Post on 24-May-2018
Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies
BETTER
Turkey SWOT Analysis
Project Coordinator: CIEMAT
Work Package 5 Leader Organization: DLR
Task 5.4 Leader Organisation: NTUA
Additional Deliverable
March 2015
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 2
Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Project Acronym: BETTER
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies
Turkey SWOT Analysis
March 2015
Project Coordinator: CIEMAT
Work Package 5 Leader Organization: DLR
Task 5.4 Leader Organisation: NTUA
Authors: Chara Karakosta, Katerina Papapostolou, Vangelis Marinakis (NTUA)
Contributions from: CIEMAT
Additional Deliverable
Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this report lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EACI nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 3
PREFACE
BETTER intends to address RES cooperation between the EU and third countries. The RES
Directive allows Member States to cooperate with third countries to achieve their 2020 RES targets
in a more cost efficient way. The core objective of BETTER is to assess, through case studies,
stakeholders involvement and integrated analysis, to what extent this cooperation can help Europe
achieve its RES targets in 2020 and beyond, trigger the deployment of RES electricity projects in
third countries and create win-win circumstances for all involved parties.
The case studies focusing on North Africa, the Western Balkans and Turkey will investigate the
technical, socio-economic and environmental aspects of RES cooperation. Additionally, an
integrated assessment will be undertaken from the “EU plus third countries” perspective, including
a quantitative cost-benefit evaluation of feasible policy approaches as well as strategic power
system analyses. Impacts on the achievement of EU climate targets, energy security, and macro-
economic aspects will be also analysed.
The strong involvement of all relevant stakeholders will enable a more thorough understanding of
the variables at play, an identification and prioritisation of necessary policy prerequisites. The
dissemination strategy lays a special emphasis on reaching European-wide actors and
stakeholders, well, beyond the target area region.
PROJECT PARTNERS
No Participant name Short Name Country code
CO1 Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Tecnológicas y Medioambientales
CIEMAT ES
CB2 German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V.)
DLR DE
CB3 Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands ECN NL
CB4 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH JR AT
CB5 National Technical University of Athens NTUA GR
CB6 Observatoire Mediterranéen de l’Energie OME FR
CB7 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research PIK DE
CB8 Vienna University of Technology TUWIEN AT
CB9 United Nations Development Program UNDP HR
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5
2. TURKEY SWOT ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................... 8
3. DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 21
4. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 23
5. ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... 26
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 5
1. INTRODUCTION
The SWOT methodology is a strategic analysis tool that combines the study of the strengths and
weaknesses of an organization, territory, project or sector with the study of opportunities and
threats in its environment. The goal is to help define a development strategy [1, 2]. It is commonly
accepted that a project’s strengths and weaknesses demonstrate the project’s internal
characteristics and are controllable; and opportunities and threats are determined by external
factors on which the project has no direct control but can react to its own advantage. SWOT
analysis is a methodology allowing understanding and planning on how to use strengths to exploit
opportunities, to recognize and repair or avoid weaknesses, and to defend against or sidestep any
threats.
The SWOT analysis has been applied to a great extent in the regional energy planning and
management [3, 4], as well as in renewable energy schemes [5 - 7]. In particular, SWOT analysis
has been used so far in order to investigate and assess the current status of renewable energy
sources (RES) in different regions [8, 9] yielding a good basis for formulating policy
recommendations regarding enhanced utilization of RES. The use of SWOT Analysis for exploring
energy sector conditions and developing an environmental strategic plan could enable a correct
comprehension of the current energy situation and serve as a basis for objectives and strategies
proposal [2].
The current SWOT analysis is used in order to assess Turkey’s, situation as conducive to
implement RES projects under Article 9 of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED). The aim is to
identify factors that are favourable (Strengths, Opportunities) and unfavourable (Weaknesses,
Threats) to the use of Art. 9. The SWOT Analysis is utilised to assess the specific strengths and
weaknesses of Turkey, and the opportunities and risks of cooperation mechanisms between
European Union (EU) and Turkey. The SWOT analysis helps to create opportunities and then
capitalise on them, as well as manage possible threats, so that the 2020 RES targets will not be
compromised by unfavourable evolution.
The SWOT analysis intents to identify win-win actions for both EU Member States and neighbouring countries by providing answers to the following questions:
How can we make the most from the regions´ strengths to increase the cumulative welfare of both EU and the regional countries?
How can we circumvent the regions´ weaknesses by choosing the best technology options?
How can we create opportunities and then capitalize on them?
How can we manage possible threats, so that the 2020 RES targets will not be compromised by unfavourable evolution?
The particular approach differs from the typical SWOT analysis, since the Strengths and
Weaknesses accounts for the current host country’s situation assessment regarding the
implementation of cooperation mechanisms, while the Opportunities and Threats for the possible
future (internal and external) developments in the ability to change the current situation.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
D9.3. Information Packs of BETTER – 5th Version Page 6
Figure 1: SWOT Analysis - BETTER Approach
In the above context, a three-level framework is followed in order to cover important dimensions
regarding the assessment of a host country for the implementation of cooperation mechanism. As
proposed in BETTER deliverable “D2.4: Issues that are Likely to Play a Key Role in the
Implementation of the Cooperation Mechanism” developed by Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact
Research (PIK) [10], a host country should be examined in a macro-economic, micro-economic
and acceptance level.
