Post on 19-Apr-2018
Case Report
Marek’s disease virus associated ocular lymphoma in Roulroul partridges (Rollulus
rouloul)
Running Title: Marek’s Disease in Roulroul partridges
Roel HaesendonckA,*, An GarmynA, Gerry M. DorresteinB, Tom HellebuyckA, Gunther
AntonissenA, Frank PasmansA, Richard DucatelleA, An MartelA
A Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary
Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
B Dutch Research Institute for Birds and Exotic Animals, Wintelresedijk 51, 5507 PP
Veldhoven, Netherlands
*Roel Haesendonck: Roel.Haesendonck@Ugent.be, Tel.: +32 9 264 73 76, Fax: +32 9 264
74 94
An Garmyn: An.Garmyn@Ugent.be
Gerry M. Dorrestein: info@noivbd.nl
Tom Hellebuyck: Tom.Hellebuyck@Ugent.be
Gunther Antonissen: Gunther.Antonissen@Ugent.be
Frank Pasmans: Frank.Pasmans@Ugent.be
Richard Ducatelle : Richard.Ducatelle@Ugent.be
An Martel : An.Martel@Ugent.be
* Corresponding author.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Abstract
Two 1-year old Roulroul partridges (Rollulus rouloul), one male and one female, were
presented because of eye problems and anorexia. Already 20 of the 30 Roulroul partridges in
the owner’s collection had died. The affected animals stopped eating, became thinner, and
eventually died. Antibiotic treatment, started because of the suspicion of a septicemic
process, was unsuccessful. At clinical examination of the two partridges it was found that in
both birds, 1 eye ball was filled with a whitish yellow amorphous material and the other eye
ball of the female showed a distinct corneal opacity. Both presented animals were euthanized.
Necropsy revealed no significant abnormalities besides the eye lesions. Histology and
immunohistochemistry of the female’s eye revealed an infiltrate of T-lymphocytes
corresponding with ocular lymphoma. Herpesvirus genus-specific PCR, followed by Sanger
sequencing confirmed the presumptive diagnosis of Marek’s disease in both animals. To our
knowledge, this is the first confirmed Gallid Herpesvirus 2 (Marek’s disease) case in
partridges and the first case in this specific species.
Key words: Gallid Herpesvirus 2, Marek’s disease, Marek’s disease virus, ocular
lymphoma, Roulroul partridge, T-lymphocytes
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Introduction
Marek’s disease is a well-known disease in poultry (Marek, 1907; Biggs, 1967) caused by a
cell-associated lymphotropic alpha-herpesvirus (Parcells et al., 2003; Biggs & Nair, 2012)
which can induce tumours in different organs (e.g. liver, lungs, ovary) including the eyes
(Smith et al., 1974; Pandiri et al., 2008). Chronic Marek’s disease is known to affect nerves,
particularly of the lumbo-sacral plexus (Biggs & Nair, 2012). The ocular form of the disease
consists of different types of lesions depending on the anatomical structures involved. These
lesions may result in blindness leading to death caused by starvation (Pandiri et al., 2008).
The disease was first described in chickens (laying hens as well as broilers) and thoroughly
studied in this species (Marek, 1907). Cases in turkeys (Davidson et al., 2002; Pennycott &
Venugopal, 2002; Blake-Dyke & Baigent, 2013), quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica)
(Pradhan et al., 1985; Imai et al., 1990; Pennycott et al., 2003) and pheasants (experimental)
(Phasianus colchicus) (Lesnik, 1981), and one case in a flock of geese (Anser albifrons)
(Murata et al., 2007) have been reported. According to Murata et al. (2012) Marek’s disease
virus is widespread among waterfowl without causing symptoms. These species could be
considered a reservoir for other avian species. Pettit et al. (1976) described macroscopic and
histopathological lesions similar to those caused by Marek’s disease in a black francolin
(Francolinus francolinus) without the confirmation of the etiologic agent. Jennings (1954)
reported a case of neural lymphomatosis in a partridge (Perdix perdix) in the UK. This bird
showed enlargement of the lumbo-sacral plexus in combination with corresponding
histological lesions, similar to those described in chickens (Biggs, 1967), but, again, an
etiologic agent could not be assigned.
