A Quantitative Method for Determining - RMACES · A Quantitative Method for Determining by Scott...

A Quantitative Method for Determining

by Scott Shuler

and Anthony Lord

Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference and Equipment Show

2nd Annual Asphalt Research Symposium

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Acknowledgements

National Cooperative Highway Research Program

Acknowledgements

Project 14-17 “Manual for Emulsion-Based Chip Seals for Pavement Preservation”

What Are Chip Seals?

Aggregate Design

Aggregate

• Spread Rate

Design

Aggregate

• Spread Rate– One Stone Thick

Design

Aggregate

Design

Aggregate

–Or…..

Design

Aggregate

–Or…..

Design

Aggregate

–Or…..

Design

Getting it One Stone ThickDesign

Getting it One Stone Thick• Follow A Design Method

– South Africa/Australia/New Zealand• Flakiness Index < 25%• ALD/Gradation - One-Sized• Traffic• Texture• Embedment

Design

– Asphalt Institute/McLeod/Hanson• Asphalt Rates Too Low, Aggregate Rates Too High

Design

– Asphalt Institute/McLeod/Hanson• Asphalt Rates Too Low, Aggregate Rates Too High

– Texas/Kearby/Gallaway/Epps• Asphalt Rates Too Low, Aggregate Rates Too Low

Design

Design Gets Us So Far, Then ‘Art’ Kicks in….. Right?

• Turning Traffic Loose– Touchy Feely?– Science ?

• Surface Texture

• Surface Texture– Touchy Feely?– Measure It?

• Surface Resistance– Ball Penetration

• Emulsion Correct on Job?

• Emulsion Correct on Job?– Measure It

Question

• Can a Lab Test be Used to Predict Emulsion or Residue Strength in the Field?

Question

• If it Could, Maybe Judgment Could be Improved

Chips at One-Stone Thickness

“Pin-Art” Holds ChipsThe ‘Grabber’

Template = 40% Embedment

A Pneumatic Roller Would be an Improvement

NCHRP 14-17“Traffic Simulator”

The Experiment

• AGGREGATES: – Basalt, Alluvial, Granite, Limestone

The Experiment

• EMULSIONS: – RS-2, RS-2P, CRS-2, CRS-2P

The Experiment

• EMULSION CURE: – 40%, 80%

The Experiment

• EMULSION CURE: – 40%, 80%

• AGGREGATE MOISTURE: – Dry, SSD

The Experiment

Experiment Design• Yiklm = µ + Ai + Wk + Ml + AWik + AMil + WMkl + AWMikl + eiklm

• • Where,• Yijklm = Chip Loss, %

• µ = mean loss, %

• Ai = effect of aggregate i on mean

• Wk = effect of water removed (40, 80%) k on mean

• Ml = effect of aggregate moisture l on mean (dry,SSD)

• AWik, etc. = effect of interactions on mean

• eiklm = random error

Aggregates

4.75 8.06.3 9.5

Sieve Size, mm

Aggregates

AggregatesLS GR BS AL

BSG 2.615 2.612 2.773 2.566Median Size, in 0.252 0.315 0.277 0.277ALD, in 0.170 0.265 0.218 0.222Design Coverage, psy

16.48 26.11 22.95 21.73

Emulsions

EmulsionsRS-2P RS-2 CRS-2 CRS-2P

SF, 50C 108 96 78 119Residue, % 65 68 68 68Pen, 25C, 100g 115 95 125 85Ductility, 25C 100+ 100+ 100+ 100+

Dry Chips - 40% Moisture Loss

SSD Chips - 40% Moisture Loss

αααα

Source RS-2 RS-2P CRS-2 CRS-2P

αααα

Aggr <0.0001 <0.0001 0.3887 0.0049

αααα

Aggr <0.0001 <0.0001 0.3887 0.0049Moist 0.0169 0.0220 0.1597 0.0003

αααα

Aggr <0.0001 <0.0001 0.3887 0.0049Moist 0.0169 0.0220 0.1597 0.0003Cure <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

αααα

Aggr <0.0001 <0.0001 0.3887 0.0049Moist 0.0169 0.0220 0.1597 0.0003Cure <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

αααα

Aggr <0.0001 <0.0001 0.3887 0.0049Moist 0.0169 0.0220 0.1597 0.0003Cure <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001A x M 0.2468 0.3618 0.0994 0.7574

αααα

A x C 0.0001 0.0020 0.3927 0.0005

αααα

A x C 0.0001 0.0020 0.3927 0.0005M x C 0.5425 0.0136 0.9999 0.9546

αααα

A x C 0.0001 0.0020 0.3927 0.0005M x C 0.5425 0.0136 0.9999 0.9546A x M x C 0.1064 0.2088 0.8805 0.0114

Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison

RS-2RS-2

Allv A

RS-2RS-2

Allv A

RS-2RS-2

Allv A

RS-2RS-2

Allv A

RS-2PRS-2P

Allv A

RS-2RS-2

Allv A

RS-2PRS-2P

Allv A

RS-2RS-2

Allv A

RS-2PRS-2P

Allv A

CRS-2CRS-2

Allv A

RS-2RS-2

Allv A

RS-2PRS-2P

Allv A

CRS-2CRS-2

Allv A

CRS-2PCRS-2P

Allv AB

Bas AB

RS-2RS-2

Allv A

RS-2PRS-2P

Allv A

CRS-2CRS-2

Allv A

CRS-2PCRS-2P

Allv AB

Bas AB

OK, So the Lab Test Works,But What About in the Field?

Arches, NP

Frederick, CO

Forks, WA

Arches, NP

Moisture Loss, %

Frederick, CO

Forks, WA

Moisture Loss, %Sunday, March 28, 2010

Chip LossField Site Aggregates - Lab Sweep Test Results

Moisture Loss, %

Conclusions

• This chip seal performance test may provide a means for comparing strength of aggregate/emulsion combinations under various curing conditions.

Conclusions

• The amount of water remaining in the chip seal emulsion has a large effect on chip retention.

Conclusions

• Significantly higher chip loss was

measured for test specimens

fabricated with dry aggregates

compared with saturated surface

dry aggregates.

Conclusions

• No significant differences in chip loss could be measured either at 40 or 80 percent cure when cationic emulsions were compared with anionic emulsions on either calcareous or siliceous aggregates.

Conclusions

• This Preliminary Data Suggests the New Sweep Test May be Used to Predict “Time to Traffic” for Fresh Chip Seals.

Questions ?

Thank You !

A Quantitative Method for Determining - RMACES · A Quantitative Method for Determining by Scott...

Documents

Transcript of A Quantitative Method for Determining - RMACES · A Quantitative Method for Determining by Scott...

Paving - RMACES

Surface Characteristics - rmaces

Arkansas Interstates Today - RMACES · 2020. 3. 5. · Rubblization and Asphalt Overlay – The Arkansas DOT Experience Arkansas Interstates Today ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Quantitative Metabolism 1. Quantitative Metabolism.

1 METHODS FOR DETERMINING SIMILARITY OF EXPOSURE-RESPONSE BETWEEN PEDIATRIC AND ADULT POPULATIONS Stella G. Machado, Ph.D. Quantitative Methods and Research.

Roller Operations 101 - RMACES

Chapter 17 - testbanku.eu€¦ · Web view1-3The quantitative analysis would focus on determining the potential cost savings from buying the part rather than making it. The qualitative

Quantitative imaging from single molecules to (bio)polymers · determining the material properties at the nano scale. The technique gives fast reliable results in many aspects of

RMACES Pavement Design Steel · AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures 1993 Just follow the nomograph… Reliability Standard Deviation ESALs Soil Strength Serviceability

Determining Efficiency of On-Target CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Introduction Editing … · 2017-09-11 · On-Target CRISPR/Cas9 Genome . Editing Using the NEB® EnGen™ ... quantitative

Analytical chemistry Second lecture. Measurements in analytical chemistry Analytical chemistry is a quantitative science. Whether determining the concentration.

Quantitative Methods for Determining U.S. Air Force Crew Cushion … › dtic › tr › fulltext › u2 › a441946.pdf · 2011-05-13 · QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR DETERMINING U.S.

METABOLISM OF IRON STORES - Nagoya University METABOLISM OF IRON STORES CLINICAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING IRON STORES Quantitative determination of iron stores The total amount of iron

Chapter 2dpuadweb.depauw.edu/harvey_web/eTextProject/pdfFiles/Chapter2.pdf · Chapter 2 Basic Tools of ... Analytical chemistry is a quantitative science. Whether determining the

Session 2: A Quantitative approach to determining waiting period for FMD freedom

Quantitative EDSA for determining the electrostatic potential and chemical bonding in crystals The modern state of method and some examples of investigations.

QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES UNDER … · The BRPD circular 02 dated 16 January 2014 regarding ‘Single Borrower Exposure Limit’ is being applied by the Bank in determining

DETERMINING LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS FROM A TIME SERIES€¦ · Lyapunov exponents, which provide a qualitative and quantitative characterization of dynamical behavior, are related to the

Quantitative Histomorphometry and Quantitative Polymerase ...

Pavement Life Cycle – Costs - RMACES · 2020-03-05 · Forensic Investigations • “Tools in the Toolbox ... • Partial depth to full depth removal 26 Milling – Advantages