Post on 07-Apr-2018
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
1/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 1 of 36
1
The Honorable John C. Coughenour2
3
45
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT7
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON8
AT SEATTLE9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CASE NO. CR10 0328 JCC11
Bankrupt legal fiction )12
Plaintiff in Error, )13
v. )14
RONALD L. BREKKE )15
Defendant, ) AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH AND FACTS16
__________________________ )17
)18Ronald Lee Brekke, Secured Party )19
3rd Party Intervenor )20
21
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH AND FACTS22
23
I, Ronald Lee Brekke, 3rd Party Intervenor, Secured Party / Creditor, hereinafter,24
Affiant and paramount Security interest holder in all property and collateral registered25
and unregistered and held in the Trust Account of RONALD LEE BREKKE 471-70-26
1235, by way of a Security Agreement, evidence of which is recorded on a State of27
California UCC Financing Statement, (SEE EXHIBIT A) am competent to state to the28
matters included in this Affidavit, have personal knowledge of the facts based on29
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
2/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 2 of 36
personal experience and/or research, and declare that the statements made herein, are1
factual and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, and not meant2
to mislead. I am a Living Sentient Being. The Flesh lives and the blood flows. I humbly3
seek Remedy.45
1- Affiant is an immortal living soul created in the image of God. Here as one of the live6
flesh and blood people. A trinity of mind, body and spirit; tribunal of the court of7
record of the final jurisdiction of my sovereign estate. Affiant was born a child of God8
and Affiant is living as a man of peace. A Notary public has witnessed Affiants9
existence and status as a man and has placed their seal below. As a man Affiant10
has dominion over the earth and Affiant is not subject to the codified laws of this civil11
society, for codified laws only apply to legal PERSONS;12
26 USC 7701. Definitions13
(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or14
manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof15
(1) Person16
The term person shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a17
trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation.18
19
26 USC 6671. Rules for application of assessable penalties20
(b) Person defined21
The term person, as used in this subchapter, includes an officer or22
employee of a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership, who23
as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in24
respect of which the violation occurs;25
26
2- Affiant has seen no law that allows a court, prosecutor, agent or the like to force the27
status of (legal) person or taxpayer upon Affiant and believes none exists;28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
3/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 3 of 36
Federal Statutes Title 28, 28 USC Part VI, chapter 151, section 2201 removes1
the authority of Federal Courts to declare the status of taxpayer on a2
Sovereign American of the United States of America..3
Cite: CIR v. Trustees of L. Inv. Assn, 100 F. 2
nd
18 (1939).43- Affiant has seen no evidence that Affiant has ever resided in or been domiciled in5
the District of Columbia, or been employed by an employer residing in the District of6
Columbia, or declared my person to be a Statutory citizen of the United States7
and believes none exists;8
4- Affiant has seen no evidence that Affiant has ever had any income connected with a9
trade or business in the United States , as defined in 26 CFR 1.864-2 and codified10
as Title 28, Part IV, chapter 97, section 1602 and believes none exists;11
26 USC 3121. Definitions12
(e) State, United States, and citizen13
For purposes of this chapter14
(1) State15
The term State includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto16
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.17
(2) United States18
The term United States when used in a geographical sense includes the19
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.20
An individual who is a citizen of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (but not21
otherwise a citizen of the United States) shall be considered, for purposes of this22
section, as a citizen of the United States. The IRC parts 7701 (a)(9) and 770123
(a)(10) define the United States as the District of Columbia.24
25
5- Affiant has seen no evidence that the ENS LEGIS, PERSON is not a state created26
artificial entity, aka CORPORATE LEGAL FICTION, aka STRAWMAN, aka27
TRANSMITTING UTILITY, aka INDIVIDUAL, aka TAXPAYER, aka TRUST aka28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
4/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 4 of 36
DEBTOR and believes none exists;1
6- Affiant has seen no evidence of a current valid oath of office of the prosecuting2
attorneys or judge on this case and believes none exists; 3
7- Affiant has seen no evidence of a provision, code, statute, regulation, etc. allowing4US District Attorneys to not include their BAR number on pleadings they sign5
without which they would be guilty of impersonating a public official and deprivation6
of public services and believes none exists;7
PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENTS - All officials are8
required by federal, state, and municipal law to provide the name, address9
and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding10
company and the policy number of the bond and, if required, a copy of the11
policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance.12
Failure to provide this information constitutes corporate and limited liability13
insurance fraud (15 USC) and is prim-a-facie evidence and grounds to14
impose a lien upon the official personally to secure their public oath and15
service of office.16
8- Affiant has seen no evidence of the documentation of authority whereby Congress17
granted permission for a US DISTRICT ATTORNEY to represent any other legal18
fiction than the UNITED STATES and believes none exists;19
A) On December 18, 1998, attorney Michael Bufkin of Dundee, Illinois sent a20
Freedom of Information Act request to the Internal Revenue Service asking21
for documentation of authority for the Department of Justice to defend IRS22
personnel in civil litigation and/or criminal prosecution. On August 2, 1999,23
Leslie Hayward, a Disclosure Program Assistant in the IRS national office,24
answered Bufkin as follows: "A search was performed with the Office of Tax25
Crimes (Criminal Investigation) and with the Assistant Chief Counsel26
(Disclosure Litigation) and we have no documents responsive to your request.27
However, you may forward a copy of your request to the U.S. Attorney28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
5/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 5 of 36
General's Office within the Department of Justice."1
B) In September, Bufkin sent the request to the Department of Justice, then on2
January 11, 2000, Thomas J. McIntyre, Chief of the Department of Justice3
Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Unit, made the following response: "We4have conducted a search of the appropriate indices to Criminal Division5
records and did not locate any records responsive to your request."16
Conclusion: US District Attorneys lack authority to prosecute or defend any7
other entity than the UNITED STATES;8
9- Affiant has seen no evidence of a chain of delegation of duly constituted lawful9
authority for any of the US attorneys on said case, or any of the judges or10
magistrates on said case, to hold his or her office and how that specifically applies to11
Affiant, the live flesh and blood man, and believes none exists;12
10-Affiant has seen no evidence of an original Admiralty maritime contract or13
commercial agreement bearing Affiants wet ink signature, between Affiant and the14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, or UNITED STATES, or DEPARTMENT OF THE15
TREASURY, or INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE that would bind Affiant to terms16
and conditions of said contract and believes none exists;17
11-Affiant has seen no evidence of any Admiralty maritime contract or commercial18
agreement bearing Affiants wet ink signature which Affiant has with UNITED19
STATES OF AMERICA, or UNITED STATES, or DEPARTMENT OF THE20
TREASURY, or INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE or any agency or instrumentality21
thereof and believes none exists;22
12-Affiant has seen no evidence that unless the PLAINTIFF or PLAINTIFFS agent(s)23
come forth with an Admiralty maritime contract or commercial agreement between24
Affiant and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, or UNITED STATES, or25
