Post on 02-May-2022
AGENDA
FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL TO BE HELD MONDAY, January 26, 2015 AT 6:30 P.M.
IN COUNCIL CHAMBER 91-1ST STREET NW, NAKUSP
CALL TO ORDER – Mayor Hamling at _________ PM INTRODUCTION OF LATE ITEMS a) b) A. AGENDA APPROVAL R/15 - Adopt Agenda
Moved by Councillor ______, Seconded by Councillor ________ THAT the agenda be approved as amended/submitted.
CARRIED B. MINUTES
1. Minutes of January 12, 2015 Regular Meeting of Council R/15
Moved by Councillor __________, Seconded by Councillor _____________ THAT the Minutes of January 12, 2015 Regular Meeting be approved as amended/submitted.
CARRIED
C. DELEGATIONS, PETITIONS, PRESENTATIONS
1. Nakusp and Area Trails Society- Representative from the Nakusp Area Community Trails Society will be presenting their proposal to improve the Wrap Around Nakusp Trail and the development of the abandoned rail bed with in the boundary of the village.
D. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
1. Nakusp Chamber of Commerce- street banner request R/15
Moved by Councillor _____________, Seconded by Councillor __________ That the Nakusp and District Chamber of Commerce be referred to the Ministry of Highways for further discussion regarding the feasibility of banners crossing the highway for promotional purposes.
CARRIED 2. District Energy (Biomass)
R/15
Moved by Councillor _____________, Seconded by Councillor __________ THAT a Village owned and operated District Energy (Biomass) system
be endorsed in principle by the Nakusp council; and that the CAO be authorized to develop and submit a grant application to the Gas Tax Strategic Priorities fund for the development of the system; and further, that the Village investigate the opportunity for partners in this initiative.
CARRIED
E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - Outstanding Actions on Resolutions R/15
Moved by Councillor __________, Seconded by Councillor ________ THAT the Outstanding Action on Resolutions report be received for information.
CARRIED F. REPORT FROM ADMINISTRATION R/15
Moved by Councillor __________, Seconded by Councillor ___________ THAT the report from the Chief Administrative Officer be received for information.
CARRIED
G. BYLAW APPROVAL
1. 2015 Water Rates R/15
Moved by Councillor __________, Seconded by Councillor ________________ THAT the “Water Rates and Regulations (2015) Amendment Bylaw No. 463-20, 2015” be reconsidered and finally adopted.
CARRIED 2. 2015 Sewer Rates
R/15
Moved by Councillor __________, Seconded by Councillor ________________ THAT the “Sewer Rates (2015) Amendment Bylaw No. 644-3, 2015” reconsidered and finally adopted.
CARRIED
H. NEW BUSINESS 1. Beaton Arm Crossing Association-
R/15
Moved by Councillor ___________, Seconded by Councillor _________
CARRIED
2. 2015 AKBLG- conference planning update
R/15
Moved by Councillor ___________, Seconded by Councillor _________ THAT the 2015 AKBLG Conference update dated ______ be received for information.
CARRIED 3. Hot Springs Website- Launch
R/15
Moved by Councillor ___________, Seconded by Councillor _________ THAT the report on the Hot Springs Website launch be received for information.
CARRIED 4. Arrow Lakes Search and Rescue (ALSR)
R/15
Moved by Councillor ___________, Seconded by Councillor ________________ THAT the Village agree to the January 16, 2015 request from Arrow Lakes Search and Rescue Association (ALSAR) to purchase a command vehicle on the behalf of the Association subject to the finalization of a formal agreement which specifies conditions to the satisfaction of Village staff including the guarantee that the vehicle will be purchased from the village by ALSAR within 30 days of initial purchase and that the ALSR Association works with Village staff to ensure compliance to the Village purchasing policy and any legislative obligations; and further, that the CAO is given authority to negotiate the agreement with the ALSAR Association.
CARRIED 5. Call for Resolutions AKBLG
R/15
Moved by Councillor ___________, Seconded by Councillor _________
CARRIED 6. Hot Springs Roof Replacement Project R/15 Moved by Councillor ___________, Seconded by Councillor _________
That staff be authorized to proceed with a contract between the Village of Nakusp and DJM Contracting for roof replacement at the Hot Springs facility and the Cedar Chalets as per the information provided.
CARRIED
INFORMATION
1. Information Items I1-I6 R/15
Moved by Councillor _______, Seconded by Councillor _______ THAT items I1-I6 be received for information, and that item(s) ____ be brought forward for discussion.
CARRIED
J. INQUIRIES BY COUNCIL OF ADMINISTRATION K. NOTICE OF MOTION L. QUESTIONS FROM THE PRESS OR PUBLIC M. NOTICE OF IN-CAMERA MEETING R/15 Notice of In Camera Meeting
Moved by Councillor _______________, Seconded by Councillor __________ THAT in the opinion of Council, and in accordance with Section 90 of the Community Charter, the public interest so requires that persons other than Councillors and staff be excluded from the meeting, AND FURTHER, that the meeting be closed on the basis identified in the following subsections: Section 90(1)c. labour relations or other employee relations; d. the security of the property of the municipality;
CARRIED N. ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FROM IN-CAMERA O. ADJOURNMENT R/15
Moved by Councillor _________________, Seconded by Councillor _________ THAT the meeting adjourn at _________ PM.
CARRIED
Agenda Item B1
DRAFT MINUTE(S) REPORT STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S): That the following Minutes be approved as submitted/amended.
1. January 12, 2015 Regular Minutes
Agenda Item B1
“DRAFT” MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL
HELD MONDAY, January 12, 2015 AT 6:30 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBER
91-1ST STREET NW, NAKUSP Present were: Mayor Karen Hamling Councillors Ulli Mueller Bill Tobey Len Heppner Tom Zeleznik Staff Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer Clyde Bersky, Director of Finance Richard Cann, Assistant Manager Arena/Parks Regrets Terry Warren, Fire Chief Gallery CALL TO ORDER – Mayor Hamling at 6:30 PM INTRODUCTION OF LATE ITEMS a) H5- Land Development Readiness Marketing Workshop b) H6- Kinsmen Health Building A. AGENDA APPROVAL R1/15 - Adopt Agenda
Moved by Councillor Heppner, Seconded by Councillor Mueller THAT the agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED B. MINUTES
1. Minutes of December 8, 2014 Regular Meeting of Council R2/15
Moved by Councillor Mueller, Seconded by Councillor Heppner THAT the Minutes of December 8, 2014 Regular Meeting be approved as submitted.
CARRIED
C. DELEGATIONS, PETITIONS, PRESENTATIONS
1. Service Recognition - Mayor Hamling presented Terry Warren, Fire Chief and Richard Cann, Assistant Manager Arena/Parks with 10 year service recognition pins. Terry Warren, Fire Chief was unable to attend.
2. Water and Sewer (Utilities) Presentation – Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer, Clyde Bersky, Director of Finance, and Warren Leigh presented council with a presentation giving an overall review of the water and sewer utilities; results of 2014 operations; update on reserve balances and proposed rates for 2015.
D. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - Outstanding Actions on Resolutions R3/15
Moved by Councillor Heppner, Seconded by Councillor Mueller THAT the Outstanding Action on Resolutions report be received for information.
CARRIED F. REPORT FROM COUNCIL COMMITTEES R4/15
Moved by Councillor Heppner, Seconded by Councillor Mueller THAT the reports from Council Committees be received for information.
CARRIED
G. BYLAW APPROVAL
1. 2015 Water Rates R5/15
Moved by Councillor Mueller, Seconded by Councillor Heppner
THAT the “Water Rates and Regulations (2015) Amendment Bylaw No. 463-20, 2015” be introduced a read a first and second time.
CARRIED
R6/15
Moved by Councillor Heppner, Seconded by Councillor Mueller THAT the “Water Rates and Regulations (2015) Amendment Bylaw No. 463-20, 2015” be read a third time.
CARRIED 2. 2015 Sewer Rates
R7/15
Moved by Councillor Heppner, Seconded by Councillor Mueller THAT the “Sewer Rates (2015) Amendment Bylaw No. 644-3, 2015” be introduced a read a first and second time.
CARRIED
R8/15
Moved by Councillor Heppner, Seconded by Councillor Zeleznik THAT the “Sewer Rates (2015) Amendment Bylaw No. 644-3, 2015” be read a third time.
CARRIED
H. NEW BUSINESS
1. Street Banners- Chamber of Commerce
R9/15
Moved by Councillor Mueller, Seconded by Councillor Heppner That the request from the Nakusp and District Chamber of Commerce be referred back to staff for recommendations and report back to council.
CARRIED 2. Building Inspection Service
R10/15
Moved by Councillor Heppner, Seconded by Councillor Mueller THAT the Memorandum of Understanding from the Regional District of Central Kootenay regarding Building Code Amendments dated January 6, 2015 be received for information.
CARRIED 3. Canadian Mountain Holiday Inc- Airport Hangar Lease
R11/15
Moved by Councillor Mueller, Seconded by Councillor Heppner THAT the Mayor and Corporate Officer be authorized to execute a five year renewal of the lease between the Village of Nakusp and Canadian Mountain Holiday Inc. to operate an airport hangar and a helicopter flight business and further on the same terms and conditions as the existing lease.
CARRIED 4. Upcoming Grants
R12/15
Moved by Councillor Mueller, Seconded by Councillor Zeleznik That the information regarding Build Canada fund and Federal Gas Tax Strategic Priorities fund be received for information.
CARRIED 5. Land Development Readiness Marketing Workshop
R13/15
Moved by Councillor Mueller, Seconded by Councillor Heppner THAT village pay for mileage for council members attending the Land Development Readiness Marketing Workshop in Silverton on Monday, January 19, 2015.
CARRIED 6. Kinsmen Health Building
R14/15
Moved by Councillor Mueller, Seconded by Councillor Heppner THAT the CAO be directed to negotiate lease with Options for Sexual Health for a 5 year term for the use and rehabilitation of the Kinsmen Health Building, and further, that the Mayor and CAO be authorized to execute the lease once finalized..
CARRIED
INFORMATION 1. Information Items I1-I7
R15/15
Moved by Councillor Heppner, Seconded by Councillor Mueller THAT items I1-I6 be received for information, and that no item be brought forward for discussion.
CARRIED
J. INQUIRIES BY COUNCIL OF ADMINISTRATION K. NOTICE OF MOTION L. QUESTIONS FROM THE PRESS OR PUBLIC M. NOTICE OF IN-CAMERA MEETING R16/15 Notice of In Camera Meeting
Moved by Councillor Heppner, Seconded by Councillor Tobey THAT in the opinion of Council, and in accordance with Section 90 of the Community Charter, the public interest so requires that persons other than Councillors and staff be excluded from the meeting, AND FURTHER, that the meeting be closed on the basis identified in the following subsections: Section 90(1)c. labour relations or other employee relations; d. the security of the property of the municipality;
CARRIED N. ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FROM IN-CAMERA O. ADJOURNMENT R17/15
Moved by Councillor Heppner THAT the meeting adjourn at 8:27 PM.
CARRIED _______________________________ _____________________________ Mayor Corporate Officer
AGENDA ITEM C1
DELEGATION DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Nakusp and Area Community Trails Society TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer Representative from the Nakusp Area Community Trails Society will be presenting their proposal to improve the Wrap Around Nakusp Trail and the development of the abandoned rail bed with in the boundary of the village. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Information and Maps
AGENDA ITEM D1
STAFF REPORT – Request for Council Decision DATE: January 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Nakusp Chamber of Commerce- Street Banners TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: That council pass the following resolution:
“That the Nakusp and District Chamber of Commerce be referred to the Ministry of Highways for further discussion regarding the feasibility of banners crossing the highway for promotional purposes.”
BACKGROUND The Village received the attached letter from the Chamber of Commerce in regards to the purchase of street banners. Council passed a resolution requesting staff to look into the matter. The Village of Nakusp does not own any type of man lift so if banners were to be erected it would have to be done through the use of ladder (which is not a viable option). In addition, prior to considering this issue further, the Chamber of Commerce would require Ministry of Highways approval as most of the main lines coming into Nakusp are Highways. Public Works staff has indicated that given current resources, we are unable to maintain the banners that we currently have erected and are facing an issue with height restrictions due to the Christmas lights resulting in a number of new banners which are broken or which have been removed. It is recommended that the Village focus on addressing this issue prior to looking into the matter of banners further. In some municipalities with full time, paid fire departments, fire department staff resources are used to erect banners but this is not a recommended approach with a volunteer fire department where availability of time from volunteers is at a premium. OPTIONS:
• That the Chamber be advised that the Village of Nakusp does not have the resources to assist with a banner program at this time and further, advise the Chamber that MOT permission would be required before investigating further.
