Andrew AcockBP Kate Bell Anchala

Ramasamy Sugar Land Leo BurdyloKeng Seng Chang Peter Hegeman Montrouge

Alison Goligher AnchorageDouglas HuppLisa Silipigno David Wylie

FloView FrontSim GHOSTMDT NODAL PatchFlexP LT R S TSqueezeCRETE TPHL USI

WFLExcel MaraSEAL

PrecisionTree Palisade

1 3400

30

Bill BaileyMike CrabtreeJeb Tyrie

Jon Elphick

Fikri Kuchuk

Christian Romano

Leo Roodhart

>

100%

75001190 3 2

1 3340 3

5 5080%

14

312000

>

Capex/Opex

Capex/Opex

Capex/Opex

Capex/Opex

Capex/Opex

Capex/Opex

$0.044$0.050$0.087$0.002$0.034$0.147$0.040$0.147$0.012$0.207$0.033$0.030$0.842$0.074$0.102$0.074$0.589

5.28%6.38%

10.36%0.30%4.09%

17.56%4.81%

17.47%1.48%

24.66%3.99%3.62%100%

8.90%12.16%

8.89%70.05%

$0.044$0.054$0.046$0.003$0.034$0.073$0.041$0.068$0.010$0.122$0.034$0.030$0.559$0.075$0.010$0.075$0.309

7.95%9.62%8.27%0.45%6.16%

12.99%7.25%

12.18%1.79%

21.89%6.01%5.45%100%

13.41%17.87%13.40%55.33%

$0.044$0.054$0.035$0.003$0.034$0.056$0.041$0.047$0.010$0.091

$0..034$0.030$0.478$0.075$0.100$0.075$0.227

9.29%11.24%

7.24%0.52%7.20%

11.64%8.47%9.85%2.09%

19.06%7.03%6.37%100%

15.67%20.88%15.66%47.80%

$0.044$0.054$0.030$0.003$0.034$0.046$0.041$0.030$0.010$0.079$0.034$0.030$0.434$0.075$0.100$0.075$0.184

10.25%12.40%

6.82%0.58%7.94%

10.58%9.34%6.87%2.31%

18.15%7.75%7.02%100%

17.28%23.03%17.27%42.41%

$0.044$0.054$0.049$0.003$0.034$0.081$0.041$0.073$0.011$0.125$0.034$0.030$0.578$0.075$0.101$0.075$0.328

7.69%9.30%8.55%0.43%5.95%

13.92%7.00%

12.63%1.84%

21.61%5.81%5.27%100%

12.96%17.38%12.95%56.71%

20,000 50,000 100,000 200,000

1 7000

1

0.00251.92

1.2$0.028

$1,000,000.00300,000

$1,600,000.00$400,000.00

1,000,0009,000,000

$0.04

3 @ 90% @ 90%

$/

1 7000

1

$600,000.00200,000

$1,000,000.0032,850,000

$0.03

3 3 $/

> Capex Opex20 000 200 000 3181 31810 3

> WORA

WOR B CD

10

1.5

32

1.0

0W

OR

WOR

A

B

C

D

1. Kuchuk F Sengul M Zeybek M Oilfield WaterA Vital Resource 22 1999 11

22 4-13

2. Kuchuk F Patra SK Narasimbam JL Ramanan SBanerji S Water watching 22

1999 11 22 14-23 Kuchuk F

>

WOR

WOR

50%

332000

FrontSim

50%

Sengul M The Challenge of Water Control22 1999 11 22 24-43

3. WOR0 100% 100%

WOR 1 50% WORWOR

>

>

WOR

10

10

WFLTPHL

FlowView

WFL

0.01

kv>0.01Kh

OWC

> > >

34

WOR

>

4. Elphick J Seright R A Classification of WaterProblem Types

1997 8 6-8

5. Hill D Neme E Ehlig-Economides C Mollinedo M8

3 1996 4-17

6.

>

> > >

352000

OWC

OWC

WOR

50 15

OWC

OWC

>

36

6

>

>

•

•

•

>

WOR

WOR

WOR

>

>

372000

10,000

1000

0

100

10

1

0.110 100 10,0001000

1000

100

10

1

0.1120,00080,000 100,00060,0000 20,000 40,000

WOR

WOR

WOR

OWC

WOR

WOR

X590 X950 X180 X290360 110

165 50OWC

GOC

WOR

>

WORWOR 1 10 WOR

WORWOR

38

100

10

1.0

0.1

WOR

WOR

100

10

1

0.0001

0.1

0.01

0.001

WOR

100

10

1

0.000110,0001000100101

0.1

0.01

0.001

WOR

WOR

WOR'

WOR'

WOR

10

1.0

0.1

0.01

0.0011000 2000 3000 4000 5000

WOR

1

2 34

>

1800 2400 2800

X590 X670X204

WOR

X670

MDT

WOR

WOR

>

1800 1 WOR

2100 WOR 2WOR

14% 2400 3

WOR WOR 0.2410%

4

7. Chan KS Water Control Diagnostic Plots SPE30775 SPE

1995 10 22-25

8. Yortsos YC Youngmin C Zhengming Y Shah PCAnalysis and Interpretation of Water/Oil Ratio in Water-

floods SPE Journal 4 4 199912 413-424

392000

X590

X680

X770

X860

X950300025002000150010005000

3000

2000

1000

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

100 , 4

20 , 20 14,000 1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

12,000

10,000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0 200 400 600 800 1000

WOR

Liquid rate

7000 1112 3 40064 3

WOR

WORWOR

NODAL

NODAL

NODAL

WOR

355

290004608 3 90%

>

50% WOR

> NODAL NODAL

9. Elphick J NODAL Analysis Shows Increased OilProduction Following Water Shutoff

1996 8 19-21

10.Beggs HD Production Optimization Using NODALAnalysis OGCIPublications 1991

11.

