Post on 01-Mar-2020
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28,2019
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Philip Berke, PI, Texas A&M UniversityJaimie Masterson, co-PI, Texas A&M UniversityMatt Malecha and Siyu Yu, Doctoral Students
Application of the Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard to Practice
Portland Road
New Road
Grand Tour
Chestnut Street
LightHouseRoadTwinLight
HillsideA
venue
Peak Street
Oak
BayStreet
W
oodlandProspect Street
North Peak Street
ValleyAvenue
Mo
u
ntainStreet
Highland Avenue
NewJersey State Highway
3 6
Miller Street
Shore Drive
Valley Avenue
Second Street
CedarS
treet
Holly St.Fourth Street
Fifth Street Point St.
North S
treet
Cornw
ell S
treet
Avenue
Center A
venue
Jackson
John St
BayAvenue
Bay Avenue
Shore Drive
Bay Avenue
Shore Drive
Locust
Will
ow
BaysideDrive
Ring M
athews
Mar
ie S
t.
Linden Avenue
Ralph Street
Laurel Drive
Ocean Avenue
BeachBoulevard
Central Avenue
Snug Harbor Avenue
Marine Place
Recreation Place
Cheerful Place
Water W
itch Avenue
Huddy Avenue
Washington Avenue
Barberie Avenue
Sea Drift Avenue
Atlantic Street
Water W
itch Drive
Rogers Street
Waddell Street
Linden Avenue
Shrewsbury
36
8B
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN MAP
Highlands Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey
Figure LU-4
October 20041"-1000'
FIGURE LU-4
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN MAP
Atlantic
Highlands
Middletown
Gateway National
Recreation Area
Sea B
right
KEY
100 Year Floodplain
500 Year Floodplain
Outside the Floodplain
36
8B
0' 1,000'500'
NJ Municipality: Before Hurricane Sandy: Opposing Intentions?
100-year floodplain &Severe repetitive loss designation
CONCEPT PLAN MAP
Highlands Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey
Figure LU-6
October 20041"-1000'
FIGURE LU-6
CONCEPT PLAN M AP
Atlantic
Highlands
Middletown
Gateway National
Recreation Area
Se
a B
rig
ht
KEY
✱
!
Potential Gateway Redevelopment Area
Potential CBD Redevelopment Area
Potential Waterfront Redevelopment Areas
County Park
Focal Point Locations
Gateway Treatments
Waterfront Gateway Treatments
Potential Municipal/Public Use
Public Fishing Piers
Twin Lights National Landmark
Rt. 36 Bridge
Heritage Trail
Waterfront Connection
0' 1,000'500'
✱
✱
!
$
✱
Portland Road
New Road
Grand Tour
Chestnut Street
LightHouseRoadTwinLight
HillsideA
venue
Peak Street
Oak
BayStreet
W
oodlandProspect Street
North Peak Street
ValleyAvenue
Mo
u
ntainStreet
Highland Avenue
NewJersey State Highway
3 6
Miller Street
Shore Drive
Valley Avenue
Second Street
CedarS
treet
Holly St.Fourth Street
Fifth Street Point St.
North S
treet
Cornw
ell S
treet
Avenue
Center A
venue
Jackson
John St
BayAvenue
Bay Avenue
Shore Drive
Bay Avenue
Shore Drive
Locust
Will
ow
BaysideDrive
Ring M
athews
Mar
ie S
t.
Linden Avenue
Ralph Street
Laurel Drive
Ocean Avenue
BeachBoulevard
Central Avenue
Snug Harbor Avenue
Marine Place
Recreation Place
Cheerful Place
Water W
itch Ave.
Huddy Ave.
Washington Avenue
Barberie Avenue
Sea Drift Avenue
Atlantic Street
Water W
itch Drive
Rogers Street
Waddell Street
Linden Avenue
Shrewsbury
8B
8B
36
36
Hazard Mitigation Plan Comprehensive Plan
Develop and apply a resilience scorecard:
1. To spatially evaluate the coordination of local networks of plans at the neighborhood scale.
2. To spatially assess the degree to which the network of plans targets areas most physically and socially vulnerable.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Research Objectives
Comprehensive Plan
Transportation Plan
Hazard Mitigation Plan
Park and Open Space Plan
∑ ∥
Policy Score for Each Plan Composite Policy Score
4
Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard(Physical Vulnerability)
The University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDelineate districts and hazard zones
Determine vulnerability
Score plans
Source: Berke, P. et al. 2015
Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard – Global Application
NijmegenDordrecht
Rotterdam
Boston, MAAsbury Park, NJ
Norfolk, VAWashington, NC
Ft. Lauderdale, FLTampa, FL
League City, TX
Houston, TX
Nashua, NH
Changsha
GuangzhouShenzhen
NEW RESARCHDifference in Land Use Suitability Between
Current Zoning and Proposed Future Land Use in Flood-Hazard Areas
1) Zone = high-density residential; plan = med-density residential
2) Zone = industrial; plan = dense mixed-use redevelopment
2
1
NEW RESARCHLeague City Resilience Scorecard: Composite Policy Scores
Plan and section showing spatial function and flood protection measures; Design impact outputs from the ‘green values’ calculatorTM
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28, 2019The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
• Funded proposals (July 2018-19)• NSF CRISP (theoretical advancement, deep engagement), $2 million• One Gulf Program (Harte Foundation), $70,000
• Publications (July 2018-19)• Berke, Malacha, Yu, Lee, Masterson. 2019. Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard: Evaluating Networks
Plans in Six US Coastal Cities, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (forthcoming)• Newman, Malecha, Yu, Qiao, Horney, Lee, Berke. 2019. Integrating a Resilience Scorecard and Landscape
Performance Tools into a Geodesign Process. Landscape Research (forthcoming)• Berke, Yu, and Malacha. 2019. Relationships Between Equity Policy in Plans and Social
Vulnerability in Six Coastal Cities, Journal of Planning Education and Research (forthcoming)• Woodruff, Berke, Malecha, Yu. Comparing the Effect of the Network of Plans on Vulnerability to
Flooding in Boston, MA and Fort Lauderdale, FL: Before and After Resilience Planning, Global Environmental Change (under review).
Research Work and Accomplishments
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28, 2019
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Scientific Contributions: New NSF CRISP 2019-23
• What are the social and economic disruptions caused by cascading failures of interdependent infrastructures?
• How well do networks of plans account for possible failures of interdependent infrastructures?
• How does the strength of neighborhood social networks among interest groups influence plan policies that guide infrastructure investments?
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28, 2019
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Local and Regional Decision-Making Process Local and Regional Plans Resilience Improvement
Implementation
Federal and State Policy and Planning
Regulations, Mandates, Resource Allocation
Resilience Planning Process
Community Characteristics
Societal Needs/Social Vulnerability
Emergency Response Network
Transportation Network
Flood Control Network
Inte
rdep
ende
nt P
hysi
cal
Infra
stru
ctur
e N
etw
orks
Interdependencies/ Spatial Structure of Flood Risk Difussion
Mitigation/Retrofit Projects
Network of Regional and Local Stakeholder Actors
Coo
rdin
atio
n/B
ound
ary
Span
ners
Net
wor
k of
Reg
iona
l an
d Lo
cal P
lans
Fragmentation/Conflicts
Net
wor
k R
etic
ulat
ion
Plans Integration
New NSF CRISP: Network of Networks
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28, 2019The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Presentations (July 2018-2019) 2019 Berke, P., Mitigation Planning for Resilient Cities: A Resilience Scorecard, January 24, Kinder Institute, Rice University, Houston.2019 Berke, P., Enhancing Policy Coordination and Community Resilience to Hazards and Climate Change, College of Architecture,
January 23, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.2019 Berke, P., Cities and Planning for Resilience: Networking Across Social, Planning and Infrastructure Domains, Keynote Talk,
September, Hunan University, China.2019 Malecha, M., Yu, S., Roy, M., & Berke, P., Spatially Evaluating the Suitability and Alignment of Zoning and Land-Use Planning in
Flood-Hazard Areas, April, Urban Affairs Association (UAA) Conference, Los Angeles, CA.2019 Malecha, M., Yu, S., Roy, M., & Berke, P., Evaluating the Suitability and Alignment of Zoning and Land-Use Planning in Flood-
Hazard Areas, February 22, International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights (PLRP) Conference, College Station, TX.
2019 Hannibal, B., Woodruff, S., & Malecha, M., The Intersection of Social and Planning Networks: A Post-Harvey Study, February 22, International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights (PLRP) Conference, College Station, TX.
2018 Yu, S., Zuniga, M., Newman, G., Horney, J., & Han, G. “A Performance Tool for Measuring Health Impacts of Urban Green-Infrastructure” National Institute of Environmental Health Superfund Research Program (SRP) Conference, Sacramento, CA.
2018 Yu, S., Brand, A.D., & Berke, P. “Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard: Assessing Flood Vulnerability and the Network of Plans in Nijmegen, Netherlands.” Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP)Conference, Buffalo, NY.
Research Work and Accomplishments
CRC 4th Annual Meeting
March 27-28, 2019The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
• City of Norfolk, Paul Shea, Senior Planner
• Interactions: Training webinar, on-site visit, 10 technical assistances
teleconferences Norfolk.