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, or INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, bearing26
Affiants wet ink signature, within twenty one (21) days of the filing of this Affidavit,27
1http://www.svpvril.com/irs_dm_bc.html
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
6/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 6 of 36
that UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE1
TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and all agents and principals thereof2
including, but not limited to, US District Attorneys, agree that no such Admiralty3
maritime contract or commercial agreement exists;413-Affiant has seen no evidence that all (alleged) offenses against revenue laws,5
pursuant to 27 CFR 72.11, are commercial crimes and believes none exists;6
14-Commercial discharge7
15-Affiant has seen no evidence that Affiant was not denied due process, when the8
Grand Jury failed to contact Affiant and invite Affiant to testify after Affiant sent9
registered mail to Grand Jury foreman stating Affiant has exculpatory evidence to10
present and believes none exists;11
16-Affiant has seen no evidence that jurisdiction can be legally or lawfully obtained by12
threat, duress, coercion, intimidation or fear and believes none exists;13
17-Affiant has seen no evidence that this court has jurisdiction over Affiant, over subject14
matter, over territory or by legislative means and believes none exists:15
A) When the absence of subject-matter jurisdiction is noticed by, or pointed16
out to, the trial court, that court has no jurisdiction to entertain further motions17
or pleadings in the case. It can do nothing but dismiss the action forthwith.18
"Any other action taken by a court lacking subject matter jurisdiction is null19
and void." Rainbow Drive, 740 So. 2d at 1029 (quoting Beach v. Director of20
Revenue, 934 S.W.2d 315, 318 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)).21
B) "As a general principal, standing to invoke the judicial process requires an22
actual justiciable controversy as to which the complainant has a real interest23
in the ultimate adjudication because he or she has either suffered or is about24
to suffer an injury." People v. Superior Court, 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 793.25
C) "A court has no jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction, for a basic26
issue in any case before a tribunal is its power to act, and a court must have27
the authority to decide that question in the first instance." Rescue Army v.28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
7/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 7 of 36
Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 171 P2d 8; 331 US 549, 91 L. ed. 1666, 671
S.Ct. 1409.2
D) There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since3
1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators4enforce Statutes and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America5
since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464,6
Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178);7
E) The administrative procedures act of 1946, 60 stat 237, 5 USC and the8
Attorney Generals Manual shows Affiant has to be the Plaintiff in the9
courtroom, i.e. Affiant has to be the one who brings the charges.10
Conclusion: this court has no jurisdiction either judicially or administratively.11
18-Affiant has seen no evidence that there is a justiciable controversy in this matter and12
believes none exists;13
19-Affiant has seen no evidence that PLAINTIFF exists (where is the evidence of14
incorporation? Where is PLAINTIFF registered to do business?) and believes none15
exists;16
A) The United States was incorporated on February 21, 1871, (16 Stat. 419,17
Chap. 62, 41st Congress, 3rd Session), the purpose being An Act to18
provide a Government for the District of Columbia, reorganized June 8,19
1878, (20 Stat. 102, Chap 180, 45th Congress, 2nd Session) as An Act20
providing a permanent form of government for the District of Columbia.21
aka U.S., Inc. a commercial agency originally designated as22
WASHINGTON D.C. in accordance with the 14th Amendment which23
records indicate was never ratified.224
B) Since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have25
been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned26
2 http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch264.html
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
8/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 8 of 36
by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain.31
C) The United States Government is a Foreign Corporation with respect to2
the state. 19 Corpus Juris Secundum 5413
D) USC 28 Sect 3002, No. 15(a) United States means - a Federal4Corporation;5
E) Uniform Commercial Code, UCC9-307(h) states Location of United6
States. The United States is located in the District of Columbia.7
F) Governments are corporations. Penhallow vs. Doanes Administrators,8
U.S. Supreme Court, (1795).9
G) Corporations are commercial enterprises that are controlled by the10
Uniform Commercial Code.11
H) The UNITED STATES Isnt a Country Its a Corporation!412
I) Statutes creating corporations are private law 20 Am jur 35, p. 60.13
J) Therefore the Federal Reserve Act is private law.14
20-Standing consists of two absolutely essential elements: 1) violation of a legal right,15
and 2) personal injury;16
The requirement of standing, however, has a core component derived directly17
from the Constitution. A plaintiff must allege personal injury fairly traceable to18
the defendant's allegedly unlawful conduct and likely to be redressed by the19
requested relief. Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984)20
21-Affiant has seen no evidence that the UNITED STATES has suffered a personal21
injury, or as a bankrupt legal fiction, has standing to sue or be sued and believes22
none exists;23
22-Affiant has seen no evidence that the Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966 did not move the24
entire taxation and monetary system under the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE25
3The united states Of America is a corporation owned by foreign interests September 21, 2008
Posted by spiritualphilantropy inAnalysis, News in English. trackback
4Lisa Guliani, www.babelmagazine.com
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=468&page=737http://garsoor.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/the-united-states-of-america-is-a-corporation-owned-by-foreign-interests/http://so.wordpress.com/tag/analysis/http://so.wordpress.com/tag/news-in-english/http://garsoor.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/the-united-states-of-america-is-a-corporation-owned-by-foreign-interests/trackback/http://garsoor.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/the-united-states-of-america-is-a-corporation-owned-by-foreign-interests/trackback/http://so.wordpress.com/tag/news-in-english/http://so.wordpress.com/tag/analysis/http://garsoor.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/the-united-states-of-america-is-a-corporation-owned-by-foreign-interests/http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=468&page=7378/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
9/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 9 of 36
(UCC) and believes none exists;1
23-According to UCC 3-102(c) the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System2
govern the UCC;3
UCC 3-102. SUBJECT MATTER.4 (c) Regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System5
and operating circulars of the Federal Reserve Banks supersede any6
inconsistent provision of this Article to the extent of the inconsistency.7
24-Affiant has seen no evidence that the FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS, BOARD OF8
GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, or the FEDERAL RESERVE9
BANK SYSTEM are part of, or Agencys of, the Federal Government and believes10
none exists;11
25-Affiant has seen no evidence that a private non-government banking cartel called12
the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK SYSTEM does not govern all commerce and trade13
in America, not the Federal Government and believes none exists;14
26-Affiant has seen no evidence that the FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS are not an15
illegal monopoly and are not a private cartel that have usurped the authority of16
Congress to coin money and believes none exists;17
Pursuant to the Constitution for the united States of America, Article I, section18
8, we find that only Congress was given the authority To coin money,19
regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of20
Weights and Measures.21
27-Affiant has seen no evidence that the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT of 1913 is not22
private law and believes none exists;23
28-Affiant has seen no evidence that Title 26 of the UNITED STATES CODE has ever24
been enacted into positive law and believes none exists.25