• That council refer the matter back to staff for further review and report. Prepared by: Linda Tynan, CAO
Nakusp & District Chamber of Commerce | PO Box 387, 92 – 6th Avenue NW | Nakusp BC V0G 1R0 250-265-4234 phone | 250-265-3808 fax | www.nakusparrowlakes.com
Village of Nakusp 91 1st Street NW Box 280 Nakusp, BC V0G 1R0
December 3, 2014 Dear Mayor and Council, The Nakusp & District Chamber of Commerce is considering purchasing 3 banners that could be suspended above the street over the three main entrances to the Village. The banners include exchangeable letters and can be used to announce events, welcome groups that are visiting town, announce elections, etc. (Please see attached image of banner.) Before we proceed with such a purchase, we would like to make sure they could be used, and so we have a few questions:
• Would Village staff be able to put them up and take them down? • What would be involved in getting permission to hang the banners? • Do you have any suggestions for ideal locations?
Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We look forward to your reply.
Sincerely, Peter Welkerling President Nakusp & District Chamber of Commerce 92 6th Ave. NW Nakusp, BC V0G 1R0 tel: 250 - 265- 4234 toll free: 1-800-909-8819 fax: 250-265-3808 www.nakusparrowlakes.com email: nakusp@telus.net
AGENDA ITEM D2
STAFF REPORT – Request for Council Decision DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: District Energy (Biomass) TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: That council pass the following resolution:
That a Village owned and operated District Energy (Biomass) system be endorsed in principle by the Nakusp council; and that the CAO be authorized to develop and submit a grant application to the Gas Tax Strategic Priorities fund for the development of the system; and further, that the Village investigate the opportunity for partners in this initiative.
PURPOSE: To affirm council’s interest in the development of a Village owned District Energy (biomass) system as a result of the review of the business case study prepared by Wood Waste 2 Rural Heat (David Dubois) and to authorize staff to work on this project through a grant application to the SPF (Gas Tax), continued work with Mr. Dubois, and exploration of partnership opportunities in the community. BACKGROUND: In early January, council received a business case report on District Energy (biomass) prepared by Mr. David Dubois (Wood Waste 2 Rural Heat). The conclusions in the report included:
• There exists a financial case for the Village of Nakusp to look at developing a biomass-fueled district heating system that would result in energy savings for clients who are connected
• The capital cost for phase 1&2 is just over $1,200,000 • It is expected that with completion of phase 1&2, the system should generate approximately
$22,000/year in net revenue • The completion of Phase 2 as a stand alone system has the strongest economic case • The system would consume about 185 BDT of biomass, resulting in approximately one gravel truck
load every 1.5 to 2 weeks. The business case report provides information to indicate that this may be a feasible project which would benefit the Village of Nakusp. Further work will be required should council agree to the project in principle. Funding opportunities must be pursued, potential partners approached, a business model further defined, etc, The Village of Nakusp will benefit by being the owner/operator of a District Energy system. Legislation regarding BC Utility Commission (BCUC) is limited when the municipality is the owner of the utility. In the future, the District Heating system may be expanded using new sources of energy and will have the possibility of bringing further revenues into the Village. Municipalities who own and operate utility systems have been able to offset property taxes with revenues generated by the energy system.
Page 2 of 2
Even as the owner/operator of the system, partners will be required for the projects. For example, in the business case study, a potential location for the biomass plant was identified as property belonging to the Youth Centre. The Village will approach such potential partners and determine whether there could be mutual benefits by working together on the project. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The preliminary figures indicate that the capital cot for both phase 1&2 is just over $1,200,000. Application to potential funding sources (grants) is key to the next step of development. See preliminary figures as included in the report. ATTACHMENTS:
1. Biomass District Heating Business Case (Wood Waste 2 Rural Heat Project 2015-01-05) Prepared by: Linda Tynan, CAO
Village of Nakusp
Biomass District Heating
Business Case
Prepared by:
Wood Waste 2 Rural
Heat Project
2015-01-05
Funding for Wood Waste 2 Rural Heat provided by:
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
2 | P a g e
Executive Summary Currently, buildings in Nakusp are heated using propane, electricity and fuel oil. The primary sources are
propane and electricity. The average price of propane per year varied from $0.63/l to $0.82/l (at times
throughout the year the price of propane could be over $1.00/l). Factoring the efficiency of each
building’s heating system, the price of energy ranged from $31.21/GJ to $46.21/GJ1. The average price
of electricity for the arena was $0.085/kWh which equals $23.53/GJ.
The Village of Nakusp is interested in developing a District Heating System (DH) capable of supplying
heat to a number of potential clients. The following map lays out the different potential phases. Phase
one is Nakusp Senior Secondary and Elementary schools. Phase two is the Arena, and emergency
services building and daycare. Phase three would be the downtown core. It is based on locating the
energy centre in conjunction with the new Nakusp Area Youth Services building currently being
considered.
Figure 1 DH System Layout
It is estimated that phase one will require approximately 85 Bone Dry Tonnes (BDT) of biomass per year.
Phase two will require 100 BDT. It is expected that phase 3 will require 100 BDT for a total of 285 Bone
Dry Tonnes.
1 One Gigajoule or GJ is a measure of energy. In this report it is the basis for comparing various types of energy including propane, electricity and fuel oil. One litre of propane or fuel oil contains 0.0253 GJ and 0.0387 GJ respectively. One kWh of electricity equals 0.0036 GJ.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
3 | P a g e
Phase one would require approximately 175 kW of boiler capacity. This includes approximately 50 kW of
capacity to heat the youth centre. Phase two would require 200 kW. The size of the boiler for Phase
three presents the largest unknown because of the lack data and level of complexity. Therefore this
report will only focus on phases one and two.
The capital cost of building phase one and two as separate standalone systems is $538,000 and
$782,000 respectively. If Phase one was built first and then upgraded to include phase two the capital
cost would be $586,000 and $632,000 for a total capital cost of $1,218,000.
The Operating and Maintenance costs are summarized below. It would require 0.1 FTE to operate the
system. Wood chips are currently available for approximately $30/BDT but it is anticipated that 60/BDt
is a more sustainable price. The average operating cost was assumed to be $24.5/GJ.
Table 1 Summary of Operating and Maintenance Costs
Phase Cost Component
Medium
Cost
$60/BDT
Low Cost
$30/BDT
Total Operating Costs $30,900 $28,300
Cost of Energy Sold $/GJ $24.18 $22.14
Total Operating Costs $39,300 $36,300
Cost of Energy Sold $/GJ $23.65 $21.84
Total Operating Costs $60,900 $55,300
Cost of Energy Sold $/GJ $20.71 $18.81
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 1
and 2
A variety of scenarios has been done varying the sale price of heat, amount of grants and price of wood
chips. The most likely scenario is based on selling heat at $28.18/GJ (cost plus 15%). The revenue must
be sufficient to cover expenses, provide for future plans and generate income. In addition it must also
offer an incentive for perspective clients to connect. Client savings will range between 10-40% with a
15% markup. It is estimated that these savings will be sufficient to get clients to connect. A grant of
approximately 60% would be required to make the DH system generate revenue. Alternately the system
could viable with a 25% grant.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
4 | P a g e
Table 2 Summary of Financial Analysis based on $60/BDT and Heat Sale Price of $28.18/GJ
Phase 1
Project Cost $538,000 $538,000 $538,000
Grant 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $134,500 $322,800
Capital Cost $538,000 $403,500 $215,200
Annual Revenue $22,000 $22,000 $22,000
Simple payback (Years) 24.5 18.3 9.8
NPV -$263,800 -$129,300 $59,000
IRR -2% 1% 8%
Phase 2
Project Cost $782,000 $782,000 $782,000
Grant 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $195,500 $469,200
Capital Cost $782,000 $586,500 $312,800
Annual Revenue $32,000 $32,000 $32,000
Simple payback (Years) 24.4 18.3 9.8
NPV -$115,500 -$6,700 $145,700
IRR -2% 1% 8%
Phase 1 & 2
Project Cost $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000
Grant 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $304,500 $730,800
Capital Cost $1,218,000 $913,500 $487,200
Annual Revenue $60,000 $60,000 $60,000
Simple payback (Years) 20.3 15.2 8.1
NPV -$301,000 -$132,100 $104,300
IRR 0% 3% 11%
Heat Price = Cost + 15% = $28.18/GJ
Fuel Costs $60/BDT
The DH system should either be wholly owned by the Village or as a partnership between the Village and
private partners (not-for-profit or for-profit entities).
If the community of Nakusp is interested in proceeding it is recommended they determine which
business model is of interest and begin to develop those partnerships. Further funding for the project
either to be used initially to finalise engineering and design, or funding to complete the entire project
should be pursued.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
5 | P a g e
Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2
Background ............................................................................................................................................. 6
Energy Cost and Consumption ................................................................................................................. 6
District Heating System Concept .............................................................................................................. 7
Building Suitability ............................................................................................................................... 9
Phase 1 - Schools ................................................................................................................................. 9
Phase 2 - Westside of Eighth Avenue ................................................................................................. 10
Phase 3 - Commercial Buildings in Downtown .................................................................................... 10
Fuel Selection and Storage ................................................................................................................. 10
Boiler Sizing ....................................................................................................................................... 12
Heat Storage...................................................................................................................................... 13
Heat Distribution ............................................................................................................................... 13
Biomass Heating System Economic Analysis .......................................................................................... 14
DH System Capital Cost ...................................................................................................................... 14
Operating and Maintenance Costs ..................................................................................................... 17
Fuel Cost ........................................................................................................................................ 18
Carbon Offsets ............................................................................................................................... 20
Total Operating Cost ...................................................................................................................... 20
Financial Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 20
Pellets............................................................................................................................................ 24
Potential Business Models ................................................................................................................. 25
Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 27
Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 28
Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 28
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 28
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
6 | P a g e
Background Nakusp has a number of businesses that create a variety of wood products. These businesses generate
significant amounts of woody debris that currently has limited value. Nakusp is not connected to the
natural gas grid and it is highly unlikely they ever will be, given their location. The community (including
local government and business) is interested in developing additional value for the woody debris. The
initial and most logical market was for District Heating (DH). The Wood Waste 2 Rural Heat project
(WW2RH) was approached by Councillor Tom Zelznik to come into the community to explore the level of
interest. Wood Waste 2 Rural Heat Coordinator David Dubois visited Nakusp in the fall of 2013 and did a
preliminary assessment of Village-owned buildings. Appendix 1 contains the results of this initial
favourable assessment. Additional follow-up visits were completed during the first half of 2014. Mr.
Dubois visited a number of potential fuel suppliers, toured buildings that could potentially connect to
the system, as well as making presentations to community groups. The result is that the community
decided that developing a DH system had potential merit but more information was needed. On behalf
of the community, the Village has asked WW2RH to provide a business case for proceeding with
developing a DH system.
This business case will look at the following:
1. current cost of energy in Nakusp,
2. the energy consumption of potential anchor clients,
3. the capital cost of a DH system (including energy center, piping and connection), but not land
acquisition,
4. the financial viability of the system and its sensitivity to certain parameters,
5. provide direction for next steps in developing a biomass heating system.
The business case should not be considered an engineering or design plan. Any estimates in regards to
equipment sizing, specifications, layout, etc. are for information purposes only.
Energy Cost and Consumption Currently, buildings in Nakusp are heated using propane, electricity and fuel oil. The primary sources are
propane and electricity. Data was provided to WW2RH by Village staff, Arrow Lakes School District and a
private business. All of the buildings are currently heated with propane with the exception of the Arena
which uses electricity. The individual data sets covered between two to six years of data. The average
price of propane per year of each building varied from $0.63/l to $0.82/ l. It is worth noting that at times
throughout the year the price of propane could be over $1.00/l. Factoring the efficiency of each
building’s heating system, the price of energy ranged from $31.21/GJ to $46.21/GJ2.
2 One Gigajoule or GJ is a measure of energy. In this report it is the basis for comparing various types of energy including propane, electricity and fuel oil. One litre of propane or fuel oil contains 0.0253 GJ and 0.0387 GJ respectively. One kWh of electricity equals 0.0036 GJ.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
7 | P a g e
The average price of electricity for the arena was $0.085/kWh which equals $23.53/GJ. The average
price of energy across all the data set is $42.47/GJ. This price represents the cost of energy after heat
production3 at the point of consumption (in the pipe or duct).
The energy consumption for heating of the various buildings is shown in Table 3
Table 3 Energy Consumption
Building 1Input
Energy (GJ)
Output
Energy
(GJ)
Percentage
of Total
Arena 1219 1219 33%
Nakusp Senior Secondary 1230 984 27%
Commercial Building 1283 898 24%
Nakusp Elementary School 372 297 8%
Emergency Services Building 335 268 7%
TOTAL 4439 3666 1. In some buildings not all the energy was used for heating so it was necessary to estimate heat only consumption from
the data set
If the DH system was to supply only these five buildings it would use approx. 220 bone dry tonnes (BDT)
of biomass per year4 (1300 cubic meters/year of wood chips). This is equal to approximately 9 ‘B’ train
chip trucks per year (shown in Figure 2). The most likely delivery vehicle would be single or tandem axle
gravel truck or similar.
