Post on 18-Jan-2018
description
1
UIUCUIUC
ATMOS 397GATMOS 397GBiogeochemical Cycles and Global ChangeBiogeochemical Cycles and Global ChangeLecture 25: Climate, Energy and Carbon Lecture 25: Climate, Energy and Carbon
SequestrationSequestration
Don WuebblesDon Wuebbles
Department of Atmospheric SciencesDepartment of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, ILUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL
April 29, 2003April 29, 2003
2
UIUCUIUC
3
UIUCUIUC
Achieving a Sustainable Climate (ASC)—Positioning Achieving a Sustainable Climate (ASC)—Positioning National Resources to Resolve Climate ChangeNational Resources to Resolve Climate Change
Improving definition of the problem Diagnosis and understanding (climate, carbon cycle,
etc.) Evaluating the impacts Determine ability to adapt to some climate change
Solving the problem Technology to increase conservation / efficiency Reduced-carbon energy technology development
—Public acceptance of nuclear technology—Fuel cells, etc.
Carbon capture and sequestration
ASC would also help solve other energy issues (e.g., California 2001; Reliance on foreign oil)
4
UIUCUIUC
ASC---The Climate Change ChallengeASC---The Climate Change Challenge
1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC)
GOAL—”…stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” (Article 2)
Stabilizing Concentrations Is not the Same as Stabilizing Emissions
Stabilizing Concentrations Implies Human-related Emissions Must (approximately) Go to ZERO.
Cumulative EmissionsConcentrations
5
UIUCUIUC
SRES Emissions ScenariosSRES Emissions Scenarios
CO2
SO2
N2O
CH4
6
UIUCUIUC
Derived CO2 Concentration – SRES ScenariosDerived CO2 Concentration – SRES Scenarios
All SRES envelopreference case
A1B Scenario envelop including climate sensitivity uncertainty
All SRES envelop including climate sensitivity uncertainty
7
UIUCUIUC
ASC---The Climate Change ChallengeASC---The Climate Change Challenge
Changes Required in Human-related CO2 Emissions to Stabilize Atmospheric Concentrations
Requires peak & then decline in emissions
Emissions Trajectories Consistent With Various Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Ceilings
-5
0
5
10
15
20
1990 2090 2190 2290
750 ppmv650 ppmv550 ppmv450 ppmv350 ppmvIS92a
8
UIUCUIUC
Without New Technology: Without New Technology: Carbon Emissions & Concentrations Will RiseCarbon Emissions & Concentrations Will Rise
Emissions Concentrations
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
PgC
/yr
IS92a(1990 technology)IS92a550 Ceiling
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
ppm
v
IS92a(1990 technology)IS92a550 CeilingPreindustrial
Preindustrial CO2
Current EnergyS&T can reducecarbon emission.
But stabilization
requires additional
Carbon S&T!
9
UIUCUIUC
Reducing Emissions to Fill in the GapReducing Emissions to Fill in the Gap
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
1990 2005 2020 2035 2050 2065 2080 2095
Mill
ions
of T
onne
s of C
arbo
n pe
r ye
ar
Reference Emissions
CO2 Emissions Cap
GAP
10
UIUCUIUC
Resolving scientific uncertainty Emissions mitigation, including
carbon sequestration Technology development, Climate adaptation
Climate policy requires a portfolio of responses, Climate policy requires a portfolio of responses, including …including …
11
UIUCUIUC
1990 2005 2020 2035 2050 2065 20802095
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Mill
ions
of T
onne
s of C
arbo
n pe
r ye
ar
soil carbon sequestrationsequestration from fossil power generationsequestration from synfuels productionsequestration from H2 productionend-use technology improvementsnuclearsolarbiomass550 ppmv emissions
19902005 2020 2035 2050 2065 2080 2095
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Mill
ions
of T
onne
s of C
arbo
n pe
r ye
ar
soil carbon sequestrationsequestration from fossil power generationsequestration from synfuels productionsequestration from H2 productionsynfuelsfinal energynuclearsolarbiomass550 ppmv emissions
CBF 550 AOG 550
Uncertain Technology …
Need flexibility while developing technology
Analyses from Jae Edmonds, 2001
12
UIUCUIUC
When take a cost effective technology out of the portfolio, the costs of stabilizing CO2 are raised—The Value of Carbon Capture & Sequestration
CBF
NOTESCP=Carbon capture & sequestration from fossil fuels used to generate electric
power.H2 Seq.=Fossil fuels used as feedstocks for hydrogen production with carbon
capture and sequestration.
Results from Jae Edmonds, 2001
No Sequestration
Soil Seq. Only
Central Power Seq.
CP + H2 Seq.
CP + H2 + Soil Seq.
750 ppmv650 ppmv
550 ppmv450 ppmv
$6,845
$4,738$4,928
$3,326
$2,180$1,453$1,034
$940 $520 $389$529 $377 $299 $149 $123$266 $193 $137 $62 $52$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$ bi
llion
s
13
UIUCUIUC
ASC---The Climate Change ChallengeASC---The Climate Change Challenge
Stabilization requires fundamental change in the energy system Technology advances are key to stabilizing CO2 concentrations and
controlling costs Diversified technology portfolios are essential to manage risk
Technologies that fill the “gap” are not part of the current energy system. Carbon capture and sequestration technologies expand dramatically. The technology portfolio changes over time. Some technologies are more important when others are also available. Some technologies expand their relative importance without expanding their
absolute deployment. Need to revisit the technology strategy frequently Energy R&D funding needs to be extensively increased as part of ASC
Solution will also require public-private partnerships
14
UIUCUIUC
Wood
Coal
OilOil (feedstock)
Gas
Hydro Nuclear
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1850
18
60 18
70 18
80 18
90 19
00 19
10 19
20 19
30 19
40 19
50 19
60 19
70 19
80 19
90
It traditionally has taken 50 years or more for a technology to grow from 1 to 50% of the market.
Energy R&D
What is done in the next 10 years will strongly influence what is possible in the next 50 years
15
UIUCUIUC
16
UIUCUIUC
Carbon Sequestration
17
UIUCUIUC
18
UIUCUIUC
DOE report
19
UIUCUIUC
Fig. 1: Soil carbon sequestration: how it worksCarbon sequestration in soils suggests that fluxes or movements of carbon from the atmosphere can be increased while the natural release of carbon back into the air can be reduced. By absorbing carbon instead of emitting it, soils could evolve from carbon sources to carbon sinks. This process relies on respiration and photosynthesis, two basic processes of the carbon cycle. Carbon, entering the soil in form of roots, litter, harvest residues, and animal manure, is stored primarily as soil organic matter (SOM). In undisturbed environments, balanced rates of input and decomposition determine steady state fluxes. However, in many parts of the world, agricultural and other land use activities have upset this natural balance, thereby releasing alarming rates of carbon to the atmosphere.
20
UIUCUIUC
Carbon Storage in U.S. Prairie States
The soils in the Historic Grasslands region of the U.S. provide a huge reservoir to store carbon. These soils, under the current conservation reserves program enrollment, could offset about 20 percent of all U.S. agricultural emissions.
21
UIUCUIUC
22
UIUCUIUC
Projected Global Surface Temperature Response:Projected Global Surface Temperature Response: ~ 2.5 to 10.4 °F by 2100 ~ 2.5 to 10.4 °F by 2100
Relative to 1990
Projected changes in emissions and concentrations of greenhouse gases could lead to large changes in climate over the century
With recent advances in climate model’s ability to represent the earth-atmosphere system, there is now a wider range in potential global and hemispheric-level change due to the range in possible emission scenarios than the range in model results