29-Affiant has seen no evidence that 26 USC is not the private law of a group of26
International bankers, owners of the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK SYSTEM who use27
the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE to run their fraudulent money laundering28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
10/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 10 of 36
scheme to steal the wealth, assets and labor energy of the American people for their1
own self-serving ends and believes none exists;2
30-Affiant has seen no evidence that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is an agency3
of the Federal Government and believes none exists;431-Affiant has seen no evidence that the GRACE COMMISSION report put forth by5
Peter Grace during RONALD REAGANS Administration in the 1980s did not find6
that even one dime of Federal income tax collected goes to pay for anything in7
America, not road construction or repair, not utility projects, not school funding, not8
grants, not parks and recreation NOTHING, but rather to pay the interest on the9
National debt and certain unknown special fund accounts and believe none exists;10
32-Affiant has seen no evidence that the so-called income tax is not actually an excise11
tax in the form of a tariff tax, i.e. a user fee one is compelled to pay for voluntarily12
exercising the benefit and privilege of using the FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS13
private script fiat currency called Federal Reserve Notes, (foreign bills of exchange)14
whereby the said user incurs liabilities for benefits of use and is therefore obligated15
to pay his/her share of interest on the National Debt, relative to use, and believes16
none exists;17
33-Affiant has seen no evidence that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is not a18
collection arm for the private International bankers who own and control the19
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK SYSTEM and believes none exists;20
34-Affiant has seen no evidence that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is not21
formerly the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) situated in and with authority only in22
the Philippine Islands (Trust Fund # 61), and then moved into Puerto Rico (Trust23
Fund # 62) and believes none exists;24
35-Affiant has seen no evidence that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the25
UNITED STATES are not distinctly different private corporations and believes none26
exists;27
36-Affiant has seen no evidence that the UNITED STATES (a corporation) or the28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
11/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 11 of 36
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (a corporation) are one in the same as the Federal1
Government and believes none exists; What is the FEIN of each?2
37-Affiant has seen no evidence that public officials, i.e. judges, magistrates, clerks,3
district attorneys and the like do not have a conflict of interest in that they work for4private corporations seeking share holder profits and their own profits yet have5
(allegedly) sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution for the United States and6
believes none exists; (Exhibit of the screen captures)7
38- requested Attorney provide him with names of the shareholders of the UNITED8
STATES, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE9
TREASURY yet Attorney failed to assist to that end;10
39-Affiant has seen no evidence that there is not a CUSIP (COMMITTEE on UNIFORM11
SECURITIES IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES) number assigned to USDC Case12
No. CR 10 0328JCC and that a subpoena of the records and an electronic forensic13
accounting will not show that officials involved in said case are not personally14
profiting from commercial paper and or bonds written on or against said case and15
believes none exists;16
40-Affiant has seen no evidence that UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE17
TREASURY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES, INTERNAL18
REVENUE SERVICE and FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS are all acting as19
unregistered foreign agents in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act20
of 1938 and are Collecting Information & Contributions for a Foreign Power in21
violation of 18 USC 951 and punishable under 18 USC 1651 - 1661, and22
believes none exists;23
A) Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91, the IRS entered into a24
"Service Agreement" with the US Treasury Department (See Public Law 94-25
564, Legislative History, pg. 5967, Reorganization (BANKRUPTCY!!!) Plan26
No. 26) and the Agency for International Development. This agency is an27
international paramilitary operation and according to the Department of the28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
12/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 12 of 36
Army Field manual (1969) 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sec. 1-7 (b) & 1-6, Sec.1-10 (7)1
(c) (1), and 22 USCA 284, includes such activities as, "Assumption of full or2
partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area."3
B) The IRS is also an agency/member of a 184 nation pact called the4International Criminal Police Organization, or INTERPOL, found at 22 USCA5
263a.6
C) The memorandum of Understanding, (MOU), between the Secretary of7
Treasury, AKA the corporate governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank"8
(International Monetary Fund, and the International Bank for Reconstruction9
and Development), indicated that the Attorney General and its associates are10
soliciting and collecting information for foreign principals; the international11
organizations, corporations, and associations, exemplified by 22 USCA 286f.12
D) According to the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, the Attorney13
General is the permanent representative to INTERPOL, and the Secretary of14
Treasury is the alternate member. Under Article 30 of the INTERPOL15
constitution, these individuals must expatriate their citizenship. They serve no16
allegiance to the United States of America.17
E) The IRS is paid by "The Fund" and "The Bank."18
F) Thus it appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue19
Service agents are "Agents of a Foreign Principal" within the meaning and20
intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938" for private, not public,21
gain.522
41-Affiant has seen no evidence that INTERPOL is not funded by the UNITED STATES23
yet cannot be sued by anyone or is accountable to anyone, and believes none24
exists;25
42-Affiant has seen no evidence that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is registered26
to do business in the State of California or the State of Washington and believes27
5 http://www.apfn.net/doc-100_bankruptcy6.htm
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
13/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 13 of 36
none exists;1
43-Affiant has seen no evidence that the Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, is2
registered to do business in the State of California or the State of Washington and3
believes none exists;444-Affiant has seen no evidence of an injured party, any evidence of a corpus delicti,5
any evidence of a ratification of commencement FRCP Rule 17A, no evidence that6
alleged plaintiff has standing as a bankrupt legal fiction and in violation the Foreign7
Registrations Act of 1938, engaging in a pattern of inland piracy, robbery ashore,8
racketeering, conversion, money laundering, etc. and believes none exists; (Affiant9
told this to Attorney yet Attorney failed to act upon said information)10
"A statute does not trump the Constitution."11
People v. Ortiz, (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th at p. 292, fn. 212
Conway v. Pasadena Humane Society (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 16313
45-Affiant has seen no evidence that this commercial matter has not already been14
discharged by Affiants Acceptance for Value of the charging instrument (True Bill)15
and believes none exists; (see exhibit ___)16
46-Affiant has seen no evidence that pursuant to 12 USC 411, lawful money is not the17
public money of the United States. Whereas, Legal Tender, i.e. Federal Reserve18
Notes, are the private script of the private International Bankers who own and run19
the private NON-GOVERNMENT Federal Reserve Banks and believe none exists;20
47-Affiant has seen no evidence that ignorance of the law is an excuse or that the gross21
omission of this material fact in #52 is not a felony and is not punishable pursuant to22
18 USC 1001 and believes none exists;23
48-Had Affiant known that Affiant could have demanded lawful money all A ffiants life,24
Affiant would have, therefore, Affiant Demands Lawful Money, nunc pro tunc;25
49-Affiant has seen no evidence that Modern Money Mechanics, a booklet for26
edification on the fundamentals of money and fractional reserve banking put out by27