Roulroul partridges (Rollulus rouloul) are medium size partridges originating from Thailand
and Malaysia, which are frequently kept in private and zoo collections. Marek’s disease virus
has not been reported previously in this species.
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
Materials and Methods
History
In a breeding group of 30 adult Roulroul partridges (Rollulus rouloul), over a period of 2.5
months, 20 animals died after developing a whitish yellow, amorphous material in their eyes
or an opaque cornea. These Roulroul partridges were bought at the age of 2-3 months from a
breeding facility in which previously chickens have been kept for several years. Other species
such as black francolins (Francolinus francolinus), blue scaled quails (Callipepla squamata),
European partridges (Perdix perdix) and Chinese bamboo partridges (Bambusicola
thoracicus) were kept in separate cages in the same room and showed no symptoms nor
mortality. These species were bought from another breeding facility. The Roulrouls became
anorectic and died approximately 10 days after the first symptoms. They were unsuccessfully
treated orally with enrofloxacine (Baytril®, Bayer Animal Health Care) via drinking water
and locally with chloramphenicol ointment (unknown origin), because of the suspicion of
septicaemia after a bacterial infection. Two chicks from the affected animals (eggs laid at the
onset of the eye symptoms), which were artificially incubated and reared (no vaccination was
performed), were completely normal and in good health at 10 weeks of age (the moment of
presenting the adults).
Clinical examination
Two of the birds, one male and one female, both 1-year old, were presented. The animals
displayed a poor body condition (210g, normal bodyweight 230-250g), were depressed and
showed eye lesions, resulting in reduced eyesight. At the left side the female had
exophthalmia and a whitish yellow, amorphous granular material in the anterior eye chamber
that seemed to be attached to the cornea (Figure 1) and at the right side an opacity of the
cornea (Figure 2). The male had exophthalmia at the right side and similar material as
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
described in the female. The left eye appeared normal. Because of the high mortality, poor
prognosis and the importance of a correct diagnosis, the birds were euthanized by an
intravenous injection in the vena ulnaris of sodiumpentobarbital 0.5 ml/kg body weight
(Natrium Pentobarbital®, Kela Laboratoria, Belgium) for necropsy and further examination.
Necropsy and further diagnostic procedures
The two birds were submitted for necropsy. On both animals, a macroscopic evaluation of the
organs and cytology (Hemacolor®, VWR International, Leuven, Belgium) was done on
smears from lung, spleen, kidney, liver, crop and eye. Small and large intestines, as well as
caecal content were evaluated for endoparasites.
A swab of the eyes (cornea and anterior eye chamber) and faecal material from the female
were collected and routinely processed for bacteriological and mycological examination.
Faecal material of the same bird was examined for the presence of Salmonella sp. Eyes
including optical nerve, spleen, liver, lung, kidney, heart, proventriculus, ventriculus,
intestines and adrenal glands, were sampled and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. After
fixation, the samples were processed for histological examination. Paraffin sections were
stained with haematoxylin-eosin. Paraffin sections of the eye of the female were also stained
for CD-3 (T-lymphocytes) (Polyclonal Rabbit Anti-Human CD3, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark)
and CD-20 (B-lymphocytes) (Polyclonal Rabbit anti-Human CD20, Thermo Scientific,
Fremont, USA) immunohistochemistry. The former polyclonal antibody has been tested in
our laboratory and shows cross-reactivity with chicken B-lymphocytes. The latter was tested
by Jones et al. (1993) and appropriate to use on chicken tissue.
A swab from the eye of the female and samples from the liver of both animals were preserved
at -20°C for further molecular diagnostic procedures. DNA from these samples was extracted
using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen Ltd., Crawley, UK). A nested Herpesvirus
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
genus-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done as described by VanDevanter et al.