Macro-economic issues can play an important role in implementing RES projects under the
umbrella of cooperation mechanisms. Without any political will and support and thus without the
regulatory framework to facilitate and encourage the implementation of joint projects investments in
these projects are hardly feasible. However, macro-economic feasibility is not enough to ensure
micro-level attractiveness, so that private firms may be uninterested to invest in Article 9 projects
although from a macroeconomic point of view it would be rational. Accordingly, by defining policies
and institutions to promote and support joint projects with third countries policy-makers have to
translate the macro-economic advantages into micro-economic opportunities for the project.
Finally, from a social acceptance point of you, if the public discourse is mainly characterized by
oppositional groups arguing against joint projects, policy-makers may not be willing to create
favourable investment conditions in terms of support mechanism and regulation.
Within this three level structure, 13 pivotal factors were identified reflecting the favourable and non-
favourable conditions for joint projects in Turkey (Figure 2). These factors were presented to
experts and stakeholders in order to gather feedback and proceed with the SWOT analysis based
on the responses received.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
D9.3. Information Packs of BETTER – 5th Version Page 7
Figure 2: SWOT Analysis Structure
The current SWOT Analysis for Turkey has been conducted taking into account an extended
literature review, examining potential opportunities and barriers that promote or hinder the
development and implementation of cooperation mechanisms in the country. EU and Turkish
stakeholders’ involvement was the key guarantee that the proper questions are addressed that
assumptions are valid and that results are meaningful and open opportunities for market
development. Bilateral meetings with stakeholders, as well as stakeholder workshops provided
feedback to the SWOT analysis. Therefore, discussions, as well as face to face meetings with
experts and regional stakeholders at the BETTER Regional Workshop implemented in Ankara,
Turkey on the 15th of May, 2014 were important to intensify, enhance and finalise the initial SWOT
analysis.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378 Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 8
2. TURKEY SWOT ANALYSIS
Strengths (current)
Weaknesses (current)
Opportunities (future)
Threats (future)
Energy system strategy and energy outlook
Important increase of RES electricity production [11].
Increased electricity generation from hydroelectric stations [12].
Turkey's intention to make privatization in every sector of the energy market [13].
Turkey's electricity demand grew by more than 90% from 2001 to 2011 [14].
The equipment used for the construction of RES power plants is imported.
Plans and agreements for the construction of new projects (hydropower stations, wind turbines, biomass projects) [15], [16].
Plans for modernization of
existing power plants.
These projects involve
thermal and hydroelectric
stations.
Turkey expects significant
investments in RES within
the next 10 years, as
demand for energy is
increasing faster than the
economic growth of the
country.
Turkey intends to become
an energy exporter.
The important extraction
costs of coal and its
extensive use, as a
national energy source,
create the need for
exploiting new energy
technologies and abandon
the great dependence on
According to estimations, the annual increase in electricity consumption for the years 2010-2020 is expected to be around 7% [17].
Limited incentives for geothermal development projects where there is huge potential.
Existence of limited
network development
actions.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378 Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 9
conventional fossil fuels
for electricity generation.
RES Industry development
The equipment used for the construction of wind parks and hydro-electric power production projects are imported.
Lack of experience and appropriate domestic human resources for managing large energy and environmental projects.
Incentives for the establishment of companies that produce RES equipment, so that it will not be necessary to import them [18].
Energy security Excellent destination for
both electricity and natural gas exports [14].
For several years, Turkey constitutes an electricity importer country.
Turkey is establishing itself as a transit country for natural gas transport to the European market [14].
Dependence on other countries. Imports of oil, natural gas, coal for electricity generation [19].
Market structure of energy system
Long-term contracts to purchase electricity produced from RES [20].
Small scale producers (installed power up to 0.5 MW) are exempt from the issue of relevant license [21].
Privatization of a part of infrastructures.
Electricity imports and
exports in Turkey have
been released.
There is significant reliance on international markets, as well as on foreign suppliers [22].
Grid and Interconnections
Existence and continuing development of new interconnections with neighboring countries. Several cross-border interconnections designed or already in operation [23].
Development and enhancement of the transmission grid in order to make the country an
Important electrical losses on the network [24].
There was not a complete
and detailed inventory of
the capabilities of existing
infrastructure.
Technical limitations on
distribution network -
increased losses and
availability problems.
Efforts to enhance and
improve the distribution
and transmission network.
Effort to reduce network
losses and electricity
thefts
Plans for construction and
expansion of the new
cross-border electricity
interconnections.
Existence of network
infrastructure that needs
strengthening and proper
maintenance.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378 Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 10
energy exporter.
Turkey is already
interconnected with EU
Members. The
interconnection is realized
by the ENTSO-E\SCR.
Permanent synchronous
operation of the Turkish
and Albanian electricity
transmission systems with
the Continental Europe
system [25].
RE Regulatory & Policy Framework
Existence of a legislative framework aimed at providing incentives to power generators. The legislative acts of 2005 [26], 2011 (law on utilization of renewable energy sources for the purpose of generating electrical energy) laid the foundations in this direction as they determined the guaranteed prices.
Electricity Market Law [28] of 2001 obligated TEIAS and distribution companies to give priority to RE producers to be connected to the network.
The license to be issued is
up to 99% less expensive
than the electricity
generation from
conventional sources.
Legislations and creation
of mechanisms that
introduce private initiative
in electricity generation
(BOT, BOO TYPE
Existence of bureaucratic obstacles that delay the issue of the appropriate licenses [27].
Legislation review where necessary.
