Post on 07-Apr-2018
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 1/46
Click to edit Master subtitle style
4/20/12
Business Process Re-
engineering
Cost Benefit Analysis Toyota
Presented by :Anirudh Rohit B 42Kartikeya Raina B 45Rahul Ravi B 49Saheb Ali B 53Sandeep Yadav B 55
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 2/46
4/20/12
SCOPE
• Introduction to the topic
• Introduction to case
• Objective
• Assumptions
• Observation
• Analysis of collected data
• Implementation
• Conclusion
• Recommendations
• Bibliography
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 3/46
4/20/12
INTRODUCTION 1
Cost–Benefit analysis or Benefit–Cost analysis
• Economic decision-making approach
• Used in government and business
• Assessment of whether a proposed project,programme or policy is worth doing
• OR - choose between several alternative ones.
• Compares total expected costs against the totalexpected benefits
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 4/46
4/20/12
INTRODUCTION 2
• Benefits and costs are expressed in money terms,and are adjusted for the time value of money
• All flows of benefits and flows of project costs over
time are expressed on a common basis in terms of their "present value“
• The aim is to gauge the efficiency of theinterventions relative to each other and the status
quo• Closely related to
o cost-effectiveness analysis
o cost–utility analysis
o Economic impact analysis
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 5/46
4/20/12
INTRODUCTION 3
Key Cost–Benefit Indicators :
• NPV (Net Present Value)
• PVB (Present Value Of Benefits)
• PVC (Present Value Of Costs)
• BCR (Benefit Cost Ratio = PVB / PVC)
• NB (Net benefit = PVB - PVC)
• NPV/k (where k is the level of fundsavailable)
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 6/46
Click to edit Master subtitle style
4/20/12
CASE INTRODUCTION
BPR Initiatives inToyota Motor Corporation– Australia (TMCA)
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 7/46
4/20/12
HISTORY OF TOYOTA
AUSTRALIA• Toyota Motor Corporation Australia (TMCA) is a
subsidiary of Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC)
• Toyota Australia’s origins go back to 1958
• The commercial vehicle business became Thesis Toyota in 1971
• In 1988, Toyota’s local operations were unified toform Toyota Motor Corporation Australia
• Two models—the Camry and Avalon series
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 8/46
4/20/12
TOYOTA AUSTRALIA BUSINESS SCENARIO
2004-05• Second largest vehicle manufacturer in
Australia
• Exports - over 60,000 cars to over 20
different commercial locations worldwidein 2003
• Toyota is a people oriented organizationthat sees the development of its staff as a
foundation stone for future businessprosperity
• Toyota has long been recognized as one of the most efficient manufacturers in the
world
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 9/46
4/20/12
TMCA - SUPPLY
NETWORK The basic of Toyota Australia’s supplynetwork:
o Supplier Association
o Effect of “knowledge sharing network” onsupply chain coordination
o Upstream and downstream entities
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 10/46
4/20/12
TMCA - CHALLENGES
After a series of research, few criticalfactors were identified:
o Bundled outsourcing
o Logistic challenge
o Import of vehicle components
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 11/46
4/20/12
OBJECTIVES
• Increase domestic supplier base
• Linear supply chain
• Reduce reliance on forecast planning forproduction
• Increase Vertical industrial relations environment
- Enabled through BPR initiatives & IT Solution
• To Evaluate options using CBA
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 12/46
4/20/12
ASSUMPTION 1
Valuation
• The costs of an intervention are usually financial
• Evaluating benefits - list all parties affected by anintervention and place a value, usually monetary, on the(positive or negative) effect it has on their welfare as itwould be valued by them
• Putting actual values on these is often difficult; surveys orinferences from market behavior are often used.
Time
• All relevant costs and benefits put on a common temporalfooting using time value of money formulas
• This is often done by converting the future expected
streams of costs and benefits into a present value amountusing a suitable discount rate
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 13/46
4/20/12
ASSUMPTION 2
Risk and uncertainty
• Risk associated with the outcome of projects is also usually
taken into account using probability theory.• This can be factored into the discount rate (to have
uncertainty increasing over time), but is usually consideredseparately.