(1996) with adjustment of the annealing temperature to 43°C and 48°C for the first and
second assay, respectively. This assay targeted a region of the herpes viral DNA directed
DNA polymerase gene. DNA from an avian herpesvirus (Columbid Herpesvirus 1) served as
a positive control in these assays. All PCR assays were done using a Mastercycler thermal
cycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Secondary PCR products were run on a 1.5%
agarose gel stained with gelred for 75 min at 170 volt and visualized under UV-light to
evaluate the PCR results. Positive PCR products were submitted for Sanger sequencing
(GATC-Biotech, Constance, Germany) using the primers from the second PCR assay.
Reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) PCR, which targeted the gp90 gene, was done as
described previously by Li et al. (2012). REV antigen concentrate (Charles Rivers
Laboratories, Wilmington, USA) served as a positive control and water as a negative.
Equipment and gel electrophoresis were similar as mentioned above.
Results
Gross pathologic examination of both Roulrouls revealed no abnormalities except for the eye
lesions. Cytology of the internal organs and the eyes of the female showed no abnormalities.
Cytology of the right eye of the male showed heterophils, lymphocytes and coccoid bacteria,
however bacteriological and mycological examination of the eyes of both animals were
negative. The faecal material tested negative for Salmonella sp.
Histopathological examination of the eyes revealed a diffuse infiltration of the iris with round
cells with a large central nucleus and a narrow rim of cytoplasm (Figure 3). There was
moderate anisokaryosis and anisocytosis. There were an average of 2 mitoses per high power
field (HPF). These cells were also infiltrating in the corneal stroma and the corpus ciliare.
Additionally, paraffin sections of the eye ball were stained with a CD-3 and CD-20 specific
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
staining. The CD-3 specific staining was positive (Figure 4A) and the CD-20 staining
negative (Figure 4B), meaning that the eye was infiltrated by a monomorphic population of
T-lymphocytes in the absence of B-lymphocytes. Histology of the other organs revealed an
infiltration of lymphoblasts in the optic nerve, ventriculus, heart, kidney, lung and adrenal
glands.
REV PCR was negative and herpesvirus genus-specific PCR positive for the female eye
swab, female and male liver. These 3 latter PCR products revealed a single band on agarose
gel. To confirm the diagnosis of Marek’s disease, the PCR products were sequenced. The eye
revealed a sequence of 240 basepairs (bp) and the liver one of 245 bp. These sequences were
compared with known sequences using the on-line Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
(BLAST). Both sequences matched for 99% with the Gallid Herpesvirus 2 (Marek’s Disease
virus type 1).
Discussion
Ocular neoplasia in birds is a rare disease, with ocular lymphomatosis in chickens being the
most prevalent (Cho, 1974; Dukes & Pettit, 1983). Previous cases describing clinical signs
and histologic characteristics suggestive for Marek’s disease in partridges or closely related
birds such as quail and francolins are rare and the aetiology has never been confirmed
(Jennings, 1954; Biggs, 1967; Pettit et al., 1976). With recent techniques, and especially
PCR, confirming the diagnosis of Marek’s disease should be easier. To our knowledge, this is
the first confirmed diagnosis of Marek’s disease in partridges. It is remarkable that this virus
has a tropism for ocular tissue in this species and that there were no macroscopic
abnormalities noticed at the internal organs, although an infiltration of lymphoblasts was
present in may organs and the birds’ livers tested positive in the PCR. Ocular lesions as the
only gross anomaly in Marek’s disease has been reported previously in chickens (Ficken et
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
al., 1991). It appears to be caused by specific isolates. But in quail, a bird species closely
related to partridges, nerve lesions and ocular lesions due to Marek’s disease are rare (Kenzy
& Cho, 1969; Imai et al., 1991).