Emphasis and design of
actions for the promotion
of dispersed generation
with RES technologies.
Turkey becomes a
member of the EU.
Delays in privatization and
private sector
participation.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378 Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 11
CONTRACTS, TOR).
Institutional Framework for RES deployment
Providing incentives for RES projects through the Renewable Energy Law (2011) [29].
Creation of workgroups aiming at reducing barriers and strengthening private initiative in the field of RES.
Although electricity imports and exports in the country have been liberalized, Turkey is feeling the effect of the worldwide recession through a decline in export demand and capital inflows [30].
Creation of a competitive market.
Possibility of private
investors’ participation in
RES projects through
dispersed energy
production and electricity
distribution.
Limited incentives for electricity generation from biomass and geothermal energy despite they are fields with unexploited potential [31].
Financial risks and uncertainty
Possibility of project financing from the European Union (especially for projects involving energy generation from biomass).
Funding from the Turkish
banking system.
Efforts to attract domestic and foreign investors [32].
Investment interest and creation of international partnerships.
Relatively favourable conditions to the starting and operation of a local firm. (Ease of doing business 55/189 [33].
Limited use of financial instruments for the development of RES investment.
General country risk is relatively high (4 in OECD index) [34].
Creation of energy exchange.
Development of
cooperation mechanisms
between neighboring
countries.
The conversion rate between Turkish lira and foreign currencies affects the investment cost [35].
Investment facilitation
Set FITs for energy produced from hydroelectric plants, biomass, geothermal units, solar energy and hydropower parks [36].
Energy market liberalization, synergies from mergers of small
Bureaucracy and complex procedures governing investment despite the considerable efforts to revise the existing legislative framework [37], [38].
Redefinition of FITs
depending on the target
that will be set.
It is the investor who bears
the cost of the
interconnection with the
network. In some cases
In Turkey the delay in utilization of RES that have attracted the interest of private investors, in conjunction with the government investments in the electricity generation from nuclear energy impedes the participation
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378 Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 12
scale companies. because of long distances
this cost is crucial to the
outcome of the
investment.
of private capital in RES investments [39].
Increased investment
costs as equipment used
in RES projects is
imported.
RES capacity/potential/ Available Technology Options
Research development in the electricity sector with a focus on RES.
Large solar, wind and especially hydro [12] and geothermal [40] potential.
The energy production from RES is primarily due to the existence of hydroelectric power stations. The hydroelectric power stations cover approximately 20% of electricity generation [41].
Existence of hydroelectric power stations, solar parks, wind turbine installations [19].
Unexploited RES (especially geothermal) potential [42].
Exploitation of the very high RES potential aiming at reduction of energy imports.
Appropriate conditions for wind turbine installation in the Aegean Sea and the Sea of Marmara [16].
Participation in research
projects of the 6th and 7
th
European framework
exploiting the research
opportunities offered by
EU.
Public awareness/acceptance
Promotional campaign for RES advantages (advocating for the environmental and socio-economic benefits).
RES are perceived as less
risky activities than
nuclear and other fossil
fuel technologies (such as
coal).
Neocolonialism
Possible rejection due to negative environmental impacts of RES (visual impacts, deforestation, etc.).
Possible rejection by workers in coal and other fossil fuel sectors.
High social acceptance due to environmental benefits at the local level as a result of a decarbonized energy mix (e.g.: lower local pollutants).
High social acceptance due to job creation and economic stimulation in rural areas.
High acceptance due to Turkish RES industry
Economic benefits of RES deployment are only captured by a small fraction of society.
Negative environmental effects (visual impacts, deforestation) due to RES plants for exports are not minimized.
Best and less expensive RES potentials are used for exports and not for huge domestic demand.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378 Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 13
development.
High acceptance due to revenues from exports.
High acceptance due to safer working conditions than fossil fuel related activities.
If environmental and social safeguard standards for RES exports were put in place, there would be higher social acceptance.
Environmental effects
High potential to reduce many local and global environmental impacts associated to fossil fuels due to the RES availability along the country.
Potential negative environmental impacts of RES technologies deployment (visual intrusion, impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity).
Additionally, for wind, risk of changes on migratory routes of birds and noise impacts. For hydro, high risk of impacts on fauna and water (eutrophication of reservoir water, alteration of hydrological regimes and river course and increased sedimentation).
The increase of RES electricity in the future scenarios contributes to reduce most of the potential environmental impacts.
Climate change could be reduced around 45% in the strongest future scenario (compared to BAU 2020)
Mineral resource depletion could be affected due to the strong increase of PV. The most efficient PV technologies should be considered in order to minimize this potential effect.
Wind onshore and PV production plants will require large areas. Other environmental impacts not covered by this analysis might occur when implementing these plants. Additional studies should be conducted in order to minimize the potential in-situ impacts.
Socio-economic effects
Compared to fossil fuel and nuclear related technologies, RES projects are less risky activities (lower health and safety risks).
Turkish industrial
The electricity sector in general has a high health and safety risks and this could contaminate RES activities.
The electricity sector has high gender
Economic growth as a result of RES deployment in a wide range of sectors.
Job creation as a result of the local content incentives.
Benefits in terms of job
Risk of not benefiting local communities.
Job loss in some parts of the value chain that is not supplied locally.
Bad distribution of benefits.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378 Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 14
capabilities are already
able to produce locally
most goods and services
along the RES value
chain.