• Uncertainty in the CBA parameters is evaluated using asensitivity analysis, which shows how the results areaffected by changes in the parameters
• The accuracy of the outcome of a cost–benefit analysis
depends on how accurately costs and benefits have been
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 14/46
4/20/12
ASSUMPTION 3
• Studies indicate that the outcomes of cost–benefitanalysis should be treated with caution becausethey may be highly inaccurate
• Rely on past projects
• Rely on the project's members to identify thesignificant cost drivers
• Rely on very crude heuristics to estimate themoney cost of the intangible elements
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 15/46
4/20/12
OBSERVATIONS
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 16/46
4/20/12
SOLUTION FOR TMC
Enterprise ResourcePlanning System
(ERP)
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 17/46
4/20/12
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 18/46
4/20/12
ENTERPRISE RESOURCEPLANNING SYSTEM
• One of the largest automotive companies in theworld
• Total of 51 overseas manufacturing companies in
26 countries / locations• Overseas network consisting of more than 160
importers / distributors and numerous dealers
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 19/46
4/20/12
ENTERPRISE RESOURCEPLANNING SYSTEM
• SAP Automotive ERP Suit
• Main means of information flow between Toyotaand its counterparts worldwide
•
Tighter collaboration links• With SAP, gain:
o Outstanding strategic
o Operational
o
Financial
o Marketing positions
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 20/46
4/20/12
E-MARKETPLACE
• iStarXchange
• Initiative with i2 Technologies Inc.
• Allow subscripted members able to view a
single catalogue to:o view information on parts
o checking the prices and availability
o conduct transaction online
o forecasting supply and demand
o delivery cycle
• Improved forecasting
• Enhancing the planning
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 21/46
4/20/12
SUPPLIER WEBSITE
IMPLEMENTATION OF A
SUPPLIER WEBSITE
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 22/46
4/20/12
SOLUTIONDESCRIPTION
• Goal : Provide a Comprehensive Domestic SupplierBaseSOLUTION: Implementation of a supplier web site
U.S. version of Toyota supplier web sitewww.toyotasupplier.com
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 23/46
4/20/12
SUPPLIER WEBSITE
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 24/46
4/20/12
SUPPLIER WEBSITE
Reason
• Many of TMCA’s car components have to be imported due to thelack of domestic suppliers
o
Application of the “right part at the right place at the right time” conceptor JIT to lack the optimal efficiency throughout the TMCA supply chain.
• The implementation of a comprehensive domestic supplier base isessential.
• Provision of collaborative web site linking current TMCA onlinepresence which provides similar functions to the Toyota supplier’sweb site currently in use in North America
o Allowing TMCA to have comprehensive overview of their currentsuppliers.
o
Also reducing the red-tape involved to be part of the TMCA supply chain;and most importantly
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 25/46
4/20/12
SUPPLIER WEBSITE
• Web site functions
o Potential suppliers will be able to acquire information on therequirements of becoming part of TMCA’s supplier network
• Potential suppliers need only to download/complete an online formto join the network
• Information such as
o Supplier’s guide
o Community activities; and
o Any core information about TMCA’s current supplier’s network can beobtained from the website.
o Connection links provided to domestic e-Marketplace
• Registered e-Marketplace members:
o Able to enjoy the privileges on what the e-Marketplace is offering
•
To be discussed in Solution 2
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 26/46
4/20/12
SUPPLIER WEBSITE
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 27/46
4/20/12
SUPPLIER WEBSITE
• TMCA focused on core competencies in
o high-end design
o engineering and
o
system integration
• Toyota Australia needs highly focusedcore competency oriented suppliers.
• Small and diverse companies though have the ability todisplay such potential to add
o Innovation
o
Flexibility ando ’
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 28/46
4/20/12
SUPPLIER WEBSITE
• TMCA first has to open its doors to thedomestic market suppliers
o Invest in their new concept of supply base
• Target: 100% domestic suppliers
• Supplier-centric web site Provide
o
opportunitiesto expand TMCAsupplier network.
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 29/46
4/20/12
REAL TIME INVENTORY TRACKING MODULE
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 30/46
4/20/12
SOLUTION
Real Time Inventory Tracking Module
Why did introduce this module?
