4.4 Theory. 4.4 Theory (structures) 2-3000km Wavelength Relative Vorticity 700hPa (10 -5 s -1 )...

Post on 15-Jan-2016

215 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of 4.4 Theory. 4.4 Theory (structures) 2-3000km Wavelength Relative Vorticity 700hPa (10 -5 s -1 )...

4.4 Theory

4.4 Theory (structures)

2-3000km Wavelength

Relative Vorticity 700hPa (10-5s-1)

11-12oN

African Easterly Wave trough

Average precipitation rate (mm/day)

Peak rainfall ahead of trough

4.4 Theory (structures)

Note distinctive horizontal tilts

4.4 Theory (structures)

Note distinctive vertical tilts

4.4 Theory (Instability)

Consensus has developed in the community that AEWs arise in association with a linear instability mechanism

Recall the Charney-Stern necessary conditions for instability:

y

P

y

In the fluid interior and at the surface have opposite signs

y

P

has opposite signs in the fluid interior

or

4.4 Theory (The basic state)

925hPa 315K PV

• Strong baroclinic zone 10o-20oN • PV ‘strip’ present on the cyclonic shear side of AEJ.

925hPa e

• High e strip exists near 15oN

4.4 Theory (The basic state)

See Dickinson and Molinari (2000) for more discussion of PV sign-reversals)

4.4 Theory (The basic state)

Note definition of meridional gradient in qgpv

4.4 Theory (see Class Notes)

Discussion of Interacting Rossby Waves

4.5 Modeling (Introduction)

Different types of modeling are possible:

Idealized modeling

Climate modeling using a global model

Regional modeling (e.g. for case studies)

Here modeling of the AEWs and AEJ are both considered.

4.5 Modeling (Idealized)

4.5 Modeling

4.5 Modeling

4.5 Modeling

4.5 Modeling

4.5 Modeling 9

4.5 Modeling

4.5 Modeling (non-linear)

4.5 Modeling

Nonlinear life-cycles

4.5 Modeling

4.5 Modeling

4.5 Modeling

4.5 Modeling

4.5 Modeling (Global)

4.5 Modeling (Global)

4.5 Modeling (Global)

5.5 Modeling (Global)

4.5 Modeling (Global)

4.5 Modeling (Regional)

Following is an animation of a predicted AEW sequence in WRF (Berry)

5.5 Modeling (Regional)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

5.5 Modeling (The Basic State) 33

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (The Basic State)

4.5 Modeling (Main Points)

Basic State:

AEJ is maintained by deep moist convection to the south and dry convection to the north (tephigram construction)

From a PV-thinking perspective in addition to the surface temperature gradient the AEJ is associated with two distinctive PV anomalies – a negative one linked to the dry convection and a +ve one linked to the moist convection (and to a lesser extent, descent in the heat low circulation)

AEWs:

Idealised modeling confirms that AEWs can grow via a mixed barotropic-baroclinic instability mechanisms. Normal modes tend to be dominated by barotropic growth. As these modes grow and become more nonlinear they become more dominated by baroclinic growth.

Climate modeling studies tend to be more about the models than the processes (biased view).

Regional Modeling can be used for process studies.

4.5 Modeling (Main Points)

AEWs and AEJ

So the observed WAM is characterized by convective processes that maintain the AEJ and processes linked to the growth of AEWs that weaken the AEJ. The observed climate represents the long-term balance of these two aspects of the WAM system.

Question: Do we expect an active AEW year to be associated with a strong AEJ or weak AEJ?