The existing local content
policies incentives seem to
be effective.
discrimination.
High skills and paid jobs might not be local.
creation and economic activity in rural areas.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 15
Strengths
Turkey provides an especially attractive option for RES projects under Article 9 for a wide variety of
reasons.
As regards Turkey’s energy and RES profile, it is characterized by a high solar, wind and
especially geothermal [43, 40] and hydro potential [12, 44]. The last decades Turkey faces
important increase of RES electricity generation, especially from hydroelectric power stations,
which cover approximately 20% of electricity generation [45]. Apart from the hydroelectric power
stations, there are also solar parks and wind turbines installed in the region [46].
Turkey intends to privatise every sector of the energy market. Since 2005, a regulation policy has
been progressively implemented in Turkey to support the unbundling process. A legislative
framework has been established, aimed at providing incentives to RES power generators.
The legislative acts of 2005 and 2011 (Law No. 5346 on Utilization of Renewable Energy Sources
for the Purpose of Generating Electrical Energy) [26] laid the foundations in this direction as they
determined the guaranteed prices. The effort is further enhanced by the creation of mechanisms
that introduce private initiative in electricity generation (BOT, BOO TYPE CONTRACTS, TOR).
This law was a key step towards strengthening the decentralized renewable energy sector
because it includes various kinds of incentives to promote renewable energy. Some incentive
mechanisms, such as licensing, land appropriation and purchase guarantee by a constant feed-in
tariff were introduced to the Turkish market for electricity generation from renewable energy
sources [47, 48].
In addition, the Electricity Market Law of 2001 obligated TEIAS (Law No. 4628) [27] and distribution
companies to give priority to RES producers to be connected to the network, showing that RES-E
is high on Turkey’s political agenda and providing, in this way, incentives for RES cooperation
projects [49].
Investment risk for RES projects was reduced in Turkey through the establishment of Feed-in-
Tariffs (FITs) for energy produced from hydroelectric plants, biomass, geothermal units, solar
energy and wind parks, as well as through the energy market liberalization and synergies from
mergers of small scale companies [50].
The restructuring of companies will enhance the performance of the electricity sector, reducing
cost and debt, as well as attracting new investments and cooperation opportunities between
neighbouring countries.
According to the “Electricity Market and Security of Supply Strategy”, approved in May 2009, the
Turkish government has outlined an overall target for renewable sources, aiming to provide at least
30% of electricity generation by 2023 [51]. The Strategy Paper draws together the essential
elements for ensuring security of supply and enhancing competitiveness in the rapidly growing
electricity market of Turkey, minimizing the risk for potential investment under the umbrella of the
cooperation mechanism. In addition, the new law, namely “Renewable Energy Law”, which
comprises new incentives for renewable energy productions, was enacted at the end of 2010.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 16
Under this law, the government aims to increase energy production from renewable energy
resources, giving further incentives to potential investors [29].
Regarding Turkey’s energy market structure, long-term contracts are supported for the purchase of
electricity produced from RES. Licenses to be issued for RES electricity generation are far less
expensive compared to those from conventional energy sources, while small scale producers are
exempt from having to issue a license [20].
Efforts are made for the development and enhancement of the transmission grid, since Turkey has
expressed intentions to become an energy exporter. Several cross-border interconnections with
neighbouring countries are designed or are in operation. Turkey is already interconnected with
European Member States. Interconnections are directed firstly to the north rather than the south. In
particular, the Turkish grid is interconnected to those of Armenia (220 kV), Azerbaijan (154 kV),
Bulgaria (400 kV), Georgia (220 kV), Greece (154 kV), Iran (154 kV and 400 kV), Iraq (400 kV),
and Syria (400 kV) [17]. It is worth mentioning that development of new interconnections with
neighbouring countries is designed through several projects [11].
Efforts to attract domestic and foreign investors have succeeded to raise investment interest and
facilitate creation of international partnerships. Funding opportunities for RES projects are available
in Turkey from various sources. Apart from funding from the national banking system, financing
from the European Union is also possible, especially in the case of projects involving energy
generation from biomass [23].
With regards to acceptance level, RES are perceived as less risky activities in terms of health and
safety compared to other energy sources, such as nuclear and other fossil fuel technologies.
Turkish industrial capabilities are already able to produce locally most goods and services along
the RES value chain, while the existing local content policies incentives seem to be effective in
supporting RES projects.
Weaknesses
One of the main Turkey’s weaknesses as regards the country’s RES status is that it has
unexploited RES (especially geothermal) potential, which may reduce the investment
attractiveness [42].
For several years, Turkey constitutes an electricity importer country [15]. Compared to Turkey’s
domestic electricity needs, its energy resource endowments are modest [17]. In addition, Turkey's
electricity demand grew by more than 90% from 2001 to 2011 [14]. Major shares of the energy
demand are met by natural gas, oil and coal imports, indicating the dependency of the country in
conventional fuels.
Based on the International Energy Agency (2010), Turkey will likely see the fastest medium to
long-term growth in electricity demand among the IEA member countries. Closely intertwined with
economic growth, energy use in Turkey is expected to roughly double over the next decade, and
electricity demand is likely to increase even faster [37].
This fact could indicate a further barrier for the country to make use of the cooperation mechanism
for RES exporting between Turkey and European countries taking into account that the higher the
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 17
energy demand growth, the greater the risk that the existing supply and new energy infrastructure
investments will not be able to provide the required energy supply.