the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago in 1991, does not accurately state that banks28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
14/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 14 of 36
do not have any credit to lend, cannot lend any depositors credit and that the credit1
backing a negotiable instrument, i.e. promissory note, loan, check or money order,2
etc. is derived from the man or woman who signs the negotiable instrument and3
believes none exists;450-Affiant has seen no evidence that the Trading with the Enemy Act, the Emergency5
Banking Act, the Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966, the Act of 1871, the Foreign6
Sovereign Immunities Act, the Sheppard Towner Maternity Act, HJR192, Public Law7
73-10, 48 Stat. Chapter 48, 1 112, the United States Bankruptcy, the Uniform8
Commercial Code and more, do not disclose the true nature of money, banking,9
commerce and the private International Bankers stranglehold on the American10
economy through the US Bankruptcy orchestrated by the these same bankers with11
the passage of the private Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and believes none exists;12
51-Affiant has seen no evidence that the Comptroller of Currency does not oversee all13
appropriations, allocations and disbursements and does not monitor each14
department, including the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, through audits and15
reports for mis-appropriations and account deficiencies, and believes none exists;16
52-Affiant has seen no evidence of any Comptroller General reports or audits showing17
misappropriations of funds or account deficiencies for (allegedly) erroneously paid18
out 1099OID refunds and believes none exists;19
53-Affiant has seen no evidence that (1) CID Agent Kevin Keys did not perjure himself20
on the witness stand in the Grand Jury proceedings when he claimed that the21
reason refunds were paid out on 1099OID claims was because sometimes IRS22
seasonal workers let things slip through or (2) Affiant has seen no evidence that CID23
Agent Kevin Keys has not exposed an unparalleled incompetency of the Comptroller24
General and his staff when in overseeing ALL disbursements, allocations and25
appropriations they signed and issued false warrants and vouchers for the allegedly26
erroneous 1099OID refunds or in the alternative that (3) Affiant has seen no27
evidence that CID Agent Kevin Keys testimony has not exposed the Comptroller28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
15/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 15 of 36
General and his staffs complicity and malfeasance in the alleged tax scheme and1
believes none exists;2
54-Affiant has seen no evidence that an audit of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE3
books and records as well as those of the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY will4not show that thousands of refunds for 1099OID claims have been paid out for5
decades, without incident, and believes none exists;6
55-Affiant has seen no evidence that information on 1099OID and debt instrument7
issuance and recoupment has not been freely available all across the internet and8
elsewhere for many years before Affiant learned about it in 2008, and thousands of9
people have applied for and received 1099OID refunds that are totally unrelated to10
Affiant, making it an impossibility for Affiant, or anyone else for that matter, to be11
involved in any sort of a conspiracy involving the filing of 1099OID and believes12
none exists;13
56-Affiant has seen no evidence that an audit of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE14
books and records as well as those of the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY will15
not show that refunds for 1099OID claims do continue to be paid out in 2011 without16
incident and believes none exists;17
57-Affiant has seen no evidence that PLAINTIFF is not guilty of malicious and18
discriminatory prosecution due to the fact there is no evidence of any other upload19
service provider ever being indicted, incarcerated, placed on GPS bracelet and20
home detention for uploading 1099OIDs and believes none exists;21
58-Affiant has seen no evidence that the Grand Jury indictment should not be quashed22
as (1) there can be no theft of public money without any public money in circulation,23
(2) there can be no theft of any funds for 1099OID refunds when the refunds paid24
out are the funds created by the live flesh and blood man or womans signature on25
said debt instruments and are the credit of the signor of the instrument (See Modern26
Money Mechanics), and believes none exists;27
59-Affiant has seen no evidence that the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT of 1913 was not a28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
16/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 16 of 36
treasonous act the corporate US government foistered against the American people1
along with a group of private International bankers to seize control of Americas2
monetary and banking system for their self-serving ends and believes none exists;3
60-Affiant has seen no evidence that the Federal Reserve Note, thereafter, did not meet4all of the qualifications of a worthless security under 26 I.R.C. 165(g) and believes5
none exists;6
61-Affiant has seen no evidence that the stock market crash of 1929 did not bring about7
the ensuing bankruptcy of the United States when the US gold reserves were8
insufficient to pay the interest on the accumulating debt due to the private9
international bankers, owners of the private FEDERAL RESERVE BANK system and10
believes none exists;11
62-Affiant has seen no evidence that on June 5, 1933 HJR192 and also Public Law 73-12
10, 48 Stat chapter 48, 1 112 did not essentially proclaim that no debts can be13
paid under the prevailing bankruptcy of the United States but only discharged or set14
off and believes none exists;15
63-Affiant has seen no evidence that the state of US bankruptcy did not strip16
Americans of the ability to hold lawful money in their possession and did not,17
thereby, deny Americans the ability to obtain actual title to property, i.e. title in18
allodium and believes none exists;19
64-Affiant has seen no evidence that the passing of the Securities and Exchange20
Commission Act of 1933 and 1934, the wealth and assets of the American people21
did not become securitized in the form of commercial paper to be held in trust as22
collateral against the US bankruptcy and believes none exists;23
65-Affiant has seen no evidence that the corporate US bankruptcy did not render ALL24
actual title and ownership to the corporate banking interests, fulfilling the intention of25
the International Bankers as Edward Mandell House proclaimed to then President26
Woodrow Wilson in the early 1900s (See Exhibit B); by enslaving the American27
people through the ancient system of pledging and believes none exists;28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
17/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 17 of 36
66-Affiant has seen no evidence that thereafter, Americans were not thus forced to1
pledge ALL their wealth, assets and labor energy as collateral for the US bankruptcy2
which was precipitated for this very reason by this private International banking3
cartel and believes none exists;467-Affiant has seen no evidence that as a result of this process of pledging, the America5
people did not unwittingly become Suretys for the corporate US National Debt and6
believes none exists;7
A) Constitutionally and in the laws of equity, the United States could not8
borrow or pledge the property and wealth of its private citizens, put at risk9
as collateral for its currency and credit without legally providing them an10
equitable and orderly remedy for recovery of what is due them on their11
assets and wealth that are at risk.12
B) This principle is well established in English common law and in the history13
of American jurisprudence. The 14th amendment provides: no person14
shall be deprived of property without due process of law.15
C) The rights of a surety to recovery on his risk or loss when standing for the16
debts of another was reaffirmed again as late as 1962 in Pearlman v.17
Reliance Ins. Co., 371 U.S. 132 when the Supreme Court said:18
sureties compelled to pay debts for their principal have been deemed19
entitled to reimbursement, even without a contractual promise and20
probably there are few doctrines better established...21
68-Affiant has seen no evidence that these obligations, pursuant to 31 USC 3124, are22
not exempt from taxation and believes none exists;23
31 USC 3124. Exemption from taxation24
(a) Stocks and obligations of the United States Government are exempt from25
taxation by a State or political subdivision of a State. The exemption applies to26
each form of taxation that would require the obligation, the interest on the27
