Post on 03-Jun-2018
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
1/32
TREND OF ENROLLMENT OFREGION V (BICOL) FROM SY
2002-2003 (GRADE I) TO SY 2011-
2012 (YEAR 4): BASIS FORINTERVENTION PROGRAM
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
2/32
EFA
GOALSCHALLENGE
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
3/32
The DepED ROV is facingchallenges for the next three
years in time of meeting the
EFA Goals by 2015, thedeadline set by the UNESCO
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
4/32
10-POINT BASIC
EDUCATION AGENDA
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
5/32
1) 12-year Basic Education Cycle;
2) Universal Pre-Schooling for All;
3) Madaris Education as a Sub-system within theEducation System;
4) Technical-Vocational Education as an Alternative
Stream in Senior High School;
5) Every Child-A-Reader Program) by Grade I;
6) Science and Math Proficiency;
7) Assistance to Private Schools as Essential
Partners in Basic Education;
8) Medium of Instruction Rationalized;
9) Quality Textbooks; and
10) Covenant with the Local Governments to Build
More Schools.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
6/32
PREVALENCE
OFSCHOOL LEAVERS
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
7/32
The prevalence of school leavers among
Grade I has been noted over the past 10-year
basic education cycle. School leaver is the
most common problem of schools.
Interventions to reduce school leavers are
particularly important because the cohort
survival rate decreased remarkably. Schools
are an essential channel for intervention
because they offer access to large numbers
of pupils. Class advisers are the very persons
who should know the whereabouts of pupils.
In time of meeting the Education for All EFA)
goals and the DepEd ROV targets, there is a
need to conduct an intervention program.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
8/32
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
9/32
The elementary completionrate level is still far from theEFA target of 81.0 percent by2015. Likewise, the drop-outrate is 0.74 percent for theelementary level and 5.32percent for secondary level.Possible reasons were due tochild labor, poverty, health andsanitation, peace and order,
and other problems in a certainarea.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
10/32
DepED Region V has
stepped up effort towards
the attainment of the
foregoing, but then it
continues to confront thechallenge of ensuring
greater participation of all
school-aged children,especially in the secondary
level.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
11/32
In school year 2011-2012, the net
enrollment rate in elementary
level was 92.30 percent and
49.48 percent in secondary level
which is far below the MDG and
Education for All (EFA) targets.The cohort survival rate reached
76.78 percent for Grade VI in the
elementary and 73.14 percent forYear 4 in the secondary level.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
12/32
THE FIVE (5)
BASICQUESTIONS
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
13/32
1. What is the actual
enrolment trend from SY2002-2003 (Grade I) to SY
2011-2012 (Year 4) along
male enrolment, female
enrolment, and region
total for male and female?
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
14/32
2. What transition grade or
level requires an
intervention programbased from the enrolment
trend?
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
15/32
3. What are the different
intervention programs
suggested by thedivision?
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
16/32
4. What are the reasons
why pupils/students
tend to leave theschool?
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
17/32
5. What are the status ofsome DepEd Programs
and Projects addressing
the problem on schoolleavers?
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
18/32
BRIEF REVIEW
OFLITERATURE:
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
19/32
A low percentage of
pupils reachedgrade six (6) but a
high percentage ofelementary
graduates made it tohigh school.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
20/32
Low survival rates are due
to unstable economic
condition of families, poor
health and nutrition
among the learners, childlabor/employment, lack of
schools, and distance ofschools from the
residence of learners.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
21/32
Results of the
NationalAchievement Test for
elementary and highschool indicate below
average performancein all subject areas.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
22/32
School-age population
continues to increase,
but not all children
are in school, and
many children do not
finish basic education.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
23/32
POLICY
THRUST
FY 2012-2015:
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
24/32
Increase school
participation, completion
and achievement at the
elementary and
secondary levels using alldelivery modalities
available, including the
strengthening of
alternative delivery
modes.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
25/32
REGIONAL
STRATEGIES/DIRECT
IONS, 2012-2015
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
26/32
Putting pupils and
students in school andkeeping them in school
by reducing high leaverrate and by providing
them quality
education.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
27/32
SYNTHESIS:
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
28/32
Based on the regional situational
overview, policy thrust and regionalstrategies/directions, it was found
out that the problem on school
leavers must be addressed in order
to come up with an intense
solutions so that the Medium-Term
Development Goal (MDG) and
Education for All (EFA) goals wouldbe achieved by 2015 as targeted.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
29/32
To do it, each school in every
division throughout the region
must be evaluated and validatedin terms of the programs of the
department. Enrollment must be
checked because it is one factorthat affects the basic services of
the government due to budget
requirements. Quality education
can be attained if governmentfunds are utilized properly in the
different programs and projects.
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
30/32
Region TOTALMALE FEMALE
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
31/32
Total (MF)MALE FEMALE
School
Year
Actual
Enrollment
School
LeaversPercentage
Actual
Enrollment
School
Leavers
Percentag
e
Actual
Enrollment
School
Leavers
Percentag
e
GRADE I 2002-2003 187 819 101 311 86 508
28 323 15.08 17 030 16.81 11 350 13.12
GRADE II 2003-2004 159 496 84 281 75 158
8 978 5.63 5 157 6.08 3 841 5.11
GRADE III 2004-2005 150 518 79 124 71 317
14 687 9.76 9 017 11.4 5 727 8.03
GRADE IV 2005-2006 135 831 70 107 65 590
2 761 2.03 2 046 2.92 718 1.09
GRADE V 2006-2007 133 070 68 061 64 872
6766 5.08 3 554 5.22 3 075 4.74
GRADE VI 2007-2008 126 304 64 507 61 797
18 058 14.29 8 967 13.90 9 091 14.71
YEAR I 2008-2009 108 246 55 540 52 706
15 945 14.73 9 919 17.86 6 093 11.56
YEAR II 2009-2010 92 301 45 621 46 613
12 675 13.73 8 009 17.56 4 659 9.99
YEAR III 2010-2011 79 626 37 612 41 954
455 0.57 767 2.03 +274 +0.64
YEAR IV 2011-2012 79 171 36 845 42 228
8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13
32/32
DIVISION
GRADE I
ENROLLMENT
(SY 2002-2003)
YEAR 4 ENROLLMENT
(SY 2011-2012)SCHOOL LEAVERS %
Albay 26 580 12 771 13 809 51.95
Camarines Norte 16 724 7 764 8 960 53.57
Camarines Sur 52 414 20 495 31 919 60.89
Catanduanes 8 392 4 924 3 468 41.32
Iriga City
2 699
1 429
1 270
47.05
Legazpi City 4 477 1 689 2 788 62.27
Ligao city 3 473 1 611 1 862 53.61
Masbate City 3 567 1 310 2 257 63.27
Masbate Province
34 621
8 750
25 871
74.72
Naga City 5 003 2 763 2 240 44.77
Sorsogon Province 21 181 10 271 10 910 51.50
Sorsogon City 4 705 2 816 1 889 40.14