The technical limitations on the distribution network lead to increase of electrical losses and
availability problems on the network, which hinder the possibility of exporting electricity to
neighbouring countries. In addition, despite the fact that the Turkish electricity market has a
multitude of different electricity sources from various energy forms, there is no complete and
detailed inventory of the capabilities of existing infrastructure in the country.
In terms of RES industry in Turkey, there is lack of experience and appropriate domestic human
resources for managing large energy and environmental projects; which is also intensified by the
fact that the equipment used for the construction of RES power plants is imported, further
highlighting the vulnerability of Turkish industry to support RES project.
As regards the RES investment readiness in Turkey, there is limited use of financial instruments for
the development of RES investment. Bureaucracy [28] and complex procedures delay investment
despite the considerable efforts to revise the existing legislative framework [37], [38]. Although
electricity imports and exports in the country have been liberalized, Turkey is feeling the effect of
the worldwide recession through a decline in export demand and capital inflows [30].
In terms of social acceptance, there is a possibility of RES projects rejection not only due to
negative visual impacts of the infrastructure or deforestation and negative environmental impacts
of RES technologies deployment (visual intrusion, impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity), but
also due to workers in coal and other fossil fuel sectors unwillingness. The electricity sector, in
general, has a high health and safety risks and this could contaminate RES activities, while there is
high gender discrimination and it is possible that high skills and paid jobs will not be local.
Opportunities
There is high hydro- and wind power potential still remaining unexploited [52, 53] and the Turkish
government has extensive plans of exploitation, aiming at the reduction of energy imports and the
initiation of energy exports, and thus a conducive environment for the implementation of joint
projects to be developed. These plans include the construction of new RES projects and the
modernization of existing power plants involving thermal and hydroelectric stations. Regarding
wind turbine installation, conditions in the Aegean Sea and the Sea of Marmara are considered
appropriate [16]. This opens opportunities for RES cooperation and investments on renewable
energy electricity.
Regarding the development of RES industry in Turkey, incentives have been provided for the
establishment of companies that produce RES equipment [18]. Moreover, concerning the grid,
efforts to enhance and improve the distribution and transmission network, to reduce network losses
and electricity thefts, as well as to construct and expand the new cross-border electricity
interconnections are in process.
The foreseen privatization of a part of the energy system infrastructures consists an opportunity for
Turkey, in terms of market structure, accelerating the establishment of a competitive market for
RES deployment, which emphasises the attractiveness of Turkey as a host country of joint
projects. The fact that the RES regulatory and policy framework is oriented towards the design of
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 18
promotional actions of dispersed generation with RES technologies, complemented by the support
of the institutional framework for RES deployment, facilitates the future participation of private
investors’ in RES cooperation projects. Investments can also be facilitated by the possible
redefinition of FITs, depending on the target that will be set.
The interconnection with the ENTSO-E/SCR to benefit from synchronous parallel operation [54]
and the integration of the Turkish electricity market into the EU’s internal electricity market consists
an opportunity to attract domestic and foreign investors. It should also be noted that in meetings in
April 2014, the ENTSO-E Regional Group Continental Europe (RG CE under the System
Operation Committee) Plenary and the Regional Group Continental South East (RG CSE under
the System Development Committee), respectively, decided on the permanent synchronous
operation of the Turkish and Albanian electricity transmission systems with the Continental Europe
system [25].
Synchronisation with the ENTSO-E/SCR through three lines to Greece and Bulgaria (completed in
2007 and in 2008 for each of the 400 kV lines) provides the necessary technical conditions for
importing/exporting significant amounts of electricity, taking in to account that the physical transfer
of electricity is a prerequisite of Article 9. Despite the fact that the EU neighbour countries of
Turkey, Greece and Bulgaria, do not need major amounts of RES import in order to reach their
targets, they could however act as “RES cooperation hubs” for other EU countries. This would
mean that Turkey exports RES-E generation only to Greece and/or Bulgaria and those countries
would make use of statistical transfers to other EU countries.
With regards to the social dimension, a high social acceptance is possible due to environmental
benefits at the local level as a result of a decarbonized energy mix (e.g.: lower local pollutants), job
creation and economic stimulation in rural areas. Turkish RES industry development, as well as
revenues emerged from exports may give an important opportunity in deploying RES and
developing RES-E project in the area. In addition, it is worth mentioning that the increase of RES-E
in the future scenarios contributes to reduce most of the potential environmental impacts. Possible
job creation in a wide range of sector and the respective economic growth may also lead to social
acceptance of such projects.
Threats
The energy and technological status of Turkey may cause problems that hinder the development of
cooperation mechanisms in the region. According to estimations, the annual increase in electricity
consumption for the decade 2010- 2020 is expected to amount to 7% [17], causing the risk that the
existing supply and new energy infrastructure investments will not be able to provide the required
energy supply. Meanwhile, the existing network infrastructure needs strengthening and proper
maintenance, which is not supported by adequate network development actions. In addition, the
fact that the majority of the equipment used for the construction and operation of wind farms,
hydropower projects and other projects for the exploitation of RES is imported can lead to
increased investment costs. This creates a significant dependence on international markets, but
also from foreign suppliers.
A major threat to the development of Turkey's electricity market and especially in the development
of RES is the delay of privatisations and the limited participation of the private sector. The Turkish
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 19
market in recent years is in a phase of transformation with the increasing private participation in
various sectors of the economy [31].
