Post on 14-Feb-2017
Plan
ning
319
Plan
ning
320
Plan
ning
321
Plan
ning
322
1 Reed et al. (2009) amalgamated in a table the different stakeholder analysis methods, including the resources required, the level of stakeholder participation, and the strengths and weaknesses of each method.
Plan
ning
323
Plan
ning
324
Plan
ning
325
Stakeholders Interests Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities/threats
Relationships Impacts Involvementneeds
Plan
ning
326
INFLUENCE FACTORS
Plan
ning
327
Stakeholders require special effort to ensure that their needs are metand their participation is meaningful Consultation - Empowerment
Hig
hin
tere
st
Low influence
Stakeholders should be closely involved to ensure their support for the project
Consultation - Collaboration Empowerment / Delegation
Stakeholders may oppose the intervention; therefore, they should be kept informed and their views acknowledged to avoid disruption or conflict Consultation - Information
High influence
Low
inte
rest
Stakeholders are unlikely to be closely involved in the project andrequire not more than information-sharing aimed at the ‘general public’ Information
Plan
ning
328
C3: Potential support or threatC4: Ability to get fundingC5: Ownership of a potential treatment site
C2:Political power
C1: Activity linked with FSMC6: Potential user of a treatment endproduct
Influence Interest
Plan
ning
329
Stakeholder categories
Main interests Opportunities Involvement needsand required actions
Plan
ning
330
Plan
ning
331
Plan
ning
332
Plan
ning
333
May
or
RD s
anit
atio
n
RD p
ublic
wor
ks
RD h
ydra
ulic
s
RD u
rban
ism
&ha
bita
t
RD p
lan
&de
velo
pmen
t
RD h
ealt
h
RD s
ocia
l aff
airs
Mun
icip
al a
utho
riti
es
Hou
seho
lds
Reg
iona
l and
nat
iona
lau
thor
itie
sRG
= R
egio
nal D
irec
tora
tes
Slud
ge e
mpt
iers
Latr
ine
buil
ders
Advi
sors
Soli
d w
aste
coll
ecti
onEn
duse
rs
- Co
mes
onc
e a
mon
th f
rom
cap
ital
cit
y
- So
lid
was
te c
olle
ctio
n
and
hea
lth
proj
ects
- M
anag
es o
ne
disp
osal
sit
e-
Sede
ntar
y an
d no
mad
ic
- A
ll y
ear
roun
d
or s
easo
nal
- in
tern
atio
nal
NG
O
Hea
d of
NG
O3
is a
lso
head
of
the
adm
inis
trat
ion
coun
cil
of N
GO
1
Tech
nica
l su
ppor
t
- Su
ppor
t to
dec
entr
alis
atio
n p
roce
ss-
Tech
nica
l su
ppor
t
- Co
ntra
ct f
or p
ubli
c l
atri
ne m
anag
emen
t-
Ord
ers
for
empt
ying
s
ervi
ce m
ade
at
Cit
y Co
unci
l
Use
dry
slu
dge
from
in
form
al d
ispo
sal
site
- M
unic
ipal
man
date
for
the
coll
ecti
onof
sol
id w
aste
fro
mth
e m
ain
mar
ket
- Pe
rman
ent
resi
denc
e-
Latr
ine
buil
ding
and
slu
dge
empt
ying
- U
sed
to c
ome
regu
larl
y f
rom
cap
ital
cit
y-
Ow
ner
of i
nfor
mal
dis
posa
l si
te
Tech
nica
l ser
vice
sU
sers
Ow
ners
Trad
itio
nal l
eade
rs
Trad
itio
nal a
utho
riti
es
Nei
ghbo
urho
od le
ader
s
Relig
ious
lead
ers
Mec
hani
cal
serv
ice
prov
ider
1
Mec
hani
cal
serv
ice
prov
ider
2
Vege
tabl
e fa
rmer
s+
cere
al c
ulti
vato
rs
Catt
le b
reed
ers
NG
O1
NG
O2
NG
O4
NG
O3Re
spon
sibl
e fo
r th
e m
anag
emen
t of
anc
estr
al l
and
Regi
ster
to
get
serv
ice
from
MSP
1
Requ
est
for
land
Call
for
ser
vice
Call for service
Enfo
rcem
ent
of n
atio
nal
law
s an
d re
gula
tion
s
Figu
re 1
5.6
Exam
ple
of a
dia
gram
of r
elat
ions
hips
bet
wee
n fa
ecal
slud
ge m
anag
emen
t st
akeh
olde
rs.
Cas
e St
udy
15.1
– P
art
I
Plan
ning
334
Plan
ning
335
Criteria
Stakeholder
C1Activity
FSM
C2Politicalpower
C3Supportthreath
C4Funding
C5Ownership
site
C6Enduse
Mechanical service provider 1FarmersCattle breeders
Hig
hin
tere
st
Low influence
Municipal authorities HouseholdsNGO1Mechanical service provider 2NGO3NGO4
Regional DirectoratesTraditional authoritiesNGO2
High influence
Low
inte
rest
Plan
ning
336
Stakeholders Roles andresponsibilities
Strengths Weaknesses Relationships Involvementneeds
Plan
ning
337
Criteria
Stakeholder
C1Activity
FSM
C2Politicalpower
C3Supportthreath
C4Funding
C5Ownership
site
C6Enduse
Plan
ning
338
Mechanical service provider 1 Mechanical service provider 2 Farmers
Cattle breeders
Hig
hin
tere
st
Low influence
Municipal authorities HouseholdsNGO1
Regional DirectoratesTraditional authoritiesNGO2NGO3NGO4
High influence
Low
inte
rest
Municipal authorities
NGO 1
RD public works
Municipal authorities
NGO 1
Mechanical service provider 1
Mechanical service provider 2
RD sanitation
Construction Management
Municipal authorities
NGO 1
Farmers
RD health
Households
NGO 2
NGO 3
NGO 4
Regional Directorates
Traditional authorities
Valorisation To be informed
Plan
ning
339
Plan
ning
340