Figure 2 'B' Train Chip Truck Configuration (source: Arrow Transportation (Transportation))
District Heating System Concept The concept for the Village of Nakusp DH system is to supply heat to a number of buildings in the area of
Sixth to Eighth Streets including the Arena, Emergency Services Building (ESB), the Elementary and High
Schools, as well as other commercial buildings. Initial interest was positive from a variety of potential
clients including Overwaitea, Selkirk Inn, Kal Tire and others. Other potential clients that may connect
would be Halcyon House, K2 Rotor Lodge and others (Figure 3Error! Reference source not found.). It is
expected that the results of this business case would be used to further confirm support and be used to
develop firm agreements.
3 Different heating appliances have different efficiencies based on age, technology, etc. A system that has a lower overall efficiency will use more fuel. 4 The moisture content of biomass can have a significant impact on the amount of energy available. It is typical to express biomass consumption rates assuming no moisture or as a Bone Dry tonne (BDT).
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
8 | P a g e
Figure 3 District Heating System Layout
The two main components are the Energy Centre (EC) and the Distribution Network (DN). The EC will
house the biomass boiler, biomass fuel storage, control equipment and heat storage. The DH is the
series of hot water supply and return pipes that will be used to transfer heat to the various clients.
A number of potential sites were identified for the EC. The first would be on Village property in the
vicinity of the ESB building by the existing recycle drop off. During some initial discussion with seniors in
the community, there were concerns raised about the aesthetic impacts. A second potential site was on
land currently occupied by the provincial forest service near the corner of First Street and Fifth Avenue.
The third location was on the site of the Nakusp Youth Group Society building, which has been damaged
by fire. The EC could be built in conjunction with a replacement building, and in this case the society
could be a partner in developing the system. For the purposes of this report it will be assumed that the
EC will be located at the youth group site.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
9 | P a g e
It is assumed that the DN will be located under unpaved laneways as much as possible. The cost of
installing the DN under paved roads would add significantly to the overall capital cost. It is worth noting
that locating the DN outside of any existing utility corridors could pose a risk if the location of the pipe is
not well documented. This report has broken down the DN into three phases. It is possible the phases
could be completed individually or at the same time. Phase one would be to connect the high school and
elementary schools, as well as supply heat to the youth group building. Phase 2 would be the buildings
along the west side of Eighth Avenue, including portions of the ESB, Arena, and potentially the day care
and seniors’ hall. Phase three would include the businesses between Sixth and Seventh Avenues down
to Overwaitea, K2 Rotor Lodge, Kal Tire and potentially further east, depending on demand. The hospital
is also a strong candidate, but it has not been included in this report because of its distance from the
core buildings.
Building Suitability
While it is technically feasible to connect all buildings to a DH, some are more suited than others.
Approximate connection costs were estimated for analysis, but detailed estimates should be confirmed
as part of any further analysis. Buildings heated using hot water (hydronic) are the easiest and cheapest
to connect while electric baseboard tends to be the most expensive. Some buildings have multiple
heating systems and each one would require a separate connection. For example the ESB has one
heating system for most of the office spaces, as well as an individual radiant heating system for the
garage space of each organization (fire, rescue, ambulance).
In some cases, the cost of connecting the clients would be higher than any potential revenue generated.
For example, a building that would cost $20,000 to connect but only generate $500/year in revenue
would not be considered an ideal client, even though the DN might be very close.
In most DH systems, the system operator pays for the cost of running the pipe into the client’s building
to the connection point, as well as supplying an energy transfer station. The energy transfer station
would include a heat exchanger to transfer heat to the clients heating system as well as a meter to track
consumption. This consumption data is then used to bill the client based on the amount of energy used.
Phase 1 - Schools
Phase 1 would see heating to Nakusp Senior Secondary and Nakusp Elementary Schools. The two
schools represent significant load and are relatively close to the EC. The schools would be easy to
connect as they already use hydronic or hot water heating and would require a minimum of retrofitting.
The pipe network would need to cross both Fourth Street and Canyon Road (Sixth Avenue). It is
expected this could be done using directional drilling.
Typically the EC is a stand-alone facility but it is possible to incorporate it into a building with multiple
uses. This represents a likely scenario if the EC is located on the property owned by the Nakusp Youth
Group Society. The design of such as building would not be complicated but would require the design to
address regulations about boiler standards. Figure 4 shows the pellet boiler at Northern Lights College in
Dawson Creek. The boiler is on display within a multiuse space.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
10 | P a g e
Figure 4 Northern Lights College Dawson Creek
Phase 2 - Westside of Eighth Avenue
The majority of the buildings within this phase are owned by the Village of Nakusp. The anchor clients
for this phase would be the ESB and the arena. Other potential clients would be the daycare and seniors’
hall; however these buildings represent a small portion of the demand for this phase.
The piping for this phase could be problematic. Installation of pipe along Third or Fourth Street would
require installation under paved roads. Installation of piping under paved roads is more costly than
along unpaved roads. A slightly longer path through the high school was chosen to take advantage of
lower installation costs.
Phase 3 - Commercial Buildings in Downtown
The piping for this phase would run south down the alley between Sixth and Seventh Avenues before
branching west towards Halcyon House and east towards Kal Tire and K2 Rotor Lodge and finally
connecting to Overwaitea. Potential connections for this line would include the previously mentioned
buildings as well as the school board office, Selkirk Lodge and others.
It is expected that this phase might be the most complicated, due to the number of connections and
varied types of building ownerships (Private, Public, Not for Profit).
Fuel Selection and Storage
A biomass-based system can be fuelled by many different forms of fibre from pellets to bush grindings.
Different fuels have different properties. Generally speaking, the more processed the fuel, the higher
the energy content and the cost (i.e. chips are cheaper than pellets but you require more chips to get
the same energy value). Capital costs also go up for less processed fuel because of higher degrees of
variability and larger fuel volumes. Wood chips, unlike pellets, do not flow, and hence a more complex
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
11 | P a g e
fuel handling system is required. Therefore any cost savings due to reduced fuel cost may not cover the
increased capital costs.
For boilers smaller than 500 kW, a dry fuel of less than 30% moisture is needed5. Often times system
operators try to use the cheapest biomass fuel available such as hog fuel6. This can lead to significant
operation and maintenance issues, especially for boilers under about 1 MW. The estimated boiler size
for this system is such that a high quality consistent fuel such as wood chips is used. It is important to
note that many systems of this size can, and do, use chips for fuel but pellets could also be used. This
relates primarily to ease of boiler operation. For this reason, this report will also include pellets as a
potential but less favourable fuel option.
Figure 5 High Quality Pulp Wood Chips
Figure 6 Bush Grind Hog Fuel
Wood chip storage systems are quite simple. The primary function is not to allow moisture (rain, snow,
etc.) to come in contact with the chips. It is important to have good air flow and a concrete or asphalt
floor to prevent contamination. 5 Hubert Steiner, GMX Austria 6 Hog fuel is a very generic term and can refer to a WIDE variety of products which have different properties.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
12 | P a g e
Figure 7 Wood Chip Storage
The chip storage for the heat plant would be a simple 2 or 3 sided shed with a concrete floor. Storage
would be approximately 1.5 times the size of the delivery vehicle. The most likely delivery vehicle would
be a tandem axle grain truck. A gravel truck could be used but the volume of chips that can be delivered
is less. The result is that the cost of delivery per tonne of fuel is higher. The exact layout for the fuel
storage bin and boiler house would be determined by the site of the EC.
It is estimated that phase 1 will require approximately 85 BDT of biomass per year. Phase 2 will require
100 BDT. It is expected that phase 3 will require 100 BDT. Once all three phases are completed there will
be a fuel delivery every 1.5 weeks. Therefore truck traffic/noise etc. will be minimal.
Boiler Sizing
Biomass boilers operate best when they are operating at full capacity as much as possible. In order to
maximize the operating time at full capacity, the boiler is typically sized to the average heat demand and
not the peak demand7. For a district heating system the types of clients and how they use the heat will
also have an impact on system sizing. For example schools require heat during the day but are
unoccupied evenings and weekends, whereas the arena would need heat mainly in the evening and on
weekends. For the purpose of this report it is assumed that the EC will be built as part of phase one but
that it will have enough space to add additional boiler capacity as additional phases come on line. Phase
one would require approximately 175 kW of boiler capacity. This includes approximately 50 kW of
capacity to heat a potential youth centre. Phase two would require 200 kW; this includes an estimated
30 kW each for the seniors’ centre and daycare. The size of the boiler for Phase three presents the
largest unknown. Data has only been provided by Overwaitea, with interest being shown by a number of
other potential clients. For the purposes of this business case it is estimated the boiler will be 200 kW.
This is based on who might potentially connect to the system and an estimate of their heat needs.
7 Peak demand refers to the additional heat energy required to supply all of the demand beyond the base or average load.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
13 | P a g e
Table 4 Piping Schedule
Phase Boiler Size (kW)
Distance (Metres)
Additional Comments
Phase 1 175 310 2” Mainline and 1” to
Elementary School
Phase 2 200 715 2” Mainline and 1” to ESB
and Daycare
Phase 3 200 610 3” Mainline and 1” to
KalTire
Total 575 1635
It is possible that the time required to complete all three phases could be lengthy. It is anticipated as the
final phase (one, two or three) is installed, that one of the two initial boilers could be traded in for a
larger boiler. Therefore the EC could be designed to accommodate only two boilers and not three.
Figure 8 150 kW Pellet Boiler at Arrow Lakes Fire Attack Base near Castlegar BC
Heat Storage
The heat storage tank is a large insulated tank that stores hot water. It allows for the supply of heat at
peak demands without using more expensive and Green House Gas (GHG) intensive peaking fuel, and
reduces boiler cycling. The heat storage vessel allows for the installation of a smaller capacity boiler
system. Heat can be generated throughout the entire day instead of on demand during peak usage
times.
Heat Distribution
Insulated hot water lines will run underground from the biomass heating system to each building. There
is relatively little elevation change across the system so high distribution pressures should not be
needed. This should be confirmed as part of the next steps. None of the buildings should require high
temperature hot water (greater than 80 or 90o C). Based on these conditions, a pre-insulated PEX piping
system is the preferred distribution solution. In addition, PEX is cheaper than metal pipe, resulting in
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
14 | P a g e
lower capital costs and easier to install, resulting in lower installation costs. It can be simply lowered into
the trench (e.g. no welding and minimal number of personnel). The breakdown of pipe length by size is
illustrated in Table 3.
Figure 9 Pre-insulated PEX pipe from Urecon with Supply and Return
Normally, each building would also include a heat meter to measure the amount of energy being
consumed, and this would be used for billing. The cost of these meters can be expensive.
Biomass Heating System Economic Analysis
DH System Capital Cost
All cost estimates are for budgeting purposes only; except as noted this report assumes typical
installation costs. These costs vary by area and contractor. Estimates from local contractors/suppliers
should be obtained prior to proceeding. The DH system capital cost can be broken down into two
components. The first is the heat plant, which would contain the biomass boilers and fuel storage. The
second is for the distribution piping and retrofitting of existing buildings.
For the purposes of this business case it is assumed that the heat plant will be a stand-alone building.
There has been some interest in having the EC incorporated into a new youth services building. In the
event this happens, the business case should be updated. The EC has a boiler house8 that would contain
the boiler, pumps, heat storage, and all system controls. The capital cost for the heat plant in each of the
individual phases is shown in Table 5. The data in Table 3 assumes each phase is carried out individually
with a separate EC and network installation. The data is included both for chips and pellets. Pellets are
included as a reference only as they represent the most expensive biomass-based fuel. It is worth noting
that the cost estimates for connecting buildings in Phase 3 is very uncertain as the number of clients and
the exact nature of their heating systems is not known (with the exception of Overwaitea, which would
8 The boiler house capital cost is based on a 20’ storage container (20’x8’) or similar stand-alone
building. This is typical for most installations in BC.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
15 | P a g e
be expected to be the anchor load for this phase). The total capital cost of all three individual phases is
$2.13 million for chips and $2.06 million for pellets.