The fact that there has not been made a complete and detailed inventory of the capabilities of
existing infrastructure may potentially result to non-rational use of them. This fact consequently
constitutes a threat to the Turkish energy planning impeding the achievement of high RES
deployment.
In addition, the conversion rate between Turkish lira and foreign currencies affects both investment
costs and the costs of purchase and use of equipment. Therefore, any instability in the
international economic and political field is expected to have a major impact on RES cooperation
investments [35].
The national energy strategy of Turkey seems like to envisage the introduction of a nuclear energy
program and the construction of additional gas-fired power plants rather than concentrating on the
introduction of large-scale renewables to cover its demand [39].
The delay in utilization of RES that have attracted the interest of private investors, in conjunction
with the government investments in the electricity generation from nuclear energy [55] impedes the
participation of private capital in RES investments. In parallel, the persistence of non-economic
barriers (e.g. complex and long-lasting administrative processes for the approval of new projects),
as well as additional payments (e.g. licensing costs, fixed and auctioned grid connection fees,
balancing costs in case of direct marketing) hinder enhanced RES deployment.
Another factor that strongly influences the future of RES deployment in Turkey is the possibility of
whether or not Turkey becomes a member of the EU and whether or not it will align its national
targets with those at EU/Community level. The difference between domestic and EU targets (i.e.
whether or not Turkey will become a member) also influences the exported amount and share of
RES(-E) from Turkey to the EU.
Important threats may emerge from a social acceptance and environmental point of view.
Economic benefits of RES deployment may only be captured by a small fraction of society, while
best and less expensive RES potentials are used for exports and not for huge domestic demand.
In addition, negative environmental effects (visual impacts, deforestation) due to RES plants for
exports are not minimized, while mineral resource depletion could be affected due to the strong
increase of PV.
Figure 3 presents in brief the main strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats addressed
after extended research conduction and stakeholders consultation process for the case study of
Turkey with regards to the investigation of cooperation mechanism in the region.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 20
Figure 3: Turkey SWOT Analysis
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 21
3. DISCUSSION
There are huge opportunities for RES deployment and cooperation in Turkey, due to its large
unexploited RES potential. However, when looking at the country’s energy demand in combination
with the dependence on energy imports, this potential might become more reasonable to be
exploited domestically and not necessarily for RES cooperation under Art 9. In addition, the
important extraction costs of coal and its extensive use as a national energy source creates the
need for exploiting new energy technologies and abandon the great dependence on conventional
fossil fuels for electricity generation
Several actions should be taken, for creating favourable conditions so as this potential to be
transformed into an important opportunity. In principal, there is a need of an appropriate legal and
regulatory framework, as well as energy planning and strengthening of national policies for RES
development that could reduce risks associated with RES cooperation projects. In this context,
technology transfer will enhance the science and technology capacity on renewable energy
production, strengthening also the political will in this field. Due to its considerable RES potential
Turkey should aim to get in bilateral negotiations with selected EU member states to analyse RES
export possibilities in the mid- to long-term.
In addition, in case non-economic barriers, such as complex and long-lasting administrative
processes for the approval of new projects, as well as additional payments, such as licensing
costs, fixed and auctioned grid connection fees, balancing costs in case of direct marketing are
encountered, then investment opportunities will be emerged.
Turkey could easily benefit from the development of a detailed inventory of the capabilities of
Turkey’s infrastructure in existence. This process does not involve any legislative restructuring or
substantial funding, but, once completed, it could prove to be a major advantage for the country,
constituting a solid base for energy planning and RES project scheduling. A review of certain
pieces of legislation and parts of the regulatory framework is necessary, however, in order to
alleviate the problem of bureaucracy that delays the issue of RES project licences.
Opportunities will also be created and then capitalized, under condition that the government’s
extensive plans for exploitation through new projects and modernization of installations are
realised. This could also restrain Turkey’s long-electricity-importing history and reverse this
characteristic by reducing energy imports and initiating energy exports, as imposed by the
country’s intentions.
There is a need for large investments and exploitation of cooperation opportunities. In this context,
Turkey’s eligibility for the cooperation mechanisms of Article 9 can present an opportunity for the
country, encouraging technology transfer that will enhance the science and technology capacity on
renewable energy production, strengthening also the political will in this field [56].
Additional benefits of cooperation are the development of the Turkish RES market, the
corresponding technology transfer and know-how with regard to the market and grid integration of
RES. This would enable Turkey to build already at an early stage adequate framework conditions
for enhanced national RES deployment later on.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 22
Turkey is an excellent destination for both electricity and natural gas exports. Therefore, Turkey’s
power system could act as a bridge for the region, providing among others, opportunities for the
implementation of RES cooperation mechanisms between neighbouring countries.
Efforts are already made for the ensuring of development funding for RES projects, while research
is undergoing for the electricity sector with a focus on RES. These efforts can be further addressed
by Turkey’s participation in relative EU research programmes, where it can benefit from both
funding and technology transfer.
Public acceptance could be also enhanced taking into consideration the opportunities that stem
from several environmental benefits gained from its implementation as a result of a decarbonized
energy mix (e.g. lower local pollutants). It is associated with the fact that renewables are
considered carbon-free and non-pollutant energy sources. In addition, the job creation and
economic stimulation in rural areas, Turkish RES industry development, revenues from exports
and safer working conditions provide a stable and favourable environment for RES cooperation
mechanisms.
