Post on 01-Jan-2016
description
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRB PresentationWhat is a DRB?History of DRBsBenefits of DRBsRecommended elements for a successful DRBDRB ethicsDRB selection Dispute Resolution Board Foundation (DRBF)A success story 2
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Dispute Review Board (DRB)
A DRB is a board of impartial professionals formed at the beginning of the project to follow construction progress, encourage dispute avoidance, and assist in the resolution of disputes for the duration of the project.
4
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Dispute Review Board (DRB)
“… a real-time ADR process for the resolution of issues and claims, controlled by the owner and the contractor.”
5
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Dispute Review Board (DRB)
A Dispute Review Board has the ability to "look forward" in a collaborative way to help the parties minimize impacts of unplanned events that will affect the job tomorrow, rather than "looking back" to assess blame for yesterday (distinguishing DRBs from mediation and arbitration, which only look back).
6
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
History of DRBs
Early 1970’s tunneling industry conducted studies on dispute resolutionFirst DRB used on second bore of I-70 Eisenhower Tunnel in Colorado in 19761996 DRB Foundation established; DRB Manual publishedBy 2010 over 2,200 US projects worth US $200 billion
8
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
History of DBs - International1981: First International DB, El Cajón Dam,
Honduras1995: The World Bank makes DBs
mandatory for all World Bank-financed projects over US $50M
1997: Asian Development Bank & European Bank for Reconstruction & Development adopt DB
Worldwide, roughly 100 DRB contracts using DRBs start every year, worth over US $5 billion per year 9
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Public and Private Projects Airports Bridges Buildings Dams Energy Highways
Ports Power plants Underground Universities
Application to Types of Projects
What do they have in common?
Lengthy duration
Complex site and/or construction methods
High risk10
Puerto Rico
DC
293
2233
1 1
44
667
417
36
2
261
1 1 10
824
1
2
7
6
252
2
3
512
121
1
1
4
21
55
5
13
4
15
2
12
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRBs in TexasStarted in 1993Owners: US Dept. of Energy (4)
Dallas Area Rapid Transit (17)TX Dept. of Criminal Justice (5)North Texas Tollway Authority (1)MTA of Harris Co. (6)The City of San Antonio (1)
Contract values ranged from $9 to $140 million 13
Low Cost Resolution High Cost Resolution L
ess
Co
ntr
ol
M
ore
Co
ntr
ol
Negotiation
Facilitation
Early Neutral Evaluation
Joint Experts
Mediation
Mini-Trial
Arbitration
Court Special Master
Court Settlement Conference
Bench or Jury Trial
Partnering
ADR Continuum 14
DISPUTE REVIEW BOARD
DISPUTE REVIEW BOARD
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Primary Benefits of the DRB Process
Claim avoidance During periodic meetings, the DRB reviews the status of outstanding issues and inquires about any potential problems or disputes.
Dispute resolution Early identification and resolution of disputes in “real time” is critical to the success of the DRB process.
16
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Other Benefits of the DRB Process
DRB recommendation is helpful for: Owners because it provides a basis and record for making decisions. Contractors because it provides an early opportunity to resolve disputes that may impact project schedule or cash flow.
17
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRB ReviewsThe DRB process appears to be effective in assisting in the resolution of disputes, leading to more timely completion of projects, reduced cost overruns and avoidance of claims. Utilization of DRBs on larger projects can serve to motivate greater cooperation between parties resulting in fewer unresolved claims and a reduced litigation potential.Florida Department of Transportation,
Office of Inspector General18
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRB ReviewsWMATA believes the presence of the Board encourages both the owner and contractor to settle their differences in most instances without DRB hearings. In cases where hearings are necessary, resolutions can be reached fairly and expeditiously. The Board can also prove beneficial in minimizing the adversarial relationships of the parties and is useful in guiding resolution to issues prior to them becoming a dispute.Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
Authority, Department of Capital Projects Management
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRB Reviews
The Dispute Review Board…is truly a Best Practice within the industry. It is practical, reliable and cost-effective.
Federal Highway Administration
20
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
University of Washington
DRBs used for over 20 years
60 "vertical" projects valued at $6 Billion
2 formal DRB hearings 6 informal hearings No arbitration or litigation
21
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRB Track RecordThe DRB process has experienced a very high rate of success in resolving disputes without arbitration or litigation.
Resolution rate to date: over 98% of matters going to the DRB do not go on to later arbitration or litigation.
22
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Recommended Elements for a Successful DRB
1. DRB members are neutral and subject to the approval of both parties.
2. DRB members sign a Three-Party Agreement obligating them to serve both parties equally.
3. DRB’s fees and expenses are shared equally by the parties.
24
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Recommended Elements for a Successful DRB
4. DRB is organized when work begins, before there are any disputes.
5. DRB keeps abreast of job developments by periodically reviewing relevant documentation and regularly visiting the site.
6. A DRB Advisory Opinion can assist the parties in the early resolution of a dispute.
25
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Recommended Elements for a Successful Standing DRB
7. Either party can refer a dispute to the DRB.
8. An informal but comprehensive hearing is convened promptly.
9. The written recommendations of the DRB are non-binding, but are admissible later in arbitration or litigation.
26
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Recommended Elements for a Successful Standing DRB
10.The DRB members are absolved from any personal or professional liability arising from DRB activities, and cannot be called as witnesses in subsequent proceedings.