Pandiri et al. (2008) reported that the distribution of the lymphoid infiltrates in the eye differs
according to the time after infection. Lymphocytic infiltration of the iris is classified as an
early lesion while late lesions consist of aggregates of lymphocytes and macrophages in the
anterior chamber resulting in granular material often attached to the cornea. In this case
however, both lesions were present at the same time in one bird. Additionally, corneal
oedema was present. Most likely early eye lesions were present but obviously it was only the
granular material which drew the owner’s attention. These ocular changes most likely result
in impaired vision, followed by the inability to find food, resulting in wasting and eventually
death. Blindness due to Marek’s disease associated miosis and grey iris discoloration has
been described in chickens (Ficken et al., 1991), but was not present in this case.
Differential diagnosis in these cases includes Salmonella sp., Pasteurella multocida and
Mycoplasma gallisepticum septicaemia (Bayón et al., 2007) and intraocular aspergillosis
(Beckman et al., 1994). P. multocida associated ophthalmia has been reported in Turkeys
(Olson, 1981) resulting in similar granular material in the anterior chamber. Beckman et al.
(1994) reported intraocular aspergillosis in chicks which resulted in similar lesions as in the
present case. Nunya et al. (1995) reported a corneal opacity in layer chickens infected with
M. gallisepticum. Salmonella Typhimurium has been reported as the causative agent of eye
changes in young broilers (Hinz & Kaleta, 1970). The authors described similar material in
the anterior chamber as reported in this study. Bacteriological and mycological examination
of the eye swab and faecal material obtained from the female was negative. Furthermore, the
high morbidity and mortality, combined with the fast onset of symptoms and progression of
the infection, are more likely associated with a viral pathogen. Reticuloendotheliosis virus
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
(REV), an oncogenic retrovirus has been described in a number of species including chickens
(Robinson & Twiehaus, 1974), quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) (Carlson et al., 1974) and
partridges (Perdix perdix) (Trampel et al., 2002) and can cause similar gross lesions as
Marek’s disease virus, but often limited to the intestinal tract, liver and spleen (Carlson et al.,
1974; Trampel et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2007). Eye lesions caused by REV are not
mentioned. In the present case there were no gross lesions noticed at the internal organs as
described in REV cases. Besides, both liver samples and the eye sample tested negative in the
REV PCR assay.
Coccoid bacteria were observed in cytology smears of the male’s eye but cultures were not
obtained. These bacteria could be indigenous to the conjunctival flora (Zenoble et al., 1983)
or could be secondary to the viral primary pathogen.
In the present case, it was not possible to identify the source of infection with certainty. The
other species and specifically the other partridges showed no clinical symptoms. Most likely,
the Roulroul partridges were infected at a young age in the breeding facility from which the
animals were bought. In this breeding facility chickens were kept during the previous years.
Pradhan et al. (1985) already described the occurrence of Marek’s disease in quail located at
the same farm where there was a problem of recurrent Marek’s disease among chickens.
In the present outbreak, chicks from these infected parents showed no problems (at the
moment of diagnosis 10 weeks old). Artificial incubation and rearing is a good preventive
measure as vertical transmission of this virus in not seen (Solomon et al., 1970). The other
partridges showed no symptoms, probably because they came into contact with the virus from
the Roulrouls when they already gained age-resistance. Besides, these partridges were bought
from another breeding facility than the Roulrouls.
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
In conclusion, we can state that partridges are indeed susceptible to Marek’s disease virus. In
the present case, noteworthy is the presence of different ocular lesions in different animals in
absence of any other symptoms or macroscopic lesions.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. C. Adriaensen and Dr. P. Van Rooij for their skilful technical
assistance. This research was supported by the Research Fund of Ghent University, Belgium
(BOF Grant 01D20312).
References
Bayón, A., Almela, R.M. & Talavera, J. (2007). Avian ophthalmology. European Journal of
Companion Animal Practice, 17, 253-266.
Beckman, B.J., Howe, C.W., Trampel, D.W., DeBey, M.C., Richard, J.L. & Niyo, Y. (1994).
Aspergillus fumigatus keratitis with intraocular invasion in 15-day-old chicks. Avian
Diseases, 38, 660-665.
Biggs, P.M. (1967). Marek’s disease. Veterinary Record, 81, 583-592.