In some cases, though, as it is with wind farms and solar plants, local opposition can be strong and
may be able to stop a renewable project from being implemented. In most cases this is associated
with the visual impact of the RES technology and the possible rejection by workers in coal and
other fossil fuel sectors create questions for the public acceptance. Some of the RES projects
could be hindered by barriers related to capital and production costs, reliability, intermittency and
incentives, which may be addressed as the technologies become more mature and further
experience is gained. Although some RES projects (e.g. wind onshore and PV production plants)
require large areas for their implementation, the increase of RES electricity contributes to reduce
most of the potential environmental impacts.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 23
4. REFERENCES
[1] Jackson, S.E., Dutton, J.E. (1988), “Discerning threats and opportunities” Administrative
Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, pp. 370–387.
[2] Helms, M., Nixon, J. (2010), “Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? A review of
academic research from the last decade”, Journal of Strategy and Management, Vol. 3, No.
3, pp. 215-251.
[3] Chiu, A.S.F., Yong, G. (2004), “On the industrial ecology potential in Asian Developing
Countries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 12, No. 8-10, pp. 1037-1045.
[4] Terrados, J., Almonacid, G., Hontoria, L. (2007), “Regional energy planning through SWOT
analysis and strategic planning tools: Impact on renewables development, Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 11, Issue 6, pp. 1275-1287.
[5] Karagiorgas, M., Tsoutsos, T., Berkmann, R. (2003), “The PHILOSOL project: a strategic
market development of the solar thermal sector in Southern Europe”, Energy Conversion and
Management, Vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 1885-1901.
[6] Naidu, B., S., K. (1996), “Indian scenario of renewable energy for sustainable development”,
Energy Policy, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 575-581.
[7] Srinivasan, A. (2005). “The 15th Asia-Pacific Seminar on Climate Change, 11-15 September,
2005”, Chairperson’s Summary of the Fifteenth Asia-Pacific Seminar on Climate Change on
11- 15 September, in Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, 2005.
[8] Jaber, J., O., Elkarmi, F., Alasis, E., Anagnostopoulos, K. (2015). “Employment of renewable
energy in Jordan: Current status, SWOT and problem analysis”, Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, Vol. 49, pp. 490-499.
[9] Chen, W., Kim, H., Yamaguchi, H. (2014), Renewable energy in eastern Asia: Renewable
energy policy review and comparative SWOT analysis for promoting renewable energy in
Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan”, Energy Policy, Vol. 74, pp. 319-329.
[10] Ellenbeck, S., Lilliestam, J., Battaglini, A. (2013), “Issues that are Likely to Play a Key Role in
the Implementation of the Cooperation Mechanism”, Deliverable 2.4, BETTER project report.
www.better-project.net.
[11] Republic of Turkey - Ministry of Foreign Affairs: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-
strategy.en.mfa
[12] Koç, C. (2014), “A study on the development of hydropower potential in Turkey”, Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 39, pp. 498-508
[13] The Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry - Investment Support and Promotion Agency (2015).
Available at: http://www.invest.gov.tr/en-US/sectors/Pages/Energy.aspx.
[14] EIA (2014). Available at: http://www.eia.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=tu.
[15] Yoruk, U., Kucukbahar, D., Helvaci, B., (2013), “Turkey Import and Export Rules and
Expectations”, Project Report 2, USAID Hydropower Investment Promotion Project.
[16] Ata, R., 2013, “The Current Situation of Wind Energy in Turkey”, Journal of Energy, Volume
2013 (2013), Article ID 794095, 8 pages
[17] ESMAP (2010), “Potential of Energy Integration in Mashreq and Neighboring Countries”,
Report No. 54455-MNA. Sustainable Development Department (MNSSD), Middle East and
North Africa Region (MNA) - Document of the World Bank.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 24
[18] PWC, (2012), “Turkey’s Renewable Energy Sector from a Global Perspective”.
[19] TUWIEN, (2013), “Report on power system inventory and status of RES(-E) deployment in
Turkey”, Deliverable 5.1, BETTER project report. www.better-project.net.
[20] EMRA, (2012), “Turkish Energy Market: An Investor's Guide”. Available at:
http://www.emra.org.tr/index.php/epdk-yayinrapor/energy-investors-guide
[21] ECRB (2013). “Small Customers' Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources”.
Available at: https://www.energy-community.org/pls/portal/docs/2010183.PDF
[22] UK Trade & Investment (2013). Available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/283308/UKTI_
DSO_Market_Brief_Turkey.pdf
[23] Baris, K., Kucukali, S. (2012). “Availibility of renewable energy sources in Turkey: Current
situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective”, Energy Policy, Volume 42,
Pages 377-391
[24] The World Bank (2011). Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.LOSS.ZS
[25] ENTSO-E, (2014). Turkey and Albania Electricity Transmission Systems in Permanent
Synchronous Operation with Continental Europe.
[26] Law No. 5346 on Utilization of Renewable Energy Sources for the Purpose of Generating
Electrical Energy, (2005). Available at: http://www.eie.gov.tr/eie-
web/english/announcements/yek_kanunu/lawonrenewableenergyreources.pdf
[27] Electricity Market Law, No. 4628, (2001). Available at:
http://www.teias.gov.tr/eng/ElectricityMarketLaw.aspx#_ftn4
[28] Toklu E. (2013), “Overview of potential and utilization of renewable energy sources in
Turkey”, Renewable Energy, Volume 50, Pages 456-463
[29] Official Gazette (2011), The Law Amending the Law on Utilization of Renewable Energy
Resources in Electricity Generation (Law No: 6094), Official Gazette dated 8 January 2011
and numbered 27809.