Table 5 Individual Phase Capital Cost
System ComponentWood
ChipPellets
Wood
ChipPellets
Wood
ChipPellets
Boi ler House $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
Fuel Storage $30,000 $15,000 $30,000 $15,000 $30,000 $15,000
Boi ler $100,000 $100,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000
Insta l lation $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Engineering $25,000 $25,000 $35,000 $35,000 $40,000 $40,000
Misc. $35,000 $32,000 $40,000 $38,000 $41,000 $38,000
Total $265,000 $247,000 $305,000 $288,000 $311,000 $293,000
Pipe $28,000 $28,000 $80,000 $80,000 $114,000 $114,000
Trenching $98,000 $98,000 $199,000 $199,000 $163,000 $163,000
Insta l lation $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $20,000 $20,000
Bui lding connections $30,000 $30,000 $40,000 $40,000 $50,000 $50,000
Total $171,000 $171,000 $334,000 $334,000 $347,000 $347,000
$15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
$87,000 $84,000 $128,000 $124,000 $132,000 $128,000
$538,000 $517,000 $782,000 $761,000 $805,000 $783,000
Phase 2 Phase 3
Contingency (20%)
Total Capital Cost
Energy
Centre
Distribution
System
Phase 1
Project Management
A more likely scenario would see the EC in Phase 1 and 2 combined as well as some network layout
resulting in reduced capital cost. This scenario would see phase 3 completed once the system is up and
running successfully. Instead of buying a third boiler for phase three it would be possible to trade in one
of the boilers from phase 1 or 2, thus reducing capital cost and overall space requirements. This business
case will focus primarily and Phases 1 and 2, with a total capital cost of $1.22 million. The total capital
cost for phases 1, 2 and 3 would be $1.87 million for chips.
If a larger boiler is installed as part of Phase 3, the use of hog fuel could be an option. For this reason the
fuel system in this system has been upgraded from a typical circular extractor (Figure 10) to a walking
floor capable of handling a coarser rougher fuel (Figure 11). It is important to note that until a larger
boiler is installed wood chips would be the preferred fuel.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
16 | P a g e
Table 6 Combined Phase 1&2 Capital Cost
System ComponentWood
ChipPellets
Wood
ChipPellets
Wood
ChipPellets
Boi ler House $30,000 $25,000
Fuel Storage $50,000 $15,000
Boi ler $100,000 $100,000 $125,000 $125,000 $100,000 $100,000
Insta l lation $55,000 $55,000 $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 $50,000
Engineering $30,000 $30,000 $20,000 $20,000 $30,000 $30,000
Misc. $40,000 $34,000 $26,000 $26,000 $27,000 $27,000
Total $305,000 $259,000 $196,000 $196,000 $207,000 $207,000
Pipe $28,000 $28,000 $80,000 $80,000 $114,000 $114,000
Trenching $98,000 $98,000 $183,000 $183,000 $163,000 $163,000
Insta l lation $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $20,000 $20,000
Bui lding connections $30,000 $30,000 $40,000 $40,000 $50,000 $50,000
Total $171,000 $171,000 $318,000 $318,000 $347,000 $347,000
$15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
$95,000 $86,000 $103,000 $103,000 $111,000 $111,000
$586,000 $531,000 $632,000 $632,000 $680,000 $680,000
Phase 2 Phase 3
Contingency (20%)
Total Capital Cost
Energy
Centre
Distribution
System
Phase 1
Project Management
Figure 10 Typical Chip Extraction Unit installed at Granisle, BC
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
17 | P a g e
Figure 11 Walking Floor Extraction System (photo courtesy of Fink Machine)
Operating and Maintenance Costs
The Operating and Maintenance costs have a number of components. The first cost is for personnel to
operate the system. Most systems are designed to be fully automatic, requiring very little operator
support. Most facilities require about 1-2 hours per week to manage the fuel, empty ash, and do
periodic checks. This equates to a 0.1 FTE. Depending on who is operating the system this small amount
of additional labour may be absorbed by existing staff, so no new personnel should be required. It is
worth noting that the most successful installations have a high degree of operator buy-in. In addition
there is the requirement to do monthly clerical work (billing, filing, etc.). This is assumed to be minimal,
2-3 hours per month, and similar to the operator, will depend on who is operating the system. For the
purposes of this analysis it will be assumed that labour costs are $150/month or $1,800 per year.
The second cost is for regular maintenance. The boiler will require annual service to clean the tubes,
check boiler function, lubricate, etc. This work could be done by onsite personnel, but it may require
support from outside personnel. The cost was assumed at $4,000/year for one boiler and $6,000/year
for two.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
18 | P a g e
The system was also assumed to consume $500/year in electricity for pumping and auger systems for
each phase. The system will also require insurance; depending on who owns the system this could be
significant. For the purposes of this business case insurance is assumed to be $3000/year.
Table 7 Operating Cost Comparison
Phase Cost ComponentHigh Cost
$100/BDT
Medium
Cost
$60/BDT
Low Cost
$30/BDTPellets
Insurance $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
Wood Chips $8,500 $5,100 $2,500 $14,100
Labour $1,800 $1,800 $1,800 $1,800
Maintenance $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000
Replacements $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000
Electrici ty (pumping) $500 $500 $500 $500
Total Operating Costs $34,300 $30,900 $28,300 $40,400
Cost of Energy Sold $/GJ $26.84 $24.18 $22.14 $31.61Insurance $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
Wood Chips $10,000 $6,000 $3,000 $16,500
Labour $1,800 $1,800 $1,800 $1,800
Maintenance $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000
Replacements $24,000 $24,000 $24,000 $24,000
Electrici ty (pumping) $500 $500 $500 $500
Total Operating Costs $43,300 $39,300 $36,300 $49,800
Cost of Energy Sold $/GJ $26.05 $23.65 $21.84 $29.96
Insurance $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Wood Chips $18,500 $11,100 $5,500 $30,600
Labour $1,800 $1,800 $1,800 $1,800
Maintenance $6,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000
Replacements $38,000 $38,000 $38,000 $38,000
Electrici ty (pumping) $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $500
Total Operating Costs $70,300 $60,900 $55,300 $79,900
Cost of Energy Sold $/GJ $23.91 $20.71 $18.81 $27.18
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 1
and 2
It is expected the boiler and fuel handling system will have a life span of 20+ years, while the piping
network and buildings life span is 40+ years. These replacement costs need to be included in the
business case. The cost for the boiler and fuel handling equipment is 5% per year while the network and
buildings are at 2.5% per year. These numbers do not include inflation or interest. The data is shown in
Table 7. The result is that no capital would need to be borrowed at the time of replacement. There is no
provision for debt servicing of the DH system, however it would be possible to reallocate money from
replacements to service debt. The result is that financing may be required for new equipment.
Fuel Cost
Typically fuel costs consist of the chips, as well as the propane or electricity required for peaking and
back up. The initial assumption is that clients will continue to use their existing heating systems to
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
19 | P a g e
provide peaking and back up to the DH. As the system progresses and depending on load, this could
change with the DH providing all the required heat and having its own peaking and back-up systems. The
net result is that the fuel costs in this business case are only for biomass.
There is currently little or no demand for most waste wood fibre in Nakusp. Box Lake Lumber produces
some wood chips and a large amount of hog fuel. The majority of this is sent to the pulp mill in Castlegar
or, depending on the market, other more distant mills. Generally speaking the cost of trucking the
biomass to these facilities is the major cost. For the purposes of this business case, three wood chip
price scenarios will be used. The low price scenario has chips at $30/BDT including delivery. It is
assumed that it will cost approximately $10/tonne to deliver the wood chips using a tandem axle grain
truck based on a 1 hour cycle time at $100/hr. The medium price scenario is $60/BDT. The high price
scenario is $100/BDT. Both include the $10/tonne delivery cost. $30/BDT is representative of the
current market, while $60/BDT is a conservative estimate of what the market could be if further
development happens and more markets for this material open up. $100/BDT represents an estimated
upper limit of the market; however this far exceeds what the other large players in the market could pay
because of further distance from the source, and hence higher transportation costs.
It is assumed that the DH system will displace 90% of the client’s current heating fuels. Based on the
energy cost and consumption data in Table 3 and estimating the energy consumption of the remaining
buildings, it is possible to estimate the amount of biomass required as well as the cost of operations and
maintenance for phase 1 and phase 2. There is limited data available for clients connecting to phase 3,
therefore no additional analysis will be completed for this phase.
The impact of the price of wood chips varies from 10% of operating cost at $30/BDT to approximately
25% at $100/BDT. The net result is that chip price is important above about $60/BDT. Below $60/BDT
controlling maintenance costs is important. The cost of pellets has also been included for comparison.
Table 8 Biomass Consumption and Cost
Phase Building
DH Energy
Consumption
(GJ)
Equivalent
Biomass
Required
(BDT)
Chip Cost
at Low
Price
$30/BDT
Chip Cost at
Med Price
$60/BDT
Chip Cost
at High
Price
$100/BDT
Pellets at
$170/ton
delivered
Nakusp Secondary 886 60 $1,800 $3,600 $6,000 $9,900
Nakusp Elementary 267 18 $500 $1,100 $1,800 $3,000
Youth Society Bui lding (est.) 125 7 $200 $400 $700 $1,200
Phase 1 Total 1,278 85 $2,500 $5,100 $8,500 $14,100
Arena 1,219 74 $2,200 $4,400 $7,400 $12,200
ESB 268 16 $500 $1,000 $1,600 $2,600
Senior's Hal l (est.) 100 6 $200 $400 $600 $1,000
Daycare (est.) 75 4 $100 $200 $400 $700
Phase 2 Total 1,662 100 $3,000 $6,000 $10,000 $16,500
2,940 185 $5,500 $11,100 $18,500 $31,800Total
Phase 1
Phase 2
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
20 | P a g e
Carbon Offsets
Phase 1 and phase 2 will result in about 94 tonnes of GHG reduction. At a price of $25/tonne this would
result in approximately $2,400 in potential offsets. This is a very small amount and would be extremely
difficult to monetise at this point in time; therefore any potential revenue from the sale of offsets will
not be included in this business case.
It is worth noting that the reductions in GHG fuels benefit both the school district and to a lesser extent
The Village of Nakusp. So while the DH will not see any revenue, it results in avoided cost for both of
them and adds more incentive for them to connect.
Total Operating Cost
The total operating cost is summarised in Table 7. It shows the data for phase 1 and phase 2 separately
as well as the combined scenario. Based on these operating costs and the expected biomass
consumption listed in Table 8 it is possible to estimate the cost of heat generated per GJ. This represents
the “break-even” point. Looking at the data, it is estimated that a total operating cost of $24.50/GJ
would cover most likely scenarios caused by fluctuating biomass costs to about $60/BDT.
Financial Analysis
Most DH systems generate revenue by selling heat to clients. The average operating cost was assumed
to be $24.5/GJ. This analysis will look at the financial analysis based on selling heat at $26.95/GJ (cost
plus 10%) and $28.18/GJ (cost plus 15%). The revenue must be sufficient to cover expenses, provide for
future plans and generate income. In addition it must also offer an incentive for perspective clients to
connect. Based on the data provided by potential clients they are paying between $31.21/GJ and
$46.21/GJ for propane. Client savings will range between 13-42% with a 10% markup and 10-40% with a
15% markup. It is estimated that these savings will be sufficient to get clients to connect.
The arena was the only building examined that was being heated by electricity at a cost of $23.53/GJ. It
is expected that as BC Hydro rates are increased the price of electricity will be approximately equal to
the sale price of the DH system.
A number of scenarios were analysed to determine a variety of parameters9 including Simple Payback,
Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The analyses were completed based on the
sale price of the heat at the three potential chip costs noted in the Fuel Costs sections. It was assumed
that potential grant funding would range from 0% to 60% (typical of Gas Tax Funding). The remaining
capital would be provided from other sources. Please see potential business models for more details.
The annual revenue shown in Table 9, Table 10, and Table 11 is based on the net revenue minus
operating costs. The operating costs do not include the cost of replacements in these tables.
The data shows that capital cost has greater impact on financial viability than chip price. For example,
when wood chips are at $100/BDT a 70% reduction in cost is similar to a 25% capital cost reduction.
9 The cost of saving for replacements was not included, as in theory this money would be invested in some form of savings vehicle. The NPV is based on a 20-year term and 5% interest and does not include inflation or debt repayment.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
21 | P a g e
Therefore it is critical to minimise the upfront capital costs. This can be done either by obtaining grants
or by selecting cost effective equipment.
The sale price for heat in phase 1, phase 2 or phase 1 & 2 should be greater than $28.18/GJ (cost plus
15%).
Phase 1 as a standalone installation is financially viable with approximately 50-60% of grant or equity
funding. The system should generate between $2,000-8,000/year of net revenue depending on the price
of wood chips. This net revenue includes the cost of replacements.
Phase 2 as a standalone installation is financially viable with 25% of grant or equity funding, provided
fuel costs can also be kept below $60/BDT. The system should generate $4-11,000 of net revenue
depending on the price of wood chips. This net revenue includes the cost of replacements.