obligation, or both, to be considered in computing a tax, except28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
18/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 18 of 36
(1) a nondiscriminatory franchise tax or another non-property tax instead of a1
franchise tax, imposed on a corporation; and2
(2) an estate or inheritance tax.3
(b) The tax status of interest on obligations and dividends, earnings, or other4income from evidences of ownership issued by the Government or an agency5
and the tax treatment of gain and loss from the disposition of those obligations6
and evidences of ownership is decided under the Internal Revenue Code of 19867
(26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.). An obligation that the Federal Housing Administration had8
agreed, under a contract made before March 1, 1941, to issue at a future date,9
has the tax exemption privileges provided by the authorizing law at the time of10
the contract. This subsection does not apply to obligations and evidences of11
ownership issued by the District of Columbia, a territory or possession of the12
United States, or a department, agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision of13
the District, territory, or possession.14
69- Affiant has seen no evidence that the US Government does not take on the status15
of a private corporation when dealing with commercial paper and all its members16
lose immunity, making all who come against Affiant jointly and severally liable for17
any and all damages and loss and believes none exists;18
A) "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and take on19
the character of a mere private citizen [where private corporate commercial20
paper (securities) are concerned]" Bank of US v. Planters Bank, 9 Wheaton21
(22 US) 904, 6LEd 2422
B) "When governments enter the world of commerce, it is subject to the same23
burdens as any private firm." U.S. v. Burr, 309 US 242, 60 Sct. 488, 84 LEd24
244.25
C) "For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as an26
entity ENTIRELY separate from government." Planters, infra.27
D) "The plaintiffs are NOT suing the USA, but the corporation, and if its act was28
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26.htmlhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000001----000-.htmlhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000001----000-.htmlhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26.html8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
19/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 19 of 36
UNLAWFUL, even if they might have sued the USA, they are NOT cut off1
from a remedy against the AGENT that did the wrongful act.2
E) In general the USA cannot be sued for a tort but its immunity does NOT3
extend to those who acted in its name." Sloan Shipyards v. US EFC 67 Cal.4LR No. 6 (1979).5
F) The American people are enemies of the State - Trading with the Enemy Act6
1933 Act of 1917 & 1933 (People declared the Enemy) Oct. 6, 1917, under7
the Trading with the Enemy Act, Section 2 subdivision (c) Chapter 106 8
Enemy defined other than citizens of the United States March 9, 1933,9
Chapter 106, Section 5, subdivision (b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act of10
Oct. 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) amended as follows: any person within the11
United States. See H.R. 1491 Public No. 1.12
70-Affiant has seen no evidence that Affiant is violation of 50 USC, the TRADING WITH13
THE ENEMY ACT, the WAR POWERS ACT, the EMERGENCY BANKING ACT or14
is an enemy of the state, the UNITED STATES, the UNITED STATES OF15
AMERICA, the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, the INTERNAL REVENUE16
SERVICE or any agency or instrumentality thereof and believes none exists;17
71-Affiant has seen no evidence that INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Form 1099OID18
does not deal with debt instruments and believes none exists;19
26 USC 1271-1275 explains debt instruments;20
26 USC 1275. Other definitions and special rules21
(a) Definitions22
For purposes of this subpart23
(1) Debt instrument24
(A) In general25
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term debt instrument means a26
bond, debenture, note, or certificate or other evidence of indebtedness.27
72-Affiant has seen no evidence that debt instruments, such as promissory notes,28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
20/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 20 of 36
checks, etc. issued by American people, i.e. in truth, the Prime creditors to the1
United States Bankruptcy, are not debt obligations of the UNITED STATES and2
believes none exists;3
18 USC 8. Obligation or other security of the United States defined4The term obligation or other security of the United States includes all5
bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve6
notes, Federal Reserve bank notes, coupons, United States notes, Treasury7
notes, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes, certificates of8
deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized9
officers of the United States, stamps and other representatives of value, of10
whatever denomination, issued under any Act of Congress, and canceled11
United States stamps.12
73-Affiant has seen no evidence that the original issuer of a debt instrument is not the13
live flesh and blood man or woman via his or her artificial PERSON, as only living14
men and women have credit and can produce goods and services from his or her15
labor energy and believes none exists;16
26 USC 1275. Other definitions and special rules17
(b) Treatment of borrower in the case of certain loans for personal use18
(2) Original issue discount deducted on cash basis in certain cases19
In the case of any debt instrument, if20
(A) such instrument21
(i) is incurred in connection with the acquisition or carrying of personal use22
property, and23
(ii) has original issue discount (determined after the application of paragraph24
(1)), and25
(B) the obligor under such instrument uses the cash receipts and26
disbursements method of accounting,27
notwithstanding section 163 (e), the original issue discount on such28
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000163----000-.htmlhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000163----000-.html#ehttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000163----000-.html#ehttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000163----000-.html8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
21/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 21 of 36
instrument shall be deductible only when paid.1
(3) Personal use property2
For purposes of this subsection, the term personal use property3
means any property substantially all of the use of which by the taxpayer4is not in connection with a trade or business of the taxpayer or an5
activity described in section 212. The determination of whether property is6
described in the preceding sentence shall be made as of the time of issuance7
of the debt instrument.8
74-Affiant has seen no evidence that debt instruments issued by a live flesh and blood9
man or woman, via his or her PERSON, such as promissory notes for car loans,10
home loans, mortgage loans, personal checking, etc. do not fall into the category of11
personal use property as described in 26 USC 1275 and believes none exists;12
75-Affiant has seen no evidence that debt instruments issued by live flesh and blood13
man or woman, via his or her PERSON, such as promissory notes for car loans,14
home loans, mortgage loans, personal checking, etc. are debt instruments publicly15
offered by the live flesh and blood man or woman and believes none exists;16
26 USC 1275; (1) Information required to be set forth on instrument17
(B) Special rule for instruments not publicly offered18
In the case of any issue of debt instruments not publicly offered, the19
regulations prescribed under subparagraph (A) shall not require the20
information to be set forth on the debt instrument before any disposition of21
such instrument by the first buyer.22
(2) Issue date23
(C) Other debt instruments24
In the case of any debt instrument not described in subparagraph (A) or (B),25
the term date of original issue means the date on which the debt instrument26
was issued in a sale or exchange.27
76-Affiant has seen no evidence that the GAO report compiled by Lynda D. Willis for the28
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000212----000-.htmlhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000212----000-.html8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
22/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 22 of 36
IRS commissioner in 1996 did not conclude (1) that the INTERNAL REVENUE1
SERVICE personnel do not understand debt instruments, (2) that there are over 342
additional types of debt instruments in circulation which are unaccounted for in the3
IRS publications and manuals and (3) that banks are supposed to complete an IRS48281 form for reporting of debt instruments and (4) that banks routinely do not5
