Post on 26-Dec-2015
1
Macro economic reform in Israel:The Trajtenberg Committee for
Economic and Social Change and the Competitiveness Committee
Professor Eugene KandelJanuary 2012
Principles:• Reducing the cost of living in Israel• Reducing inequality• Emphasis on parents of young children• Maintaining fiscal responsibility
• Cancel purchase taxes and customs
• Limit the use of anti-dumping tariffs
• Adoption of European standards
• Limit monopolistic control of key industries - food, fuel, seaports, water,
etc..
• Cancel excise tax increase on fuel
• Import duty exemption on a personal import through the
Internet on goods up to 300$
• Increasing the supply of day-care centers for children ages 0-3
• Free Education Act applied for ages 3-4
• Afternoon educational frameworks subsidy for ages 3-9
• Reducing excess burden of payments from parents
• Two tax credits to fathers of children ages 0-3
• Expansion in the earned income tax credit grants for
working mothers
• Stopping the declining path of direct taxation
• Raising the top tax bracket
• Raising the corporate tax rate and tax on capital gains
• Encouragement of employment of ultra-Orthodox
• Encouragement of employment of minorities
• Integration of people with disabilities in the labor market
• Enforcement of labor laws
• Setting clear objectives for planning and marketing of housing units
• Detailed government support and removal of planning barriers in large housing projects
• Lowering the minimum price in Israel Lands Administration auctions
• Reducing the concentration of land ownership
• Dealing with empty apartments, and creating incentives for reconstruction of unsuitable apartment
• Promoting an Urban Renewal Plan• Close guidance of selected compounds• Dealing with development costs• Establishment of decisive appraiser mechanism for
issues of urban renewal
• Create long-term rental market• Determining the affordable housing designation• Construction of small apartments requirements
The Committee's Conclusions
• Recommendations relate to a variety of problems
raised during the protests of last summer
• The report does not change the system, but improve
it from within
• The solution is not a complete one, but it deals with
many of the problems
Implications of the Report
• Immediate and significant relief of economic burden,
especially for young couples
• Reduction of inequality
• Creating a competitive and more efficient economy
• Improvement of decision making processes
Committee Mandate
To examine the impact of current economic structure on the
competitiveness in different market sectors and on current
financial stability and economic efficiency. To recommend
desirable policy measures, in particular in the following topics:
1. Control of a public company through pyramidal ownership structure
2. Financial companies owned by non-financial firms
3. Measures to strengthen corporate governance in public companies
4. Application of antitrust policy
5. Special conditions for the allocation of government assets and
obtaining licenses and franchises by business groups22
Committee's Work
3 working groups:
1 .Financial and non-financial holdings Headed by Prof. Eugene Kandel, head of the National
Economic Council
2 .Pyramidal business groupsHeaded by Prof. Shmuel Hauser, chairman of the SEC
3 .Allocation of public assets Headed by Prof. David Gilo, chairman of the Israeli antitrust
authority
23
Public
funds
Financial sectorBusiness sector
Bank
Provi-
dent fund
Bank
Pension fund
Bank
Infra-structur
e
Real estate
Energy Food
Communic-ation
Commerce
Holder of controlling interest
Holder of controlling interest
24
Financial and Non-Financial Holdings
Pension fund
Holder of controlling interest
International comparison:10 major groups as a percentage of market
value of public companies
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
ʺʥʩyʥʡʩʁ
ʤ̋ʥyʡ
ʧʤ̫ʥ́
ʩʥʥ́ʮʦ
ʥʧʠ
ʸ ʥ̫ʮʺ ʩʬʫʬʫʤʤ̫ ʬʧʮʤʪy ʲ ʺ ʥyʩʩh̋ ʥ́y
ʭʩhʥ̋ʰʤ̋ ʥyʥ̫ʮClaessens, Djankov & Lang Faccio & Lang ʺ ʩʬʫʬʫʤʤ̫ ʬʧ ʮʤʩʣʥʡʩ̡ʪy ʲ ʺ ʥyʩʩh̋ ʥ́ʸʩɹʬClaessens et al.ʫʬʲ ʣʮʥ̡ʤʩʣʥʥ́ʡʸ ʥ̡ʩ́ ʤ-ʩɹʬHogfeldtʺ ʹh ʡʮʤʥʡʢʤʩʤʤʦy ʥ̡ʩ́-
25
41%
Source: Economics Department, the Securities Authority
The distribution of control of public companies in Israel
International comparison- number of tiers
Israel’s Large Groups Tend to Form Pyramidal Ownership Structures with a Controlling Shareholder
with a controlling shareholder
Source: Economics Department, SEC
OECD Non- OECD
Potential Problems with Pyramidal Ownership Structure
Tunneling
Inefficient allocation of resources
Excess risk-taking
Internal capital market (not effective)
Double leverage
Persistence
Controlling shareholder’s interest can be different than the companies he controls
26
51%
51%
51%
Public
Public
Public
Potential Macro-Level Problems
•Impact on macro economic stability
•Combined Influence in several markets
•Deterring foreign investors
•Inflation of indices•Underdeveloped capital
markets
27
International benchmark- Number of “tiers”
28
Source: Masulis et al. 2011- Family Business Groups around the World: Financing Advantages, Control Motivations and Organizational Choices
Key Recommendations
.1Separation of holdings in significant financial activity and non- financial activity
.2Prohibition of directors tenure in both financial and non-financial companies
.3 Improvement of corporate governance and minority shareholder rights in pyramidal
business groups
.4Restrictions of expansion of pyramids and their control of existing companies
.5Empowering the Antitrust regulatory authority to deal with pyramidal business groups
.6Competition considerations while allocating public assets
29
Implication
•Increase in competition within the market and market
competitiveness
•Reduction of systemic risk
•Improvement of capital allocation in the market
•Continuance of the Israeli capital market development
30
Full implementation will be carried out gradually and is expected to affect the economy in the medium and the long term