Combining Phase 1 & 2 results in a project that is marginally financially viable at 25% grant or equity
funding but more would be recommended. The system should generate $13-27,000/year of revenue
depending on the price of wood chips. This net revenue includes the cost of replacements. It is worth
noting that while the simple payback and IRR improve with a combined phase 1 & 2, the NPV does not
improve.
Figure 12 Telkwa Municipal Office with EC Located in Back of Building
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
22 | P a g e
Table 9 Financial Analysis with Chips at $100/BDT
Phase 1
Project Cost $538,000 $538,000 $538,000 $538,000 $538,000 $538,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $134,500 $322,800 $0 $134,500 $322,800
Capital Cost $538,000 $403,500 $215,200 $538,000 $403,500 $215,200
Annual Revenue $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $19,000 $19,000 $19,000
Simple payback (Years) 31.6 23.7 12.7 28.3 21.2 11.3
NPV -$326,100 -$191,600 -$3,300 -$301,200 -$166,700 $21,600
IRR -4% -2% 5% -3% -1% 6%
Phase 2
Project Cost $782,000 $782,000 $782,000 $782,000 $782,000 $782,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $195,500 $469,200 $0 $195,500 $469,200
Capital Cost $782,000 $586,500 $312,800 $782,000 $586,500 $312,800
Annual Revenue $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000
Simple payback (Years) 31.3 23.5 12.5 27.9 20.9 11.2
NPV -$187,300 -$78,400 $74,000 -$157,900 -$49,000 $103,400
IRR -4% -1% 5% -3% 0% 6%
Phase 1 & 2
Project Cost $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $304,500 $730,800 $0 $304,500 $730,800
Capital Cost $1,218,000 $913,500 $487,200 $1,218,000 $913,500 $487,200
Annual Revenue $47,000 $47,000 $47,000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000
Simple payback (Years) 25.9 19.4 10.4 23.9 17.9 9.6
NPV -$383,400 -$214,600 $21,900 -$348,500 -$179,600 $56,800
IRR -2% 0% 7% -2% 1% 8%
Cost + 10% = $26.95/GJ Cost + 15% = 28.18
Fuel Costs $100/BDT
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
23 | P a g e
Table 10 Financial Analysis with Chips at $60/BDT
Phase 1
Project Cost $538,000 $538,000 $538,000 $538,000 $538,000 $538,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $134,500 $322,800 $0 $134,500 $322,800
Capital Cost $538,000 $403,500 $215,200 $538,000 $403,500 $215,200
Annual Revenue $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000
Simple payback (Years) 25.6 19.2 10.2 24.5 18.3 9.8
NPV -$276,300 -$141,800 $46,500 -$263,800 -$129,300 $59,000
IRR -2% 0% 7% -2% 1% 8%
Phase 2
Project Cost $782,000 $782,000 $782,000 $782,000 $782,000 $782,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $195,500 $469,200 $0 $195,500 $469,200
Capital Cost $782,000 $586,500 $312,800 $782,000 $586,500 $312,800
Annual Revenue $29,000 $29,000 $29,000 $32,000 $32,000 $32,000
Simple payback (Years) 27.0 20.2 10.8 24.4 18.3 9.8
NPV -$135,600 -$26,800 $125,600 -$115,500 -$6,700 $145,700
IRR -3% 0% 7% -2% 1% 8%
Phase 1 & 2
Project Cost $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $304,500 $730,800 $0 $304,500 $730,800
Capital Cost $1,218,000 $913,500 $487,200 $1,218,000 $913,500 $487,200
Annual Revenue $56,000 $56,000 $56,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000
Simple payback (Years) 21.8 16.3 8.7 20.3 15.2 8.1
NPV -$333,000 -$164,200 $72,300 -$301,000 -$132,100 $104,300
IRR -1% 2% 10% 0% 3% 11%
Cost + 10% = $26.95/GJ Cost + 15% = 28.18
Fuel Costs $60/BDT
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
24 | P a g e
Table 11 Financial Analysis with Chips at $30/BDT
Phase 1
Project Cost $538,000 $538,000 $538,000 $538,000 $538,000 $538,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $134,500 $322,800 $0 $134,500 $322,800
Capital Cost $538,000 $403,500 $215,200 $538,000 $403,500 $215,200
Annual Revenue $23,000 $23,000 $23,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
Simple payback (Years) 23.4 17.5 9.4 21.5 16.1 8.6
NPV -$251,400 -$116,900 $71,400 -$226,400 -$91,900 $96,400
IRR -1% 1% 9% -1% 2% 10%
Phase 2
Project Cost $782,000 $782,000 $782,000 $782,000 $782,000 $782,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $195,500 $469,200 $0 $195,500 $469,200
Capital Cost $782,000 $586,500 $312,800 $782,000 $586,500 $312,800
Annual Revenue $32,000 $32,000 $32,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000
Simple payback (Years) 24.4 18.3 9.8 22.3 16.8 8.9
NPV -$106,200 $2,600 $155,000 -$76,800 $32,000 $184,400
IRR -2% 1% 8% -1% 2% 9%
Phase 1 & 2
Project Cost $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000 $1,218,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $304,500 $730,800 $0 $304,500 $730,800
Capital Cost $1,218,000 $913,500 $487,200 $1,218,000 $913,500 $487,200
Annual Revenue $62,000 $62,000 $62,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000
Simple payback (Years) 19.6 14.7 7.9 18.7 14.1 7.5
NPV -$298,100 -$129,200 $107,200 -$263,200 -$94,300 $142,100
IRR 0% 3% 11% 1% 4% 12%
Cost + 10% = $26.95/GJ Cost + 15% = 28.18
Fuel Costs $30/BDT
This analysis was based on locating the EC for all phases at the youth centre site. The construction of
phase 2 with an EC located near to the Arena would most likely improve the financial viability of phase
2, only because of the reduced piping network. The down side is that any further development such as
connecting phase 1 or phase 3 would most likely be negatively impacted.
Pellets
The financial analysis for pellets is shown in Table 12. It is worth noting that pellets are only viable with
significant grants (60% plus) and would generate very little if any revenue.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
25 | P a g e
Table 12 Financial Analysis based on Pellets
Phase 1
Project Cost $517,000 $517,000 $517,000 $517,000 $517,000 $517,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $129,250 $310,200 $0 $129,250 $310,200
Capital Cost $517,000 $387,750 $206,800 $517,000 $387,750 $206,800
Annual Revenue $11,000 $11,000 $11,000 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000
Simple payback (Years) 47.0 35.3 18.8 39.8 29.8 15.9
NPV -$379,900 -$250,700 -$69,700 -$355,000 -$225,700 -$44,800
IRR -7% -5% 1% -6% -4% 2%
Phase 2
Project Cost $761,000 $761,000 $761,000 $761,000 $761,000 $761,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $190,250 $456,600 $0 $190,250 $456,600
Capital Cost $761,000 $570,750 $304,400 $761,000 $570,750 $304,400
Annual Revenue $19,000 $19,000 $19,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000
Simple payback (Years) 40.1 30.0 16.0 36.2 27.2 14.5
NPV -$253,000 -$147,100 $1,200 -$227,200 -$121,300 $27,100
IRR -6% -4% 2% -5% -3% 3%
Phase 1 & 2
Project Cost $1,163,000 $1,163,000 $1,163,000 $1,163,000 $1,163,000 $1,163,000
Grant 0% 25% 60% 0% 25% 60%
Grant funding $0 $290,750 $697,800 $0 $290,750 $697,800
Capital Cost $1,163,000 $872,250 $465,200 $1,163,000 $872,250 $465,200
Annual Revenue $37,000 $37,000 $37,000 $41,000 $41,000 $41,000
Simple payback (Years) 31.4 23.6 12.6 28.4 21.3 11.3
NPV -$440,900 -$276,500 -$46,500 -$415,700 -$251,300 -$21,300
IRR -4% -2% 5% -3% -1% 6%
Cost + 10% = $26.95/GJ Cost + 15% = 28.18
Pellets at $170/tonne delivered
Potential Business Models
The following chart summarizes the general strengths and weaknesses of private ownership, public
ownership and a partnership business model. In this discussion private ownership is either a for- profit
company or a not-for-profit entity (such as Nakusp and Area Youth Society). Public ownership would be
the Village of Nakusp.
Table 13 Strengths and Weaknesses of Different Ownership Structures
Model Strengths Weakness
Private Ownership carries the financial investment and risk
typically bring expertise (project management,
require higher rates of return therefore higher charges to customers
cannot access as low cost
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
26 | P a g e
operational skills, technical knowledge)*
capital as public
typically unable to access any grants
loss of control for public sector sponsors
Public Ownership close alignment with municipal, social and environmental policy
lower cost of financing and ability to access grants
greater customer confidence and willingness to sign long term contracts
any potential revenue can be used in the delivery of other services
relies on financial strength and credit availability of municipality
risk is carried by municipality
Partnership Model * potential alignment with municipal social and environmental policy
* greater flexibility than private or public approaches
* able to access lower cost municipal financing or grants
* some risk still remains with public sector
* potential complex relationship between partners
* This is typical of larger systems owned by utilities with experience in owning and operating DH. This
is most likely not the case in Nakusp
Within the community of Nakusp there has been much discussion about potential approaches to
ownership of any district heating system. The fundamental questions are whether the system should be
revenue neutral or generate revenue, as well as what are the desired outcomes. If the system is
operated to be revenue neutral then public ownership is the best choice. The system would operate as
any other utility (water, sewer, etc.) within the community either directly by the public entity, most
likely the Village of Nakusp, or as a wholly-owned subsidiary. This would require the Village of Nakusp to
develop additional capacity (see Operating and Maintenance Cost section).
The other end of the spectrum would see the system looking to generate revenue. Ownership of the
system in this case could be public, private or a partnership of both. The question then becomes what is
the optimum model. Based on the financial analysis a private-for-profit venture is unlikely because the
capital costs versus the potential return is not large enough. Most private ventures would be unlikely to
secure grants, etc. to make the project viable. The exception would be if the owner would be able to
significantly reduce the capital required by leveraging their existing equipment, skills, etc. It is also
possible that the Village of Nakusp could operate the system as a for-profit-venture to generate revenue
to support other activities. This would be similar to Nelson Hydro. It is assumed that the Village would
be in a position to access grant funding to improve the viability of the system
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
27 | P a g e
An alternative would be a partnership between public and private entities. The goal of the partnership
could be to generate revenue only or meet other goals (economic development, reduced energy cost,
GHG reduction). The amount of revenue generated would depend on the type of partnership and their
needs. A public partner would allow for access to various grants to reduce capital costs. The private
partner(s) could be a for-profit or not-for-profit group; this will also govern how any returns are
dispersed.
For many communities the decision on ownership is one of the most difficult because of the number of
uncertainties.
Based on the financial analysis, it is the author’s opinion that the best alternatives are as follows:
1) A system owned and controlled by the Village of Nakusp. The system would be either revenue-
neutral or revenue-generating. The operation of a utility of this size is something with which the
Village is familiar. Local governments are exempt from BC Utilities Commission, thus simplifying
the business, and municipalities also have the ability to access grants and cheaper capital.
2) The system is owned in partnership between the Village of Nakusp and private partners. These
partners could be not-for-profit or for-profit entities (either companies or individuals). The
entity would also be exempt from BCUC and have access to grants and potentially cheaper
capital. It is assumed that the system would be revenue-generating but at a lower return than
would be required from for-profit private investors.
This business case is based on the Village of Nakusp developing a district heating system that would
benefit a variety of clients that would connect. The Village could choose to do Phase 2 only, with only
buildings controlled by the Municipality connected to the heating system, and with limited plans to
connect additional buildings. This would reduce the capital cost of Phase 2, resulting in lower costs for
the Village.
Conclusions
1) There exists a financial case for the Village of Nakusp to look at developing a biomass-fueled
district heating system that would result in energy savings for clients who are connected to the
system. The savings would range from 10-50% depending on their current energy costs.
2) The capital cost for both phase 1&2 is just over $1,200,000 and a minimum of 25% grant or
equity would be required, assuming a biomass cost of $60/BDT.
3) While it is difficult to predict the financial impact in the long term, it is expected that by the
completion of Phase 1&2 the system should generate about $22,000/year in revenue after
expenses and replacements.
4) The completion of Phase 2 as a stand-alone system has the strongest economic case. The
completion of Phase 1&2, as well as phase 3, represent strong opportunities for the future.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
28 | P a g e
5) The system would consume about 185 BDT of biomass, resulting in approximately one gravel
truck load (or similar) every 1.5 to 2 weeks.
Recommendations If the community of Nakusp is interested in proceeding we have the following recommendations.