27
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRB ETHICS Five Canons
1. Strong emphasis on disclosure2. Conflict of interest shall be avoided - no ex parte communications with the parties 3. Do not divulge any confidential information to others unless approved by the parties.4. Conduct meetings and hearings in an expeditious, diligent, orderly and impartial manner. 5. Impartially consider all disputes referred to it. Reports shall be based solely on the provisions of the contract documents and the facts of the disputes.
29
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Selection of Board MembersAn essential element in the DRB process is that all parties are completely satisfied with each Board member. Board members should be:
Experienced and technically qualified. Impartial with no conflicts of interest. Trained in the DRB process.
31
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Criteria: Technical ExperienceParties must evaluate qualifications for the specific project experience as to:
Type of construction Specific construction methodsType of project delivery method Types of foreseeable disputes
32
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Criteria: Other Skills Experience with interpretation of contract documents. Experience in resolution of construction disputes and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Ability to analyze disputes and write reports in a clear, concise, and logical manner.Complement other skills sets on DRB.
33
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Criteria: Neutrality/Availability
Completely: neutral impartial objective
Avoid conflicts of interest for the duration of the project. Available to fulfill duties as required.
34
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Criteria: Training/Role Training, experience, and understanding of the DRB process and DRB role. Dedicated to the objectives and principles of the DRB process and DRB role (including DRB Canons). Demonstrated ability to manage people and processes.
35
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Board Member Selection Methods
Typically, a three member Board is selected by:
Each party proposes a member for approval by other party; two selected DRB members nominate the third for party approval. Each party proposes a slate of candidates, from which the other party makes a selection; two selected DRB members nominate the third for party approval. Parties jointly select all three members.
36
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Selecting the Third Member
Third member should supplement technical expertise and background of the first two members. If to act as Chair, candidate should have DRB experience as well as expertise in managing processes.
37
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Three-Party Agreement Contract that binds DRB members and the contracting parties. TPA includes:
Scope of DRB services. Responsibilities of the parties. Duration of DRB’s services. Process for termination. Legal relations.
38
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Three-Party Agreement
TPA includes: Compensation rates and expense reimbursement guidelines. Cost splitting between parties. Invoicing process.
39
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Three-Party AgreementThe TPA typically includes the following:Each Board member shall be held harmless for
any personal or professional liability arising from or related to DRB activities. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the OWNER and the CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold harmless all Board members for claims, losses, demands, costs, and damages (including reasonable attorneys fees) for bodily injury, property damage, or economic loss arising out of or related to Board members carrying out DRB activities. 40
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRBF
The Dispute Resolution Board Foundation (DRBF), was established in 1996 and is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting the avoidance and resolution of disputes worldwide using the unique and proven Dispute Resolution Board (DRB) method.
42
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRBFThe DRBF provides assistance with the worldwide application of the DRB method by providing general advice and suggestions tailored for the conditions and practices existing in local areas. The DRBF publishes the DRBF Practices and Procedures Manual, which offers a thurough review of the DRB concept for owners, designers and contractors to employ the process more effectively. 43
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
DRBF
Worldwide presence with Three Regions:
1 - United States and Canada2 - Europe, Asia, Central and
South America, Mexico and Africa3 - Australia and New Zealand
44
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Dispute Resolution Board Foundation
19550 International Blvd., Suite 314Seattle, WA 98188
1-206-878-3336Toll free (USA only) 1-888-523-5208
Fax 1-206-878-3338Email: home@drb.orgWebsite: www.drb.org
45
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Background on New Disputes and Claims Resolution Spec
2005: More than 40 claims totaling over $19 Million
2006: QAR – Quality Assurance Review Basically said that the old process was not working
costing both CDOT and contractors lots of $.
CDOT/CCA Task Force Formed Goal was simply to reduce size and number of claims by developing a new spec, which added DRBs, and training for both CDOT and Contractor personnel.
47
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
Task Force VisionEmpower the project level peopleProvide them with a step-by-step process with time lines to work withProvide them with a tool to assist them - the Dispute Review Board of impartial expertsResolving issues at the time they occur, not after the project is over
48
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
CDOT DRBsStanding DRB: Typical three member board formed at the beginning of a projectOn Demand DRB: Board formed when the dispute has not been resolved at the Project Engineer and Resident Engineer levelsNo dispute can proceed to a claim unless it has been heard by a DRB
49
Copyright © Dispute Resolution Board Foundation 2013
CDOT Track Record = SUCCESSIn January 2008, the Dispute, DRB and Claim spec
was added to CDOT contracts. Totals from January 2008 to December 31, 2012
Contracts Awarded: 635 Totaling almost $2 billionStanding DRBs: 13, Standing DRB Hearings: 3On Demand DRB Hearings: 13 (6 on 2 projects)DRB Recommendations Rejected:
CDOT – 0 Contractor – 4To Dec. 31, 2012, only one claim has reached the Chief Engineer, was settled after arbitration started 50