NODALPLT

NODAL

6

40

•

PVT

•

•

•

-5000 0 5000 10,000 15,000 20,000

L1

L2

L3

L4

L5

-6000 -4000 -2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000

L1

L2

L3

L4

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

L3

L4

> NODALNODAL 2 5

1

• PLT

•

NODAL

5

1-42966 4294 471

682 3 26510 127424212 2025 3

>

412000

42

1 2 53 4

4613 733 3

3 0 047 3 4 5

PS PLAFFORM

[12]

[13]

PSPLATFORMGHOST

R S T P r o G H O S TFloView

TPHL WFL

WFL GHOSTTPHL

50%

GHOSTX137>

X200

X300

X400

X500

X600

> 90°

TPHL TPHL

X070 X055

GHOST

1 0

WFL

1 0API20 70

85 95 WFL

0 500 0 1200 0 25,000

USI

432000

X100

X200

X300

508 3

NODAL

MDT RFT

X100

X000

5200 5400 5600 5800 6000 6200 6400

X300

X500

X700

X400

X600

X200

Tarbut

Ness

Etive

Rannoch

12. Lenn C Kuchuk F Rounce J Hook P HoricontalWell Performance Evaluation and Fluid Entrymechanisms SPE 49089 SPE

1998 9 28-30

13. A khnoukh R Leighton J Bigno Y Bouroumeau-fusean P Quin E Catala G Sil ipigno LHemmingway J Horkowitz J Herue X WhittakerC Kusaka K Markel D Martin A

11 11999 30-47

14. Hegeman P Pelissier-Combescure J9

2 1997 16-20

15. Al Shahri Am AL Ubaidan AA Kibsgaard P Kuchuk F Monitoring Areal Vertical Sweep andReservoir Pressure in the Ghawar Field UsingMultiprobe Wire line Formation Tester SPE48956

SPE1998 9 28-30

>

USI

> MDT

PosiSet

PatchFlex

MDT

2.3 0.7

PosiSet

PatchFlex

1 2.5

PatchFlex

> PosiSET PosiSET

> PatchFlex PatchFlex

44

B

C

A

D

D E

E

C

D

B

A

8 5 % 1 0 % P SPLATFORM

1.2RST

RST

PatchFlex

SqueezeCRETE

160

SqueezeCRETE

MaraSEAL OrganoSEAL-R

51000 10000 159

1589 3

M a r c i tOrganoSEAL-F

3

>

>

16.Crombie A Haiford F Hashem M McNeal R ThomasEC Melbourne G Mullins OC

10 31998 26-41

17.Boisnauit JM Guillot D Bourahla A Tirlia T DahlT Holmes C Raiturkar AM Maroy P Moffett CMejia GP Martinez IR Revil P Roemer R

111 1999 16-29

18. 25

19.O.Brien W Stratton JJ Lane RH MechanisticReservoir Modeling Improves Fissure Treatment GelDesign in Horizontal Injectors Idd EI Shargi NorthDome Field Qatar SPE 56743 SPE

1999 10 3-6

452000

ACP

ACP

OWC

>

>

>

46

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

75% 80% 85%

95% 96% 97%

95% 96% 97%

75% 80% 85%

75% 80% 85%

QRA

PalisadePrecisionTree Excel

•

•

•

•

20.Elphick J Fletcher P Crabtree M Techniques forZonal Isolation in Horizontal wells

Reading 1998 11 4-5

21.Hill 5

22.

>

472000

1

2

5

10

WaterCASE

100 20%90% 60%

•156

• 85 20

•

25• 15 15

QRA

50

25%

> FrontSim

105 1 2 510

48

>WaterCASE

WaterCASE

492000

1.0

0.75

0.5

0.25

0.00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

%

A B

95%

38%

58%

9%

13%

17%

15% 5%

27%

27%

WOR

WOR

0.5-1.0%

10 40ppm10-50

20%80%

A

B

17% 13%9% 14%

15% 27% 5%50

6000-80001828-2438 1000 159 3

5000 795 3

>

>

50

Framo

40ppm5ppm

95%

Dacion LASMO PlcApertura

1 9 9 8 4LASMO-

•

50%50% 20000 3178 3

60% 8000012712 3 10000

30000 1589-4767 3

• 36000057204 3 75%

9000014300 3

•

90%600000 95340

3 30000

14% 35%

RH

>

23.Dake Lp The Practice of Reservoir Engineering,Developments of Petroleum Science 36

Elsevier 1994 445-450

24.Crabtree M Eslinger D Fletcher P Miller M JohnsonA King G 11

3 1999 30-45

512000