1) Determine which business model is of interest and begin to develop those partnerships,
including a memorandum of understanding for the potential ownership partners to sign. This
may require additional consultation with experts in the development of utilities.
2) Continue discussions with the school district, the Village of Nakusp and other potential clients of
the DH system, with the goal of signing preliminary heat sales contracts (subject to final cost
based on engineering design).
3) Develop a timeline or plan for the project, based on which phases are to be completed and
when.
4) Develop funding for the project either to be used initially to finalise engineering and design, or
funding to complete the entire project.
5) Based on this business case, begin discussions with potential fuel suppliers (Box Lake Lumber,
PIPCO, Community Forest) to formalise fuel supply costs and logistics.
6) It is anticipated that this report will include enough data to form an application for funding from
a number of sources including Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Provincial Government,
Columbia Basin Trust and others.
WW2RH is interested in continuing to support Nakusp as they work through the above
recommendations. If desired, WW2RH can assist the Village in further refining the business case, help
identify potential funding sources, and/or assist Village staff with the preparation of a Request for
Proposals, if required.
Disclaimer Assumptions, conclusions and estimates for this report are based on available information and should
be used only for informational purposes. This report is a pre-feasibility study and should not be used for
engineering or design.
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Tom Zelenik for his commitment to this project and drive to move it
forward. We would like to thank Linda Tynan and Village of Nakusp staff members for providing access
to information and facilities. We would like to thank Art Olson from School District 10 for providing data
for this report and access to facilities.
Nakusp District Heating Business Case
29 | P a g e
Funding for the Wood Waste 2 Rural Heat Project is provided by the Southern Interior Beetle Action
Coalition (SIBAC), the Columbia Basin Trust, the Government of BC, Cariboo-Chilcotin Beetle Action
Coalition (CCBAC) and the Omineca Beetle Action Coalition (OBAC).
Agenda Item E1
STAFF REPORT: Request for Council Decision DATE: September 8, 2014 SUBJECT: Outstanding Actions on Resolutions TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S): That council pass the following resolution:
That the outstanding action on Resolutions report be received for information. BACKGROUND: The outstanding action on resolutions report is intended to be a report which records all council resolutions which require action. It is not a list of all management duties/priorities – this information is included in the monthly CAO report. Some items were included on this list when it was started that were general items or resolutions of the previous council. Any item may be removed from the outstanding task list if a councilor brings it forward and council votes to remove it. __________________ Submitted by: Linda Tynan, BBA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer Attachment: Outstanding action item report
OUTSTANDING ACTIONS ON COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS (originating from council direction)
Agenda Item E1(a)
Origin Item Description Status 1 Statutory Water Service Bylaw Update Water Service bylaw to
incorporate properties outside village who are receiving Village water
High priority
2 Resolution # R334/11
Nakusp Trails Society Prepare report for council re stewardship agreement
Trail Society to attend council as delegation
3 Council direction
Policy P-11 Staff appreciation
Update of policy required.
4 Council direction
Memorial Trees/benches (donations)
Policy update required; CAO working with Parks/Arena and PW to develop proposed policy for council including map of available locations for further benches.
In progress; draft policy written; presentation Postponed due to other priorities.
5 Resolution # R18/11
Nakusp Chicken Bylaw Policy development in progress.
6 Subdivision Bylaw Update required 7 Purchasing policy update Some revisions required to update for
consistency and clarity CFO to begin work as priority
8 Policy Manual Review of existing policies; update as required
CAO reviewing workplan to accommodate task as priority
9 Statutory Bylaws Complete consolidations and review of outdated references
Ongoing – staff will develop schedule for review
10 R81/12 Chamber of Commerce Request to use ESB for Board Meetings 11 R193/12 Staff develop a policy for Policy development – purchase of
Origin Item Description Status purchasing sponsorship in community events rather than granting fee waiver
sponsorship (advertising) in community events.
12 R254/12 Public Showers Chamber of Commerce Chamber to research grant/funding opportunities for coin operated showers at Marina. In progress; dependant on Chamber time constraints.
13 R255/12 Review of portion of OCP/Zoning bylaw relating to R5 zone and adjacent properties.
Second phase - Delayed due to staff capacity. Currently preparing RFP for consultant. Expected to be posted week of Jan 26.
14 R98/13 Launch Club Agreement CAO to prepare an Agreement and present to council regarding the breakwater replacement
Under staff review.
15 R279/13 Cemetery Bylaw Review requirements for headstones 16 R169/14 Unsightly premises 1401-
Hwy 6 Staff to work to an acceptable solution Requires staff follow up.(March)
17 R248/14 Build Canada Project Grant Projects Application deadline Feb 15; in progress. 18 R9/15 Chamber of Commerce Request- Street Banners Referred back to staff for further review and
report back to council. 19 R11/15 Canadian Mountain Holiday
Inc. Hangar Lease Draft Lease prepared.
20 R14/15 Options for Sexual Health- Kinsmen Health Building
Lease to occupy the Kinsmen Health Building
Draft Lease started. In progress.
CAO Report: January 26, 2015 Agenda Item: F1
General:
1. Website Upgrades: The website development continues to require a significant amount of staff involvement and time. This investment is critical to the success of the website. Terry Welsh (Director of Hot Springs Operations) has taken the lead on the Hot Springs website and Clyde Bersky (Director of Finance) has been primarily responsible for working with the developers of the municipal site.
Hot Springs Website: Soft launch, Sunday January 25; presentation at Jan 26 council meeting Municipal Website: Contracted Karen Marshall to assist with development of content; home page being developed. Expected to launch in early spring.
Village staff is very close to choosing an on-line reservation system for the Chalets and campground. This will allow customers to go to the website and book directly. Although there is some set up time required for the system, this will be greatly offset by the time savings in the future.
2. Association of Kootenay Boundary Local Government 2015 (AKBLG 2015) conference Change. Challenge. Collaborate. See report as agenda item for update.
3. Staffing Updates Mr. Warren Leigh has accepted the position of Director of Operations (permanent). Mr. Terry Welsh is continuing in the position of Temporary Director of Hot Springs Operations. Fire Chief Terry Warren is back at work; CAO would like to acknowledge the contribution of
Deputy Chief Reg Gustafson who covered the Chief’s responsibilities during his absence. 4. Village owned buildings and property: Old Firehall: Lease is in place with the Old Firehall Collective Society; Work has started with
rehabilitation of the building; the Society has been working with RDCK to obtain a building permit as the need for it was overlooked by the Society. Engineered drawings are complete and building permit is expected imminently. Requirement for Development Permit from Village was waived because of the nature of the renovation.
Kinsmen’s Health Unit: Staff is working on the draft lease between the Options for Sexual Health Society and the Village.
Centennial Building: There is some dispute between the contractor and the Archives Society over final cost of renovation – CAO will assist in dispute resolution if required.
Farmer’s Market: CAO has recently been advised that the Farmer’s Market has successfully organized their group into a registered non-profit society. This will allow the Village and the Market to enter into a “License to Occupy” agreement for the market which will alleviate concerns about uncertainty regarding location, fees, etc. This item will be presented to council for discussion at a future council meeting.
5. Financial activities: January is always a very busy time for finance. This will be the first year for
our Director of Finance to prepare the annual financial plan and audit therefore greater assistance/ participation is required from all staff members to ensure that it can all be done in a timely manner. Water and sewer rates have been established by council and utility bills will be mailed very soon. The focus at this time is verifying all of the 2014 entries and making adjustments as required in order to have an accurate picture of 2014 operations. The first financial presenation will be made to council on Thursday, January 29th. The external audit is
scheduled for March and therefore, focus must be also made on updating “lead sheets and financial statements” for this.
6. Snow Removal: According to AccuWeather.com the Village of Nakusp received 119.2 cm (46.9
inches) of snow in December and 81.3 cm (32 inches) to date in January, for a total of 200.5 cm (80”). This snow was received during a few storm events in a short time frame. Crews worked to plow, sand, and haul snow. During this time, some complaints were received regarding snow removal in alleyways; however, alleys are currently not rated as priority routes and are plowed as resources and time permits. It should be noted that the Village received numerous phone calls commending our crews for the work they did in very challenging conditions.
Additional complaints were received about missed garbage pick up. This occurred as a result of
snow piles obscuring the location of bags placed out for collection. 7. Airport: A “NOTAMS” was issued for the airport which closed it to all traffic. This was necessary
because Village machinery was not able to clear the snow and a contractor was required. When snowfall is average, snow clearing is continued, however, with such large amounts of snow, such a closure was required. The runway is now open again.
8. Boat Ramp: BC Hydro/Columbia Power Corporation requested an extension to the Permit to Occupy Village property so that the project to extend the ramp could continue this winter/spring. Update to be provided after meeting on Tuesday, Jan 27 with Village.
9. Nakusp Hot Springs Hillclimb: the organizers of this proposed event (September 2015) have requested Village assistance in working with the Ministry of Transportation. A telephone conference call is scheduled for Monday to determine what further documentation is required before the event can be permitted.
10. Grant Applications: Build Canada – in progress; deadline February (PRV Water System) Gas Tax (Strategic Priority Fund) – deadline April. – application for Biomass District Energy funding 11. Land Use / Zoning Inquiries
Subdivision applications a. 211 Broadway Street (Cann)
nearing completion; Preliminary Letter of Approval to be issued. b. Marshall Road (Zobell/Volansky)-access issues to consider c. 16th avenue NW (Chernoff)-new application in waterfront R5 zone
Land Use Planning general inquiries Several general inquiries regarding zoning, allowable uses, etc. Plan reviews (for building permits) – four completed over past month.
12. Hot Springs Communication System: a new satellite communication system has been installed for telephone communication; to date the reliability has been very high. We are in the process of making arrangements to port existing Telus phone numbers to the new system. 13. Emerging Issues
Village staff was contacted by a resident residing on Alexander Road (out of Village boundaries).
The property owners insurance company had charged him a greater premium for his household insurance this year because the insurance company confirmed with the Village that there are not required “fire flows” to ensure fire hydrant protection. It was explained to the property owner that there is not municipal “obligation” to provide for fire hydrants – our mandate is to provide safe drinking water. An upgrade to the Alexander Road water system is not on the capital plan for 2015. The resident suggested that perhaps other residents on Alexander Road were not aware that the hydrants were not capable of effectively providing fire protection. I explained to the resident that the Village would be completing a long term financing strategy and maintenance/development in summer 2015 and that would be when such capital projects would be contemplated. I encouraged the property owner to continue discussions with the Village.
14. Capital Projects: Installation of the 200,000 Gallon Reservoir Backup Generator The pad is in place, awaiting delivery of the generator mid-December. Installation will be
completed through the coordinated efforts of the Village of Nakusp, Frontier Power and WSA Engineering.
Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and Waste Water Treatment Plant (STP) Both plants are continuing to experience operational issues and Village staff are working with the
project consultants and the equipment suppliers to resolve issues. 15. Review of 2014 Operations An overview of 2014 operations for all departments (including hot springs) will be presented to council at the Financial plan workshop on Thursday, January 29, 2015.
AGENDA ITEM G1 & G2
STAFF REPORT – Request for Council Decision DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: 2015 Water and Sewer Bylaws TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Clyde Bersky, Director of Finance STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: That council pass the following resolutions:
1. THAT the “Water Rates and Regulations (2015) Amendment Bylaw No. 463-20, 2015” be reconsidered and finally adopted.
2. THAT the “Sewer Rates (2015) Amendment Bylaw No. 644-3, 2015” be reconsidered
and finally adopted. PURPOSE: At the January 12, 2015 special meeting Council was presented with a staff report titled “2015 Water and Sewer Rates and Regulation Bylaw” and passed the first three readings of each of the above bylaws. Final consideration and adoption are required to pass these bylaws. ALTERNATIVES/OPTIONS:
1. Adopt the bylaws as presented. 2. Amend the proposed bylaw(s) and give three readings. 3. Refer back to staff for further review and report.
CONCLUSIONS/SUMMARY: Having completed the first three readings of the bylaws, adoption of the bylaws as presented is recommended.
_______________________________ Submitted by: Reviewed by: Clyde Bersky, Director of Finance Linda Tynan, CAO
Agenda Item G1(a)
VILLAGE OF NAKUSP
BYLAW NO. 463-20, 2015
A BYLAW TO AMEND VILLAGE OF NAKUSP WATER RATES BYLAW NO. 463, 1996
WHEREAS Council has the authority under Section 194 of the Community Charter to impose fees in respect of a service to the Municipality, base the fees on factors specified in the bylaw, and establish the terms and conditions of payment, AND WHEREAS Council for the Village of Nakusp has approved Bylaw No.463, Water Rates and Regulations Bylaw, which it now deems advisable to amend; AND WHEREAS the Village of Nakusp, under the authority of Section 11(3) of the Community Charter can apply the requirements of this bylaw to users of the Village water system that are outside of the Village boundary, NOW THEREFORE the Municipal Council for the Village of Nakusp, duly assembled, hereby enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Water Rates and Regulations” (2015) Amendment
Bylaw No. 463-20, 2015”.
