shown satisfactory ability to select and evaluate material, but may notbe equally strong on both.
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
12/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
1.2 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ~ RESEARCH
. . . FAIR . . .
R-F1 . . .
Has failed to research the issue adequately.
R-F2 . . .
Has carried out
no first-hand enquiry.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
13/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.1 COMMUNICATION ~ ORAL COMMUNICATION
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
OC-E1 . . .
Speaks very fluently.
OC-E2 . . .
Shows excellent variety ofpaceand intuition.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
14/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.1 COMMUNICATION ~ ORAL COMMUNICATION
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
OC-E3 . . .
Achieves good rapport with audience.
OC-E4 . . .
Structures material well and uses
repetitionand
emphasisvery
effectively.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
15/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.1 COMMUNICATION ~ ORAL COMMUNICATION
. . . GOOD . . .
OC-G1 . . .
Speaks competently sometimes but rather reliant on written notes.
OC-G2 . . .
Is
not woodenand maintains the attention of the audience quite well.
OC-G3 . . .
Material is fairly well-structured.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
16/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.1 COMMUNICATION ~ ORAL COMMUNICATION
. . . FAIR . . .
OC-F1 . . .
Speaks hesitantly.
OC-F2 . . .
May read entirely from notes.
OC-F3 . . .
Makes little sense if relating to an audience.
OC-F4 . . .Material badly structured.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
17/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.2 COMMUNICATION ~ WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
WC-E1 . . .
Writes very well with appropriate style.
WC-E2 . . .
Text is
elegantand
persuasiveand is structured
clearlyand
logically grammatically accurate and spelt correctly.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
18/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.2 COMMUNICATION ~ WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
. . . GOOD . . .
WC-G1 . . .
Writes quite well with some sense of the appropriate style.
WC-G2 . . .
Text is
reasonablywell structured,
clear,and
logicalwith
minormistakes in grammar and spelling.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
19/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninC
ommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.2 COMMUNICATION ~ WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
. . . FAIR . . .
WC-F1 . . .
Writes very badly with no sense of style.
WC-F2 . . .
Text is difficult to follow with serious lack ofclarity andlogic.
WC-F3 . . .
Weaknesses in grammar and spelling.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
20/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.3 COMMUNICATION ~ VISUAL COMMUNICATION
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
VC-E1 . . .
Has chosen media with care and shows great skill in using chosen media.
VC-E2 . . .
Very successfullyrelates spoken or written communication with visual
communication.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
21/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.3 COMMUNICATION ~ VISUAL COMMUNICATION
. . . GOOD . . .
VC-G1 . . .
Has reasonably sound skill in choosing media and competent inusing media.
VC-G2 . . .
Is satisfactory in relation to spoken and written communication.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
22/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
2.3 COMMUNICATION ~ VISUAL COMMUNICATION
. . . FAIR . . .
VC-F1 . . .
Little skill in choosing media and poor level of competence in use.
VC-F2 . . .
Little orno grasp of relating Visual Communication with spoken or writtencommunication.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
23/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.1 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ CREATIVITY
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
C-E1 . . .
Demonstrates a highly fertile imagination.
C-E2 . . .
Shows excellent powers ofinvention in terms oforiginalityofconcepts.
C-E3 . . .
Is not unduly bound by convention of precedent.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
24/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.1 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ CREATIVITY
. . . GOOD . . .
C-G1 . . .
Demonstrate average powers of imagination.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
25/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.1 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ CREATIVITY
. . . FAIR . . .
C-F1 . . .
Shows little evidence of imagination.
C-F1 . . .
Powers of invention are poor.C-F1 . . .
Few ideas.
C-F1 . . .
Weak ideas.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
26/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.1 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ FUNCTION
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
F-E1 . . .
Produces a highly practical and workable solution.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
27/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.1 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ FUNCTION
. . . GOOD . . .
F-G1 . . .
Solution is reasonably practical and workable.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
28/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.1 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ FUNCTION
. . . FAIR . . .
F-F1 . . .
Solution is seriously impartial in one or more ways.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
29/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.2 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ USE of TECHNOLOGY
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
UoT-E1 . . .
Excellent grasp of technology.
UoT-E2 . . .
Has applied appropriate technology with great skill andunderstanding.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
30/34
aSir(ChooKa
m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.2 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ USE of TECHNOLOGY
. . . EXCELLENT . . .
UoT-E3 . . .
Demonstrates a high level of understanding of material and technicalprocesses.
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
31/34
aSir(ChooKa m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.2 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ USE of TECHNOLOGY
. . . GOOD . . .
UoT-G1 . . .
Applies appropriate technology with satisfactory skills andunderstanding, though not always with complete success in understanding thematerials and technical processes.
3 2 DESIGN POTENTIAL USE f TECHNOLOGY
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
32/34
aSir(ChooKa m
Thong~MasterofDesig
ninCommun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
3.2 DESIGN POTENTIAL ~ USE of TECHNOLOGY
. . . FAIR . . .
UoT-F1 . . .
Poor grasp of technology.
UoT-F1 . . .
Little skills or understanding of materials and technical processes.
General Criteria Specific Criteria Graphic Design
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
33/34
aSir(ChooKa m
Thong~MasterofDesig
nin
Commun
icationDesign)
choo_kam_thong@yahoo.com
General Criteria Specific Criteria Graphic Design
Project Development Problem Analysis / XX %
Research / XX %
2. Communication Oral Communication / XX %
Written Communication / XX %
Visual Communication / XX %
3. Design Potential Creativity / XX %
Function/Usefulness / XX %
Use of Technology / XX %
TOTAL / 100 %
10Q
8/9/2019 Choo Kam Thong (aSir)__Marking Criteria 2010
34/34
. . . 10Q . . .
aSir(ChooKa m
Thong~MasterofDesig
nin
Commun
icationDesign)