Biggs, P.M. & Nair, V. (2012). The long view: 40 years of Marek’s disease research and
Avian Pathology. Avian Pathology, 41, 3-9.
Blake-Dyke, C. & Baigent, S. (2013). Marek’s disease in commercial turkey flocks.
Veterinary Record, 173, 376.
Carlson, H.C., Seawright, G.L. & Pettit, J.R. (1974). Reticuloendotheliosis in Japanese quail.
Avian Pathology, 3, 169-175.
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
Cheng, Z., Shi, Y., Zhang, L., Zhu, G., Diao, X. & Cui, Z. (2007). Occurrence of
reticuolendotheliosis in Chinese partridge. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 69, 1295-
1298.
Cho, B.R. (1974). An isolation of Marek’s disease herpesvirus from aqueous humor of a
chicken with ocular form of Marek’s disease. Avian Diseases, 18, 267-270.
Davidson, I., Malkinson, M. & Weisman, Y. (2002). Marek’s disease in turkeys. I. A seven-
year survey of commercial flocks and experimental infection using two field isolates. Avian
Diseases, 46, 314-321.
Dukes, T.W. & Pettit, J.R. (1983). Avian ocular neoplasia – A description of spontaneaously
occurring cases. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine, 47, 33-36.
Ficken, M.D., Nasisse, M.P., Boggan, G.D., Guy, J.S., Wages, D.B., Witter, R.L.,
Rosenberger, J.K. & Nordgren R.M. (1991). Marek’s disease virus isolates with unusual
tropism and virulence for ocular tissues: Clinical findings, challenge studies and pathological
features. Avian Pathology, 20, 461-474.
Hinz, K.-H. & Kaleta, E.F. (1970) Augenveränderungen bei Hühnerküken infolge Salmonella
typhimurium-Infektion. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 34, 37-39.
Imai, K., Yuasa, N., Furuta, K., Narita, M., Banba, H., Kobayashi, S. & Horiuchi, T. (1991).
Comparative studies on pathological, virological and serological properties of Marek’s
disease virus isolated from Japanese quail and chicken. Avian Pathology, 20, 57-65.
Imai, K., Yuasa, N., Kobayashi, S., Nakamura, K., Tsukamoto, K. & Hihara, H. (1990).
Isolation of Marek’s disease virus from Japanese quail with lymfoproliferative disease. Avian
Pathology, 19, 119-129.
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
Jennings, A.R. (1954). Diseases in wild birds. Journal of Comparative Pathology, 64, 356-
359.
Kenzy, S.G. & Cho, B.R. (1969). Transmission of classical Marek’s disease by affected and
carrier birds. Avian Diseases, 13, 211-214.
Jones, M., Cordell, J.L., Beyers, A.D., Tse, A.G.D. & Mason, D.Y. (1993). Detection of T
and B cells in many animal species using cross-reactive anti-peptide antibodies. The Journal
of Immunology, 150, 5429-5435.
Lesnik, F., Pauer, T., Vrtiak, O.J., Danihel, M., Gdovinova, A. & Gergely, K. (1981).
Transmission of Marek’s disease to wild feathered game. Veterinarni Medicina, 26, 623-630.
Li, K., Gao, H., Gao, L., Qi, X., Qin, L., Gao, Y., Xu, Y. & Wang, X. (2012). Development
of taqman real-time PCR assay for detection and quantitation of reticuloendotheliosis virus.
Journal of Virological Methods, 179, 402-408.
Marek, J. (1907). Multiple nervenentzuedung (polyneuritis) bei huehnern. Deutsche
Tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 15, 417-421.
Murata, S., Chang, K.-S., Yamamoto, Y., Okada, T., Lee, S.-I., Konnai, S., Onuma, M., Osa,
Y., Asakawa, M. & Ohashi, K. (2007). Detection of the virulent Marek’s disease virus
genome from feather tips of wild geese in Japan and the Far East region of Russia. Archives
of Virology, 152, 1523-1526.