• Outcomes: Revised network of plans; modified zoning ordinance, included location
criteria in network of plans; two successful proposals from HUD totally $140 million
• After action report on research utilization
• City of Nashua, Justin Kates, Director Emergency Management
• Interactions: Collaboration with NIST, Training webinar, on-site visit, ongoing
monthly technical assistance
• Outcomes: proposals funded by Nat’l League of Cities.
End User Engagement
Norfolk Highlights: Project Impacts
“The Resilience Scorecard was a great tool to allow us to evaluate our existing plans and policies.” (George Homewood, FAICP, CFM, Planning Director, City of Norfolk)
Outcomes• Revised network of plans
• Modified zoning ordinance• Changed CIP infrastructure location criteria• Choice Neighborhood Implementation Grant• National Disaster Resilience Grant
• Building resilience: linking built environment, socially marginalized people, and natural environmental systems
St. Paul’s Neighborhood Revitalization
Norfolk Resilience Park
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28, 2019The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
• NY RISING-Paul Beyer, NY Dept of State; and Coreena Coveallo, NY Dept. of Homeland Security, FEMA Nat’l Mitigation Program• Interactions: multiple teleconferences, webinar to county mitigation planners in NY State• Expected Outcome: Apply PIRS to Sullivan County, NY
• NIST• Interactions: approx. 10 tele-conference calls to coordination.• Expected Outcomes: Couple PIRS with the Community Resilience Planning Guide (CRPG) developed by
the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in a manner that allows the two products to be used by community planners in a joint and reinforcing manner.
• TX Sea Grant Community Resilience Collaborative, Heather Wade, Director• Interactions: Bi-weekly collaboration to translate research to planning practice• Outcome: Employed staff planner to train mitigation planners in Texas coast communities• Expected Outcome: Co-apply Scorecard in San Patricio County, Corpus Christi
End User Engagement
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28, 2019
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
• ASFPM, Chad Berginnis, Executive Director• Interactions: Joint panel May 2019 conference; Texas A&M and
Nashua• Proposed Outcomes: Trainings, CFM credit, placed on ASFPM
website• Other professional association
• APA, Jim Schwab• Natural Hazard Mitigation Association
• Trainings & Conferences • FEMA Prep Talk, January 2018 • Texas Sea Grant Program, 1st training February 2018 • National Hurricane Conference, April 2018• FEMA Community Planning & Capacity Building, June 2018 • City of Nashua Resilience Planning Workshop with NIST, June 2018 • Louisiana Sea Grant Program, July 2018 • Texas Sea Grant Program, 2nd training November 2018 • NY Rising and FEMA webinar, December 2018
End User Engagement
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28, 2019
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Develop an instructional curriculum:• PIRS Guidebook for local practitioners• Links to webinars, lectures, and workshops given by the Texas A&M team• Slides for lectures• Summaries of real world examples of community applications of PIRS for
practitioners and policy makers.• Summaries (3 pgs.) of peer review research publications that focus on the process
of community utilizations of PIRS and new capabilities of PIRS.• Interactive website to include all of the above.
Transition to End Users
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Technical Assistance Tasks:
1) Score plan integration
2) Assess Social & Physical Vulnerability
3) Identify conflicts and opportunities
Participatory Tasks:
1) Willing partner communities: contribute staff time, data
2) Staff participate in training sessions
3) Self-evaluate plans, seek public input, draft revisions
A New Tool for Translating Research to Practice
Website: ifsc.tamu.edu/getattachment/News/July-2017/Plan-Integration-for-Resilience-Scorecard-
Guideboo/Scorecard-(1).pdf.aspx
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28, 2019
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Adopted for Training (and Certificate Programs) by professional Associations• APA-Hazard Mitigation and Disaster Recovery Division• ASFPM
Build National Network of Coastal Partners• Training by Texas Sea Grant Community Resilience Collaborative
Adoption by Federal Partners• FEMA Community Rating System• Integrate PIRS with NIST Community Resilience Planning Guide
Explore Copyrights Protection• Met with TAMU copyright staff, March 21, 2019
Anticipated Project Impact
CRC 4th Annual Meeting March 27-28, 2019
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
How has / will your project be transitioned to end users?
1. Develop an instructional curriculum, with case studies, that teaches planners how to use the coupled products correctly and effectively.
2. Offer certificates to practitioners through professional association (APA, ASFMP etc.) who successfully complete the instructional curriculum.
3. Add credits to FEMA’s NFIP Community Rating System if communities apply PIRS.
4. Couple PIRS with the Community Resilience Planning Guide (CRPG) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in a manner that allows use by community planners in a joint and reinforcing manner.
Transition