2. That Bylaw 463, 1996 is hereby amended as follows:
(a) That Schedule “A” be replaced with the attached Schedule “A” labeled as being a part of Bylaw 463-20, 2015 which amends the Annual Rates for 2015.
3. That this Bylaw shall take effect on January 1, 2015. READ A FIRST TIME THIS 12 day of January, 2015 READ A SECOND TIME THIS 12 day of January, 2015 READ A THIRD TIME THIS 12 day of January, 2015 RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED THIS ____ day of ____, 2015. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
ANNUAL WATER RATES
SCHEDULE "A" BYLAW 463,1996
2015 Unmetered Water Rates
Category Category Name Annual Rate W01 Single family dwelling $352W02 Apartments – per unit 352W03 Retail and other businesses 375W04 Hotel/motel Room - manager residence 375W05 Restaurant and Cafe 603W08 Large Grocer 1,260W09 Church or church hall 312
W10 Public hall or place of amusement with two separate washroom facilities 504
W11 Licenced Lounge 1,044W12 Car Wash - per wash unit 314W13 Water Bottling Plant- per cubic meter 14W14 Hospital, intermediate care facility - per bed 303W15 Fire hall 226W17 Sports Complex 2,521W18 Concrete batch plant 1,035W19 Cemetery 141W20 Mobile home park - each space 275W21 Drive-In Restaurant (with no indoor seating) 452W24 Laundromat - per washer 245W25 Beach and park washrooms - per building 106W26 Beach and park sprinkling 842W30 Campground - per site 50W35 Swimming pool 261
W40 Farm with livestock (horse, cow, sheep, swine) with one residence 704
W41 Garage, service station or body shop 451W52 Apartments – per unit 245W84 Hotel/motel Room - per room 174W99 Vacant lot with service available 90WES Nakusp Elementary School 4,546WSS Nakusp Secondary School 6,974
2015 Basic Connection Fee
Single Family Dwelling – charge per lot Greater of Actual cost or $1,200
Each unit of a new or multi-family project Actual cost
2015 Other Services Temporary water on for construction (max 1 year) $340 + taxTemporary water shut off 40 + taxWater turn on 40 + taxLocation of service 65 + tax
2015 Annual metered Water Rates Category Min. Monthly Rates
¾ inch service $25.001 inch service $50.001 ½ inch service $100.002 inch service $165.00>2 inch service TBD upon activationWater allowance 20,000 litres / month Rate for service over monthly allowance (for each 1,000 litres or fraction thereof) $2.80Testing water meter reported to be malfunctioning.; no charge if defective. For meters found not be defective the testing fee shall be: $55 + taxWater meters may be read and billed quarterly or for a longer period and prorated accordingly
Amendment Bylaw 463-20, 2015
Agenda Item G2(a)
VILLAGE OF NAKUSP
BYLAW NO. 644-3, 2015
A BYLAW TO AMEND VILLAGE OF NAKUSP SEWER RATES BYLAW NO. 644, 2013
WHEREAS Council has the authority under Section 194 of the Community Charter to impose fees in respect of a service to the Municipality, base the fees on factors specified in the bylaw, and establish the terms and conditions of payment, AND WHEREAS Council for the Village of Nakusp has approved Bylaw No. 644, Sewer Rates which it now deems advisable to amend; AND WHEREAS the Village of Nakusp, under the authority of Section 11(3) of the Community Charter can apply the requirements of this bylaw to users of the Village water system that are outside of the Village boundary, NOW THEREFORE the Municipal Council for the Village of Nakusp, duly assembled, hereby enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Sewer Rates” (2015) Amendment Bylaw No. 644-3,
2015”.
2. That Bylaw 644, 2013 is hereby amended as follows:
(a) That Schedule “A” be replaced with the attached Schedule “A” labeled as being a part of Bylaw 644-3, 2015 which amends the Annual Sewer Rates for 2015.
3. That this Bylaw shall take effect on January 1, 2015. READ A FIRST TIME THIS 12 day of January, 2015 READ A SECOND TIME THIS 12 day of January, 2015 READ A THIRD TIME THIS 12 day of January, 2015 RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED THIS ____ DAY OF ______, 2015. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
ANNUAL SEWER RATES SCHEDULE "A"
BYLAW 644, 2013
2015 Annual Sewer Rates Inside Specified
Area No. 1 (Brouse/Glenbank)
Category Category Name Annual Rate Annual Rate
S01 Single family dwelling $339 $316 S02 Apartments – per unit 277 257 S03 Retail and other businesses 398 373 S05 Restaurant and Cafe 836 779 S06 Two family residence 560 521 S08 Large Grocer 925 875 S10 Church, Church Hall and Public Hall 339 320 S11 Licenced Lounge 850 834 S12 Car Wash - per wash unit 298 276 S13 School per class room 339 316 S14 Hospital, intermediate care facility - per bed 339 316 S17 Sports Complex 2,000 1,930 S20 Mobile home park - each space 251 235 S21 Drive-In Restaurant (with no indoor seating) 627 585 S24 Laundromat - per washer 210 188 S30 Campground - per site 40 40 S41 Garage, service station or body shop 504 471 S70 Bachelor Dwelling - per unit 184 176 S74 Government Building 339 316 S84 Hotel/motel Room - per room 142 135 S99 Vacant lot with service available 79 S99-1 Nakusp Elementry School 79
2015 Basic Connection Fee
Single Family Dwelling – charge per lot Greater of Actual cost or $1,200
Greater of Actual cost or $1,200
Each unit of a new or multi-family project Actual cost Actual cost
Amendment Bylaw 644-3, 2015
AGENDA ITEM H1
STAFF REPORT – Request for Council Decision DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Beaton Arm Crossing Association TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
THAT Council discuss the letter received from Beaton Arm Crossing Association and decide on course of action.
PURPOSE: To review and discuss the request from the Beaton Arm Crossing Association (request attached). BACKGROUND:
The Beaton Arm Crossing Association was formed to liaison with all levels of government in order to develop and implement solutions to provide a fixed link crossing of the Upper Arrow Lake replacing the Galena‐Shelter Bay ferry. Although recent discussions between council and the Ministry of Transportation and Highways has focused on the issues surrounding the new ferry (such as continuing availability of a backup ferry) and encouragement to continue awarding ship building contracts for other ferries in Nakusp, council has also discussed the importance of a fixed link crossing with the Ministry. The most recent meeting took place at the 2014 UBCM where council met with the Ministry of Transportation and emphasized the desire for a fixed link crossing in addition to the other issues discussed. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Beaton Arm Association‐letter of request
Prepared by: Linda Tynan, CAO
From: ernie_rcTo: info@nakusp.comCc: Earl & Sandi Frerichs; lheppner@hotmail.comSubject: BACADate: January 16, 2015 1:04:09 PM
Dear Council,The Beaton Arm Crossing Association is still very active in pursuing the fixed link at the Beaton Arm. Allthe studies, reports and discussions lead to the fact that without the fixed link, Nakusp and area will notsee economic growth over 1% for years to come. We request that council consider writing a letter toTodd Stone (Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure) expressing the importance of this link to theTrans Canada Highway. His address is "minister.transportation@gov.bc.ca" and if you could c/c me acopy of your letter would be appreciated. If you have any questions or concerns, please let us know.Ernie CalanciaSec/Tres BACA
AGENDA ITEM H2
STAFF REPORT – Request for Council Decision DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: 2015 AKBLG Conference Planning update TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: THAT the 2015 AKBLG Conference Planning update be received for information. BACKGROUND: Planning for AKBLG 2015 in Nakusp is fully underway. The local planning committee includes: Veronica Sargeant (Event Coordinator) Linda Tynan Mayor Hamling Ulli Mueller Anna Marie Hogg (staff support) Linda McInnes (staff support) Current activity:
• Finalization of sponsors • Development of webpage (included on AKBLG site) • Development of registration form (through CivicInfo) • Continued work on accommodation issues • Program content under development • Entertainment program and Partner program in development • Venue logistics (arena/auditorium/ESB) including Audio visual, transportation, catering, furnishing
(tables/chairs, etc) in progress • Development of Tours • Beginning to campaign for Volunteers
It must not be underestimated the magnitude of time that this event requires of Village staff and coordinator. This is a large event and is very specific to local government. It is expected that the conference will benefit the local businesses and events are being planned to ensure that delegates have the opportunity to explore our area and businesses. It is a great opportunity to showcase our community. Prepared by: Linda Tynan, CAO
AGENDA ITEM H3
STAFF REPORT – Request for Council Decision DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Hot Springs Website TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: That council pass the following resolution: THAT the report and update on the Hot Springs Website launch be received for information. PURPOSE: To update Council on the new Hot Springs Website. BACKGROUND: Staff and Management attended a training session on January 22, 2015 with website developer ( SpaceRace) staff to learn the how to navigate and update the new Hot Springs Website. Village Staff and Space Race are planning a soft launch of the new website the evening of Sunday, January 25, 2015. CAO Linda Tynan and Director of Hot Springs Operations, Terry Welsh will make a presentation of the new hot springs website to council. ATTACHMENTS: Prepared by: Linda Tynan, CAO
AGENDA ITEM H4
STAFF REPORT – Request for Council Decision DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Arrow Lakes Search and Rescue‐ New Command Vehicle TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
THAT council pass the following resolution:
“That the Village agree to the January 16, 2015 request from Arrow Lakes Search and Rescue Association (ALSAR) to purchase a command vehicle on the behalf of the Association subject to the finalization of a formal agreement which specifies conditions to the satisfaction of Village staff including the guarantee that the vehicle will be purchased from the village by ALSAR within 30 days of initial purchase and that the ALSR Association works with Village staff to ensure compliance to the Village purchasing policy and any legislative obligations; and further, that the CAO is given authority to negotiate the agreement with the ALSAR Association.”
PURPOSE: To review the request from the Arrow Lakes Search and Rescue for the purchase of their new Command vehicle. BACKGROUND:
Arrow Lakes Search and Rescue (ALSAR) are in the process of purchasing a new Command vehicle. Through requesting price quotes it has been brought to their attention that a price benefit could be attained should the purchase of this vehicle be completed by a business who maintains a fleet of vehicles. Arrow Lakes Search and Rescue would like Mayor and Council consider signing a contract to purchase the new Command Vehicle and then reselling it to the Arrow Lakes Search and Rescue as per the contract terms. ALSAR will raise all the necessary monies required to purchase this vehicle as well do all the necessary arrangements through to the ordering of the vehicle in conjunction with the dealer to the contract point. At this time ALSAR would have the contract and transaction completed solely under the name of the Village of Nakusp, allowing the fleet pricing benefit to be secured and benefited from. Policy F1‐ Purchasing Policy states that Purchases in excess of $15,000 require formal tendering or proposal call except in situations where delay would jeopardize continuous delivery of the Village’s essential services and thereby be injurious to the public or where the goods and services are unique to one supplier or where supply or4 expertise is very limited. Council can also reserve the right, by resolution, to award a contract contrary to this policy‐ on the written advice of its consultant or senior staff where it is deemed to be in the best interest of
Page 2 of 2
the Village. When purchasing is done, for these exceptions the circumstances shall be noted in the Accounts Payable file. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Staff time ATTACHMENTS: 1. ALSR‐ request 2. Policy F1‐ Purchasing Policy
Prepared by: Linda Tynan, CAO
AGENDA ITEM H5
STAFF REPORT – Request for Council Decision DATE: January 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Call for Resolutions AKBLG TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: That council discuss and determine if they would like to send Resolutions to the Association of Kootenay & Boundaries Local Governments Annual General Meeting. PURPOSE: To review request from AKBLG executive for submission of resolutions for AKBLG. BACKGROUND: The Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Governments (AKBLG) is the local government association that represents the municipalities and electoral areas of the south-eastern portion of the province of British Columbia. The area includes the Regional Districts of Kootenay Boundary (RDKB), Central Kootenay (RDCK), East Kootenay (RDEK) and the Town of Golden and the Village of Valemount. The purpose of the association is to identify and illuminate issues that impact on the economy, environment, and the social well being of people living in South Eastern BC. The membership is encouraged to forward their concerns to the association. Focusing on issues from a regional, rather than a local perspective, the Executive works through various channels to effect long-term solutions. Committees are struck to address the immediate concerns of the membership for the development of an action plan The Executive board is comprised of 9 local government leaders elected from within the membership. A president, vice-president and six directors at large are elected bi-annually. The past-president also sits on this Executive Committee. One staff person assists the AKBLG Executive. The AKBLG conducts research and circulates information on identified concerns. Workshops and information sessions are developed for the membership when required. Resolutions are formulated and presented to the UBCM for further discussion and endorsement. Issues are taken directly to senior levels of government. This is the first formal call for resolutions for the 2015 of the Association of Kootenay & Boundaries Local Governments Annual General Meeting. The Association has announced the first call for resolutions for the Annual General Meeting which is being held April 22, 23 and 24, 2015 in Nakusp. Resolutions are to be received at the AKBLG office no later that Monday, February 23, 2015. Local Governments may only submit resolution if there is an issue of concern which cannot be resolved at the local government level. ATTACHMENTS: 1. AKBLG Notice of Annual General Meeting Prepared by: Linda Tynan, CAO
790 Shakespeare Street, Trail BC V1R 2B4
Cell 250-231-0404 | Email akblg@shaw.ca
TO: All AKBLG Members FROM: Arlene Parkinson, Secretary/Treasurer DATE: November 21, 2014 RE: NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING and FIRST CALL FOR RESOLUTIONS 2015 The 2015 Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Association of Kootenay & Boundary Local Governments will be held April 22, 23 and 24, 2015 and will be hosted by the Village of Nakusp. Pursuant to Section 10 of your Constitution, this is the FIRST FORMAL CALL FOR RESOLUTIONS for the Annual General Meeting. If there is an issue of concern to your Local Government, which cannot be resolved at the local level, please submit it to the Association in the form of a Resolution. We will be circulating the resolution package for perusal by delegates prior to the convention. Please make note of the deadline date. All resolutions must be received at this office no later than Monday, February 23, 2015. Resolutions received after this date will be held over until the next Annual General Meeting. The Executive will receive Special Resolutions no later than 10:00 a.m., Thursday, April 23, 2015, at the AGM provided that there are 100 copies of each resolution. A Special Resolution requires a two thirds vote in support of consideration prior to being introduced onto the floor of the AGM. Background material and a brief statement of any previous action taken by the member should support each draft Resolution. Each Resolution may be submitted electronically to akblg@shaw.ca and should be on the letterhead of the Local Government submitting it with a short heading to designate the subject of the Resolution. The Resolution may not contain more than two "Whereas" clauses. Please do not hesitate to contact me at the above email address if you have any questions or concerns.