Murata, S., Hayashi, Y., Kato, A., Isezaki, M., Takasaki, S., Onuma, M., Osa, Y., Asakawa,
M., Konnai, S. & Ohashi, K. (2012). Surveillance of Marek’s disease virus in migratory and
sedentary birds in Hokkaido, Japan. The Veterinary Journal, 192, 538-540.
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
Nunoya, T., Yagihashi, T., Tajima, M. & Nagasawa, Y. (1995). Occurrence of
keratoconjunctivitis apparently caused by Mycoplasma gallisepticum in Layer chickens.
Veterinary Pathology, 32, 11-18.
Olson, L.D. (1981). Ophthalmia in turkeys infected with Pasteurella multocida. Avian
Diseases, 25, 423-430.
Pandiri, A.K.R., Cortes, A.L., Lee, L.F. & Gimeno, I.M. (2008). Marek’s disease virus
infection in the eye: chronological study of the lesions, virus replication, and vaccine-induced
protection. Avian Diseases, 52, 572-580.
Parcells, M.S., Arumugaswami, J.T., Prigge, J.T., Pandaya, K. & Dienglewicz, R.L. (2003).
Marek’s disease virus reactivation from latency: changes in gene expression at the origin of
replication. Poultry Science, 82, 893-898.
Pennycott, T.W. & Venugopal, K. (2002). Outbreak of Marek’s disease in a flock of turkeys
in Scotland. Veterinary Record, 150, 277-279.
Pennycott, T.W., Duncan, G. & Venugopal, K. (2003). Marek’s disease, candidiasis and
megabacteriosis in a flock of chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and Japanese quail
(Coturnix japonica). Veterinary Record, 153, 293-297.
Pettit, J.R., Taylor, P.A. & Gough, A.W. (1976). Microscopic lesions suggestive of Marek’s
Disease in a Black Francolin (Francolinus f. francolinus). Avian Diseases, 20, 410-415.
Pradhan, H.K., Mohanty, G.C. & Mukit, A. (1985). Marek’s disease in Japanese quails
(Coturnix coturnix japonica): a study of natural cases. Avian Diseases, 29, 575-582.
Robinson, F.R. & Twiehaus, M.J. (1974). Isolation of the avian reticuloendothelial virus
(Strain T). Avian Diseases, 18, 278-288.
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
Smith, T.W., Albert, D.M., Robinson, N., Calnek, B.W. & Schwabe, O. (1974). Ocular
manifestations of Marek’s disease. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 13, 586-
592.
Solomon, J.J., Witter, R.L., Stone, H.A. & Champion, L.R. (1970). Evidence against embryo
transmission of Marek’s disease virus. Avian Diseases, 14, 752-762.
Trampel, D.W., Pepper, T.M. & Witter, R.L. (2002). Reticuloendotheliosis in Hungarian
partridge. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 38, 438-442.
VanDevanter, D.R., Warrener, P., Bennett, L., Schultz, E.R., Coulter, S., Garber, R.L. &
Rose, T.M. (1996). Detection and analysis of diverse herpesviral species by consensus primer
PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 34, 1666-1671.
Zenoble, R.D., Griffith, R.W. & Clubb, S.L. (1983). Survey of bacteriologic flora of
conjunctiva and cornea in healthy psittacine birds. American Journal of Veterinary Research,
44, 1966-1967.
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
Figure 1: Left eye of the female showing the whitish yellow, amorphous granular material in
the anterior eye chamber.
Figure 2: Right eye of the female with distinct corneal opacity.
Figure 3: Histopathological section (HE) of the female’s iris (I) showing a diffuse infiltration
with round cells with a large central nucleus and a large amount of apoptotic cell bodies (C:
Cornea).
Figure 4: Immunohistochemistry of the female’s eye shows a T-lymphocyte infiltration in the
iris (I) (CD-3 immunohistochemistry) (A) and an absence of B-lymphocyte infiltration in the
(CD-20 immunohistochemistry) (B) (L: lens).
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326