complete and submit the 8281 form without which, the IRS has no ability to track and6
account for said debt instruments and believes none exists;7
77-Affiant has seen no evidence that the 2006 GAO report compiled8
78-Affiant has seen no evidence that the 1991 publication from the Chicago Federal9
Reserve Bank entitled Modern Money Mechanics does not state that funds are10
created out of thin air on the signature, i.e. credit, of the live flesh and blood man or11
woman and believe none exists;12
79-Affiant has seen no evidence that the so-called lending institution, hereinafter,13
bank, actually lends the customer funds at all, therefore bank suffers no risk of14
loss in the so-called loan transaction and believes none exists;15
80-Affiant has seen no evidence that the bank does not withhold the funds generated by16
the live flesh and blood man or womans signature on debt instruments and does not17
treat the promissory note or check as a deposit item according to Generally18
Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and further, according to the 199119
publication put forth by the Chicago Federal Reserve Bank entitled Modern Money20
Mechanics, does not fractionalize the deposited amount nine times or more and21
believes none exists;22
81- INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Form 1099A is for lenders and borrowers, where23
the A stands for Acquisition and Abandonment;24
82-Affiant has seen no evidence that 1099 series tax forms do not come under category25
5, Gift and Estate taxes and believes none exists;26
83-Affiant has seen no evidence of a law that states a live flesh and blood man or27
woman is obligated to gift his or her credit or labor energy to a bank, the FEDERAL28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
23/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 23 of 36
RESERVE BANK, the Federal Government or to the INTERNAL REVENUE1
SERVICE and believes none exists;2
84-Affiant has seen no evidence that Labor, in a legal sense, is not property and3
believes none exists;485-Affiant has seen no evidence that it is a crime to request ones credit or labor energy5
be returned to him or her in the form of a recoupment on a 1099OID, due, in no6
small part, to the fact that the American people were stripped of their ability to hold7
actual title to property when the private Federal Reserve Bankers put America into a8
bankruptcy in 1929. Though a treasonous act, the remedy given is stated in HJR1929
and Public Law 73-10, 48 Stat 48, 1 112, which is essentially this - no debts can10
be paid, but only discharged or set off and believes none exists;11
86-Affiant has seen no evidence that the American people, without choice, and as a12
result of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the ensuing bankruptcy of 1929, did13
not lose actual title of all property to a private group of International Bankers and/or14
their subsidiary corporations and the leaders of the de factogovernment corporation,15
and believes none exists;16
87-Affiant has seen no evidence that in order for US government leaders to not be17
found guilty of treason for allowing a private banking cartel to take over banking and18
commerce in America, the United States and all states of the union de factoand de19
jure, and then enforce a bankruptcy upon America such that ALL Americans were20
forced to turn over actual title to all property to these private International Bankers as21
collateral to the bankruptcy that said leaders had to provide a remedy; a remedy22
whereby the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is to discharge or set off all debts for23
the American people in exchange for the loss of the ability to hold actual title to24
property, as long as the American people would submit the proper paperwork, to the25
proper channels and in the proper format or the remedy will get denied and believes26
none exists;27
88-Affiant has seen no evidence that those administering the ongoing bankruptcy,28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
24/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 24 of 36
including but not limited to attorneys, the courts, all banks, the UNITED STATES OF1
AMERICA, UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF2
THE TREASURY, FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS are not all in breach of their3
fiduciary duty Amjur to the American people for not assisting the American people in4effectively attaining the remedy of discharge or set off of all debts by either (1)5
crediting the accounts to a zero balance upon receipt of instruments tendered6
Accept for Value, i.e. commonly called Bankers Acceptance, Bills of Exchange,7
Promissory Notes, drafts and the like, or (2) showing where the defect is in the8
instrument(s) tendered and how to correct it so that discharge or set off may occur9
and believe none exists; Publication 110
89-Affiant has seen no evidence that it does not serve the personal and corporate11
interests of attorneys, the courts, the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, the12
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the13
UNITED STATES, the FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS, and ALL STATUTORY14
BANKS to deny the American people this remedy and believe none exists;15
90-Affiant has seen no evidence that attempting to pay debts with debt instruments,16
Federal Reserve notes included, does not raise the National Debt and believes none17
exists;18
91-Affiant has seen no evidence a properly completed 1099OID claim and subsequent19
refund, does not reduce the National Debt by cancelling that portion of debt20
obligations created by the issuance of said debt instrument(s) and believes none21
exists;22
92-Affiant has seen no evidence a live flesh and blood man or woman does not have23
the option of lending instead of gifting his or her credit to the bank as designated24
on a 1099A, wherein the live flesh and blood man or womans legal PERSON, often25
called a TRANSMITTING UTILITY, is the lender and the bank is the borrower (See26
GAAP and Modern Money Mechanics) and believes none exists;27
93-Affiant has seen no evidence that if a live flesh and blood man or woman opts to28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
25/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 25 of 36
lend his or her credit to a bank, as designated on a 1099A, he or she then should not1
complete a 1099OID for a return to source (his or her self) of the funds created by2
his or her signature on said debt instruments pursuant to 26 USC 1271 1275 and3
believes none exists;494-Affiant has seen no evidence that for the nearly two years Affiant provided an upload5
service through the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE FIRE system web site, that6
each upload was not ultimately approved by INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE7
personnel and believes none exists;8
95-Affiant has seen no evidence of even one incident where INTERNAL REVENUE9
SERVICE personnel of the FIRE system or otherwise, informed Affiant of a problem10
with any uploads as performed by Affiant and believes none exists;11
96-Affiant has seen no evidence INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE personnel did not12
continue to allow uploads by Affiant right up until November 17, 2010 and believes13
none exists;14
97-Affiant has seen no evidence that Affiant did not conduct his affairs in the open and15
that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE did not have ample opportunity to contact16
Affiant via phone, email, mail or by a visit in person to inform Affiant of any errors in17
Affiants uploads as performed yet Affiant was never contacted even one time and18
believes none exists;19
Case in point: U.S. v Leo J. Dorey, Jr, U.S. Ct, of Appeals, 9th Cir 82-I 32220
(Argued & submitted 3/83, decided 7/83, pp. 3470-3473). DECISION The21
due process clause requires that a statute, which is used as basis of a22
criminal charge, give fair warning of conduct which is prohibited so that each23
person can conform his conduct to requirements of the law. Fundamental24
principles of due process mandates that no individual be forced to speculate25
whether his conduct is prohibited.26
98- Affiant has seen no evidence that if the 1099OID and 1099A as uploaded by Affiant27
has been and is illegal, then paying out refunds for years on said 1099 claims, not28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
26/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 26 of 36
charging any other upload service provider as Defendant has been charged, not1
criminally charging any tax preparer who prepared returns for said 1099 claims and2
still paying out said 1099 claims in 2011, is not a form of entrapment, malicious,3
selective and discriminatory prosecution and believes none exists;45
US V. DANIEL, 3 F3D 775 (4th Cir. 1993)6
HAMPTON V. US, 425 US 484, 48 LEd2d 113, 96 SCt 1646 (1976)7