[30] Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Economic Outlook of Turkey”. Available at:
http://www.mfa.gov.tr/prospects-and-recent-developments-in-the-turkish-economy.en.mfa.
[31] TUWIEN, (2013), “Existing and expected framework conditions for RES development in
Turkey”, Deliverable 5.2.2, BETTER project report. www.better-project.net.
[32] Basaran S., T. et al. (2015). “Assessment of renewable energy potential and policy in Turkey
– Toward the acquisition period in European Union“, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol.
46, pp. 82–94.
[33] The World Bank (2014). Available at: http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings.
[34] OECD, (2015). Available at: http://www.oecd.org/tad/xcred/crc.htm.
[35] Erdoğan, E., Ataklı, R. (2012), “Investment Incentives and FDI in Turkey: The Incentives
Package after the 2008 Global Crisis”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume
58, Pages 1183-1192.
[36] Atilgan C.A. (2009), “A Spotlight on Turkish Electricity Market”, Budapest, Hungary.
[37] IEA, (2010), “Energy policies of IEA countries: Turkey 2009 review”, OECD/IEA, Paris.
[38] REN21 (2010), “Global renewable energy report for 2010”. Available from: www.ren21.net/
[39] Şekercioğlua, S., Yılmazb, M. (2012), “Renewable energy perspectives in the frame of
Turkey’s and the EU’s energy policies”, Energy Conversion and Management, Volume 63,
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 25
November 2012, Pages 233–238, 10th International Conference on Sustainable Energy
Technologies (SET 2011)
[40] Celiktas, M., S., Kocar, G. (2013), “Telescopic drilling view for future: A geothermal foresight
study in Turkey”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages
148-160.
[41] IEA, (2012), http://www.iea.org/countries/membercountries/turkey/statistics/
[42] EIE, (2015), “Potential of Turkish renewable energy”, Available at: www.eie.gov.tr
[43] Gunerhan, G.G., Kocar, G., Hepbasli, A. (2001), “Geothermal energy utilization in Turkey”,
Int. J. Energy Res., 25 (9), pp. 769–784.
[44] Yuksel, I. (2013), “Renewable energy status of electricity generation and future prospect
hydropower in Turkey”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 50, pp. 1037-1043.
[45] Duhamel B., Beaussant H. (2011), “EU Energy Strategy in the South Mediterranean”,
Directorate General for Internal Policies Policy Department: Economic and Scientific Policy
Industry, Research and Energy. Brussels, Belgium.
[46] Guler O. (2009), Wind energy status in electrical energy production of Turkey. Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews; Vol. 13, pp. 473-8.
[47] Simsek, H., A., Simsek, N. (2013), “Recent incentives for renewable energy in Turkey”,
Energy Policy, Volume 63, Pages 521-530
[48] Kucukali, S., Baris, K. (2011), “Renewable Energy Policy in Turkey”, World Renewable
Energy Congress, Policy issues, 8–13 May, Linköping, Sweden.
[49] Tükenmez, M., Demireli, E. (2012), “Renewable energy policy in Turkey with the new legal
regulations”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 39, Issue 1, pp. 1-9.
[50] Atilgan, C., A. (2009), A Spotlight on Turkish Electricity Market. Budapest, Hungary.
[51] MENR, (2010), “The Republic of Turkey Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources Strategy
Plan 2010–2014”, Ankara.
[52] İlkiliç, C. (2012) Wind energy and assessment of wind energy potential in Turkey, Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 1165-1173.
[53] Ozgur, M., A. (2008) Review of Turkey’s renewable energy potential, Renewable Energy,
Vol. 33, pp. 2345–2356.
[54] EC (2010), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council,
the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Energy
infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond - A Blueprint for an integrated European energy
network. COM(2010) 677 final.
[55] Erdogdu, E. (2007), “Nuclear power in open energy markets: A case study of Turkey”,
Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp. 3061-3073.
[56] Karakosta, C., Doukas, H., Psarras, J. (2008), “A Decision Support Approach for the
Sustainable Transfer of Energy Technologies under the Kyoto Protocol”, American Journal of
Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, Issue 12, pp. 1720-9.
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Contract N°: IEE/11/845/SI2.616378
Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable Energies (BETTER)
Additional Deliverable: Turkey SWOT Analysis Page 26
5. ABBREVIATIONS
BAU Business as Usual
BOO Build-own-operate
BOT Build-Operate-Transfer
CE Continental Europe
CSE Continental South East
EC European Commission
ECRB Energy Community Regulatory Board
EIA Energy Information Administration
EIE General Directorate of Electrical Power Resources of Turkey
EMRA Energy Market Regulatory Authority
ENTSO-E European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity
ESMAP Energy Sector Management Assistance Program
EU European Union
FDI Foreign Direct Investment
FIT Feed-in-Tariffs
IEA International Energy Agency
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
MENR Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources
MNA Middle East and North Africa
MNSSD Middle East and North Africa Sustainable Development Department
MS Member States
PV Photovoltaics
RED Renewable Energy Directive
REN21 Renewable Energy Network for the 21st Century
RES Renewable Energy Sources
RES-E Renewable Energy Sources of electricity
RG Regional Group
SCR Synchronous Continental Region
TEIAS Turkish Electricity Transmission Company