Post on 16-Dec-2015
2
The Lisbon Agenda of 2000
To become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge based economy
To have sustained and accelerated economic growth
Full employment Modernized social protection system GOAL: “EU in leading position in 2010”
2004: Wim Kok: “Facing the Challenge” 2004: NL EU 2004: “Rethinking the ICT
Agenda”
3
Table of Contents
The Lisbon Agenda of 2000 The breakthroughs needed Development of the environment Standardization should … Dealing with disruption R&D and standardization High mobility Automotive Radar 5GHz RadioLAN Conclusion
5
ICT – The key technology to stimulate growth
For the Information Society A key productivity enabler for industry New smart services and applications Industry has to adapt and
transform itself fast! Member State focus on eEurope action plan;
eGovernment Boost Broadband accessibility
6
Look at the progress in…
USAJapanKoreaChinaIndiaEtc.
Their success is based on a National strategy!
Don’t we need a clear European Industry policy?
7
Breakthrough 1: From connectivity to take up
“A crucial conditionfor more economic growth
is a broad deployment and use of ICTby enterprises and public institutions. …
Special attention is neededfor small and medium-sized enterprises.”
8
Breakthrough 2: Standardise ICT
to trigger and enable new business
“Standardization is a prerequisitefor a broad deployment and use of ICT,
and will trigger and enable new business.Pan-European interoperable solutions
for electronic authentication,electronic payments, etc. …
are needed to boost innovation andeconomic growth significantly.”
9
Breakthrough 3: Accelerate the introduction of
disruptive technologies
“The speed
with which new technologies
are accepted and put to work
has a serious impact on economic growth.
The EU needs to play a key role
by accelerating the introduction
of new (disruptive) technologies,
like smart tags (RFID) and Voice-over IP.”
10
Breakthrough 5:Global platform leadership
in the ICT industry
“An excellent and competitive
European ICT industry is a crucial condition for economic growth and employment. The EU
needs to define a strategy
towards global leadership in specific areas,
for example by stimulating
a (new) European standards policy
(in cooperation with the market)
and making an explicit choice for e.g.
the future of 3G mobile telecom in Europe.”
11
Breakthrough 5:Global platform leadership
in the ICT industry
Mobile and wirelessWeb servicesService Oriented Architectures (SOA)Example: EU Grid computing initiative
“Europe must think of a fruitful environment for the ICT sector or certain segments of
the sector to flourish. This has to be supported by a proactive industry policy, but we need to refrain from protectionist
policies”
12
Breakthrough 7: Remove barriers for the development
of an innovating European electronic communications sector
“The electronic communications sector
is a proven source
for economic growth and employment.
The EU needs to anticipate
in an early stage
the barriers for investments
In next generation networks”
13
Breakthrough 8: Move to a new and flexible model of
spectrum allocation
“Spectrum is a major battlefield for innovation and new business.
Modernization of spectrum policies will have a large economic impact.
Therefore, we urgently need to make
The spectrum allocation model flexible”
14
Development of the environment
Users care about:AvailabilityReliabilityEase of use InteroperabilitySpeedMobilityCost
…not technology
Industry needs to make technology choices to provide customer requirements
Standards are rarely “technology neutral”
Standardisation process is technology neutral
15
Standardisation should encourage…
New technologies to be integrated into existing networks to augment user services and new applications
Innovative solutions offering alternative means of delivering new servicesand smart applications
16
Dealing with disruption…
Existing systems must not be allowed to “hoard” spectrum to the detriment of technological progress
BUT spectrum allocations need to be protected:To provide stability to encourage investmentBut not indefinitely…
17
Dealing with disruption…
New technologies may require different methods of measurement and different calibration methods
Technical basis for spectrum sharing studies needs to be relevant to new technology
Spectrum models need to be constantly reviewed
18
Research and standardization(traditional model)
Consortium appointed to carry out funded research programme
Completed work passed to standards body
Wider community may not contribute to the research project
Consensus may be difficult
What about IPR?
Funded Research
Standardisation
19
Research and standardization(alternative model)
Consortium appointed to carry out funded research programme
Interim results passed to standards body for peer review
Wider community contributes to research objectives
Consensus may be enabled/facilitated
Availability of IPR licences Improved
market acceptance
Research
Stan
dard
ization
20
Highly mobile devices
People move, like nomadesand bring their belongings with them Computers with embedded LAN connections Personal music players PDAs with wireless connections Remote-controlled toys …the user may not even be aware they are radio!
Light regulation stimulates market growth Global harmonization
of licence-exempt bands must be a priority for CEPT.
21
Example of innovative use of spectrum:Automotive Radar (1)
Public policy requirement Introduce active radar sensors in cars
to improve road safety Warns driver of potential collisions Applies brakes / tightens seat belt
if a collision is inevitable
Need to limit the influence on other systems (e.g. weather forecasting, radio astronomy) A radio spectrum policy that is too defensive,
can stifle innovation And could prevent
the development of life-saving technology!
22
Example of innovative use of spectrum:Automotive Radar (2)
The solution: Neds to take into account:
• The availability of current technology• Projected speed of technological development• Cumulative interference effect of devices
Harmonized standard for 24 GHz equipment for use on a temporary band
Harmonized standard for 79 GHz equipment (permanent)
Parameters of the standard and parameters of the regulation developed in partnership (ETSI/CEPT/EU)
CEPT will withdraw the 24 GHz band at the ‘sunset date’
EU provides legal certainty via the Radio Spectrum Decision
23
Example of effective co-operation between Standardizers and Regulators:
5 GHz Radio LAN
ETSI Harmonized Standard provides access to the market throughout Member States
ECC Decision developed in parallel Radio Spectrum Decision provides
legal certainty: Equipment may be used without
National restrictions (R&TTE “Class 1”) Refers to Harmonized Standard
for its technical basis
Industry has one document which defines all? technical requirements
24
Conclusions:To achieve the Lisbon goals…
Standards must be market led / driven The market longs for services and applications Technology is not an end in itself
Standardizers and Regulators must co-operate internationally Global market place for telecommunications
Closer ties between research and standardizaton
Standardizers must work with Regulators for innovative solutions in order to: Encourage smart technological development Ensure a stable environment for investment