1) Entrapment has 2 related elements; government inducement of crime and8
lack of predisposition on part of defendant to engage in criminal conduct.9
2) Predisposed defendant for purposes of defendants allegation of entrapment,10
is one who is ready and willing to commit the offense.11
12
KRAMER V. VILLAGE OF NORTH FOUND du LAC, 384 F3d 856 (7th Cir. 2004)13
Selective prosecution and entrapment are complete defenses to a crime.14
15
US V. TOM, 330 F3d 83 (1st Cir. 2003)16
Government agents may not originate a criminal design, implant in an innocent17
persons mind the disposition to commit a criminal act, and then induce18
commission of the crime so that the government may prosecute.19
20
99- Affiant has seen no evidence that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, the UNITED21
STATES OF AMERICA, their agents and assigns by their own admission of sending22
employees and agents to spy on Affiant could not have instead used their resources23
to contact Affiant to explain any potential wrongdoing and explain how to correct the24
filings so that each American can recoup his or her credit on debt instruments he or25
she issued and believes none exists;26
100- Affiant has seen no evidence that the failure of the INTERNAL REVENUE27
SERVICE and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to contact Affiant in a civil28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
27/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 27 of 36
manner to explain how to correct any (alleged) erroneous filings, when they had1
ample time to do so, is not a form of entrapment and is not a deliberate and2
premeditated attempt to force Americans into gifting their credit and labor energy3
and wealth to a bank through fear and intimidation and threat of or actual4incarceration on bogus charges for merely applying for the remedy that was directly5
given to each American in HJR192, Public Law 73-10, 48 stat 48, 1 112, for the6
forced surrender of actual title to ALL property in 1933 and believes none exists;7
101- Affiant has seen no evidence that had Affiant actually violated any code, rule,8
regulation or statute that Affiant was subject to, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY are not clearly10
guilty of violating the Fair Warning Doctrine and believes none exists;11
102- Affiant has seen no evidence that there are supporting regulations to the alleged 2612
USC violations and believes none exists; (See Exhibit C on Code of Federal13
Regulations Parallel Index of Authorities);14
U.S. v. Mersky, 362 US 431, 438, 80 S.Ct. 459 An administrative15
regulation, of course, is not a statute. While in practical effect regulations may16
be called little laws, they are at most but offspring of statutes. Once17
promulgated, these regulations, called for by statute itself, have the force of18
law, and violations thereof incur criminal prosecutions, just as if all the details19
had been incorporated into the congressional language. The result is that20
neither the statute nor the regulations are complete without the other and only21
together do they have any force. In effect, therefore, the construction of one22
necessarily involves construction of the other. For federal tax purposes,23
federal regulations govern. Dodd v. U.S. 223 F. Supp. 785; Lyeth v. Hoey,24
305 US 188, 59 S. Ct. 155; Failure to adhere to agency regulations [by the25
I.R.S. or other agency] may amount to denial of due-process if regulations are26
required by constitution or statute. Curley v. US, 791 F.Supp. 5; failure27
to adhere to agency regulations may amount to a denial of due-process is the28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
28/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 28 of 36
regulations are required by the constitution or statute. Arzanipour v. IS,1
866 F.2d 743, 746 (5th Cir. 1989). (In 26 US 7805(a) the Secretary shall2
prescribe all needful rules & regulations for the enforcement of this title. 3
103- Affiant has seen no evidence that there are implementing regulations in 26 CFR4authorizing any kind of enforcement actions by the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE5
for Title 26 USC and therefore, the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE can only6
enforce statutes against the United States Federal employees, and direct Federal7
contractors. Per 26 CFR 601.702 (a)(2)(ii) failure to publish implementing8
regulations, and Title 44, 44 U.S.C. chapter 15, part 1505 (a)(1) and believes none9
exists;10
104- Affiant has seen no evidence or proof that 18 USC is positive law and believes11
none exists;12
The federal Title 18 criminal code was codified in 1909, again in 1940, and13
again in 1948. In 1909 and 1940 the jurisdictional section for federal courts14
only authorized prosecution under Title 18 crimes, not under drug crimes or15
IRS crimes. The 1940 statute, 18 USC 546, was never repealed or16
amended. That statute, which is still valid, only authorized prosecution for17
1909 Title 18 crimes, nothing for Title 21 or Title 26. Furthermore, under the18
Fair Warning Doctrine, to prosecute someone under a prior statute, a person19
must be given warning under that statute. Therefore, no possible prosecution20
exists under Title 21, Title 26, or under any Title 18 charge other than those21
listed in the 1909 act, but prior notice is required.22
THE ABOVE SUPPORTS THE CONCLUSION: (1) THAT PERSONS ARE23
REGISTERED VESSELS UNDER TITLE 46, (2) THAT THE ADMIRALTY24
JURISDICTION IS USED AS A MEANS OF IN REM SEIZURE; AGAINST25
THE VESSEL, (3) THAT THESE FACTS ARE CONCEALED DUE TO 193926
INDENTURED TRUST ACT, AND USC 50; TRADING WITH THE ENEMY27
ACT, (4) USC 26 IS NOT POSITIVE LAW, (5) USC 18, IS NOT POSITIVE28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
29/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 29 of 36
LAW, (6) 18 and 26 USC ARE TRUST PROVISIONS COVERING THE1
NATIONAL SECURITIES BIRTH CERTIFICATES AND CUSIP (EQUITIES)2
BONDS HELD IN THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, RENDERING3
PEOPLE AS CHATTEL, BOUGHT AND SOLD ON THE INTERNATIONAL4MARKETS, ALL IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,5
CONSTITUTING TRAFFICKING IN SLAVES, ENTICEMENT INTO6
SLAVERY, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, ETC.7
105- Affiant has seen no evidence that Attorney and prosecution along with INTERNAL8
REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES,9
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS, are not ALL10
unregistered foreign agents and part of a criminal enterprise engaged in a pattern of11
money laundering, theft, conversion, monopoly, RICO, racketeering, extortion, inland12
piracy, robbery ashore, and more and all involved are complicit, and guilty of mis-13
prision of treason and mis-prision of felony for ignorance of the law is no excuse and14
believes none exists;15
106- Affiant has seen no evidence that prosecution, in adding wire fraud charges in a16
superceding indictment, has not violated Defendants rights as the sole reason for17
adding wire fraud charges was because Defendant would not plead guilty to the18
Conspiracy charge and accept a 5 year prison sentence and believes none exists;19
(Public Defender Barry Flegenheimer repeatedly threatened Affiant that if Affiant did20
not plead guilty to the conspiracy charge by April 30, 2011,and accept a 5 year21
prison sentence that prosecution would amend the indictment with wire fraud22
charges and seek to imprison Defendant for 20 years.)23
24
US V. GOMEZ-ORDUNO, 235 F3d 453 (9th Cir. 2000)25
Prosecutor violates due process when he seeks additional charges solely to26
punish a defendant for exercising a constitutional right.27
KINZER V. JACKSON, 316 F3d 139 (2nd Cir. 2003)28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
30/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 30 of 36
Freedom from Malicious prosecution is a constitutional right.1
BRAGAN V. POINDEXTER, 249 F3d 476 (6th Cir. 2001)2
1) Criminal prosecution which would not have been initiated but for3
vindictiveness is constitutionally prohibited.42) The remedy for prosecutorial vindictiveness is dismissal of the charges or5
other appropriate remedies.6
7
BIVENS V. SIX UNKNOWN AGENTS, 403 US 388, 29 Led2d 619, 91 SCt 199 (1970)8
When a government agent acts in an unconstitutional manner he becomes liable for9
money damages.10
11
AVERSA V. US, 99 F3d 1200 (1st Cir. 1996)12
Person may sue federal official in his individual capacity for damages arising out of13
constitutional violation.14
15
107-16
17
18
19
If so-called government can deny anyone his/her justly entitled "rights" and20
remedies, without penalty and without recourse, is it because alleged government21
is, in truth, a de facto quasi-governmental body masquerading as a de jure22
government; yet in reality, is merely a private corporation with private interests,23
seeking to maximize shareholder profits wherein key personnel receive bonuses,24
merit pay increases and/or shares of profits for prosecuting and incarcerating25