• GOAL : Provide real-time updates on demandand supply allocation
• Solution: Real-time tracking function moduleincorporated into the current electronic BEAsystem
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 31/46
4/20/12
GRAPHICAL OVERVIEW
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 32/46
4/20/12
GENERAL OVERVIEW
• A complete modular solution,
• reduce the bullwhip effect which causes shifts inorders up and down the supply chain,
• eliminating any stockpiling cause by the currentforecast method of determining the quantity of components needed for the productions.
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 33/46
4/20/12
Analysis Of Collected
Data
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 34/46
4/20/12
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 1
Development Cost :
Team of developers required by TMCA:1 Project Leader
2 System Analysts10 Programmers
SALARIES AND WAGES
Team member Salary/wages for project
Project Leader $50,000.00
Senior system analyst $35,000.00
System analyst $30,000.00
Programmer analysts $60,000.00
Programmers $160,000.00
System programmers $50,000.00
Total salaries and wages $385,000.00
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 35/46
4/20/12
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 2
Development Costs
GraphSUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT COST
Expenses Amount
Salaries/wages $385,000.00
Software/installation $100,000.00
Trainning $200,000.00
Facilities $120,000.00
Utilities $70,000.00
Miscellaneous $100,000.00
Upgrade Licenses $10,000.00
Support Staff $50,000.00Total $1,035,000.00
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 36/46
4/20/12
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 3
SUMMARY OF ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS
Recurring expense Amount
Connectivity $50,000.00
Equipment/installation $20,000.00
Programming support $80,000.00
Training & ongoing assistance $120,000.00
Advertising $50,000.00
Total recuring costs $320,000.00
Annual Operating CostsGraph
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 37/46
4/20/12
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 4
Sample Benefits
GraphSAMPLE BENEFITS
Benefits/cost saving Amount
Increased localization of parts $300,000.00
Efficiency and flexibility indealing with suppliers. $200,000.00
Reduced shipping costs $250,000.00
Increased sales of cars/parts $1,300,000.00
Other savings $100,000.00
Total annual benefits $2,150,000.00
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 38/46
4/20/12
Cost Benefit Analysis
Net Present Value
&Return of Investment
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 39/46
4/20/12
NPV & ROI
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 40/46
COST
Categories of Cost Significant Major Minor
Development/maintenance costs X
Cost to involve Existing suppliers X
Shipping cost X Attracting new suppliers X
Disruptions to staff X
Additional staff to handle the system X
Threats of competitors taking advantage of similar technology and achieving similar efficiency improvements
X
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 41/46
BENEFITS
Categories of Benefits Significant Major Minor
Increased localization of parts X
Expanded sales and customer base X
Efficiency and flexibility in dealing with
supplier
X
Gaining experience that would assist withfuture e-commerce ventures.
X
Increasing the business’ competitiveadvantage
X
Suppliers remain loyal due the range of services offered
X
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 42/46
4/20/12
IMPLEMENTATION
• NVA showed ROI as 262.54 %
• All steps were put into implementation
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 43/46
4/20/12
CONCLUSION
A n n u a l S a l
e s
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 44/46
4/20/12
RECOMMENDATIONS 1
• Project costo Professional constraint programmers + months of
development time
o Willing to invest significant amount
• The need to train internal and external userso Company staff, suppliers, customers, automotive
manufacturers, etc.
• Proper infrastructure needs to be providedo Users need to be capable of operating the system
with minimal technical support
o
Willing to spend significant amount of time and money•
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 45/46
4/20/12
RECOMMENDATIONS 2
• The need to retain system expertso None of required skills currently available to
develop/support the system
• Preparing for possible outcomes• Toyota should be prepared for project failure
o A contingency plan
• fall-back to other alternatives
• Other methods of CBA to be used
•
CBA assumption must be properly researchedespecially non- tangible aspects
8/4/2019 BPR_sandeep yadav
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bprsandeep-yadav 46/46
BIBLIOGRAPHY
• http://www.toyota.com.au/about/key-facts
• http://www.toyota.com.au/toyota/promise
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Australia
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_benefit_analysis
• Report by Flyvbjerg, Holm, and Buhl, 2002
• http:// www.toyotasupplier.com