790 Shakespeare Street, Trail BC V1R 2B4
Cell 250-231-0404 | Email akblg@shaw.ca
I have included below the updated Constitution excerpts that were passed at the 2010 AKBLG Annual General Meeting. Thank you Arlene Parkinson Secretary Treasurer
10.4 Ordinary Resolutions (1) Each resolution shall be prepared on a separate sheet of 8 1/2” by 11”
paper under the name of the sponsoring Member and shall bear a short descriptive title;
(2) Each resolution shall be endorsed by the sponsoring Member. (3) All resolutions of the Association shall be deemed to be of a local
(regional) nature unless specifically indicated by the sponsor that the resolution is to be handled at the Provincial Government level.
10.5 Late and Special Resolutions (April 2010) (i) Resolutions that are not received in accordance with the deadline outlined in
10.7 below shall be categorized as follows; (a) Late Resolution (b) Special Resolution (ii) A Late Resolution shall be held over until the next Annual Meeting (iii) A Special Resolution shall be determined by the Resolutions Committee, as
being any resolution pertaining to a new issue that has arisen between the deadline outlined in 10.7 below and the Annual General Meeting.
(iv) A Special Resolution requires a two thirds vote in support of consideration prior to being introduced onto the floor of the Annual General Meeting, and may only be introduced after all Ordinary Resolutions have been considered or if two thirds of the Delegates present determine to hear the resolution immediately.
10.6 The Executive will cause the resolutions to be printed and circulated to Members by way of the delegate packages.
10.7 All resolutions, along with supportive, background information, shall be sent to the Secretary-Treasurer sixty (60) days prior to the date of the Annual General Meeting.
AGENDA ITEM H6
STAFF REPORT – Request for Council Decision DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Hot Springs Roof – facility and Cedar Chalets TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Linda Tynan, Chief Administrative Officer STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
THAT Council authorize staff to proceed with a contract between the Village of Nakusp and DJM Contracting for roofing of Hot Spring facility and the Cedar Chalets.
PURPOSE: To review quote received for the replacement roof at the Hot Springs and Cedar Chalets. See attached report from Director of Hot Springs Operations. BACKGROUND: The roof on the Hot Spring facility and also those on the Cedar Chalets are long overdue for replacement. When the Cedar Chalets were purchased, additional funds were borrowed for the purpose of roof replacement. The Village has issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on two occasions for this roof replacement project. Neither process resulted in acceptable proposals. As a result of this, the Director of Operations contacted roofing/construction companies directly, met with each of them individually and asked for recommendations and quotations. The results have been closely reviewed (see attached). The cost is higher than expected however not as high as the rfp originally received. Staff believes it is important to negotiate a contract with the successful proponent as soon as possible so that our project is addressed as soon as the snow is clear at the hot springs. Village staff will speak this report at the council meeting and provide greater detail. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The Village currently has $50,000 set aside in the budget for the facility roof replacement and approximately $40,000 set aside for the Chalet roofs. The proposal presented will require additional funds. Financing will be discussed at the council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Roof Replacement report – Director of Hot Springs Operations.
Page 2 of 2
Prepared by: Linda Tynan, CAO
Item H6(a)
Information Report
Date: January 21, 2015 To: Lynda Tynan, CAO Title: Hot Springs & Chalets Roof Replacement Project Originated By: Terry Welsh, Director Hot Springs Operations BACKGROUND: Administration has received a quote from DJM Contracting in the amount of One Hundred & Three Thousand, Six Hundred & Fifty Dollars and Eighty-Three Cents ($103,650.83) plus applicable taxes, for the replacement of the existing roofs at the Hot Springs and the Cedar Chalets. DJM’s quote was judged to be superior to all other quotes received, both in terms of price and completeness of the work. DJM was also the only proponent that supplied an OH&S Program that meets the Village’s responsibilities under WorkSafe BC, the Workers Compensation Act, and the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation. The Director of Operations and the Director of Hot Springs Operations are recommending that an additional fifteen (15) to twenty (20) percent be considered for the project as contingency for unforeseen work. This recommendation is primarily related to the Chalets, due to the deteriorated condition of the roof structures. With a twenty percent contingency, this would result in a project budget of One Hundred & Twenty Four Thousand, Three Hundred & Eighty One Dollars ($124,381.00) plus taxes. Proposal Review: A review of DJM’s quote verified their compliance with the project work as set out. A synopsis of the major work follows:
• A base quote of $85,000 plus tax for the installation of 24” Class C #1 Cedar Shakes and waterproof membrane on the Hot Springs and Chalets.
o 40 Year Product Warranty. o Five year Workmanship Warranty.
• 26 gauge metal roofing to be used on the low slope roofs at the Chalets.
• A base quote of $18,650.83 plus tax for the installation of membrane roofing at the base of the Hot Springs Roof.
o Two product options are provided for consideration, a SBS membrane and an EPDM membrane. In terms of cost, the two options are within $450 of each other. For the purposes of this report, the higher cost of the SBS membrane is being used. A choice of the preferred system will be made upon further review.
• 26 gauge coloured steel flashing. • Removal and disposal of all current roofing materials.
Options:
• An option for 26 gauge metal roofing can be substituted for cedar shakes on the Chalets. There is no difference in the price in terms of material and installation.
o 40 Year Product Warranty. o Five year Workmanship Warranty.
Exclusions:
• Hazardous material assessment or removal. • Power consumption or usage during the project. • Potential latent defects. • The flashing at the Hot Springs facility eave.
Extra Work (Unforeseen): All work deemed to be extra to the contract will be as per the following schedule.
• Carpenter - $65.00 per hour • Apprentice Carpenter - $55.00 per hour • Journeyman Roofer – S50.00 per hour
DJM Contracting is proposing a project start date of March 15th subject to weather conditions. As part of the project contract, the Directors also recommend that a completion date of May 15th be established, so as to mitigate the potential negative impact on revenue streams of the facility.
Agenda Item I1-I6
INFORMATION ITEM (S) REPORT ITEMS SUMMARY:
The following items of correspondence and interest have been received since the last meeting of Council.
1. Columbia Power Corporation – Boat Launch ‐extension of Permit to Construct on Village
Streets. 2. BC Hydro Boat Ramp update January 2015. 3. Burton Volunteer Fire Department‐ Thank You 4. CivicInfo‐ Membership Renewal (2015) 5. Nakusp and District Chamber of Commerce‐ Annual General Meeting January 29, 2015 6. Canadian Union of Postal Workers‐ Request for Support to Save Canada Post
REQUEST FOR PROCLAMATIONS:
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Unless items listed are dealt with specifically by Council, staff will respond to request, referrals and issues
where appropriate and as outlined by Village policy and as indicated on each item.
Submitted by
____________________________
Linda Tynan, CAO
January 19, 2015
Update on the Arrow Lakes Reservoir Boat Launch Improvement Projects BC Hydro is committed to improving summer recreational boat access on Arrow Lakes Reservoir as recommended by the Columbia River Water Use Plan. There are a number of boat launch projects currently underway at various stages of completion. This year, BC Hydro plans to resume construction at Anderson Point, Burton, Nakusp, Edgewood and Fauquier.
Boat Ramp 2015 Work Plan
Anderson Point BC Hydro and Columbia Power are continuing to collaborate on a plan to complete work at this site. Columbia Power will resume construction at Anderson Point in February to complete the ramp as far as water levels will allow. If water levels don’t allow for full completion of this ramp in 2015, work will resume in 2016 for the in‐water portion of the ramp. The site will be closed to public access starting in early February.
The current design of the Anderson Point boat launch’s breakwater has resulted in navigational concerns for one of BC Hydro’s stakeholders. In order to address these concerns, BC Hydro is exploring options to relocate the breakwater for the Anderson Point boat launch. We will be hosting a public meeting on at the Sandman Hotel in Castlegar on Thursday, January 29 from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. to discuss this potential change. BC Hydro is committed to continuing to work with stakeholders to find a solution that meets the needs of the community and engineering design limitations due to site conditions.
Burton South Construction work will resume during low water to extend the ramp as far as water levels will permit. If water levels don’t allow for full completion of this ramp in 2015, a safety curb will be installed at the bottom of the ramp, and in 2016 a company specializing in underwater marine construction will be retained to complete the ramp to the final design elevation of 425.5 metres. The site was closed to the public beginning January 19, 2015 so that work can proceed.
Edgewood BC Hydro is continuing to work with local residents to identify a solution for the southern floating log breakwater that addresses site conditions and will meet the needs of the community.
In 2015, Columbia Power will be installing rip rap around the ramp and a transition panel at the toe of the ramp to allow users to drive off the end of the ramp during low water. There will be no access to the boat launch site during this construction work which is expected to begin in early February.
Fauquier Adjustments will be made to the breakwater chains to prevent the pontoons from overlapping near the shore. This work will be completed in February
2015. BC Hydro will also be installing signs on Highway 6 to direct the public to the boat launch.
McDonald Creek No work is planned at this location for 2015. BC Hydro is reviewing the work completed to date and developing a plan for construction to resume in 2016.
Nakusp BC Hydro and Columbia Power are continuing to collaborate on a plan to complete work at this site. Columbia Power will resume construction at Nakusp in February to complete the ramp as far as water levels will allow. The site will be closed to the public starting in early February. Work will resume in 2016 for the in‐water portion of the ramp using a company specializing in underwater marine construction.
BC Hydro appreciates your continued support as these upgrades are completed. For more information, contact: Mary Anne Coules Stakeholder Engagement Advisor, Lower Columbia Phone: 250‐365‐4565 Email: maryanne.coules@bchydro.com Jennifer Walker‐Larsen Stakeholder Engagement Advisor, Upper Columbia Phone: 250‐814‐6645 Email: jennifer.walker‐larsen@bchydro.com
For reference
J. INQUIRIES BY COUNCIL OF ADMINISTRATION K. NOTICE OF MOTION L. QUESTIONS FROM THE PRESS OR PUBLIC M. NOTICE OF IN-CAMERA MEETING R/13 Notice of In Camera Meeting
Moved by Councillor _______________, Seconded by Councillor __________ THAT in the opinion of Council, and in accordance with Section 90 of the Community Charter, the public interest so requires that persons other than Councillors and staff be excluded from the meeting, AND FURTHER, that the meeting be closed on the basis identified in the following subsections: Section 90(1)c. labour relations or other employee relations; d. the security of the property of the municipality;
CARRIED N. ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FROM IN-CAMERA O. ADJOURNMENT R/13
Moved by Councillor _________________ THAT the meeting adjourn at _________ PM.
CARRIED