American people?26
27
Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is an actual or moral duty to speak,28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
31/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 31 of 36
or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading We cannot1
condone this shocking conduct If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This2
sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected3
immediately.4U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F2d 997, 299-3005
6
Affiant grants Plaintiff thirty (30) days, from date of filing to respond to the statements,7
claims and inquiries above, unless an extension of a reasonable amount of time is8
requested in writing and via certified mail to Affiant in Care of Notary Public WALTER9
ETIENNE ESTEVA, NOTARY PUBLIC at PO BOX 51237 IRVINE, CA 92619 within10
the said twenty one (21) day period. Failure to respond will constitute as an operation of11
law, the admission of Plaintiff by TACIT PROCURATION to the statements, claims and12
ANSWERS to inquires shall be deemed RES JUDICATA, STARE DECISIS. Failure to13
respond will constitute PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL, COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL, and14
ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE. I hereby and herein reserve the right to amend and15
make amendments to this document as necessary in order that the truth may be16
ascertained and proceedings justly determined.17
18
MAXIMS19
20
AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS TRUTH IN COMMERCE21
22
AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT IS ACTED UPON AS THE JUDGMENT IN23
COMMERCE.24
25
ALL CORPORATE GOVERNMENT IS BASED UPON COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVITS,26
COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS, COMMERCIAL LIENS AND COMMERCIAL27
DISTRESSES, HENCE, GOVERNMENTS CANNOT EXERCISE THE POWER TO28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
32/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 32 of 36
EXPUNGE COMMERCIAL PROCESSES.1
2
THE LEGITIMATE POLITICAL POWER OF A CORPORATE ENTITY IS3
ABSOLUTELY DEPENDENT UPON ITS POSSESSION OF COMMERCIAL BONDS4AGAINST PUBLIC HAZARD, BECAUSE NO BOND MEANS NO RESPONSIBILITY,5
MEANS NO POWER OF OFFICIAL SIGNATURE, MEANS NO REAL CORPORATE6
POLITICAL POWER, MEANS NO PRIVILEGE TO OPERATE STATUTES AS THE7
CORPORATE VEHICLE.8
9
THE CORPORATE LEGAL POWER IS SECONDARY TO COMMERCIAL10
GUARANTORS. CASE LAW IS NOT A RESPONSIBLE SUBSTITUTE FOR A BOND.11
12
EXCEPT FOR A JURY, IT IS ALSO A FATAL OFFENSE FOR ANY PERSON, EVEN13
A JUDGE, TO IMPAIR OR TO EXPUNGE, WITHOUT A COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT, ANY14
AFFIDAVIT OR ANY COMMERCIAL PROCESS BASED UPON AN AFFIDAVIT.15
16
GOVERNMENTS CANNOT MAKE UNBONDED RULINGS OR STATUTES WHICH17
CONTROL COMMERCE, FREE ENTERPRISE MEN AND WOMEN, OR SOLE18
PROPRIETORSHIPS WITHOUT SUSPENDING COMMERCE BY A GENERAL19
DECLARATION OF MARTIAL LAW.20
21
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCPIAL22
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT23
Further Affiant sayeth naught.24
25
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that26
the foregoing is true and correct. 28 USC 1746 (1)27
28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
33/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 33 of 36
Signed on this the _____ day of the _____ month in the year of our Lord two thousand1
eleven.2
______________________________3
Ronald-Lee:Brekke, Authorized Representative4of RONALD L. BREKKE5
"I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract, commercial agreement or bankruptcy that I did not6
enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not and will not accept the liability of the compelled7
benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement or bankruptcy."8
9
JURAT10
State of California )11
) ss.12
Orange County )13
14
SUBSCRIBED AND AFFIRMED before me on this ________day15
of________________, 2011 by Ronald-Lee:Brekke who proved to me on the basis of16
satisfactory evidence to be the man who appeared before me17
__________________________________________, Notary Public, and whose name18
is subscribed on this Document / Instrument; witnessed by my signature and official19
stamp.20
21
NS: ____________________________________22
Signature of Notary Public23
LEGAL NOTICE24
The Certifying/Affirming Custodian Notary is an independent contractor and not a party25
to this claim. In fact the Certifying/Affirming Custodian Notary is a Federal Witness26
Pursuant to TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 73, SEC. 1512. Tampering with a witness,27
victim, or an informant. The Certifying/Affirming Custodian Notary also performs the28
functions of a quasi-Postal Inspector under the Homeland Security Act by being29
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
34/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 34 of 36
compelled to report any violations of the U.S. Postal regulations as an Officer of the1
Executive Department. Intimidating a Notary Public under Color of Law is a violation of2
Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 242, titled Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law,3
which primarily governs police misconduct investigations. This Statute makes it a crime4for any person acting under the Color of Law to willfully deprive any individual residing5
in the United States and/or United States of America those rights protected by the6
Constitution and U.S. law. Use of a Notary or references to US codes, rules,7
regulations, statutes and the like does not constitute a granting of jurisdiction, waiving of8
any rights or an acceptance of any benefits or privileges, real or imagined.9
10
Reserving ALL Natural God-Given Unalienable Birthrights, Waiving None, Ever,11
12
13
14
RELIEF AND REMEDY DEMANDED15
Affiant is the beneficiary of the trust known as RONALD LEE BREKKE and I hereby16
appoint JUDGE JOHN C COUGHENOUR as Fiduciary / Trustee. (See Exhibit D) I want17
you to Discharge the matter and Remove the Case from the public record.18
19
I am not an expert in the law however I do know right from wrong. If there is any human20
being damaged by any statements herein, if he will inform me by facts I will sincerely21
make every effort to amend my ways. I hereby and herein reserve the right to amend22
and make amendment to this document as necessary in order that the truth may be23
ascertained and proceedings justly determined. If the parties given notice by means of24
this document have information that would controvert and overcome this Affidavit,25
please advise me IN WRITTEN AFFIDAVIT FORM within thirty (30) days from filing26
hereof providing me with your counter affidavit, proving with particularity by stating all27
requisite actual evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law, and not merely the ultimate28
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
35/36
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Page 35 of 36
facts or conclusions of law, that this Affidavit Statement is substantially and materially1
false sufficiently to change materially my status and factual declarations. Your silence2
stands as consent to, and tacit approval of, the factual declarations herein being3
established as fact as a matter of law.45
Ronald-lee: brekke, Sui juris6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE14
15
I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document, Affidavit of Truth, for16
Case No. CR10 0328JCC in the DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE17
was sent by mail, sufficient postage prepaid, to the following, whose names and18
addresses are listed below, on this the _____ day of the ______ month in the year of19our Lord, two thousand eleven.20
21
_____________________________22
WALTER ETIENNE ESTEVA23
NOTARY PUBLIC24
PO BOX 5123725
IRVINE, CA 9261926
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA27
C/O JENNY DURKAN, US ATTORNEY28
US DISTRICT COURT29 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 522030
SEATTLE, WA 9810131
32
ROBERT M. LEEN33
PO BOX 8234
WOODINVILLE, WA 980723536
8/4/2019 Affidavit of Truth - Ron5
36/36
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION1
RAY LAHOOD, SECRETARY21200 NEW JERSEY AVE SOUTHEAST3
WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 205904Pursuant to: [46 USC 31321] Filing, recording, and discharge5
6DOUGLAS H. SHULMAN, IRS COMMISSIONER7
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE8
CRIMINAL DIVISION9
BOX 19210
COVINGTON, KENTUCKY 410121112
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., DBA US ATTORNEY GENERAL13U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE14950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW15WASHINGTON, DC 2053016
17
J. RUSSELL GEORGE18
DBA INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION19
1125 - 15TH STREET NW - WASHINGTON, DC 2000520